Breve Análise do Portátil PC Specialist Proteus V (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060, Full HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 242 cd/m²
Contraste: 1152:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.17 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.13% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
| PC Zentrum Proteus V BOEhydis NV156FHM-N42 (BOE06C6), 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte P55W v7 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 52% | 24% | 56% | 50% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.13 | 64.3 64% | 48.21 23% | 65.8 68% | 63.5 62% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58 | 83 43% | 72.6 25% | 85.1 47% | 82 41% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.42 | 60.6 50% | 49.81 23% | 62.2 54% | 59.9 48% |
| Response Times | 13% | -2% | 18% | 34% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52.8 ? | 40.8 ? 23% | 28 ? 47% | 41 ? 22% | 37 ? 30% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 39.6 ? | 30.4 ? 23% | 23.6 ? 40% | 34 ? 14% | 25 ? 37% |
| PWM Frequency | 21930 ? | 20490 ? -7% | 1351 ? -94% | ||
| Screen | -11% | -59% | -2% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 242 | 297 23% | 274.2 13% | 322 33% | 287 19% |
| Brightness | 235 | 276 17% | 263 12% | 297 26% | 289 23% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 87 2% | 92 8% | 86 1% | 87 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.3 -43% | 0.44 -110% | 0.31 -48% | 0.29 -38% |
| Contrast | 1152 | 990 -14% | 623 -46% | 1039 -10% | 990 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.27 | 5.25 -23% | 8 -87% | 4.73 -11% | 4.92 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.09 | 10.3 -45% | 14.6 -106% | 12.37 -74% | 11 -55% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.17 | 4.64 -114% | 9.1 -319% | 2.99 -38% | 3.66 -69% |
| Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.39 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.32 95% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 6912 94% | 6600 98% | 5020 129% | 6905 94% | 6482 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 54 46% | 45.7 24% | 56 51% | 54 46% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 83 43% | 72.1 24% | 85 47% | 82 41% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 18% /
6% | -12% /
-33% | 24% /
12% | 26% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21930 Hz | ≤ 95 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 21930 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 95 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 21930 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4916 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3904 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PC Zentrum Proteus V Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Gigabyte P55W v7 Liteonit CV3-8D256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 20% | 26% | -68% | ||
| Seq Read | 2541 | 2678 5% | 2719 7% | 514 -80% | |
| Seq Write | 1180 | 1172 -1% | 1550 31% | 328.1 -72% | |
| 4K Read | 51 | 46.56 -9% | 48.01 -6% | 23.34 -54% | |
| 4K Write | 136.4 | 142.9 5% | 127.6 -6% | 48.47 -64% | |
| Score Read | 1472 | 1639 11% | 1549 5% | 393 -73% | |
| Score Write | 677 | 1323 95% | 1468 117% | 248 -63% | |
| Score Total | 2842 | 3728 31% | 3756 32% | 840 -70% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12205 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 143270 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26044 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10010 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V | |
| Gigabyte P55W v7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Core 15 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 72.2 | 39.9 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 68 | 52 | ||
| The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 43.4 | 41.8 | ||
| ELEX (2017) | 68.1 | 51.9 | ||
| Destiny 2 (2017) | 94.1 | 78.4 | ||
| Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) | 77.4 | 70.7 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 57 | 47 | ||
| Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 93.8 | 70.4 | ||
| Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 77.8 | 73.7 | ||
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 80.6 | 62.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 37 / 38 / 39 dB |
| Carga |
| 47 / 52 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A) | ||
| PC Zentrum Proteus V GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 12% | 10% | 11% | 9% | |
| off / environment * | 31 | 29 6% | 28.8 7% | 30.4 2% | 30 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 37 | 31 16% | 33.1 11% | 30.9 16% | 33 11% |
| Idle Average * | 38 | 32 16% | 33.1 13% | 30.9 19% | 34 11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 39 | 34 13% | 34 13% | 31.5 19% | 35 10% |
| Load Average * | 47 | 41 13% | 37.2 21% | 40.7 13% | 39 17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 39 9% | 46.1 -7% | 45.5 -6% | |
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 47 10% | 47.1 9% | 43.9 16% | 50 4% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
| PC Zentrum Proteus V GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -23% | 0% | -6% | 8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 53 -20% | 51.9 -18% | 49.6 -13% | |
| Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 61 -15% | 54.6 -3% | 47.7 10% | |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 35 -21% | 28.4 2% | 29.1 -0% | 23.6 19% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29 | 39 -34% | 29.6 -2% | 29.3 -1% | 24.6 15% |
* ... smaller is better
PC Zentrum Proteus V audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.5 / 0.9 Watt |
| Ocioso | 28 / 32 / 38 Watt |
| Carga |
91 / 152 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| PC Zentrum Proteus V GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 14% | 28% | 35% | 41% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28 | 18 36% | 14.5 48% | 7.2 74% | 8 71% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 22 31% | 17.3 46% | 10.5 67% | 13 59% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 26 32% | 17.4 54% | 16 58% | 18 53% |
| Load Average * | 91 | 93 -2% | 93 -2% | 82 10% | 76 16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 124 | 119 4% | 128.8 -4% | 124 -0% | |
| Load Maximum * | 152 | 175 -15% | 155 -2% | 143 6% |
* ... smaller is better
| PC Zentrum Proteus V GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 82 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 65 Wh | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 69 Wh | Gigabyte P55W v7 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 63 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 22% | 26% | 90% | 115% | |
| Reader / Idle | 221 | 300 36% | 386 75% | 501 127% | 789 257% |
| H.264 | 200 | 234 17% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 196 | 282 44% | 232 18% | 357 82% | 346 77% |
| Load | 89 | 80 -10% | 75 -16% | 144 62% | 98 10% |
Pro
Contra
Se a duração da bateria não é importante e nem os alto-falantes internos para ouvir música, assistir filmes ou jogar, então o Proteus V da PC Specialist pode ser uma alternativa viável a um preço justo. Além da elegante carcaça feita parcialmente de alumínio, também gostamos dos dispositivos de entrada.
Seu desempenho geral é mais do que decente. Equipado com 16 GB de RAM DDR4 e um SSD, o Proteus V pode facilmente acompanhar o nível da Acer, Asus ou MSI. Os jogos modernos funcionam sem problemas na resolução FHD nativa do dispositivo de 1920x1080 graças ao processador Core i7-7700HQ e placa de vídeo GTX 1060.
Infelizmente, a tela FHD mostrou-se bastante pobre. Apesar de sua alta relação de contraste e baixo nível de preto, ela simplesmente não é suficientemente brilhante para deixar uma impressão positiva duradoura e sofre de cobertura de espaço de cores pobre, para iniciar. Os controles de velocidade do ventilador precisam de uma renovação maciça o mais rápido possível. As baixas temperaturas do dispositivo são um sinal de ventoinhas muito agressivas; As ventoinhas têm o potencial de irritar os usuários do portátil com bastante rapidez. Esperemos que a PC Specialist melhore isso com uma futura atualização do BIOS.
Assim, no momento da redação, preferimos recomendar o um pouco mais quente e significativamente mais silencioso Schenker XMG Core 15 apesar de sua falta de brilhantes superfícies metálicas. Outros concorrentes de 15 polegadas podem ser encontrados em nossa Lista dos Top 10 (portáteis) https://www.notebookcheck.net/Notebookcheck-s-Top-10-Gaming-Laptops.98628.0.html e a pagina de benchmarks da GTX 1060.
PC Zentrum Proteus V
- 12/16/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
