Breve Análise do Portátil NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus (N3350, QHD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell Latitude 5290 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell Latitude 5290 | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
Chuwi LapBook SE |
|
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 431.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 1003:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.34
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Sharp SHP142C, IPS, 12.5", 2560x1440 | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Sharp SHP14A6, IPS, 10", 1800x1200 | Dell Latitude 5290 AUO B125XW01-V0, TN LED, 12.5", 1366x768 | Lenovo ThinkPad A275 Len40E0, TN, 12.5", 1366x768 | Chuwi LapBook SE 13.3", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Air 2018 APPA039, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -8% | -45% | -41% | -10% | -7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 74.8 | 66.5 -11% | 39.22 -48% | 42.05 -44% | 65 -13% | 67.8 -9% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.9 | 97.5 -1% | 59 -40% | 62.8 -37% | 94.8 -4% | 96.1 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 75.6 | 67.5 -11% | 40.56 -46% | 43.48 -42% | 66.5 -12% | 69.8 -8% |
Response Times | 139% | 18% | 107% | 3% | 19055% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 44 ? -17% | 46.8 ? -24% | 41 ? -9% | 39.2 ? -4% | 39.6 ? -5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31.6 ? | 25.6 ? 19% | 12.8 ? 59% | 23 ? 27% | 27.7 ? 12% | 28 ? 11% |
PWM Frequency | 198.4 ? | 1020 ? 414% | 800 ? 303% | 200 ? 1% | 113600 ? 57158% | |
Screen | 30% | -101% | -79% | -47% | 26% | |
Brightness middle | 431.5 | 456 6% | 232 -46% | 255 -41% | 227 -47% | 320 -26% |
Brightness | 406 | 426 5% | 218 -46% | 244 -40% | 210 -48% | 315 -22% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 88 10% | 86 8% | 87 9% | 89 11% | 95 19% |
Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.31 28% | 0.54 -26% | 0.52 -21% | 0.44 -2% | 0.29 33% |
Contrast | 1003 | 1471 47% | 430 -57% | 490 -51% | 516 -49% | 1103 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.56 | 1.3 63% | 11.8 -231% | 9.76 -174% | 6.6 -85% | 1.2 66% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7 | 3 57% | 23.2 -231% | 14.53 -108% | 12.2 -74% | 3.2 54% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.34 | 1.1 67% | 3.9 -17% | 1.9 43% | 0.5 85% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 1.4 52% | 13.9 -379% | 11.13 -284% | 7.9 -172% | 0.8 72% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.13 103% | 2.38 92% | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6572 99% | 6687 97% | 16629 39% | 12214 53% | 8879 73% | 6548 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.7 | 62.3 -7% | 37.6 -44% | 40 -40% | 62.1 -7% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.9 | 96.8 -2% | 59.2 -40% | 63 -36% | 96 -3% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 54% /
42% | -43% /
-76% | -4% /
-37% | -18% /
-30% | 6358% /
3378% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 198.4 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Latitude 5290 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
Average Intel Celeron N3350 (43 - 48, n=9) | |
Chuwi Hi12 | |
HP x2 210 G2 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Dell Latitude 5290 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Chuwi Hi12 | |
HP x2 210 G2 | |
Average Intel Celeron N3350 (81 - 92, n=9) | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus |
PCMark 10 | |
Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500 (1102 - 1220, n=7) | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500 (2833 - 3510, n=7) | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500 (1690 - 1974, n=7) | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500 (678 - 835, n=7) | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500 (1462 - 1816, n=8) | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
Chuwi Hi12 | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500 (2148 - 2703, n=6) | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
Chuwi Hi12 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500 (1814 - 1935, n=3) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1462 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2148 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 1102 pontos | |
Ajuda |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus SanDisk DF4064 | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 64 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo ThinkPad A275 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Chuwi LapBook SE SanDisk DF4032 | Chuwi GBox CWI560 SanDisk DA4064 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 105% | 619% | 19% | ||
Seq Read | 154 | 289.8 88% | 1289 737% | 264.1 71% | |
Seq Write | 102.4 | 126.7 24% | 350 242% | 131.8 29% | |
4K Read | 5.07 | 18.29 261% | 21.53 325% | 6.3 24% | |
4K Write | 8.42 | 35.07 317% | 1.24 -85% | 13.6 62% | |
4K-64 Read | 27.74 | 40.27 45% | 556 1904% | 25.65 -8% | |
4K-64 Write | 12.15 | 44.48 266% | 117 863% | 9.11 -25% | |
Access Time Read * | 0.747 | 0.151 80% | 0.094 87% | 0.671 10% | |
Access Time Write * | 1.136 | 0.233 79% | 1.929 -70% | 1.233 -9% | |
Score Read | 48 | 88 83% | 707 1373% | 58 21% | |
Score Write | 31 | 92 197% | 153 394% | 36 16% | |
Score Total | 103 | 225 118% | 1177 1043% | 120 17% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 119.7 | 99.1 -17% | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 72.8 | 44.34 -39% | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 116.5 | 76.5 -34% | |||
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 124% | 804% | 8% | 142% | |
Write 4K | 7.837 | 26.91 243% | 76.4 875% | 11.17 43% | 38 385% |
Read 4K | 7.689 | 19.72 156% | 36.38 373% | 7.2 -6% | 23.84 210% |
Write Seq | 104.9 | 126.2 20% | 1208 1052% | 87.7 -16% | 226.7 116% |
Read Seq | 167.8 | 268 60% | 1191 610% | 247 47% | 271.8 62% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 13.64 | 62.9 361% | 101 640% | 12.29 -10% | 44.74 228% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 32.95 | 39.82 21% | 133.9 306% | 32.46 -1% | 53.2 61% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 99.5 | 131.3 32% | 1381 1288% | 92 -8% | 129.4 30% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 128.8 | 259.3 101% | 1785 1286% | 150.1 17% | 189.4 47% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 12.36 | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 31.66 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 115% /
112% | 712% /
697% | 14% /
14% | 142% /
142% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Dell Latitude 5290 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Chuwi GBox CWI560 | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Average Intel HD Graphics 500 (368 - 584, n=11) | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
HP x2 210 G2 | |
Chuwi Hi12 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
Dell Latitude 5290 | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Average Intel HD Graphics 500 (343 - 588, n=11) | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Chuwi GBox CWI560 | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
HP x2 210 G2 | |
Chuwi Hi12 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell Latitude 5290 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A275 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Average Intel HD Graphics 500 (2578 - 3693, n=8) | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus | |
HP x2 210 G2 | |
Chuwi Hi12 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Dell Latitude 5290 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Average Intel HD Graphics 500 (293 - 444, n=8) | |
HP x2 210 G2 | |
Chuwi Hi12 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
Intel NUC7CJYH | |
Average Intel HD Graphics 500 (12299 - 18200, n=3) | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
Chuwi LapBook SE |
3DMark 11 Performance | 461 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 1932 pontos | |
Ajuda |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (61.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (17.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (47.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 1.7 / 1.7 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.7 / 7 / 8 Watt |
Carga |
14.1 / 27.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, SanDisk DF4064, IPS, 2560x1440, 12.5" | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10" | Dell Latitude 5290 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1366x768, 12.5" | Lenovo ThinkPad A275 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1366x768, 12.5" | Chuwi LapBook SE Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DF4032, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | -44% | -43% | 16% | -10% | 16% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 2.88 39% | 2.68 43% | 4.2 11% | 2.7 43% | 2.2 53% | 2.7 43% |
Idle Average * | 7 | 4.8 31% | 4.3 39% | 8.2 -17% | 6.3 10% | 5.7 19% | 2.7 61% |
Idle Maximum * | 8 | 7.5 6% | 5.2 35% | 10 -25% | 7.6 5% | 10.3 -29% | 7.2 10% |
Load Average * | 14.1 | 16.9 -20% | 40.3 -186% | 34.5 -145% | 12.6 11% | 25.6 -82% | 22 -56% |
Load Maximum * | 27.1 | 23.8 12% | 68 -151% | 37 -37% | 24.6 9% | 30.6 -13% | 20.5 24% |
* ... smaller is better
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 31.9 Wh | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh | Dell Latitude 5290 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad A275 PRO A12-9800B, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 71 Wh | Chuwi LapBook SE Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 37 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 50.3 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 3% | 48% | 29% | 36% | 12% | 15% | |
Reader / Idle | 676 | 771 14% | 961 42% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 409 | 448 10% | 606 48% | 538 32% | 444 9% | 668 63% | 501 22% |
Load | 214 | 180 -16% | 243 14% | 347 62% | 131 -39% | 231 8% |
Pro
Contra
O NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus é uma máquina desequilibrada. Aplaudimos seu foco em fornecer uma tela de alta resolução brilhante e chassi de alumínio atraente por menos de $400, mas isso vem ao custo de quase todo o resto. As opções de portas são severamente limitadas, o posicionamento da webcam não é ideal, as teclas do teclado e o trackpad são esponjosos, a base e a dobradiça poderiam ser melhores, o carregamento é muito lento e o desempenho do SSD não é tão bom quanto o de uma unidade mecânica padrão. A tela nítida e cores profundas não são suficientes para compensar o resto do portátil.
Usuários intrigados pelo formato pequeno e pelo preço fariam melhore investindo em uma Ultrabook Core i3 de última geração. Modelos mais antigos do Dell XPS, HP Spectre ou Envy, Lenovo Ideapad 720s, ou até o Chuwi LapBook são capazes de oferecer muito mais do que o NuVision em quase todos os aspectos.
Uma grande tela prejudicada por teclas esponjosas e desempenho de sistema super lento. A NuVision teve que fazer muitos cortes notáveis para oferecer uma tela QHD nessa faixa de preço baixa.
NuVision Encite Book 12 Plus
- 01/21/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo