Breve Análise do Portátil Nexoc G734IV (Clevo P670HS-G)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Nexoc G734III | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Nexoc G734III | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 348 cd/m²
Contraste: 1088:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.13 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.52 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
| Nexoc G734IV LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080 | Nexoc G734III LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080 | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-w110ng LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | 4% | 0% | 4% | 37% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.2 | 67.4 2% | 68.3 3% | 66.6 1% | 68 3% | 86.9 31% |
| sRGB Coverage | 83.7 | 85.8 3% | 86.7 4% | 84.1 0% | 87.5 5% | 100 19% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.2 | 62.8 3% | 63.4 4% | 61.5 0% | 64 5% | 99.4 62% |
| Response Times | 16% | 53% | 13% | 15% | 13% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 36 ? 14% | 29 ? 31% | 37 ? 12% | 33.6 ? 20% | 37 ? 12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 23 ? 18% | 7 ? 75% | 24 ? 14% | 25.6 ? 9% | 24 ? 14% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | |||||
| Screen | -1% | -34% | 0% | -12% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 348 | 314 -10% | 299 -14% | 362 4% | 329.2 -5% | 336 -3% |
| Brightness | 336 | 308 -8% | 277 -18% | 342 2% | 321 -4% | 320 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 87 -4% | 87 -4% | 93 2% | 88 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.28 12% | 0.27 16% | 0.31 3% | 0.267 17% | 0.25 22% |
| Contrast | 1088 | 1121 3% | 1107 2% | 1168 7% | 1233 13% | 1344 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.13 | 4.17 -1% | 9.65 -134% | 4.5 -9% | 5.93 -44% | 3.61 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.21 | 8.94 3% | 15.43 -68% | 9.31 -1% | 11.07 -20% | 6.02 35% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.52 | 3.84 -9% | 9.68 -175% | 3.48 1% | 6.72 -91% | 4.78 -36% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.41 91% | 1.89 116% | 2.23 99% | 2.12 104% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 6228 104% | 6950 94% | 11652 56% | 6144 106% | 7611 85% | 6185 105% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 56 2% | 75 36% | 55 0% | 57 4% | 88 60% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 86 2% | 100 19% | 84 0% | 87 4% | 100 19% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
2% | 8% /
-15% | 4% /
2% | 2% /
-5% | 21% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Nexoc G734III | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Nexoc G734III | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Nexoc G734III | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 6219 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4330 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5378 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5288 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Nexoc G734III | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Nexoc G734III | |
| Nexoc G734IV Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Nexoc G734III Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5 | HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 5% | -48% | -28% | -57% | |
| Read Seq | 2268 | 1917 -15% | 521 -77% | 1156 -49% | 481.7 -79% |
| Write Seq | 1559 | 1283 -18% | 311.8 -80% | 294.9 -81% | 315.4 -80% |
| Read 512 | 413.8 | 871 110% | 403.1 -3% | 616 49% | 303.1 -27% |
| Write 512 | 1167 | 1199 3% | 332.3 -72% | 294.7 -75% | 314.4 -73% |
| Read 4k | 54 | 51 -6% | 33.35 -38% | 42.7 -21% | 25.93 -52% |
| Write 4k | 154.9 | 142.1 -8% | 111.1 -28% | 153.3 -1% | 84.6 -45% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 634 | 603 -5% | 331.1 -48% | 600 -5% | 273.9 -57% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 509 | 382.4 -25% | 318.3 -37% | 295.3 -42% | 274.9 -46% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 15979 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 92034 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25308 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13940 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 7643 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5385 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Nexoc G734III | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| Nexoc G734III | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Nexoc G734III | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG | |
| Civilization VI - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| Resident Evil 7 - 1920x1080 Very High / On AA:FXAA+T | |
| Nexoc G734IV | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 405.7 | 417.6 | 354.6 | 202.5 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 191.6 | 177.4 | 168.6 | 124.1 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 199.3 | 197.7 | 197.1 | 136.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 179.7 | 163.5 | 104.6 | 90.3 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 78 | 73 | 65.5 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 140.3 | 127.1 | 82.1 | 42.1 |
| Civilization VI (2016) | 73.9 | 58 | 52 | 51.6 |
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 359.6 | 273.9 | 160.9 | 132.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 34 / 35 / 46 dB |
| Carga |
| 49 / 56 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Nexoc G734IV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | 10% | 8% | 8% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 31 -3% | 30 -0% | 29.7 1% | 31 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 34 | 31 9% | 34 -0% | 33 3% | 33.2 2% | 33 3% |
| Idle Average * | 35 | 32 9% | 35 -0% | 34 3% | 33.2 5% | 34 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 46 | 33 28% | 37 20% | 35 24% | 33.2 28% | 40 13% |
| Load Average * | 49 | 49 -0% | 37 24% | 45 8% | 47.5 3% | 44 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 56 | 50 11% | 44 21% | 52 7% | 52.5 6% | 50 11% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.3 °C / 139 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.9 °C / 87.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
| Nexoc G734IV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | 9% | -0% | -18% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48.1 | 50 -4% | 41.5 14% | 45 6% | 59 -23% | 42.6 11% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 59.3 | 60.5 -2% | 50.6 15% | 54.3 8% | 66 -11% | 44.9 24% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.2 | 29.1 -3% | 26.4 6% | 29.6 -5% | 33.2 -18% | 33.1 -17% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26 | 26.9 -3% | 25.4 2% | 28.6 -10% | 30.6 -18% | 28.9 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Nexoc G734IV audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.2 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 12 / 17 / 22 Watt |
| Carga |
86 / 224 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
| Nexoc G734IV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -10% | -30% | -27% | -40% | -69% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 12 | 13 -8% | 20 -67% | 19 -58% | 18.4 -53% | 25 -108% |
| Idle Average * | 17 | 20 -18% | 27 -59% | 25 -47% | 22.8 -34% | 35 -106% |
| Idle Maximum * | 22 | 27 -23% | 31 -41% | 31 -41% | 24 -9% | 46 -109% |
| Load Average * | 86 | 90 -5% | 86 -0% | 90 -5% | 175.5 -104% | 103 -20% |
| Load Maximum * | 224 | 210 6% | 184 18% | 193 14% | 229.5 -2% | 223 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nexoc G734IV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 60 Wh | Nexoc G734III 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 60 Wh | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 83 Wh | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 95 Wh | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 3% | 6% | 24% | 11% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 463 | 400 -14% | 316 -32% | 432 -7% | 418 -10% | 278 -40% |
| H.264 | 195 | 208 7% | 228 17% | 233 19% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 205 | 177 -14% | 230 12% | 247 20% | 201 -2% | 200 -2% |
| Load | 71 | 95 34% | 91 28% | 115 62% | 103 45% | 89 25% |
O Nexoc G734IV pode ser colocado na categoria "atualização do modelo". O novo processador quad-core Kaby Lake tem apenas uma leve vantagem de desempenho sobre seu predecessor Skylake. Assim como o G734III, o G734IV também pode rodar todos os jogos atuais fluentemente em resolução Full HD com configurações de qualidade altas a máximas. Ativar a tecnologia G-Sync da Nvidia garante imagem fluente na tela de 60 Hz. A tela IPS Full HD mate agrada com seu alto brilho, alto contraste, e ângulos de visão estáveis.
Com o G734IV, a Nexoc entrega um portátil para jogos completo, para gamers que gostem de atualizar seus portáteis.
A emissão de calor do portátil está dentro dos limites normais para um portátil de jogos. A Nexoc deveria melhorar o controle automático da ventoinha no modo inativo: A ventoinha está sempre ativa e ás vezes aumenta sua velocidade desnecessariamente, o qual se torna perturbante depois de um tempo. Afortunadamente, os usuários podem resolver isso, por si mesmos.
Um veloz SSD NVMe garante um sistema muito veloz. O espaço de armazenamento necessário é fornecido por um disco rígido de 2,5 polegadas, também presente que oferece um armazenamento total de 2 TB. Um segundo disco rígido de 2,5 polegadas pode ser instalado se isto não for suficiente. Para trocar as unidades, a bandeja inferior do portátil teria que ser removida.
Pro
Contra
The Nexoc G734IV can be primarily put into the category "model update". The new Kaby Lake quad-core processor has only a slight performance advantage over its Skylake predecessor. Just as the G734III, the G734IV can also run all current games smoothly in Full HD resolution with high to maximum quality settings. Activating Nvidia's G-Sync technology ensures smooth images on the 60 Hz display. The matte IPS Full HD display delights with a high degree of brightness, high contrast and stable viewing angles.
With the G734IV, Nexoc delivers a rounded gaming notebook for gamers who like to upgrade their laptop.
The notebook's heat development is within normal limits for a gaming laptop. Nexoc should improve the automatic fan control in idle mode: The fan is always on and sometimes unnecessarily speeds up, which becomes annoying after a while. Fortunately, users can fix this themselves.
A fast NVMe SSD guarantees a very speedy system. The necessary storage space is provided by an also present 2.5-inch hard drive that offers a total of 2 TB of storage. A second 2.5-inch hard drive can be installed if this is not enough. To switch the drives, the bottom case of the notebook would have to be removed.
Nexoc G734IV
- 02/11/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
