Breve Análise do Portátil Monster Tulpar T5 (Tongfang GK5CN6Z, i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)

Name: Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Brand: Monster

Pequeno, porém, poderoso. Da mesma forma que você não deve julgar um livro pela capa, seria prematuro julgar a potência de um portátil por sua altura, e o Tulpar T5 V18.1 do revendedor de barebones Monster é a prova viva disso. O portátil para jogos de 15 polegadas possui um chassi de metal super fino que acomoda uma CPU de seis núcleos emparelhada com uma GPU de gama alta. Vamos descobrir se o sistema de resfriamento está à altura da tarefa.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 09/22/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Monster Notebook

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 (Tongfang GK5CN6Z) (Tulpar Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 388.73, Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados, 32 GB máx

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD05C0, IPS, FHD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM370

Disco rígido

ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB, 480 GB

, NVMe-SSD + Seagate Barracuda Pro ST1000LM049, 1 TB HDD, 7,200 rpm. slots: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 & 1x 2.5-inch

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x fone, 1x microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.9 x 359 x 240

Bateria

46.74 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 3 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0 (Sound Blaster Cinema 5), Teclado: mecânico, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 150 W, guia de início rápido, unidade thumb com controladores e ferramentas, Control Center, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.076 kg, Suprimento de energia: 496 g

Preço

1732 EUR

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	191 MB/s +664%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s +282%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	242 MB/s +633%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s +262%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	33 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	662 MBit/s 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	661 MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Wireless-AC 9260	642 MBit/s -3%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	593 MBit/s -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	379 MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	682 MBit/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Wireless-AC 9260	682 MBit/s +1%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	674 MBit/s
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	666 MBit/s -1%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	660 MBit/s -2%


307 cd/m²	307 cd/m²	317 cd/m²
314 cd/m²	335 cd/m²	331 cd/m²
297 cd/m²	303 cd/m²	321 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LGD05C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 335 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 314.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 335 cd/m²
Contraste: 1015:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.66 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.37
ΔE Greyscale 4.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 AU Optronics AUO45ED, IPS, 1920x1080	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Display		-5%	-1%	0%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	64.8	63.4 -2%	64.4 -1%	66.2 2%	63.6 -2%
sRGB Coverage	94.3	87.7 -7%	93.4 -1%	92.1 -2%	93.8 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.3		65.5 -1%	67.2 1%	64.9 -2%
Response Times		-112%	8%	-9%	1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	16 ?(8.4, 7.6)	30.8 ?(13.6, 17.2) -93%	13.6 ?(7.6, 6) 15%	17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4) -10%	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) -5%
Response Time Black / White *	12 ?(6.8, 5.2)	27.6 ?(16, 11.6) -130%	12 ?(7.6, 4.4) -0%	12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2) -7%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) 7%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-7%	10%	9%	19%
Brightness middle	335	286.7 -14%	304.3 -9%	254 -24%	313 -7%
Brightness	315	281 -11%	293 -7%	262 -17%	300 -5%
Brightness Distribution	89	92 3%	80 -10%	89 0%	78 -12%
Black Level *	0.33	0.39 -18%	0.38 -15%	0.22 33%	0.33 -0%
Contrast	1015	735 -28%	801 -21%	1155 14%	948 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.66	4.17 -14%	1.79 51%	2.37 35%	1.29 65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.56	7.22 -10%	3.69 44%	4.71 28%	2.04 69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.37			1.84 -34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.26	2.5 41%	1.1 74%	1.58 63%	0.69 84%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.274 ^97%	2.27 ^97%	2.48 ^89%	2.43 ^91%
CCT	6461 ^101%	6885 ^94%	6665 ^98%	6785 ^96%	6550 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	61	57 -7%	59.8 -2%	60 -2%	60 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	94	87 -7%	92.8 -1%	92 -2%	94 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-41% / -21%	6% / 8%	0% / 5%	6% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points +58%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H	176 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points 0%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 Intel Core i7-8750H	168 Points -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +211%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 Intel Core i7-8750H	1174 Points +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	1133 Points +4%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 Intel Core i7-8750H	1093 Points
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	1053 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H	1008 Points -8%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)	3.33 Points +68%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	2 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.98 Points 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.98 Points
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.92 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)	37.2 Points +208%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.93 Points +7%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.55 Points +4%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.08 Points
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	11.82 Points -2%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.98 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

12.08 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

175 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1093 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points +58%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5184 Points +5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5095 Points +3%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	5092 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5059 Points +3%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB	4931 Points

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)	5223 Points +14%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4665 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4650 Points +2%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB	4565 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4504 Points -1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	4119 Points -10%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)	6102 Points +11%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5705 Points +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5676 Points +3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5621 Points +2%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB	5486 Points
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	5111 Points -7%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4565 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5486 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		4931 pontos
Ajuda

	Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB	Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
AS SSD		-59%	28%	24%	-12%
Seq Read	1571	841 -46%	1820 16%	1266 -19%	2213 41%
Seq Write	1215	404.7 -67%	1917 58%	1834 51%	1163 -4%
4K Read	52.9	22.62 -57%	48.56 -8%	48.94 -7%	23.36 -56%
4K Write	101.3	67.1 -34%	99.2 -2%	107.2 6%	80.4 -21%
Score Read	1397	377 -73%	1407 1%	1346 -4%	1092 -22%
Score Write	996	345 -65%	1955 96%	2051 106%	939 -6%
Score Total	3101	900 -71%	4095 32%	4122 33%	2536 -18%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1677 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1643 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 363.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 307.3 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1671 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1579 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 97 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +169%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	15156 Points +30%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14780 Points +27%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11733 Points +1%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11621 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	11315 Points -3%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +200%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	19162 Points +32%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18687 Points +29%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14975 Points +3%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14507 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	14180 Points -2%

3DMark 11 Performance		13166 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		31561 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		10195 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 ultra

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +226%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	52.7 fps +35%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	52.4 fps +35%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	39 fps 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	38.9 fps
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H	37 fps -5%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years)	238 fps +238%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	95.5 fps +36%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	92.8 fps +32%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H	74.2 fps +5%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	70.4 fps
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	66 fps -6%

	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	70.4	38.9
FIFA 18 (2017)	217	213
Destiny 2 (2017)	94.2	78.4
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)	65	54
Need for Speed Payback (2017)	82.1	77.1
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)	74.8	62.3
The Crew 2 (2018)	59.4	58
F1 2018 (2018)	84	60

Barulho

Ocioso		29 / 33 / 39 dB
HDD		33 dB
Carga		49 / 58 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Noise		5%	10%	10%	3%	15%
off / environment *	29	28.6 1%	28.1 3%	30 -3%	29 -0%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=157, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Minimum *	29	31.4 -8%	28.1 3%	30 -3%	30 -3%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=158, last 2 years) 12%
Idle Average *	33	31.4 5%	33 -0%	31 6%	31 6%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=158, last 2 years) 18%
Idle Maximum *	39	34.2 12%	33.5 14%	34 13%	35 10%	30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=158, last 2 years) 23%
Load Average *	49	42.8 13%	42.2 14%	43 12%	49 -0%	42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=158, last 2 years) 13%
Witcher 3 ultra *	52	50.9 2%	45.3 13%	42 19%	51 2%
Load Maximum *	58	50.9 12%	45.7 21%	44 24%	54 7%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=158, last 2 years) 8%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


51 °C	52 °C	43 °C
43 °C	46 °C	39 °C
41 °C	41 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 43.8 °C


63 °C	65 °C	49 °C
64 °C	64 °C	44 °C
33 °C	34 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 65 °C
Médio: 49.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 56 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


29 °C	30 °C	28 °C
29 °C	29 °C	28 °C
28 °C	28 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 28.4 °C


29 °C	30 °C	29 °C
29 °C	30 °C	28 °C
26 °C	27 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 28.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 26 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


46 °C	48 °C	43 °C
40 °C	44 °C	39 °C
36 °C	39 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 41.4 °C


61 °C	62 °C	52 °C
60 °C	62 °C	41 °C
37 °C	36 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 62 °C
Médio: 48.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 65 °C / 149 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).

	Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Heat		9%	-1%	12%	3%	6%
Maximum Upper Side *	52	43 17%	51.2 2%	49 6%	53 -2%	46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=156, last 2 years) 11%
Maximum Bottom *	65	46.6 28%	55.2 15%	63 3%	65 -0%	49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=156, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Upper Side *	30	29.2 3%	31 -3%	24 20%	26 13%	31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=156, last 2 years) -4%
Idle Bottom *	30	34 -13%	35.6 -19%	25 17%	30 -0%	32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=156, last 2 years) -7%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (24.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.4 / 1.5 Watt
Ocioso	10 / 12 / 18 Watt
Carga	93 / 152 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-25%	-19%	-3%	-26%	-44%
Idle Minimum *	10	12.35 -24%	14.9 -49%	7 30%	14 -40%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Average *	12	19.98 -67%	17.5 -46%	11 8%	18 -50%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) -58%
Idle Maximum *	18	25.44 -41%	19.2 -7%	20 -11%	22 -22%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) -48%
Load Average *	93	94.28 -1%	103.2 -11%	98 -5%	91 2%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) -15%
Witcher 3 ultra *	110	132.9 -21%	123.1 -12%	132 -20%	142 -29%
Load Maximum *	152	140.63 7%	132.7 13%	182 -20%	173 -14%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -64%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		5h 05min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 03min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 41min

	Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.74 Wh	Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-22%	65%	32%	105%	41%
Reader / Idle	305	271 -11%		507 66%	762 150%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 85%
WiFi v1.3	243	240 -1%	402 65%	362 49%	513 111%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 55%
Load	101	45 -55%		81 -20%	156 54%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -16%
H.264				356	504	408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Chassi leve e compacto

+ Painel de 144 Hz (opcional)

+ Teclado mecânico

+ Iluminação de fundo RGB

+ Marcos finos

+ SSD NVMe

+ Wi-Fi rápido

+ Optimus

Contra

- Sem Thunderbolt 3 ou USB 3.1 Gen2

- Turbo da CPU massivamente oscilante

- Desempenho de som pobre

- Lento leitor de cartões

- Controle pobre da ventoinha

- Bleeding da tela

- Bateria pequena

- Ruído da bobina

Monster Tulpar T5 (Tongfang GK5CN6Z). Review unit courtesy of Monster Notebook.

No final desta análise, nosso veredicto para o Tulpar T5 V18.1 é idêntico ao do Schenker XMG Neo 15 que se baseia no mesmo barebone Tongfang GK5CN6Z.

O muito bem feito painel IPS de 144 Hz, com marcos de tela consideravelmente estreitos e o teclado mecânico retro iluminado RGB certamente merecem elogios. Outros pontos fortes incluem seu baixo peso e baixo perfil, o que torna este portátil de jogos de 15 polegadas perfeito para viagens longas.

No entanto, o baixo desempenho de som, a bateria pequena e o controle muito ruim do ventilador impediram efetivamente uma melhor pontuação geral. O dispositivo foi extraordinariamente barulhento ao rodar aplicativos 3D, o que certamente vai assustar uma quantidade significativa de compradores em potencial.

O portátil da Monster dificilmente chegaria à nossa lista Top 1º dos Finos e Leves.

.

Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 - 05/14/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

82 / 98 → 84%

Teclado

89%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

60 / 80 → 74%

Peso

63 / 10-66 → 94%

Bateria

58 / 95 → 61%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

87%

Desempenho da aplicação

90%

Temperatura

75 / 95 → 79%

Ruído

61 / 90 → 67%

Audio

57%

Camera

43 / 85 → 50%

Médio

72%

81%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Monster Tulpar T5 (Tongfang GK5CN6Z, i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)

Florian Glaser, 2018-09-22 (Update: 2018-09-30)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 audio analysis

Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison