Breve Análise do Portátil Medion Erazer X6805 (Core i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G7 15-7588 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G7 15-7588 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 270 cd/m²
Contraste: 844:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.25
ΔE Greyscale 4.16 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
| Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080 | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE0747), IPS, 1920x1080 | Dell G7 15-7588 LG Philips LGD053F, IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6 (LGD0590), IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-dc0001ng BOE07A1, IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH B156HAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5% | -36% | -33% | -33% | -35% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.8 | 66.6 4% | 37.82 -41% | 39.59 -38% | 39.64 -38% | 38.31 -40% |
| sRGB Coverage | 82.4 | 87.3 6% | 56.2 -32% | 59.5 -28% | 59 -28% | 57.3 -30% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.3 | 63.8 6% | 39.2 -35% | 40.92 -32% | 40.95 -32% | 39.58 -34% |
| Response Times | -25% | 4% | 13% | -44% | -13% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.4 ? | 53.2 ? -39% | 38.8 ? -1% | 38 ? 1% | 47.2 ? -23% | 43.6 ? -14% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.2 ? | 41.6 ? -42% | 26.8 ? 8% | 22 ? 25% | 32.4 ? -11% | 32.4 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 20490 ? | 21550 ? 5% | 200 ? -99% | |||
| Screen | 12% | -41% | 4% | -1% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 270 | 283 5% | 250.9 -7% | 252 -7% | 275 2% | 282.8 5% |
| Brightness | 269 | 269 0% | 246 -9% | 237 -12% | 254 -6% | 264 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 87 1% | 89 3% | 86 0% | 90 5% | 88 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.23 28% | 0.34 -6% | 0.21 34% | 0.27 16% | 0.42 -31% |
| Contrast | 844 | 1230 46% | 738 -13% | 1200 42% | 1019 21% | 673 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 4.68 8% | 7.34 -44% | 4.42 13% | 4.62 9% | 4.93 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.25 | 8 14% | 28.66 -210% | 7.21 22% | 8.05 13% | 17.65 -91% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.25 | 2.5 23% | 4.42 -36% | 3.08 5% | 3.59 -10% | 4.07 -25% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.16 | 4.32 -4% | 6.8 -63% | 3.74 10% | 4.31 -4% | 3.8 9% |
| Gamma | 2.53 87% | 2.36 93% | 2.164 102% | 2.34 94% | 2.49 88% | 2.449 90% |
| CCT | 6860 95% | 7612 85% | 6780 96% | 7291 89% | 7000 93% | 6112 106% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 57 6% | 36 -33% | 38 -30% | 38 -30% | 36 -33% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 82 | 87 6% | 56 -32% | 59 -28% | 59 -28% | 57 -30% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
4% | -24% /
-34% | -5% /
-1% | -26% /
-14% | -22% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 20490 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 20490 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 20490 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4404 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5379 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5234 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Dell G7 15-7588 SK hynix SC311 SATA | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -51% | -69% | -32% | -56% | -60% | |
| Seq Read | 1653 | 502 -70% | 506 -69% | 1321 -20% | 1238 -25% | 1231 -26% |
| Seq Write | 1262 | 450.1 -64% | 220.3 -83% | 554 -56% | 123.5 -90% | 131.6 -90% |
| 4K Read | 44.29 | 38.11 -14% | 23.66 -47% | 32.38 -27% | 31.48 -29% | 38.71 -13% |
| 4K Write | 100.9 | 104.1 3% | 59.8 -41% | 94.5 -6% | 79.3 -21% | 35.74 -65% |
| Score Read | 1565 | 343 -78% | 233 -85% | 670 -57% | 343 -78% | 497 -68% |
| Score Write | 762 | 302 -60% | 181 -76% | 661 -13% | 195 -74% | 128 -83% |
| Score Total | 3113 | 834 -73% | 528 -83% | 1643 -47% | 670 -78% | 838 -73% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13648 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 33333 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10351 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
| Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH | |
| Dell G7 15-7588 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
| Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 | |
| Dell G7 15-7588 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 72.1 | 39.5 | ||
| Destiny 2 (2017) | 93.8 | 81.3 | ||
| Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) | 85.2 | 78.7 | ||
| Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 94.5 | 68.2 | ||
| The Crew 2 (2018) | 60 | 59.9 | ||
| Monster Hunter World (2018) | 56.5 | 44.9 | ||
| F1 2018 (2018) | 97 | 60 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 56 | 49 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29 / 32 / 35 dB |
| HDD |
| 32 dB |
| Carga |
| 45 / 56 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Dell G7 15-7588 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H | HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | 6% | 3% | -1% | 12% | 11% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 30 -3% | 28.1 3% | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 28 3% | 24 ? 17% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 28 3% | 25.5 ? 12% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 34 -6% | 29 9% | 32 -0% | 33 -3% | 28 12% | 27.2 ? 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 35 | 38 -9% | 29.2 17% | 33 6% | 41 -17% | 28.5 19% | 30.4 ? 13% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 44 2% | 40.6 10% | 42 7% | 44 2% | 34.9 22% | 42.7 ? 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47 | 50 -6% | 49.8 -6% | 46 2% | 47 -0% | 40 15% | |
| Load Maximum * | 56 | 55 2% | 49.8 11% | 49 12% | 49 12% | 49.6 11% | 53.4 ? 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
| Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Dell G7 15-7588 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H | HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -6% | 5% | -14% | -17% | -10% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 46 -7% | 48.6 -13% | 52 -21% | 51 -19% | 42.8 -0% | 46.2 ? -7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 55 | 52 5% | 51.4 7% | 55 -0% | 58 -5% | 52 5% | 49.1 ? 11% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 32 -14% | 24 14% | 36 -29% | 35 -25% | 32 -14% | 31.3 ? -12% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 32 -7% | 26.8 11% | 32 -7% | 35 -17% | 39.4 -31% | 32.3 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.7 / 2.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10 / 13 / 21 Watt |
| Carga |
101 / 176 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Dell G7 15-7588 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H | HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | 29% | 33% | 6% | 27% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10 | 10 -0% | 5.5 45% | 5 50% | 12 -20% | 4.5 55% | 13.5 ? -35% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 13 -0% | 7.6 42% | 7 46% | 14 -8% | 10 23% | 18.9 ? -45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 21 | 19 10% | 9 57% | 11 48% | 18 14% | 13.8 34% | 26.7 ? -27% |
| Load Average * | 101 | 68 33% | 94 7% | 91 10% | 92 9% | 92.5 8% | 106.3 ? -5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 126 | 110 13% | 116.3 8% | 97 23% | 100 21% | 108.1 14% | |
| Load Maximum * | 176 | 136 23% | 154.4 12% | 137 22% | 142 19% | 123.2 30% | 249 ? -41% |
* ... smaller is better
| Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.7 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, 55 Wh | Dell G7 15-7588 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 56 Wh | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52-74DR GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, 48 Wh | HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, 70 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, 52.5 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -13% | 44% | 32% | 41% | -9% | 13% | |
| Reader / Idle | 503 | 386 -23% | 656 30% | 752 50% | 626 24% | 565 ? 12% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 270 | 275 2% | 452 67% | 418 55% | 514 90% | 245 -9% | 375 ? 39% |
| Load | 98 | 80 -18% | 132 35% | 90 -8% | 106 8% | 85.6 ? -13% | |
| H.264 | 265 | 428 | 506 | 409 ? |
Pro
Contra
O Medion Erazer X6805 é um excelente valor pelo dinheiro. A maioria dos portáteis de jogos econômicos é equipado com uma CPU Core i5-8300H, uma GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, 8 GB de RAM e um SSD de 128 GB. A Medion deu um passo para frente e armou seu X6805 com uma CPU Core i7-8750H, uma GPU GeForce GTX 1060, 16 GB de RAM e um SSD PCIe de 256 GB.
A inclusão de um teclado mecânico é um movimento incomum, mas inteligente, para um dispositivo desse preço. Além disso, a iluminação RGB e a carcaça robusta devem atrair os jogadores. Os alto-falantes e a seleção de portas também são decentes, embora tenhamos gostado de ver o Thunderbolt 3 ou pelo menos uma porta USB 3.1 Gen2.
O Medion Erazer X6805 é um poderoso e bem projetado portátil de jogos de orçamento que não é obstaculizado por suas deficiências.
A Medion também poderia ter equipado o X6805 com um leitor de cartões SD mais rápido e ajustou a curva padrão do ventilador. Além disso, o dispositivo teria se beneficiado de uma opção para uma bateria maior em vez do HD. Independentemente disso, recomendamos muito o Medion Erazer X6805, pois é um dos melhores portáteis de jogos de orçamento no momento.
Medion Erazer X6805-MD61085
- 09/28/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
