Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil MSI WP65 9TH: Para Profissionais com orçamento apertado
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | MSI WP65 i7-9750H, Quadro P620 | 1.9 kg | 21.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 11/2018 | Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200 | 2.6 kg | 29.95 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 83.2 % v6 (old) | 07/2018 | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE i5-8550U, Quadro P500 | 2.2 kg | 20.2 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 267.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 723:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 4.27
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.46% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| MSI WP65 AU Optronics B156HAN02.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA AU Optronics AUO30EB, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE N156HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Precision 7530 Sharp LQ156D1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE NV156FHM-N47, IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US SAMSUNG LƒFL156FL02-101 , IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 70% | 57% | 105% | 6% | 20% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.46 | 69.2 75% | 62.4 58% | 82.5 109% | 41.83 6% | 47.43 20% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.8 | 97.1 65% | 91.5 56% | 99.4 69% | 62.1 6% | 71.4 21% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.69 | 69.7 71% | 63.4 56% | 96.2 136% | 43.22 6% | 49 20% |
| Response Times | -45% | 29% | 5% | -33% | -1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 68.8 ? -83% | 34.4 ? 9% | 35.2 ? 6% | 47.2 ? -26% | 36.8 ? 2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 ? | 29.6 -7% | 14 ? 49% | 26.4 ? 4% | 38.4 ? -39% | 28.4 ? -3% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 198.4 ? | 21550 ? | 1351 ? | ||
| Screen | 42% | 39% | 24% | 20% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 267.4 | 451 69% | 542 103% | 292.8 9% | 291 9% | 259.4 -3% |
| Brightness | 259 | 434 68% | 528 104% | 295 14% | 284 10% | 247 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 84 -2% | 85 -1% | 91 6% | 85 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.25 32% | 0.41 -11% | 0.36 3% | 0.11 70% | 0.43 -16% |
| Contrast | 723 | 1804 150% | 1322 83% | 813 12% | 2645 266% | 603 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.21 | 4.4 -5% | 3.5 17% | 3.48 17% | 6.7 -59% | 5.5 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.1 | 6.7 68% | 7.8 63% | 6.81 68% | 20.2 4% | 12.7 40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.27 | 1.8 58% | 1.3 70% | 3.13 27% | 4.5 -5% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 5 -117% | 4.8 -109% | 4.1 -78% | 4.5 -96% | 3.6 -57% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.31 95% | 2.33 94% | 2.2 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6578 99% | 7717 84% | 7690 85% | 6740 96% | 7503 87% | 7163 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.2 | 63 69% | 58.8 58% | 84.4 127% | 39.6 6% | 45 21% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58.5 | 97 66% | 91.1 56% | 99.6 70% | 61.7 5% | 71 21% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 22% /
36% | 42% /
41% | 45% /
37% | -2% /
11% | 5% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4165 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5213 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5025 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI WP65 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Dell Precision 7530 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 15% | 20% | 3% | -8% | -26% | |
| Seq Read | 1097 | 2083 90% | 2980 172% | 1807 65% | 1463 33% | 2133 94% |
| Seq Write | 1838 | 1715 -7% | 2094 14% | 1540 -16% | 1164 -37% | 1287 -30% |
| 4K Read | 52.9 | 55.3 5% | 45.05 -15% | 34.27 -35% | 44.98 -15% | 40.2 -24% |
| 4K Write | 108.4 | 137.6 27% | 155.4 43% | 103 -5% | 140 29% | 114.6 6% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1509 | 1211 -20% | 1291 -14% | 1304 -14% | 1312 -13% | 710 -53% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1695 | 1446 -15% | 1506 -11% | 1221 -28% | 612 -64% | 314 -81% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.067 | 0.039 42% | 0.064 4% | 0.055 18% | 0.065 3% | 0.128 -91% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.103 | 0.026 75% | 0.024 77% | 0.037 64% | 0.026 75% | 0.033 68% |
| Score Read | 1671 | 1474 -12% | 1634 -2% | 1519 -9% | 1504 -10% | 962 -42% |
| Score Write | 1988 | 1755 -12% | 1871 -6% | 1478 -26% | 868 -56% | 557 -72% |
| Score Total | 4558 | 3976 -13% | 4300 -6% | 3761 -17% | 3131 -31% | 1979 -57% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1800 | 2015 12% | 3015 68% | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 569 | 597 5% | 519 -9% | |||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1409 | 1449 3% | 1172 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 34862 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 25105 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6492 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 100811 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22501 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4493 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1572 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guild Wars 2 (2012) | 149.9 | 73.1 | 28.4 | |
| StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 542 | 258.9 | 156.8 | 82.4 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 301.7 | 160.9 | 140 | 52.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 101 | 57.7 | 33 | 18.1 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 101.9 | 62.9 | 33.7 | 26.4 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 50.6 | 29.2 | 25.4 | |
| Doom (2016) | 96.7 | 76.3 | 44.1 | |
| Overwatch (2016) | 261.8 | 169 | 77 | |
| Prey (2017) | 144.7 | 74.8 | 56.7 | |
| Rocket League (2017) | 248.9 | 153.5 | 96.5 | |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 96 | 37 | 27 | 20 |
| Destiny 2 (2017) | 100.5 | 48.6 | 37.6 | 30.1 |
| Fortnite (2018) | 183.6 | 113.2 | 41.9 | 29.3 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 51.9 | 25.6 | 18.3 | |
| F1 2018 (2018) | 106 | 55 | 42 | 25 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 70 | 16 | 14 | 12 |
| Apex Legends (2019) | 88.4 | 35.2 | 29.1 | 26 |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 46.6 | 21.4 | 15.5 | 12.9 |
| F1 2019 (2019) | 102 | 46 | 39 | 26 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 75.8 | 29.7 | 19.3 | 14.5 |
| FIFA 20 (2019) | 166 | 117.8 | 112 | 92.4 |
| MSI WP65 Quadro P620, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Dell Precision 7530 Quadro P3200, i9-8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE Quadro P500, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 13% | 14% | 5% | 14% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 28.7 | 29.7 -3% | 28.8 -0% | 28.3 1% | 29 -1% | 28 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33.4 | 29.7 11% | 28.8 14% | 28.3 15% | 29 13% | 33.2 1% |
| Idle Average * | 33.5 | 29.7 11% | 28.8 14% | 28.3 16% | 29 13% | 33.2 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.5 | 30.3 10% | 28.8 14% | 30.5 9% | 31.2 7% | 33.2 1% |
| Load Average * | 37 | 32.6 12% | 36.1 2% | 34.5 7% | 32.5 12% | 41.4 -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.7 | 34.2 12% | 49.5 -28% | 32.5 16% | 38.4 1% | |
| Load Maximum * | 59.5 | 36.1 39% | 36.7 38% | 49.5 17% | 37.5 37% | 43.5 27% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33.4 / 33.5 / 33.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 37 / 59.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.7 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
MSI WP65 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.29 / 0.78 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.6 / 8.6 / 30.7 Watt |
| Carga |
78 / 170.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI WP65 i7-9750H, Quadro P620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE i5-8550U, Quadro P500, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P4000 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 25% | -77% | 39% | -38% | -38% | 17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.6 | 5.5 2% | 15.7 -180% | 4.1 27% | 13.3 -138% | 13.7 -145% | 4.02 28% |
| Idle Average * | 8.6 | 9.8 -14% | 20.3 -136% | 7.7 10% | 17.2 -100% | 17.5 -103% | 7.2 16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.7 | 12 61% | 25.7 16% | 10.7 65% | 17.9 42% | 20.9 32% | 11.46 63% |
| Load Average * | 78 | 59 24% | 118.9 -52% | 52 33% | 83.7 -7% | 77.2 1% | 76.3 2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 63.5 | 51 20% | 131.2 -107% | 38.8 39% | 101.9 -60% | 74 -17% | |
| Load Maximum * | 170.2 | 70 59% | 174 -2% | 65 62% | 114.3 33% | 123.7 27% | 154 10% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI WP65 i7-9750H, Quadro P620, 51 Wh | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200, 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 80 Wh | Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200, 97 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE i5-8550U, Quadro P500, 104 Wh | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 105% | 81% | 32% | 319% | -22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 605 | 745 23% | 382 -37% | 2360 290% | 235 -61% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 362 | 415 15% | 532 47% | 278 -23% | 974 169% | 175 -52% |
| Load | 37 | 140 278% | 79 114% | 95 157% | 221 497% | 54 46% |
Pro
Contra
A MSI é conhecida principalmente por seus portáteis para jogos e, portanto, não surpreende que o workstation WP65 se sinta e pareça um portátil da série G. Ele ainda vem com vários conectores de áudio dourados para microfones e fones, o que é uma singularidade para um workstation. Do ponto de vista de um profissional, esta é uma faca de dois gumes; o WP65 é definitivamente mais atraente e visualmente animado do que o típico Dell Precision 3000 ou HP ZBook 15v de nível básico, mas essas vantagens têm o custo dos recursos de hardware.
Vá mais fundo no portátil e uma longa lista de desvantagens começa a aparecer. Recursos comuns de workstations como CPUs Xeon, memória ECC, cobertura sRGB plena, leitor SD, teclado numérico integrado e login com cartão inteligente ou impressão digital estão ausentes no WP65. Além disso, o chassi e suas dobradiças são mais flexíveis do que nas estações de trabalho ThinkPad P ou Precision 3541 mais baratas, para uma primeira impressão mais fraca. O clickpad e o selo de fábrica, desencorajando a assistência ao usuário final, parecem como reflexões derivadas de um portátil de consumidor, em vez de recursos atraentes para profissionais. Você precisaria atualizar para a série WS de ponta da MSI ou a super poderosa série WT, se desejar essas opções comuns de workstations.
Os workstations com orçamento tradicional priorizam as opções e a funcionalidade sobre a aparência. O MSI WP65 se inclina um pouco demais ao último aspecto e não o suficiente ao anterior para experiência de barebone. Mais SKUs e recursos dedicados aos profissionais podem ajudá-lo a se destacar mais contra gigantes como a HP, Lenovo e Dell.
MSI WP65
-
10/15/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
