Breve Análise do Portátil MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009: Comet Lake para criadores de conteúdo
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 (Prestige 14 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10710U 6 x 1.1 - 4.7 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 930 MHz, Memoría: 1751 MHz, GDDR5, NVIDIA 431.9
Memória
16 GB
, LPDDR3 2133, dual channel
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 315 PPI, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB
, 890 GB livre
peso
1.29 kg, Suprimento de energia: 420 g
Preço
1800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.2 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.2 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | MSI Prestige 15 A10SC i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.7 kg | 16 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.5 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 83.1 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.7 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø786 (678-865)
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø640 (573-691)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 567 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 515.9 cd/m² Minimum: 30 cd/m²iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 567 cd/m²
Contraste: 1274:1 (Preto: 0.445 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.55 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.24
ΔE Greyscale 1.48 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.19
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Sharp LQ156D1JW42, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 AUO202B, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 BOE NV156FHM-N63, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA AU Optronics AUO30EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | |||||
| Display P3 Coverage | 82 | 64.3 | 66.6 | 69.2 | |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.3 | 95.8 | 87.7 | 97.1 | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 96.2 | 65.7 | 64.1 | 69.7 | |
| Response Times | -12% | -11% | 17% | -4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55 ? | 60 ? -9% | 62 ? -13% | 41.2 ? 25% | 68.8 ? -25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 36 ? | 41.2 ? -14% | 39 ? -8% | 33.2 ? 8% | 29.6 18% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | ||||
| Screen | -42% | -55% | -100% | -49% | |
| Brightness middle | 567 | 464.5 -18% | 353 -38% | 312.6 -45% | 451 -20% |
| Brightness | 516 | 451 -13% | 335 -35% | 290 -44% | 434 -16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 92 7% | 90 5% | 85 -1% | 89 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.445 | 0.5 -12% | 0.25 44% | 0.31 30% | 0.25 44% |
| Contrast | 1274 | 929 -27% | 1412 11% | 1008 -21% | 1804 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.55 | 3.36 -117% | 4.4 -184% | 5.78 -273% | 4.4 -184% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.14 | 7.06 -37% | 7.21 -40% | 8.86 -72% | 6.7 -30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.24 | 3.42 -176% | 1.1 11% | 3.78 -205% | 1.8 -45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.48 | 1.3 12% | 5.49 -271% | 5.4 -265% | 5 -238% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.26 97% | 2.21 100% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 6741 96% | 6596 99% | 7689 85% | 7864 83% | 7717 84% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 84.8 | 61 | 57.1 | 63 | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.3 | 96 | 87.4 | 97 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -27% /
-37% | -33% /
-47% | -42% /
-78% | -27% /
-41% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel Core i7-10710U: Ø795 (774.95-1100.17)
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel Core i7-10710U: Ø1087 (1011.3-1125.11)
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø483 (464-551)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø669 (651.9-718.51)
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø489 (485.76-508.49)
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3511 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4422 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5150 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 Lite-On CA3-8D512 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -14% | 10% | 6% | -6% | 2% | |
| Write 4K | 163.8 | 150.8 -8% | 153 -7% | 141.6 -14% | 156 -5% | 165.7 ? 1% |
| Read 4K | 48.6 | 47.3 -3% | 59.5 22% | 45.28 -7% | 45.73 -6% | 44.6 ? -8% |
| Write Seq | 2269 | 981 -57% | 1608 -29% | 1975 -13% | 1158 -49% | 1982 ? -13% |
| Read Seq | 1963 | 976 -50% | 2293 17% | 2272 16% | 1132 -42% | 1764 ? -10% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 289.8 | 442.7 53% | 497 71% | 458.6 58% | 369.2 27% | 395 ? 36% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 373.6 | 499.7 34% | 544 46% | 391.4 5% | 573 53% | 434 ? 16% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2395 | 1706 -29% | 1640 -32% | 2393 0% | 1969 -18% | 2351 ? -2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3479 | 1758 -49% | 3158 -9% | 3464 0% | 3138 -10% | 3234 ? -7% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 960 | 1408 ? | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 844 | 1449 ? | ||||
| AS SSD | -15% | -26% | -13% | 2% | -4% | |
| Seq Read | 2300 | 1274 -45% | 2666 16% | 1887 -18% | 2083 -9% | 1993 ? -13% |
| Seq Write | 2051 | 1395 -32% | 1497 -27% | 1432 -30% | 1715 -16% | 2036 ? -1% |
| 4K Read | 46.23 | 50.3 9% | 53.7 16% | 52.3 13% | 55.3 20% | 46.4 ? 0% |
| 4K Write | 84.6 | 119.8 42% | 133.7 58% | 146 73% | 137.6 63% | 109.7 ? 30% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1552 | 1599 3% | 652 -58% | 969 -38% | 1211 -22% | 1502 ? -3% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1789 | 1455 -19% | 272 -85% | 1375 -23% | 1446 -19% | 1625 ? -9% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.049 | 0.044 10% | 0.075 -53% | 0.034 31% | 0.039 20% | 0.05158 ? -5% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.045 | 0.092 -104% | 0.032 29% | 0.075 -67% | 0.026 42% | 0.05581 ? -24% |
| Score Read | 1828 | 1777 -3% | 972 -47% | 1210 -34% | 1474 -19% | 1747 ? -4% |
| Score Write | 2079 | 1714 -18% | 555 -73% | 1664 -20% | 1755 -16% | 1942 ? -7% |
| Score Total | 4831 | 4411 -9% | 1982 -59% | 3483 -28% | 3976 -18% | 4588 ? -5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-14% | -8% /
-11% | -4% /
-5% | -2% /
-1% | -1% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3479 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2395 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
373.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
289.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1963 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2269 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
48.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
163.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 10232 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14259 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6517 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (70.2 - 84.3, n=7) | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
| Dota 2 Reborn | |
| 3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Multimedia (30 - 139.3, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
| 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (64.4 - 105.6, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
| 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (28 - 196.9, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (71.2 - 128, n=5) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 3840x2160 High Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8.98 - 81.9, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (8.7 - 9.6, n=2) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (23.1 - 33.1, n=3) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9.75 - 162.4, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (36.7 - 45.7, n=3) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (19 - 225, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (51.7 - 91.2, n=2) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 70.2 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 86.2 | 76.5 | 71.2 | 64.4 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 51.7 | 36.7 | 23.1 | 8.7 | |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 50.4 | 40.3 | 39.6 | 12.7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 40.2 / 43.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.4 °C / -11.6 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.4 °C / -11.6 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.5 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.2 / 12.2 / 14.3 Watt |
| Carga |
67 / 67 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | MSI Prestige 15 A10SC i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Lite-On CA3-8D512, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -21% | -25% | -29% | 8% | -26% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 6.1 -17% | 10.7 -106% | 5 4% | 5.5 -6% | 7.75 ? -49% | 6.54 ? -26% |
| Idle Average * | 12.2 | 13.2 -8% | 13.6 -11% | 13.2 -8% | 9.8 20% | 11.8 ? 3% | 11.3 ? 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14.3 | 19.2 -34% | 15.7 -10% | 24 -68% | 12 16% | 16.6 ? -16% | 13.3 ? 7% |
| Load Average * | 67 | 75 -12% | 60 10% | 70 -4% | 59 12% | 75.2 ? -12% | 70.7 ? -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 67 | 89.7 -34% | 71 -6% | 114 -70% | 70 -4% | 105.5 ? -57% | 116.1 ? -73% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 74 | 64 | 63.3 | 51 |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 52 Wh | MSI Prestige 15 A10SC i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Razer Blade Stealth 13, Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 53.1 Wh | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 71 Wh | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200, 56 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 41% | -10% | 66% | 18% | 52% | |
| Reader / Idle | 596 | 1147 92% | 500 -16% | 1289 116% | 745 25% | 1168 ? 96% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 351 | 456 30% | 329 -6% | 503 43% | 415 18% | 640 ? 82% |
| Load | 125 | 125 0% | 114 -9% | 174 39% | 140 12% | 97.1 ? -22% |
Pro
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Muito boa calibração da tela, de fábrica
+ Teclas e ClickPad grandes
+ Perfis de desempenho fáceis de selecionar
Contra
- Pouca variedade de portas
- Altas temperaturas sob uso intenso
- Poucas opções de manutenção
- Forte queda no desempenho da CPU uso intenso prolongado
Veredicto - Bom desempenho com trocas
O MSI Prestige provou ser um portátil contraditório em nosso teste. O desempenho é bom, mas cai um pouco mais fortemente do que no nosso teste em setembro de 2019. A tela já está excelentemente calibrada e também possui uma boa relação de contraste, mas o valor do preto ligeiramente aumentado e a concorrência parcialmente melhor nublam esse ponto também. A tela já está excelentemente calibrada e também possui uma boa taxa de contraste, mas o valor do preto ligeiramente aumentado e a concorrência parcialmente melhor nublam esse ponto também. Como não há porta HDMI, as duas portas Thunderbolt serão bloqueadas em casos extremos, pelo que uma estação docking correspondente remediará isso naturalmente.
O MSI Prestige 14 traz muito poder. Mas os compradores também devem aceitar alguns compromissos.
Mas tudo isto sendo muito minucioso. O Prestige 14 é equipado com bom desempenho para seu tamanho e oferece muito hardware por seu preço. Quase não existem opções de manutenção disponíveis, e os compromissos que precisam ser feitos, por exemplo, na duração da bateria com a tela 4K, podem ser avaliados por qualquer comprador em potencial. Quem optar por comprar esse portátil não ficará decepcionado, mas também é recomendável dar uma olhada na concorrência.
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009
- 02/17/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
