Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil MSI PS63 Modern 8RC (Core i7-8565U, GTX 1050 Max-Q)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 75 %
iluminação com acumulador: 289 cd/m²
Contraste: 1112:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.88
ΔE Greyscale 1.42 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Chi Mei CMN15E8 N156HCE/EN1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 CMN N140HCE-EN2, , 1920x1080, 14" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Panasonic MEI96A2 , , 3000x2000, 13.5" | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Sharp SHP149A LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000RGE NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) APPA040, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE Chi Mei CMN15E8 / N156HCE-EN1 CMN, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 9% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 8% | 6% | 3% | 35% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.5 | 67.5 6% | 64.3 1% | 63.6 0% | 63.4 0% | 67.9 7% | 66 4% | 68.6 8% | 98.7 55% | 63.6 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 87.9 | 98.6 12% | 94.1 7% | 93.8 7% | 93.3 6% | 95.7 9% | 96.5 10% | 88.7 1% | 99.9 14% | 89.4 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.9 | 69.6 9% | 65.3 2% | 64.9 2% | 64.5 1% | 69.4 9% | 66.7 4% | 64.8 1% | 86.6 36% | 64.3 1% |
| Response Times | 13% | 66% | 63% | 65% | -10% | -36% | -18% | 122% | 14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 34.4 ? 18% | 16 ? 62% | 16.8 ? 60% | 15.2 ? 64% | 52.8 ? -26% | 49 ? -17% | 52.8 ? -26% | 43.2 ? -3% | 34 ? 19% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 24.8 ? 22% | 9.6 ? 70% | 11.2 ? 65% | 11.2 ? 65% | 30 ? 6% | 30 ? 6% | 36 ? -13% | 31.2 ? 2% | 25 ? 22% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 25000 ? 0% | 961 ? -96% | 21370 ? -15% | 117000 ? 368% | 25000 ? 0% | ||||
| Screen | 16% | 3% | 17% | -2% | 26% | 10% | -40% | 35% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 289 | 285.4 -1% | 325 12% | 313 8% | 309 7% | 385 33% | 413 43% | 331 15% | 520 80% | 332 15% |
| Brightness | 262 | 269 3% | 303 16% | 300 15% | 291 11% | 372 42% | 378 44% | 305 16% | 492 88% | 301 15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 75 | 86 15% | 90 20% | 78 4% | 91 21% | 89 19% | 86 15% | 84 12% | 88 17% | 83 11% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.31 -19% | 0.33 -27% | 0.33 -27% | 0.31 -19% | 0.21 19% | 0.29 -12% | 0.24 8% | 0.39 -50% | 0.29 -12% |
| Contrast | 1112 | 921 -17% | 985 -11% | 948 -15% | 997 -10% | 1833 65% | 1424 28% | 1379 24% | 1333 20% | 1145 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 1 66% | 2.69 7% | 1.29 56% | 2.96 -2% | 1.6 45% | 2.44 16% | 5.6 -93% | 1.2 59% | 3.73 -29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.71 | 3.65 36% | 4.91 14% | 2.04 64% | 5.14 10% | 4.5 21% | 4.46 22% | 9.9 -73% | 2.3 60% | 6.6 -16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.88 | 0.98 66% | 1.27 56% | 1.41 51% | 2.48 14% | 3 -4% | 2 31% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.42 | 1.4 1% | 2.34 -65% | 0.69 51% | 2.88 -103% | 1.5 -6% | 2.48 -75% | 6.3 -344% | 1.3 8% | 3.96 -179% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.25 98% | 2.38 92% | 2.43 91% | 2.33 94% | 2.22 99% | 2.43 91% | 2.33 94% | 2.18 101% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 6705 97% | 6699 97% | 6872 95% | 6550 99% | 6725 97% | 6502 100% | 7006 93% | 7152 91% | 6738 96% | 6921 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 63.82 12% | 60 5% | 60 5% | 60 5% | 64 12% | 62 9% | 58 2% | 58 2% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87 | 98.91 14% | 94 8% | 94 8% | 93 7% | 95.9 10% | 96 10% | 88.6 2% | 89 2% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
14% | 24% /
11% | 28% /
20% | 22% /
7% | 8% /
18% | -7% /
1% | -18% /
-28% | 64% /
54% | 0% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3801 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4844 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4905 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4020 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000RGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Apple SSD AP0512 | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 7% | 29% | 4% | 4% | 20% | 3% | 46% | 15% | |
| Write 4K | 121.3 | 94.4 -22% | 113.5 -6% | 140.6 16% | 89.4 -26% | 109.4 -10% | 43.59 -64% 35.92 -70% | 139.3 15% | 138.5 ? 14% |
| Read 4K | 44.07 | 37.65 -15% | 43.49 -1% | 43.62 -1% | 44.64 1% | 41.5 -6% | 12.68 -71% 11.67 -74% | 46.78 6% | 44.2 ? 0% |
| Write Seq | 1176 | 1335 14% | 1466 25% | 343.3 -71% | 830 -29% | 1460 24% | 1605 36% 1522 29% | 2125 81% | 1265 ? 8% |
| Read Seq | 1139 | 1404 23% | 1200 5% | 1452 27% | 1774 56% | 1561 37% | 1595 40% 1528 34% | 2354 107% | 1237 ? 9% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 257.8 | 268.6 4% | 295.4 15% | 344.4 34% | 310.6 20% | 278.4 8% | 232.7 -10% 204.5 -21% | 298.4 16% | 404 ? 57% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 325.9 | 332.8 2% | 376.8 16% | 457.2 40% | 266.4 -18% | 354.9 9% | 404 24% 393.3 21% | 355.8 9% | 421 ? 29% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1455 | 1375 -5% | 2498 72% | 344.3 -76% | 831 -43% | 1461 0% | 1770 22% 1756 21% | 2128 46% | 1491 ? 2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1741 | 2627 51% | 3549 104% | 2885 66% | 2962 70% | 3452 98% | 2993 72% 2805 61% | 3324 91% | 1741 ? 0% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1415 | 715 ? | |||||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 572 | 1027 ? | |||||||
| AS SSD | -32% | 38% | -385% | 4% | -56% | 29% | -13% | ||
| Seq Read | 1372 | 2213 61% | 2685 96% | 1574 15% | 2612 90% | 2239 63% | 2469 80% | 1363 ? -1% | |
| Seq Write | 1244 | 1163 -7% | 2325 87% | 340.3 -73% | 1386 11% | 1644 32% | 1991 60% | 1227 ? -1% | |
| 4K Read | 43.34 | 23.36 -46% | 53.6 24% | 32.5 -25% | 53 22% | 9.46 -78% | 54.3 25% | 40.8 ? -6% | |
| 4K Write | 162.2 | 80.4 -50% | 131.9 -19% | 5.12 -97% | 119.4 -26% | 18.78 -88% | 99.8 -38% | 127.3 ? -22% | |
| 4K-64 Read | 1044 | 847 -19% | 1339 28% | 301.8 -71% | 764 -27% | 965 -8% | 1823 75% | 957 ? -8% | |
| 4K-64 Write | 1111 | 742 -33% | 1836 65% | 19.19 -98% | 1270 14% | 163.5 -85% | 1282 15% | 1081 ? -3% | |
| Access Time Read * | 0.058 | 0.119 -105% | 0.045 22% | 0.086 -48% | 0.062 -7% | 0.225 -288% | 0.042 28% | 0.07744 ? -34% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.024 | 0.046 -92% | 0.029 -21% | 0.889 -3604% | 0.031 -29% | 0.039 -63% | 0.03671 ? -53% | ||
| Score Read | 1224 | 1092 -11% | 1661 36% | 492 -60% | 1078 -12% | 1199 -2% | 2125 74% | 1134 ? -7% | |
| Score Write | 1398 | 939 -33% | 2200 57% | 58 -96% | 1528 9% | 347 -75% | 1581 13% | 1331 ? -5% | |
| Score Total | 3249 | 2536 -22% | 4701 45% | 750 -77% | 3111 -4% | 2119 -35% | 4771 47% | 3046 ? -6% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 632 | 1637 | 1169 ? | ||||||
| Copy Program MB/s | 117.2 | 466.8 | 446 ? | ||||||
| Copy Game MB/s | 465.9 | 960 | 874 ? | ||||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-16% | 34% /
34% | 4% /
4% | -191% /
-221% | 12% /
11% | -27% /
-20% | 38% /
36% | 1% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7299 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18526 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5292 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (38 - 38.8, n=2) | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25 - 150, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q (27 - 33, n=2) | |
| Battlefield V - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) | |
| Darksiders III - 1920x1080 High | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q () | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 147.7 | 62.1 | ||
| Thief (2014) | 56.5 | 57.2 | 38.8 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 41.4 | 34.6 | 28.7 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 57 | 33 | 26 | 22 |
| FIFA 19 (2018) | 96.5 | 100.8 | ||
| Battlefield V (2018) | 46.1 | 39.7 | 36.5 | |
| Darksiders III (2018) | 33.6 | 37.2 | 31.5 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.7 / 30.7 / 30.7 dB |
| Carga |
| 34 / 33.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58.6 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Book 2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.5 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 6.8 / 9.8 / 11.4 Watt |
| Carga |
76 / 93 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000RGE i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -51% | -78% | -75% | 0% | 23% | 7% | 4% | -12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.8 | 10 -47% | 14 -106% | 14 -106% | 4.7 31% | 2.9 57% | 4.14 39% | 4.48 ? 34% | 6.96 ? -2% |
| Idle Average * | 9.8 | 13 -33% | 18 -84% | 17 -73% | 10.6 -8% | 5.8 41% | 7.3 26% | 9.58 ? 2% | 11.3 ? -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.4 | 18 -58% | 22 -93% | 22 -93% | 12.3 -8% | 7.5 34% | 11.5 -1% | 11.6 ? -2% | 13.5 ? -18% |
| Load Average * | 76 | 95 -25% | 91 -20% | 102 -34% | 81 -7% | 77.5 -2% | 78.8 -4% | 77.3 ? -2% | 72.3 ? 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 93 | 179 -92% | 173 -86% | 157 -69% | 100.3 -8% | 107 -15% | 118 -27% | 105.5 ? -13% | 119.2 ? -28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 114 | 142 | 130 | 97 | 84 | 82 |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 82 Wh | MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 82 Wh | SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 55 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 75 Wh | MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 46.7 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 79 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000RGE i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 80 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -44% | -52% | -60% | 28% | 7% | -49% | -14% | 3% | 3% | -10% | -1% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 838 | 447 -47% | 301 -64% | 1469 75% | 1010 21% | 400 -52% | 762 -9% | 1356 62% | 1261 50% | 1146 ? 37% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 683 | 428 -37% | 372 -46% | 220 -68% | 663 -3% | 893 31% | 262 -62% | 513 -25% | 588 -14% | 942 38% | 614 -10% | 562 -18% | 613 ? -10% |
| Load | 168 | 85 -49% | 70 -58% | 89 -47% | 190 13% | 118 -30% | 111 -34% | 156 -7% | 102 -39% | 114 -32% | 110 -35% | 98.3 ? -41% | |
| H.264 | 353 | 933 | 288 | 504 | 665 | 701 | 576 | 793 ? | |||||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 230 | 62 | 88 | 76.3 ? |
Pro
Contra
O MSI PS63 Modern 8RC é um portátil multimídia de gama média impressionante. Não ganhará prêmio algum por sua combinação de CPU, GPU e SSD, mas o dispositivo mostra seus pontos fortes em outras áreas. O PS63 é leve, compacto e fácil de consertar ou de fazer manutenção. Além disso, o dispositivo é elegante, bem construído e resistente graças ao seu design, em grande parte, de alumínio.
O MSI PS63 Modern 8RC é uma ótima opção se você estiver procurando por um portátil multimídia, mas não precisa do poder de uma CPU de 45 W. Ele oferece desempenho sólido e funciona silenciosamente, enquanto seus 80 Wh podem durar facilmente um dia inteiro de trabalho.
O dispositivo também geralmente funciona friamente, mas fica mais quente do que a maioria dos portáteis similares ao operar sob carga sustentada, o que pode ser uma preocupação para algumas pessoas. O único problema que temos com os ventiladores silenciosos do PS63 é que o dispositivo não aproveita o máximo do seu Core i7-8565U, que se afoga drasticamente quando chega a 75 °C, o que poderia impactar os tempos de renderização, por exemplo. No entanto, a GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q não é afetada.
A MSI também colocou dois slots M.2, que nem todos os portáteis multimídia têm, e o fabricante deixou um slot livre de RAM, facilitando a atualização para 32 GB de RAM, se necessário. É uma pena que a MSI não tenha incluído uma porta Thunderbolt 3, mas o USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C com saída DisplayPort é uma adição bem-vinda.
O PS63 Modern custa cerca de 1.700 Euros (~$1.938), o que não é exatamente pouco para uma carteira, especialmente porque você pode comprar um portátil mais potente como o Aero 15X V8 ou o XPS 15 9570 pelo mesmo preço. Porém, você vai sacrificar um pouco de mobilidade com qualquer um desses portáteis.
Se a mobilidade for um fator secundário, o Core i7-8850H ou o Core i5-8300H quad-core serão melhores opções do que o Core i7-8565U. A Dell vende configurações para qualquer CPU com seu XPS 15 9570, enquanto a MSI tem o P65 Creator ou o GS65 Stealth Thin. Decidir entre uma CPU de 15 W e 45 W, no final, é questão de preferência e se você precisa da potência adicional que um processador da série H traz. Vamos usar os requisitos do sistema VEGAS Pro 16 como um exemplo prático:
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC
-
10/25/2019 v7 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch
Price comparison
