Breve Análise do Portátil MSI Modern 14 A10RB: Mais leve do que parece

Name: MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Brand: MSI

Para o escritório moderno.

O mais recente portátil de escritório de gama média da MSI para criadores de conteúdo oferece gráficos Comet Lake-U, GeForce MX250 e um monitor 1080p bem calibrado de 14 polegadas, tudo por menos de US$ 900 e um peso de apenas 1,2 kg. Suas vantagens são claras, mas algumas de suas desvantagens são evidentes.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 01/28/2020 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 ...

Business Comet Lake Laptop / Notebook MSI

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US (Modern 14 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-10210U 4 x 1.6 - 4.2 GHz, Comet Lake-U

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1518 MHz, GDDR5, 441.87, Optimus

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-2666, 10-10-10-28, Single-Channel

Pantalha

14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium

Disco rígido

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, 512 GB

Placa de Som

Intel Comet Lake PCH-LP - cAVS

Conexões

4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: Leitor SD

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16 x 322 x 222

Bateria

50 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2x 2 W, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, MSI True Color, Driver and App Center, Creator Center, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

1.22 kg, Suprimento de energia: 255 g

Preço

900 USD

Links

MSI página inicial
MSI Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution	Price
80.9 % v7 ^(old)	01/2020	MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250	1.2 kg	16 mm	14.00"	1920x1080

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U DIN A4 ❌

Right: Kensington Lock, SD reader, USB Type-C 3.2 Gen. 1, 2x USB 3.2 Gen. 1

Left: AC adapter, HDMI 1.4, USB Type-C 3.2 Gen. 1, 3.5 mm combo audio

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	172.4 MB/s +516%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	69.2 MB/s +147%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	192.1 MB/s +609%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	82.2 MB/s +203%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	27.1 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1374 (720^min - 1484^max) MBit/s
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	621 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1291 (1212^min - 1379^max) MBit/s
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	696 MBit/s


286.6 cd/m²	315.4 cd/m²	281.9 cd/m²
290.7 cd/m²	324.1 cd/m²	296.3 cd/m²
292.1 cd/m²	313.9 cd/m²	306.8 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 324.1 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 300.9 cd/m² Minimum: 13.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 324.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 1473:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.63 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.42
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080	MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U AUO123B, , 14", 3840x2160	Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 BOE NV156FHM-N63, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS LED, 14", 1920x1080	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.6", 3840x2160	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M APPA044, IPS, 16", 3072x1920
Display		26%	-2%	3%	27%
Display P3 Coverage	64.2	81.5 27%	66.6 4%	66 3%	88.1 37%
sRGB Coverage	94.8	99 4%	87.7 -7%	97.9 3%	99.6 5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.4	95.4 46%	64.1 -2%	67.3 3%	91.8 40%
Response Times			1%	-6%	29%	132%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39.2 ?(20.8, 18.4)		41.2 ?(22, 19.2) -5%	49.6 ?(23.6, 26) -27%	2.3 ?(1.1, 1.2) 94%	52.4 ?(23.9, 28.5) -34%
Response Time Black / White *	35.6 ?(21.2, 14.4)		33.2 ?(19.6, 13.6) 7%	30 ?(16.4, 13.6) 16%	2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3) 93%	34.9 ?(17.8, 17.1) 2%
PWM Frequency	25000 ?(28)				59.5 ?(100) -100%	131700 427%
Screen		-5%	-70%	-9%	-45%	6%
Brightness middle	324.1	568 75%	312.6 -4%	384 18%	421.2 30%	519 60%
Brightness	301	513 70%	290 -4%	363 21%	417 39%	477 58%
Brightness Distribution	87	87 0%	85 -2%	90 3%	94 8%	86 -1%
Black Level *	0.22	0.28 -27%	0.31 -41%	0.17 23%		0.39 -77%
Contrast	1473	2029 38%	1008 -32%	2259 53%		1331 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.63	3.18 -95%	5.78 -255%	3.5 -115%	6.06 -272%	2.28 -40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.25	7.01 -65%	8.86 -108%	5.5 -29%	11.89 -180%	6.54 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.42	1.14 20%	3.78 -166%	1 30%		0.86 39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	4.79 -118%	5.4 -145%	4.6 -109%	2.8 -27%	0.9 59%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.49 ^88%	2.21 ^100%	2.32 ^95%	2.15 ^102%	2145 ^0%
CCT	6887 ^94%	6488 ^100%	7864 ^83%	6884 ^94%	6235 ^104%	6572 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60.2	85 41%	57.1 -5%	62 3%	81 35%	78 30%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	95	99 4%	87.4 -8%	97.7 3%	99.6 5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		11% / 1%	-24% / -48%	-4% / -6%	4% / -14%	69% / 35%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.2 ms rise
35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.8 ms rise
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

25000 Hz

≤ 28 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 28 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø565 (559.89-595.69)

HP Spectre X360 15-5ZV31AV GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø546 (537.14-592.71)

Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø627 (606.12-749.06)

Dynabook Portégé X30-F-10N UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø521 (516.63-551.37)

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Cinebench R20

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML Intel Core i7-10510U	195 Points +15%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7	184 Points +8%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	180 Points +6%
Dell G3 3590 Intel Core i5-9300H	172 Points +1%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U	170 Points
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (134 - 174, n=35)	165.6 Points -3%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	156 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE Intel Core i7-8565U	155 Points -9%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	152 Points -11%
Walmart Motile M142 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	147 Points -14%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	143 Points -16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	139 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	1051 Points +76%
Dell G3 3590 Intel Core i5-9300H	790 Points +33%
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML Intel Core i7-10510U	756 (560^min - 756^max) Points +27%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7	733 Points +23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	693 Points +16%
Walmart Motile M142 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	640 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	622 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (320 - 790, n=35)	609 Points +2%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U	596 Points
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	564 Points -5%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	494 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE Intel Core i7-8565U	452 Points -24%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	2.18 Points
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (1.71 - 1.91, n=4)	1.85 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	1.65 Points
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	1.63 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	11.81 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	7.82 Points
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (5.69 - 8.66, n=4)	7.34 Points
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	5.56 Points

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	31463 Points
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	20546 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	18307 Points
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (15037 - 22164, n=3)	17758 Points
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	15324 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE Intel Core i7-8565U	13806 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	7345 Points
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (6410 - 6613, n=3)	6478 Points
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	6212 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE Intel Core i7-8565U	6128 Points
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	6038 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	4525 Points

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	274.7 s *
Average Intel Core i5-10210U ()	218 s *
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	171.1 s *

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML Intel Core i7-10510U	465 Points +10%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	460 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7	460 Points +9%
Dell G3 3590 Intel Core i5-9300H	422 Points 0%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U	421 Points
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (322 - 428, n=30)	407 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	399 Points -5%
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	383 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE Intel Core i7-8565U	374 Points -11%
Walmart Motile M142 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	356 Points -15%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	352 Points -16%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	351 Points -17%
CPU (Multi Core)
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U Intel Core i7-10710U	2410 Points +97%
Dell G3 3590 Intel Core i5-9300H	1864 Points +52%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7	1799 Points +47%
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML Intel Core i7-10510U	1607 Points +31%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	1549 Points +26%
Walmart Motile M142 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	1398 Points +14%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	1350 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (722 - 1820, n=30)	1279 Points +4%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U	1225 Points
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 Intel Core i7-8550U	1138 Points -7%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	1117 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE Intel Core i7-8565U	988 Points -19%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

170 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

596 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

92.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

1225 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

421 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	5500 Points +22%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	5469 Points +22%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4828 Points +7%
MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U	4690 Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4583 Points +2%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4497 Points
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3825 - 4497, n=3)	4205 Points -6%
Essentials
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	9701 Points +23%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	9678 Points +23%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9067 Points +15%
MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U	8903 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (7861 - 9236, n=3)	8320 Points +6%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	7861 Points
Productivity
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	7494 Points +6%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7201 Points +2%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	7040 Points
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6924 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (6298 - 7217, n=3)	6852 Points -3%
MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U	6494 Points -8%
Digital Content Creation
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	6110 Points +37%
MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U	4843 Points +9%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4680 Points +5%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4461 Points
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3900 Points -13%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3067 - 4461, n=3)	3583 Points -20%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	4900 Points +41%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4003 Points +16%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3799 Points +10%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	3764 Points +9%
MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U	3744 Points +8%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	3464 Points
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 ()	3464 Points 0%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5158 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5132 Points +3%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4992 Points
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 ()	4992 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	4812 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	4762 Points -5%
MSI Prestige 14 i7-10710U GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U	4472 Points -10%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3464 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4992 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		4497 pontos
Ajuda

	MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple SSD AP1024 7171
AS SSD		51%	64%	73%	57%
Seq Read	1061	1887 78%	2525 138%	1723 62%	2531 139%
Seq Write	953	1432 50%	1253 31%	1386 45%	2289 140%
4K Read	35.59	52.3 47%	59.1 66%	43.25 22%	15.85 -55%
4K Write	87	146 68%	134.1 54%	98.3 13%	39.88 -54%
4K-64 Read	769	969 26%	1010 31%	1078 40%	1267 65%
4K-64 Write	733	1375 88%	1461 99%	1456 99%	1749 139%
Access Time Read *	0.084	0.034 60%	0.052 38%	0.05 40%	0.122 -45%
Access Time Write *	0.136	0.075 45%	0.029 79%	0.039 71%	0.095 30%
Score Read	911	1210 33%	1322 45%	1294 42%	1536 69%
Score Write	916	1664 82%	1721 88%	1693 85%	2018 120%
Score Total	2294	3483 52%	3670 60%	3638 59%	4317 88%
Copy ISO MB/s	956	1375 44%	2016 111%	3182 233%	1995 109%
Copy Program MB/s	496.5	468 -6%	542 9%	984 98%	584 18%
Copy Game MB/s	872	1287 48%	1278 47%	1824 109%	1135 30%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		68%	66%	58%	49%
Write 4K	107.7	141.6 31%	128.4 19%	104.3 -3%	55.5 -48%
Read 4K	39.73	45.28 14%	46.37 17%	45.23 14%	16.21 -59%
Write Seq	926	1975 113%	1863 101%	1729 87%	1959 112%
Read Seq	1014	2272 124%	2340 131%	1861 84%	1763 74%
Write 4K Q32T1	343.6	458.6 33%	451.1 31%	509 48%	398.5 16%
Read 4K Q32T1	499.1	391.4 -22%	415.3 -17%	388.5 -22%	648 30%
Write Seq Q32T1	1033	2393 132%	2985 189%	2813 172%	2727 164%
Read Seq Q32T1	1604	3464 116%	2565 60%	2906 81%	3242 102%
Write 4K Q8T8			451.4
Read 4K Q8T8			1004
Total Average (Program / Settings)		60% / 57%	65% / 65%	66% / 67%	53% / 54%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1604 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1033 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 499.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 343.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1014 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 926 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.73 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 107.7 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	116593 Points +399%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	97136 Points +316%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	80615 Points +245%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	45246 Points +94%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i5-10210U	23376 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (13805 - 23863, n=25)	21491 Points -8%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	18633 Points -20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	17892 Points -23%
Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i5-8265U	15803 Points -32%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U	12166 Points -48%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	18055 Points +370%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	14718 Points +283%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	11332 Points +195%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	8532 Points +122%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H	7199 Points +87%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i5-10210U	3845 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2939 - 3885, n=29)	3531 Points -8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	3062 Points -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	2874 Points -25%
Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i5-8265U	2566 Points -33%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U	2291 Points -40%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	6910 Points +494%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5534 Points +375%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	3626 Points +212%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	3353 Points +188%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H	2196 Points +89%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i5-10210U	1164 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (881 - 1169, n=22)	1070 Points -8%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	862 Points -26%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	847 Points -27%
Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i5-8265U	786 Points -32%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U	623 Points -46%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	23734 Points +382%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	19670 Points +300%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	12620 Points +157%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	12388 Points +152%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H	8619 Points +75%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i5-10210U	4920 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	4612 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29)	4404 Points -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3560 Points -28%
Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i5-8265U	3399 Points -31%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U	2734 Points -44%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	12450 Points +171%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	12192 Points +165%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	8801 Points +91%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H	8589 Points +87%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	6839 Points +49%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i5-10210U	4596 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3532 - 4638, n=29)	4250 Points -8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	4045 Points -12%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3707 Points -19%
Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i5-8265U	3533 Points -23%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U	2740 Points -40%

3DMark 11 Performance		5085 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		14266 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3487 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		1279 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	117 fps +109%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	82 fps +46%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	57 fps +2%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	56 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (24 - 56, n=8)	46.6 fps -17%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230	32 fps -43%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	31 fps -45%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	30 fps -46%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 9	29 fps -48%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	56 fps +195%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	53 fps +179%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	33 fps +74%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	19 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (7 - 19, n=8)	16.3 fps -14%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	11 fps -42%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230	10 fps -47%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 9	8 fps -58%

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	188 fps +176%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	186.8 fps +174%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M	165 (146^min - 187^max) fps +142%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	68.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (47.4 - 70, n=24)	60.8 fps -11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	56.4 fps -17%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	42.6 fps -37%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 9	41.9 fps -38%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	142.6 fps +275%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	114.8 fps +202%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	38 fps
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	36.8 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (30 - 40, n=27)	35.3 fps -7%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	25.6 fps -33%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	89.9 fps +318%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M	72 (62^min - 79^max) fps +235%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	60.4 fps +181%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	21.5 fps
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	20.1 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (16.3 - 23.1, n=27)	20.1 fps -7%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	14.2 fps -34%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 9	13.3 fps -38%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	52.2 fps +346%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M	43.6 (36^min - 48^max) fps +273%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	34.4 fps +194%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	11.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9 - 16, n=24)	11.6 fps -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	10 fps -15%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	9 fps -23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 9	8.1 fps -31%

BioShock Infinite
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	323.6 fps +71%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	224.2 fps +18%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M	201 fps +6%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	189.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (133.9 - 212, n=14)	187.3 fps -1%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230	151.5 fps -20%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	144 fps -24%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 9	117.9 fps -38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	109.6 fps -42%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	238.3 fps +103%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	195.6 fps +66%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	117.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (98.4 - 117.5, n=14)	109.1 fps -7%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	84.2 fps -28%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230	82.8 fps -30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	73 fps -38%
1366x768 High Preset
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	206.8 fps +106%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	180.9 fps +80%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M	169 fps +68%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	147.7 fps +47%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	100.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (84 - 100.5, n=14)	93.6 fps -7%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	76.4 fps -24%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230	70.2 fps -30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	61.5 fps -39%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M	123 fps +225%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	107.4 fps +184%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	81.7 fps +116%
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	62.1 fps +64%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	37.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (32.3 - 38.1, n=14)	35.7 fps -6%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	28.4 fps -25%
Asus VivoBook 14 F412FJ-EB084T Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX230	27.96 fps -26%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	22.6 fps -40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 9	20.5 fps -46%

MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ: Ø37.7 (36-40)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	189.7	117.5	100.5	37.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	68.1	38	21.5	11.7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	56	19	12

	MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE Quadro P520, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-256G	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Noise		1%	3%	-10%	3%	6%
off / environment *	28.7	28.4 1%	29.3 -2%	29.8 -4%	29.2 -2%	28.4 1%
Idle Minimum *	29.5	28.4 4%	29.3 1%	29.9 -1%	29.2 1%	28.4 4%
Idle Average *	29.5	28.4 4%	29.3 1%	29.9 -1%	29.2 1%	28.4 4%
Idle Maximum *	29.5	28.4 4%	29.3 1%	29.9 -1%	29.2 1%	28.6 3%
Load Average *	33.4	33.9 -1%	33.3 -0%	43 -29%	33.3 -0%	31.5 6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	37.9	39.8 -5%		45.4 -20%
Load Maximum *	40.5	40.2 1%	33.3 18%	46.1 -14%	33.3 18%	33.1 18%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso		29.5 / 29.5 / 29.5 dB
Carga		33.4 / 40.5 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.7 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


37 °C	47.6 °C	27.8 °C
32 °C	38.2 °C	28.2 °C
26.8 °C	25 °C	25.2 °C

Máximo: 47.6 °C
Médio: 32 °C


35 °C	58.2 °C	43.4 °C
32.4 °C	43.6 °C	37.4 °C
29 °C	31.8 °C	31.6 °C

Máximo: 58.2 °C
Médio: 38 °C

alimentação elétrica 57 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


21.4 °C	21.8 °C	20 °C
21.2 °C	21.2 °C	20.6 °C
20.4 °C	20 °C	20 °C

Máximo: 21.8 °C
Médio: 20.7 °C


24 °C	26.2 °C	25.2 °C
24.2 °C	25 °C	25.6 °C
23.4 °C	24 °C	25 °C

Máximo: 26.2 °C
Médio: 24.7 °C

Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


35 °C	41.8 °C	25 °C
28.8 °C	34 °C	25.6 °C
25 °C	23.4 °C	23.2 °C

Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 29.1 °C


31.2 °C	50 °C	42.2 °C
29.4 °C	39.6 °C	34.8 °C
26.8 °C	29.4 °C	30.2 °C

Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.2 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.7 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.9 °C / 1.7 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 0.44 Watt
Ocioso	4.2 / 5.9 / 7.2 Watt
Carga	63.4 / 67.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14"	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 2560x1440, 14"
Power Consumption		-79%	2%	-90%	-70%	7%
Idle Minimum *	4.2	5 -19%	3.2 24%	6.2 -48%	3.7 12%	3 29%
Idle Average *	5.9	13.2 -124%	7 -19%	9.6 -63%	12.1 -105%	6.3 -7%
Idle Maximum *	7.2	24 -233%	8.9 -24%	21.2 -194%	17 -136%	8.9 -24%
Load Average *	63.4	70 -10%	47.6 25%	104.3 -65%	91.5 -44%	40.8 36%
Witcher 3 ultra *	53.5	63.3 -18%		91.7 -71%	103 -93%
Load Maximum *	67.4	114 -69%	63.1 6%	135.3 -101%	102.3 -52%	67.5 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		16h 26min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 35min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 45min

	MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh	Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 71 Wh	Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh	Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh
Battery Runtime		4%	32%	-8%	24%	-3%
Reader / Idle	986		1289 31%		910 -8%
WiFi v1.3	515	537 4%	503 -2%	636 23%	467 -9%	718 39%
Load	105		174 66%	64 -39%	199 90%	58 -45%
Witcher 3 ultra						54

Pro

+ Excelentes opções de portas para um subportátil

+ Tela bem calibrada de fábrica

+ Atraente e muito leve

+ Bom desempenho do GPS

+ Adaptador de CA pequeno

+ Acessível

Contra

- Desempenho de CPU abaixo da média; sustentabilidade pobre do desempenho Turbo Boost

- Sem 4K UHD, Thunderbolt 3, Core i7, ou opções gráficas GTX graphics

- As atualizações de RAM e SSD não são amigáveis com o usuário

- Não é possível carregar via USB Tipo C

- Localização da webcam não ideal

- A rigidez do chassi poderia ser melhor

- As teclas são esponjosas e pouco profundas

- Desempenho lento do leitor de cartões SD

- Sem infravermelhos ou leitor de digitais

- RAM de apenas um canal

In review: MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US. Test unit provided by Xotic PC

Depois de mergulhar nos portáteis de jogos e portáteis profissionais por tanto tempo, a MSI agora está pronta para entrar no mercado subportáteis com o Modern 14. As melhores características do Modern 14 são principalmente visuais; a tela de 14 polegadas está bem calibrada e pronta para uso, enquanto tem um peso amigável para viajar, a seleção saudável de portas e os gráficos opcionais da GeForce MX250 beneficiam diretamente o público-alvo.

As principais desvantagens do Modern 14 são a rigidez do chassi, capacidade de atualização, a RAM de canal único e resposta do teclado. As superfícies se flexionam e rangem mais do que a maioria dos portáteis de escritório da Dell, Lenovo ou HP, enquanto atualizações comuns como RAM ou armazenamento são dificultadas. As teclas do teclado estão no lado suave e poderiam ter se beneficiado mais da resposta mais nítida para servir melhor os datilógrafos.

Outras desvantagens incluem a webcam "nose cam", a ausência de um leitor de digitais ou suporte para Thunderbolt 3, 8 GB de RAM de canal único e desempenho médio da CPU do Core i5-10210U. No entanto, menos de US$ 900 é um preço justo, desde que você conheça os pontos fortes e fracos do sistema.

Este não é o portátil de escritório do seu pai. O MSI Modern 14 tem como alvo usuários de escritório mais jovens e criadores de conteúdo com seu design visualmente atraente e muito leve quando comparado às soluções de escritório de gama média da Dell, HP ou Lenovo.

MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US - 01/27/2020 v7 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

71 / 98 → 73%

Teclado

75%

Mouse

77%

Conectividade

46 / 80 → 58%

Peso

72 / 20-75 → 95%

Bateria

83%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

65 / 78 → 83%

Desempenho da aplicação

84 / 95 → 88%

Temperatura

88%

Ruído

93%

Audio

70%

Camera

35 / 85 → 41%

Médio

73%

81%

Office - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5243 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI Modern 14 A10RB: Mais leve do que parece

Allen Ngo, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison