Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GT76 9SG: O Titã dos Portáteis de Jogos

Projetado para ser poderoso.

O novíssimo GT76 Titan DT da MSI deve ser especialmente atraente para os gamers apaixonados que podem viver com um chassi pesado e enorme. Graças ao Core i9-9900K e à GeForce RTX 2080, o portátil de 17 polegadas oferece muita potência para jogos modernos.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 06/24/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Test device courtesy of MSI Taiwan

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG (GT76 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i9-9900K 8 x 3.6 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-R, socketed

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1575 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 425.31, Optimus

Memória

64 GB

, 4x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados; quantidade máxima de RAM: 128 GB

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Cannon Lake Z390 (Cannon Lake-H)

Disco rígido

2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), 512 GB

, NVMe SSDs + WDC WD10SPZX, 1 TB HDD, 5400 rpm, Slots: três slots M.2-2280 (um dos quais está livre) e uma baia de armazenamento de 2,5 polegadas

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Conexões

6 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Um conector para fones, um conector para microfone, Card Reader: MicroSD

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E3000 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 42 x 397 x 330

Bateria

90 Wh, 6250 mAh Lítio-Ion, 8 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: FHD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.1 Dynaudio, Teclado: chiclet-style, RGB, SteelSeries, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Dois adaptadores de CA de 230 watts, Diversas utilidades do fabricante, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

4.167 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.87 kg

Preço

4560 EUR

Links

MSI página inicial
MSI Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus ROG G703GX SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG MSI GE75 9SG DIN A4 ❌

Left side: power socket, one Gigabit Ethernet port, one Thunderbolt 3 port, two USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A ports, headphone jack, microphone jack

Right side: MicroSD card reader, two USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A ports,one USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C port, one Mini DisplayPort 1.4 port, HDMI 2.0 port

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	730 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	712 MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG G703GX Intel Wireless-AC 9560	682 MBit/s -7%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	680 MBit/s -7%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	629 MBit/s -14%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	690 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	673 MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG G703GX Intel Wireless-AC 9560	671 MBit/s -3%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	661 MBit/s -4%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	652 MBit/s -6%


378 cd/m²	380 cd/m²	357 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	396 cd/m²	355 cd/m²
380 cd/m²	373 cd/m²	353 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 396 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 372.7 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 396 cd/m²
Contraste: 1200:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.82
ΔE Greyscale 2.83 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 LG Philips 173WFG, IPS, 1920x1080	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160	MSI GE75 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080	Asus ROG G703GX AU Optronics B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080
Display		4%	33%	-1%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	62.3	66.3 6%	86.3 39%	61.5 -1%	64.1 3%
sRGB Coverage	93.4	96.9 4%	100 7%	92 -1%	93.3 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64.3	66.5 3%	99.1 54%	63.5 -1%	65.6 2%
Response Times		-37%	-268%	15%	7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	8 ?(4.4, 3.6)	13.2 ?(8, 5.2) -65%	41.6 ?(20.4, 21.2) -420%	7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4) 10%	7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4) 10%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(5.2, 4.8)	10.8 ?(6, 4.8) -8%	21.6 ?(9.6, 12) -116%	6.6 ?(3.2, 3.4) 34%	9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2) 4%
PWM Frequency	26040 ?(20)			26040 ?(10) 0%
Screen		-31%	-33%	2%	-44%
Brightness middle	396	335.2 -15%	343 -13%	400.7 1%	296 -25%
Brightness	373	297 -20%	328 -12%	372 0%	279 -25%
Brightness Distribution	89	82 -8%	82 -8%	89 0%	85 -4%
Black Level *	0.33	0.66 -100%	0.31 6%	0.34 -3%	0.25 24%
Contrast	1200	508 -58%	1106 -8%	1179 -2%	1184 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.04	2.02 1%	5.03 -147%	1.33 35%	4.77 -134%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.85	7.23 -88%	7.91 -105%	3.51 9%	9.08 -136%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.82	1.17 -43%	0.86 -5%	1.39 -70%	1.46 -78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.83	3.2 -13%	6.29 -122%	1.3 54%	5.83 -106%
Gamma	2.49 ^88%	2.16 ^102%	2.38 ^92%	2.24 ^98%	2.47 ^89%
CCT	7113 ^91%	6746 ^96%	6389 ^102%	6735 ^97%	8076 ^80%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59	61.3 4%	88 49%	58.2 -1%	60 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	94	96.9 3%	100 6%	92.1 -2%	93 -1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-21% / -25%	-89% / -50%	5% / 4%	-12% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.4 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

26040 Hz

≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1998 (1943.92-2022.14)

Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1875 (1847.15-1952.27)

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1887 (1858.65-1934.33)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2022 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

212 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4926 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

509 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)	278 Points +31%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K	212 Points
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K	207 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing Intel Core i9-9900K	207 Points -2%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	189 Points -11%
Asus ROG G703GX Intel Core i7-8750H	167 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)	3440 Points +70%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K	2022 Points
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K	1979 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing Intel Core i9-9900K	1944 Points -4%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	1721 Points -15%
Asus ROG G703GX Intel Core i7-8750H	1212 Points -40%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)	727 Points +43%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K	509 Points
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	441 Points -13%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)	8352 Points +70%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K	4926 Points
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	3712 Points -25%

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)	7813 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	7050 Points +7%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)	7006 Points +6%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)	6599 Points
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6306 Points -4%
Asus ROG G703GX GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5680 Points -14%

	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	MSI GE75 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Asus ROG G703GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		20%	25%	-3%	-15%
Write 4K	101.4	111.1 10%	183.2 81%	116.1 14%	90.4 -11%
Read 4K	40.57	45.47 12%	52.4 29%	44.98 11%	39.19 -3%
Write Seq	2229	2454 10%	1790 -20%	2370 6%	1863 -16%
Read Seq	2528	2212 -12%	1743 -31%	1465 -42%	2100 -17%
Write 4K Q32T1	379.6	622 64%	550 45%	337.5 -11%	260.2 -31%
Read 4K Q32T1	421.9	695 65%	648 54%	453.6 8%	297 -30%
Write Seq Q32T1	2439	2675 10%	3236 33%	2399 -2%	1870 -23%
Read Seq Q32T1	3199	3184 0%	3538 11%	3087 -4%	3471 9%

3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		58737 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		21988 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		10290 pontos
Ajuda

MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0): Ø95.9 (90-101)

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)	31461 Points +25%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	27080 Points +8%
Asus ROG G703GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	26223 Points +4%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	25126 Points
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	24623 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	23089 Points -8%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)	13142 Points +28%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	10720 Points +5%
Asus ROG G703GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	10364 Points +1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	10243 Points
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	9754 Points -5%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=112, last 2 years)	8736 Points +54%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5852 Points +3%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5660 Points
Asus ROG G703GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5649 Points 0%
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5538 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5383 Points -5%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)	128.5 fps +29%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K	101.1 fps +1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K	100 fps
Asus ROG G703GX GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H	99.7 fps 0%
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	95.3 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K	94.5 fps -5%

	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
The Witcher 3 (2015)		186	100		66.9
Apex Legends (2019)	144	144	144	128	75
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	128	121	108	96	57
Metro Exodus (2019)	109	82.2	68.3	54.4	35.6
Anthem (2019)	130	120	112	83.7	48.6
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)	212	171	101	79.2
The Division 2 (2019)	169	136	103	72	40
Anno 1800 (2019)	115	92.2	54.3	47.8	34.9
Rage 2 (2019)	144	122	119	78.1	39.1

Barulho

Ocioso		33 / 34 / 44 dB
Carga		47 / 59 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Asus ROG G703GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		4%	5%	10%	5%	19%
off / environment *	30	28.1 6%	30 -0%	28.2 6%	30 -0%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=154, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Minimum *	33	28.1 15%	30 9%	30.4 8%	30 9%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=155, last 2 years) 23%
Idle Average *	34	28.6 16%	33 3%	30.4 11%	35 -3%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=155, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Maximum *	44	51 -16%	35 20%	33.4 24%	41 7%	30.3 ?(23 - 47, n=155, last 2 years) 31%
Load Average *	47	51 -9%	44 6%	37.1 21%	44 6%	42.7 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=155, last 2 years) 9%
Witcher 3 ultra *	53	51 4%	55 -4%	54.2 -2%	51 4%
Load Maximum *	59	51 14%	58 2%	56.4 4%	52 12%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=154, last 2 years) 9%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


42 °C	42 °C	51 °C
41 °C	42 °C	42 °C
33 °C	36 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 40.3 °C


57 °C	53 °C	45 °C
50 °C	48 °C	45 °C
36 °C	33 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 57 °C
Médio: 44.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


25 °C	25 °C	25 °C
26 °C	26 °C	25 °C
26 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Máximo: 26 °C
Médio: 25.3 °C


24 °C	25 °C	26 °C
25 °C	26 °C	26 °C
24 °C	25 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 28 °C
Médio: 25.4 °C

Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


40 °C	43 °C	54 °C
40 °C	42 °C	44 °C
36 °C	37 °C	37 °C

Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 41.4 °C


54 °C	48 °C	39 °C
48 °C	44 °C	42 °C
42 °C	33 °C	33 °C

Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 42.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 52 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).

	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Asus ROG G703GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-10%	-6%	-21%	-5%	-3%
Maximum Upper Side *	51	47 8%	45 12%	48.8 4%	50 2%	46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=153, last 2 years) 10%
Maximum Bottom *	57	58.8 -3%	45 21%	52 9%	50 12%	49 ?(33.6 - 66, n=153, last 2 years) 14%
Idle Upper Side *	26	31 -19%	36 -38%	36.2 -39%	30 -15%	31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=153, last 2 years) -20%
Idle Bottom *	28	35 -25%	33 -18%	44.4 -59%	33 -18%	32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=153, last 2 years) -15%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	1.1 / 2.6 Watt
Ocioso	14 / 18 / 23 Watt
Carga	114 / 443 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Asus ROG G703GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-42%	-74%	8%	-4%	6%
Idle Minimum *	14	23.3 -66%	39 -179%	13.9 1%	5 64%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Average *	18	33.5 -86%	45 -150%	18.8 -4%	24 -33%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) -6%
Idle Maximum *	23	38.4 -67%	55 -139%	23.1 -0%	42 -83%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) -17%
Load Average *	114	114.1 -0%	122 -7%	112.3 1%	112 2%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=152, last 2 years) 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	283	339.5 -20%	259 8%	231 18%	284 -0%
Load Maximum *	443	485.1 -10%	346 22%	291.5 34%	320 28%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=153, last 2 years) 44%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		6h 49min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)		0h 52min

	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 82 Wh	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh	Asus ROG G703GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 96 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-31%	-30%	-3%	1%	43%
Reader / Idle	409	155 -62%	165 -60%		301 -26%	567 ?(155 - 1290, n=66, last 2 years) 39%
WiFi v1.3	302	127 -58%	135 -55%	294 -3%	238 -21%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years) 25%
Load	52	66 27%	65 25%		78 50%	85.7 ?(41 - 173, n=116, last 2 years) 65%
H.264			135		226	413 ?(129 - 837, n=78, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Muitas opções de manutenção e atualização

+ Muitas portas

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ Excelente desempenho

+ Iluminação RGB

+ Marcos finos

+ 144 Hz

Contra

- Muito barulhento sob carga

- Traseira muito grande

- Muito pesado

- Dois adaptadores de CA

- Sem G-Sync

MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG, review device provided courtesy of: MSI Taiwan.

O GT76 9SG Titan DT é um portátil extraordinário, pelo menos no que diz respeito ao preço e desempenho. O GT76 9SG Titan DT é um portátil extraordinário, pelo menos no que diz respeito ao preço e desempenho.

O desempenho de primeira classe é comprado às custas da quietude, o que pode assustar alguns clientes (recomendamos usar fones de ouvido quando estiver jogando no GT76). Uma vez que você põe ao lado o peso pesado, a parte traseira grande e os dois adaptadores de poder, realmente não há muito para reclamar.

O GT76 o atrai com muitas portas (Thunderbolt 3), bons dispositivos de entrada e uma qualidade de som decente. A qualidade da imagem da tela fina de 144 Hz é mais do que aceitável para um dispositivo com esse preço. E, claro, você não deve esquecer as opções expansivas de manutenção e atualização.