Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GT75VR 7RF Titan Pro (i7-7820HK, GTX 1080)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus G701VIK-BA049T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus G701VIK-BA049T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 274 cd/m²
Contraste: 1054:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 0.64 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware 17 R4 2560x1440, 17.3" | Asus G701VIK-BA049T B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), 1920x1080, 17.3" | SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -24% | -26% | -21% | 4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 90.3 | 90.6 0% | 66 -27% | 61.2 -32% | 68.8 -24% | 86.6 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 99.9 0% | 83.7 -16% | 82.9 -17% | 87.7 -12% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.8 | 84.7 -2% | 61.2 -29% | 60.5 -30% | 64.1 -26% | 99.5 15% |
| Response Times | -64% | -300% | -124% | -211% | -296% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 11.6 ? | 26 ? -124% | 45 ? -288% | 30 ? -159% | 38 ? -228% | 44 ? -279% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 6.8 ? | 7 ? -3% | 28 ? -312% | 12.8 ? -88% | 20 ? -194% | 28 ? -312% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | |||||
| Screen | -235% | -83% | -122% | -82% | -40% | |
| Brightness middle | 274 | 307 12% | 380 39% | 402.3 47% | 306 12% | 362 32% |
| Brightness | 262 | 284 8% | 362 38% | 372 42% | 299 14% | 344 31% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 85 -2% | 91 5% | 86 -1% | 91 5% | 85 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.25 4% | 0.37 -42% | 0.62 -138% | 0.27 -4% | 0.35 -35% |
| Contrast | 1054 | 1228 17% | 1027 -3% | 649 -38% | 1133 7% | 1034 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.36 | 9.65 -610% | 4.12 -203% | 5.6 -312% | 3.98 -193% | 2.46 -81% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.1 | 16.36 -299% | 8.19 -100% | 9.8 -139% | 7.29 -78% | 4.26 -4% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.64 | 10.07 -1473% | 3.95 -517% | 4.7 -634% | 4.15 -548% | 2.9 -353% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.12 104% | 2.47 89% | 2.14 103% | 2.45 90% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 6551 99% | 12145 54% | 6539 99% | 7519 86% | 7386 88% | 6120 106% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77 | 75 -3% | 55 -29% | 53.7 -30% | 58 -25% | 88 14% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 0% | 84 -16% | 82.2 -18% | 89 -11% | 100 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -100% /
-165% | -136% /
-100% | -91% /
-103% | -105% /
-87% | -111% /
-65% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 15 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
| Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
| Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5237 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5444 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5211 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0) | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0) | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB | Asus G701VIK-BA049T 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -4% | -23% | -38% | 9% | 6% | |
| Seq Read | 3137 | 2988 -5% | 2261 -28% | 1752 -44% | 3247 4% | 2746 -12% |
| Seq Write | 2352 | 2332 -1% | 1338 -43% | 735 -69% | 2520 7% | 1445 -39% |
| 4K Read | 50.1 | 46.75 -7% | 39.52 -21% | 35.61 -29% | 51 2% | 56.8 13% |
| 4K Write | 128.8 | 123.8 -4% | 133.8 4% | 113.4 -12% | 120.9 -6% | 175.9 37% |
| Score Read | 1412 | 1511 7% | 1118 -21% | 831 -41% | 1760 25% | 1858 32% |
| Score Write | 1289 | 1054 -18% | 930 -28% | 858 -33% | 1458 13% | 1187 -8% |
| Score Total | 3392 | 3310 -2% | 2581 -24% | 2072 -39% | 4088 21% | 3938 16% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| Asus G701VIK-BA049T | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19621 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 155671 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29451 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15851 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6563 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 144 | 75.9 | 52.2 | ||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 99.7 | 61.4 | 41.4 | ||
| Prey (2017) | 139 | 136 | 68.3 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 240 | 110 | |||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 178 | 105 | |||
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 115 | 90.1 | 32.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33 / 34 / 38 dB |
| Carga |
| 44 / 62 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G701VIK-BA049T i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 5% | 2% | 4% | 5% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.2 6% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33 | 34 -3% | 33 -0% | 35.6 -8% | 30 9% | 31 6% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 35 -3% | 35 -3% | 35.6 -5% | 31 9% | 34 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 37 3% | 37 3% | 35.7 6% | 36 5% | 37 3% |
| Load Average * | 44 | 39 11% | 40 9% | 50.2 -14% | 47 -7% | 44 -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 56 | 50.2 10% | 51 9% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 62 | 56 10% | 50 19% | 50.2 19% | 56 10% | 52 16% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G701VIK-BA049T i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 18% | 10% | 6% | 10% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46 | 39.8 13% | 44.2 4% | 49.6 -8% | 50.9 -11% | 47.5 -3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 57 | 47.8 16% | 43 25% | 56 2% | 44.6 22% | 56 2% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34 | 27.1 20% | 32.4 5% | 29.6 13% | 29.9 12% | 34.5 -1% |
| Idle Bottom * | 35 | 27.4 22% | 32.8 6% | 29.2 17% | 28.8 18% | 33.6 4% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (98 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 1 / 1.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 34 / 41 / 50 Watt |
| Carga |
106 / 320 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G701VIK-BA049T i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | 17% | 9% | 17% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 34 | 29 15% | 27 21% | 37.5 -10% | 24 29% | 32 6% |
| Idle Average * | 41 | 35 15% | 32 22% | 37.6 8% | 31 24% | 43 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 50 | 40 20% | 41 18% | 37.6 25% | 38 24% | 51 -2% |
| Load Average * | 106 | 94 11% | 102 4% | 122.4 -15% | 98 8% | 138 -30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 257 | 180.3 30% | 279 -9% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 320 | 315 2% | 248 22% | 277.4 13% | 320 -0% | 350 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75.2 Wh | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 88.8 Wh | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | Asus G701VIK-BA049T i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 93 Wh | SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 89 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 5% | 56% | 28% | 61% | 29% | |
| Reader / Idle | 182 | 313 72% | 276 52% | 342 88% | 222 22% | |
| H.264 | 148 | 145 -2% | 204 38% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 144 | 160 11% | 251 74% | 181 26% | 241 67% | 168 17% |
| Load | 65 | 90 38% | 69 6% | 83 28% | 97 49% |
Pro
Contra
Tudo dito, o GT75VR deixa uma impressão mista. Primeiro o bom: Comparado com o GT73VR que achamos bom a muito bom em grande parte, a MSI fez melhorias em várias seções. Assim, não apenas o som, mas também o teclado entram em uma classificação alta.
Exceto pelo layout incomum e o ruído de digitação extremamente proeminente, o teclado mecânico da SteelSeries é absolutamente agradável. Depois de digitar em um modelo correspondente, o usuário nunca mais desejará retornar para um teclado tradicional. A mudança se sente tão revolucionária como quando se muda de HD para SSD.
Outros componentes que já eram convincentes no GT73VR foram adotados sem muita modificação. Por exemplo, as excelentes opções de manutenção (4x RAM, 4 dispositivos de armazenamento, GPU removível, etc.), a conectividade generosa, incluindo uma porta Thunderbolt 3 ou o painel altamente responsivo e de cores realistas de 120 Hz com suporte para G-Sync.
Infelizmente, regressões que nem sempre entendemos, são vistas em algumas áreas. Por que o touchpad tem que ser emborrachado (os dedos rapidamente ficam presos) é tão intrigante como o nível de ruído extremamente elevado das ventoinhas no modo 3D, que é ainda mais alto do que o GT73VR, apesar de um chassi mais grosso e maior peso. Por isso os usuários sensíveis ao ruído devem evitar o GT75VR. O mesmo é verdade para os usuários que estão frequentemente em movimento e não querem sempre reiniciar para mudar da Nvidia para a GPU da Intel para ter uma duração útil da bateria.
A máquina de 17-polegadas continua sendo um substituto de desktop puro que somente se vê bem no escritório em casa.
O ROG Zeyphrus GX501 da Asus, por exemplo, demonstra ser mais fino e mais silencioso é possível (com desempenho limitado). Os compradores que não tenham problema com as carcaças massivas também podem optar pelo Acer Predator 17 X, Alienware 17 R4, Asus G701VIK ou Schenker XMG U727 como alternativas similares. Eles também colheram em uma classificação similarmente alta no teste (85 a 88%). No entanto, eles não têm um teclado mecânico.
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
- 08/08/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
