Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GT75 8RG Titan (i9-8950HK, GTX 1080, Full-HD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Aorus X9 DT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus G703 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years) | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Aorus X9 DT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus G703 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 240 cd/m²
Contraste: 1091:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.54
ΔE Greyscale 1.62 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080 | Aorus X9 DT AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus G703 AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx AU Optronics B173HW01, IPS, 1920x1080 | Alienware 17 R4 TN LED, 2560x1440 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -19% | -20% | -24% | -23% | -27% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 90.9 | 66.8 -27% | 65.5 -28% | 66 -27% | 63.7 -30% | 61.2 -33% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 92.1 -8% | 92.4 -8% | 83.7 -16% | 88.2 -12% | 82.9 -17% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.2 | 67.3 -22% | 66.6 -23% | 61.2 -29% | 64.2 -26% | 60.5 -30% |
Response Times | -122% | -110% | -432% | -457% | -202% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8 ? | 18.4 ? -130% | 17.6 ? -120% | 45 ? -463% | 44 ? -450% | 30 ? -275% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.6 ? | 12 ? -114% | 11.2 ? -100% | 28 ? -400% | 31.6 ? -464% | 12.8 ? -129% |
PWM Frequency | 26000 ? | |||||
Screen | 11% | -33% | -31% | -19% | -60% | |
Brightness middle | 240 | 280 17% | 274 14% | 380 58% | 343 43% | 402.3 68% |
Brightness | 248 | 262 6% | 268 8% | 362 46% | 332 34% | 372 50% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 86 4% | 80 -4% | 91 10% | 83 0% | 86 4% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.22 -0% | 0.29 -32% | 0.37 -68% | 0.35 -59% | 0.62 -182% |
Contrast | 1091 | 1273 17% | 945 -13% | 1027 -6% | 980 -10% | 649 -41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.14 | 1.78 17% | 3.99 -86% | 4.12 -93% | 3.35 -57% | 5.6 -162% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.04 | 3.91 22% | 7.33 -45% | 8.19 -63% | 5.62 -12% | 9.8 -94% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.54 | 1.79 -16% | 2.5 -62% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.62 | 0.74 54% | 4.14 -156% | 3.95 -144% | 2.4 -48% | 4.7 -190% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.43 91% | 2.58 85% | 2.47 89% | 2.35 94% | 2.14 103% |
CCT | 6846 95% | 6494 100% | 7352 88% | 6539 99% | 6495 100% | 7519 86% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77 | 60 -22% | 60 -22% | 55 -29% | 57 -26% | 53.7 -30% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 92 -8% | 92 -8% | 84 -16% | 88 -12% | 82.2 -18% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -43% /
-13% | -54% /
-40% | -162% /
-83% | -166% /
-74% | -96% /
-72% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise | |
↘ 1.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise | |
↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26000 Hz | ≤ 19 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 26000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 19 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=170, last 2 years) | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Aorus X9 DT | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Asus G703 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5720 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5801 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 6558 pontos | |
Ajuda |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Aorus X9 DT Transcend TS1TMTE850 | Asus G703 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0) | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -41% | 13% | -19% | -18% | -35% | |
Seq Read | 3058 | 1518 -50% | 3177 4% | 2261 -26% | 2352 -23% | 1752 -43% |
Seq Write | 2196 | 1019 -54% | 2556 16% | 1338 -39% | 1145 -48% | 735 -67% |
4K Read | 38.37 | 22.23 -42% | 47.61 24% | 39.52 3% | 44.81 17% | 35.61 -7% |
4K Write | 97.7 | 98.9 1% | 148.4 52% | 133.8 37% | 116.2 19% | 113.4 16% |
Score Read | 1691 | 828 -51% | 1633 -3% | 1118 -34% | 1248 -26% | 831 -51% |
Score Write | 1553 | 916 -41% | 1519 -2% | 930 -40% | 1029 -34% | 858 -45% |
Score Total | 4066 | 2145 -47% | 3962 -3% | 2581 -37% | 2862 -30% | 2072 -49% |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
Aorus X9 DT | |
Asus G703 | |
Alienware 17 R4 | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx |
3DMark 11 Performance | 23175 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 193287 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 42660 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18738 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Alienware 17 R4 | |
Asus G703 | |
Aorus X9 DT | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 148 | 76.8 | ||
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 110 | 60.5 | ||
FIFA 18 (2017) | 427 | 418 | ||
Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 145 | 141 | ||
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 139 | 121 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 120 | 113 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 32 / 34 / 37 dB |
HDD |
| 34 dB |
Carga |
| 43 / 62 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | 1% | 3% | 11% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.3 6% | 28.2 6% |
Idle Minimum * | 32 | 36 -13% | 35 -9% | 33 -3% | 31.5 2% | 35.6 -11% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 37 -9% | 36 -6% | 35 -3% | 31.6 7% | 35.6 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 37 | 43 -16% | 38 -3% | 37 -0% | 31.6 15% | 35.7 4% |
Load Average * | 43 | 50 -16% | 46 -7% | 40 7% | 36.8 14% | 50.2 -17% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 57 | 57 -0% | 48 16% | 48.2 15% | 50.2 12% | |
Load Maximum * | 62 | 61 2% | 54 13% | 50 19% | 52.1 16% | 50.2 19% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -2% | -13% | -5% | 14% | -9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 43 9% | 55 -17% | 44.2 6% | 35.6 24% | 49.6 -6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 55 -4% | 54 -2% | 43 19% | 39 26% | 56 -6% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 27 -4% | 29 -12% | 32.4 -25% | 24.2 7% | 29.6 -14% |
Idle Bottom * | 27 | 29 -7% | 32 -19% | 32.8 -21% | 27.4 -1% | 29.2 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Aorus X9 DT audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 1.8 / 2.2 Watt |
Ocioso | 31 / 35 / 45 Watt |
Carga |
130 / 374 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | 11% | 17% | 31% | 9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 31 | 28 10% | 26 16% | 27 13% | 21.6 30% | 37.5 -21% |
Idle Average * | 35 | 37 -6% | 30 14% | 32 9% | 26.4 25% | 37.6 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 45 | 40 11% | 37 18% | 41 9% | 26.6 41% | 37.6 16% |
Load Average * | 130 | 109 16% | 123 5% | 102 22% | 95.6 26% | 122.4 6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 268 | 256 4% | 257 4% | 221.7 17% | 180.3 33% | |
Load Maximum * | 374 | 353 6% | 341 9% | 248 34% | 199.6 47% | 277.4 26% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 88.8 Wh | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 17% | -14% | 33% | 71% | 17% | |
Reader / Idle | 225 | 252 12% | 200 -11% | 313 39% | 348 55% | 276 23% |
H.264 | 174 | 143 -18% | 204 17% | |||
Load | 63 | 77 22% | 54 -14% | 90 43% | 117 86% | 69 10% |
WiFi v1.3 | 190 | 151 | 251 | 333 | 181 |
Pro
Contra
Se você aceitar o seu tamanho e peso, o MSI GT75 8RG é um substituto de desktop de alta qualidade, bem equipado e incrivelmente poderoso que lembra os clássicos PCs de torre. O GT75 tem extensas opções de manutenção e atualização e muitas conexões, entre outras coisas.
Além disso, a MSI integra uma tela de 120 Hz com alta velocidade e cores precisas e um sistema de som decente. Os dispositivos de entrada são igualmente impressionantes Um dos destaques do GT75 é seu teclado mecânico; cuja experiência de digitação está muito afrente da concorrência.
No entanto, não podemos recomendar totalmente o GT75 8RG. Como no seu predecessor, o ruído do ventilador é um verdadeiro ponto de atrito. Embora o dispositivo de 17 polegadas tenha praticamente 6 cm de espessura, os ventiladores são extremamente barulhentos sob uso intenso. Eles são tão barulhentos que você precisará usar fones de ouvido quando estiver jogando. O mesmo é verdade para o Aorus X9 DT, mas este dispositivo tem apenas 3 cm de espessura. Esse desempenho comparável mostra que o sistema de resfriamento da MSI é um pouco deficiente.
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
-
05/16/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser