Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG: Um portátil para jogos fino e potente com boa duração da bateria
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 366 cd/m²
Contraste: 1262:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.71
ΔE Greyscale 1.93 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080 | Dell G7 17 7790 AU Optronics AUO409D, B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080 | Alienware m17 P37E AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 3840x2160 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -2% | 33% | -2% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 62.6 | 65.2 4% | 61.9 -1% | 86.4 38% | 62.9 0% | 64 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.5 | 92.2 -1% | 89.6 -4% | 99.9 7% | 87.8 -6% | 90.4 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.7 | 66.5 3% | 63.2 -2% | 99.1 53% | 63.9 -1% | 64.8 0% |
| Response Times | -92% | -80% | -287% | 2% | -73% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.2 ? | 18.8 ? -161% | 17.2 ? -139% | 35.6 ? -394% | 7.2 ? -0% | 15.6 ? -117% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 12 ? -20% | 12 ? -20% | 28 ? -180% | 9.6 ? 4% | 12.8 ? -28% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 971 ? -96% | ||||
| Screen | -32% | -77% | -135% | -30% | -104% | |
| Brightness middle | 366 | 304 -17% | 308.6 -16% | 357.9 -2% | 288 -21% | 299.1 -18% |
| Brightness | 343 | 289 -16% | 299 -13% | 347 1% | 287 -16% | 273 -20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 92 1% | 94 3% | 91 0% | 81 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.26 10% | 0.29 -0% | 0.33 -14% | 0.2 31% | 0.27 7% |
| Contrast | 1262 | 1169 -7% | 1064 -16% | 1085 -14% | 1440 14% | 1108 -12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.51 | 2.65 -75% | 4.26 -182% | 6.57 -335% | 2.33 -54% | 5.07 -236% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.22 | 6.11 -90% | 7.83 -143% | 9.86 -206% | 5.34 -66% | 10.55 -228% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.71 | 1.5 -111% | 2.93 -313% | 6.74 -849% | 2.47 -248% | 3.31 -366% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.93 | 2.75 -42% | 5 -159% | 4.3 -123% | 1.19 38% | 6.8 -252% |
| Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.46 89% | 2.07 106% | 2.6 85% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 6881 94% | 6763 96% | 7488 87% | 6403 102% | 6710 97% | 7805 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60 0% | 57.8 -4% | 88.4 47% | 57 -5% | 58.5 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94 | 92 -2% | 89.2 -5% | 100 6% | 88 -6% | 89.9 -4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -41% /
-37% | -53% /
-64% | -130% /
-123% | -10% /
-21% | -59% /
-81% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25510 Hz | ≤ 17 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG (Edge 44) | |
| Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=175, last 2 years) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG (Edge 44) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG (Edge 44) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 6948 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4461 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4193 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5716 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5804 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
| Dell G7 17 7790 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Dell G7 17 7790 | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Dell G7 17 7790 | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | Dell G7 17 7790 Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G | Alienware m17 P37E SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -21% | -56% | -17% | -27% | -18% | |
| Write 4K | 95.5 | 92.7 -3% | 78.6 -18% | 120.2 26% | 92.4 -3% | 99.8 5% |
| Read 4K | 42.59 | 41.4 -3% | 31.89 -25% | 44.3 4% | 39.59 -7% | 40.81 -4% |
| Write Seq | 2851 | 1363 -52% | 230.4 -92% | 1278 -55% | 1221 -57% | 1385 -51% |
| Read Seq | 2696 | 1259 -53% | 925 -66% | 1389 -48% | 1005 -63% | 2089 -23% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 402.6 | 289.7 -28% | 159.1 -60% | 436.2 8% | 292.5 -27% | 380 -6% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 443.9 | 337.5 -24% | 315.6 -29% | 515 16% | 330.8 -25% | 445.5 0% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3420 | 3332 -3% | 230.7 -93% | 1157 -66% | 2385 -30% | 1380 -60% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3514 | 3477 -1% | 1323 -62% | 2671 -24% | 3339 -5% | 3471 -1% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 37968 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 21390 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 34168 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17182 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7518 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
| Dell G7 17 7790 | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| Dell G7 17 7790 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (120 - 131, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
| Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 331.1 | 289.6 | 263.6 | 163.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 286.3 | 217.2 | 135 | 76.9 |
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 172 | 161 | 134 | 92 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 82.5 | 80.7 | 81.3 | |
| Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 160.9 | 87.9 | 63.5 | 43.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 127.4 | 100.7 | 74 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 123 | 109 | 99 | 95 |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 116 | 98 | 94 | 85 |
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 98.5 | 93.9 | 77.7 | 41.2 |
| Rage 2 (2019) | 206.6 | 112.2 | 96.1 | 93.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 32 / 38 dB |
| Carga |
| 47 / 49 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Dell G7 17 7790 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 10% | 4% | 2% | 10% | 12% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29 3% | 28.2 6% | 28.2 6% | 29 3% | 28.3 6% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 29 6% | 28.6 8% | 28.2 9% | 29 6% | 31.5 -2% | 25.5 ? 18% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 32 -0% | 28.6 11% | 28.2 12% | 32 -0% | 31.6 1% | 27.2 ? 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 33 13% | 28.6 25% | 31 18% | 33 13% | 31.6 17% | 30.3 ? 20% |
| Load Average * | 47 | 42 11% | 31.8 32% | 50.8 -8% | 47 -0% | 32.3 31% | 42.6 ? 9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 49 -2% | 50.6 -5% | 50.8 -6% | 49 -2% | 43 10% | |
| Load Maximum * | 49 | 49 -0% | 50.8 -4% | 50.8 -4% | 51 -4% | 45.5 7% | 53.4 ? -9% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 65 °C / 149 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-16.1 °C / -29 F).
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Dell G7 17 7790 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 11% | 1% | 2% | 11% | 13% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 55 | 47 15% | 46.6 15% | 55 -0% | 53 4% | 38.6 30% | 46.2 ? 16% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 65 | 56 14% | 57 12% | 60 8% | 50 23% | 43.6 33% | 49.1 ? 24% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 28 7% | 34.4 -15% | 30.4 -1% | 27 10% | 30.2 -1% | 31.2 ? -4% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32 | 30 6% | 34.6 -8% | 31.8 1% | 30 6% | 35 -9% | 32.2 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GE75 9SG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 1.8 / 2.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 13 / 17 / 25 Watt |
| Carga |
96 / 239 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Dell G7 17 7790 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | 10% | -36% | -16% | -15% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 13 | 13 -0% | 9.5 27% | 21.2 -63% | 19 -46% | 20.2 -55% | 13.5 ? -4% |
| Idle Average * | 17 | 16 6% | 16.2 5% | 29.6 -74% | 22 -29% | 27.2 -60% | 19 ? -12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25 | 21 16% | 23.8 5% | 34 -36% | 30 -20% | 28.7 -15% | 26.7 ? -7% |
| Load Average * | 96 | 96 -0% | 101.7 -6% | 130.9 -36% | 104 -8% | 90.8 5% | 106.8 ? -11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 156 | 172 -10% | 155 1% | 177.5 -14% | 167 -7% | 152.1 2% | |
| Load Maximum * | 239 | 191 20% | 172.2 28% | 219.7 8% | 203 15% | 165.4 31% | 250 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 46.74 Wh | Dell G7 17 7790 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 60 Wh | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -32% | 13% | -11% | -34% | -47% | 11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 461 | 315 -32% | 511 11% | 543 18% | 298 -35% | 565 ? 23% | |
| H.264 | 410 | 408 ? 0% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 357 | 224 -37% | 236 -34% | 296 -17% | 230 -36% | 190 -47% | 376 ? 5% |
| Load | 74 | 55 -26% | 119 61% | 49 -34% | 52 -30% | 85.8 ? 16% |
Pro
Contra
O MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG é um elegante portátil para jogos de 17,3 polegadas que oferece um grande impacto. Infelizmente, embora o dispositivo pareça elegante para os padrões de jogos, ele pode ser mais robusto. Esperamos que a MSI aborde isso com modelos subsequentes reforçando ou atualizando o chassi.
Internamente, as coisas se moldam muito bem, com o Core i7-9750H e a GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q combinados para oferecer excelente desempenho em jogos. Esses componentes permitem que o 9SG tire proveito de sua tela de 144 Hz, com a maioria dos títulos triple-A modernos em média em torno de 90 FPS, mesmo com configurações gráficas máximas. A tela tem ganha uma pontuação alta por causa de seus ângulos de visão estáveis, alto brilho, boa relação de contraste, tempos de resposta curtos e reprodução de cores precisa.
O MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG é um poderoso portátil para jogos que deve deixar a maioria dos jogadores felizes. No entanto, sua carcaça frágil e alto preço de varejo são razões para procurar outras opções.
Também gostamos que a MSI tenha incluído dois SSDs NVMe em RAID-0. A decisão dá ao 9SG velocidades de transferência comparativamente boas e um bom armazenamento de 2 TB. Você pode até mesmo adicionar uma terceira unidade M.2 2280 caso precise de mais espaço, embora, infelizmente, a MSI tenha optado por um conector SATA III mais lento em vez de NVMe.
O 9SG também tem uma duração de bateria relativamente boa graças à sua bateria de 80,25 Wh e deve durar um dia inteiro entre as cargas. A carcaça frágil também ajuda a manter o peso baixo, com o 9SG pesando apenas 2,28 kg (~5lb). Incluindo o Thunderbolt 3 foi uma medida sensata, e embora deva haver portas suficientes para a maioria das pessoas, a MSI tinha espaço para adicionar mais algumas. No geral, o MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG é uma boa opção para aqueles que estão no mercado por um portátil móvel de 17,3 polegadas. Se você pode ignorar as deficiências com seu design, o 9SG o recompensará com um desempenho de ponta em um lindo painel de 144 Hz.
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
- 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
