Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS: Visualmente discreto, acusticamente perceptível

Name: MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Brand: MSI

Reforma extrema.

Enquanto o GS65 teve algumas dificuldades contra os concorrentes em muitos aspectos, a MSI apresenta um sucessor completamente atualizado com o GS66. Descubra em nossa análise o que mudou para melhor.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/02/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Comet Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook MSI

Test device courtesy of MSI Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS (GS66 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i9-10980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 930 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, Full-HD, G-Sync, Brilhante: não, 300 Hz

placa mãe

Intel HM470

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB

, NVMe, slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS

Conexões

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 358 x 248

Bateria

99.99 Wh, 6578 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 4 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD (720p)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0 Dynaudio, Teclado: chiclet RGB SteelSeries, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 230 Watts, guia de início rápido, Dragon Center, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.167 kg, Suprimento de energia: 732 g

Preço

2849 EUR

Links

MSI página inicial
MSI Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.2 kg	20 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84 % v7 ^(old)	08/2019	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.1 kg	18 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84 % v7 ^(old)	05/2019	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.1 kg	19 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.3 % v7 ^(old)	09/2019	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.4 kg	19.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.1 kg	22 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Size Comparison

HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA DIN A4 ❌

Left side: power, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI, USB-A 3.1 Gen2

Right side: 3.5 mm audio port, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen2, RJ45-LAN

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1330 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1140 MBit/s -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	678 MBit/s -49%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Wireless-AC 9560	654 MBit/s -51%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	554 MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1360 MBit/s +3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1320 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	696 MBit/s -47%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	694 MBit/s -47%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Wireless-AC 9560	688 MBit/s -48%

ColorChecker MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS: 14.2 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 22.63 ∆E


298 cd/m²	308 cd/m²	306 cd/m²
314 cd/m²	316 cd/m²	323 cd/m²
303 cd/m²	307 cd/m²	320 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 323 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 310.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 316 cd/m²
Contraste: 1505:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-7%	-5%	-6%	-8%
Display P3 Coverage	69.5	64.6 -7%	65.3 -6%	66.2 -5%	64 -8%
sRGB Coverage	99.6	92.6 -7%	95.5 -4%	92.3 -7%	90.3 -9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.8	66 -7%	66.5 -6%	67.2 -5%	65.4 -8%
Response Times		23%	-13%	-11%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14 ?(6.8, 7.2)	5.2 ?(2.6, 2.6) 63%	15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6) -9%	15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6) -9%	9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8) 31%
Response Time Black / White *	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) -17%	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) -17%	10.8 ?(6, 4.8) -13%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -25%
PWM Frequency			23580 ?(24)
Screen		-7%	-8%	-34%	-12%
Brightness middle	316	288 -9%	266 -16%	324.8 3%	313 -1%
Brightness	311	265 -15%	248 -20%	316 2%	295 -5%
Brightness Distribution	92	84 -9%	89 -3%	84 -9%	89 -3%
Black Level *	0.21	0.22 -5%	0.31 -48%	0.26 -24%	0.3 -43%
Contrast	1505	1309 -13%	858 -43%	1249 -17%	1043 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.03	3.22 -6%	2.78 8%	4.96 -64%	3.33 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.32	6.26 14%	5.96 19%	8.95 -22%	6.25 15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.1	1.5 -36%	0.91 17%	3.23 -194%	1.77 -61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.9	3.43 12%	3.58 8%	5 -28%	3.1 21%
Gamma	2.42 ^91%	2.41 ^91%	2.46 ^89%	2.21 ^100%	2.51 ^88%
CCT	7439 ^87%	7290 ^89%	7186 ^90%	7742 ^84%	6930 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	65	60 -8%	62 -5%	59.8 -8%	59 -9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	93 -7%	96 -4%	91.8 -8%	90 -10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / -4%	-9% / -8%	-17% / -26%	-6% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)

Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)

HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points +51%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	477 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	457 Points -4%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	442 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	434 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H	429 Points -10%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points +122%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3713 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	2448 Points -34%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H	2427 Points -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	2384 Points -36%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	2298 Points -38%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points +37%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	201 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	192 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	189 Points -6%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	181 Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H	175 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +108%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1635 (1518.31^min - 1635.12^max) Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	1188 Points -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	1181 Points -28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H	1115 Points -32%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	1057 Points -35%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	295 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * +42%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS +20%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5227 MIPS
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS +93%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	43786 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points +47%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1283 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points +95%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	7634 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +91%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	12.2 fps

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	52.4 s *
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +9%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.592 sec *
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1635 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

131 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

201 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3713 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

477 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points +20%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6490 Points
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	5991 Points -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	5746 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	5697 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001	5522 Points -15%

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	1916 μs *

* ... smaller is better

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-4%	-4%	2%	-12%
Write 4K	131.3	108.8 -17%	115.5 -12%	137.4 5%	108.7 -17%
Read 4K	45.84	40.31 -12%	58 27%	41.37 -10%	41.4 -10%
Write Seq	2370	2488 5%	1555 -34%	2500 5%	1083 -54%
Read Seq	1509	1916 27%	2590 72%	1576 4%	917 -39%
Write 4K Q32T1	481.5	382.4 -21%	369.3 -23%	446.7 -7%	468.5 -3%
Read 4K Q32T1	560	421.8 -25%	441.7 -21%	522 -7%	530 -5%
Write Seq Q32T1	2392	2542 6%	1547 -35%	2796 17%	3057 28%
Read Seq Q32T1	3232	3320 3%	2969 -8%	3415 6%	3422 6%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3232 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2392 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 560 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 481.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1509 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2370 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.84 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.3 MB/s

3DMark 11 Performance		21934 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		45202 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		17312 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		7272 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø71.1 (67-75)

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +65%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	18992 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18060 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	17419 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	17335 Points -9%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	16483 Points -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +84%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	7084 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6748 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6716 Points -5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6419 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6387 Points -10%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=114, last 2 years)	8661 Points +102%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	4280 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3738 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3721 Points -13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3719 Points -13%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3717 Points -13%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +73%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	25135 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22749 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22005 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	21861 Points -13%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18434 Points -27%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +80%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK	70.5 (55^min) fps
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	69 fps -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	64.4 (54^min) fps -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	64.1 fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	60.4 (49^min) fps -14%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)	182	174	153	83.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)			131	70.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	153	138	128	120
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	113	97.4	82.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)			102	91
Battlefield V (2018)			121	113
Apex Legends (2019)			140	139
Borderlands 3 (2019)			76.3	58.9
FIFA 20 (2019)			196	190
Need for Speed Heat (2019)			88.2	80.7
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)			95	88.8
Escape from Tarkov (2020)			121	119
Hunt Showdown (2020)			91.6
Doom Eternal (2020)			141	137
Gears Tactics (2020)			116	90.6

Barulho

Ocioso		32 / 34 / 39 dB
Carga		53 / 53 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Noise		4%	0%	8%	1%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	30 -0%	29 3%	31 -3%
Idle Minimum *	32	30 6%	31 3%	30.5 5%	31 3%
Idle Average *	34	33 3%	34 -0%	31.5 7%	34 -0%
Idle Maximum *	39	39 -0%	39 -0%	31.5 19%	37 5%
Load Average *	53	45 15%	46 13%	40.6 23%	47 11%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	49 -2%	53 -10%	49.5 -3%	50 -4%
Load Maximum *	53	51 4%	55 -4%	53.4 -1%	54 -2%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


48 °C	53 °C	53 °C
44 °C	45 °C	42 °C
34 °C	36 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 42.8 °C


52 °C	55 °C	48 °C
50 °C	53 °C	45 °C
37 °C	38 °C	35 °C

Máximo: 55 °C
Médio: 45.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


27 °C	27 °C	27 °C
27 °C	28 °C	27 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 28 °C
Médio: 26.8 °C


29 °C	29 °C	29 °C
29 °C	28 °C	29 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 29 °C
Médio: 28.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 37 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


50 °C	52 °C	53 °C
45 °C	47 °C	44 °C
37 °C	36 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 44 °C


52 °C	54 °C	48 °C
50 °C	53 °C	46 °C
39 °C	39 °C	37 °C

Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 46.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Heat		0%	-10%	-24%	-13%
Maximum Upper Side *	53	49 8%	58 -9%	48.8 8%	60 -13%
Maximum Bottom *	55	59 -7%	64 -16%	55 -0%	66 -20%
Idle Upper Side *	28	28 -0%	30 -7%	41 -46%	30 -7%
Idle Bottom *	29	29 -0%	31 -7%	45.6 -57%	32 -10%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	1.4 / 1.8 Watt
Ocioso	13 / 16 / 27 Watt
Carga	109 / 236 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Power Consumption		24%	-17%	-109%	15%
Idle Minimum *	13	7 46%	21 -62%	46 -254%	11 15%
Idle Average *	16	12 25%	23 -44%	59 -269%	15 6%
Idle Maximum *	27	22 19%	32 -19%	65.5 -143%	21 22%
Load Average *	109	86 21%	97 11%	99.8 8%	94 14%
Witcher 3 ultra *	155	144 7%	148 5%	154.1 1%	143 8%
Load Maximum *	236	177 25%	213 10%	222.7 6%	173 27%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		8h 25min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 04min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 42min

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		19%	34%	-48%	-14%	-0%
Reader / Idle	505	666 32%	545 8%	221 -56%	439 -13%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 12%
WiFi v1.3	364	478 31%	421 16%	129 -65%	340 -7%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 3%
Load	102	96 -6%	181 77%	80 -22%	79 -23%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -16%
H.264			408			408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Mais opções de manutenção que no seu predecessor

+ A carcaça é significativamente mais robusta

+ Maior ângulo de abertura da tampa da tela

+ Conexões USB modernas (incl. TB3)

+ Bateria poderosa

+ Design elegante

+ Painel de 300-Hz

Contra

- A CPU não se encaixa no conceito de portátil / sistema de refrigeração

- Ventiladores irritantes (acelerando, características, nível de ruído)

- Leva um tempo se acostumar ao teclado

- Sem leitor de cartões

- Som medíocre

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS, test unit provided by MSI Germany

O GS66 representa um progresso claro em comparação com o GS65.

A MSI cuidou das reclamações mais importantes e forneceu mais opções de estabilidade e manutenção à carcaça compacta. Também merece elogios pelo equipamento de conexão atualizado (Thunderbolt 3), o painel de 300 Hz rápido e rico em contraste, bem como a enorme bateria, mesmo que não seja capaz de aproveitar seu potencial.

Achamos um pouco difícil de entender a escolha do processador. Enquanto o Core i9-10980HK é obviamente muito atraente do ponto de vista de marketing e em termos de ganhos, se o cliente tiver que lidar mais com as desvantagens (temperatura e desenvolvimento de ruídos muito altos) do que com as vantagens (maior potencial de desempenho) e o portátil geralmente é projetado para mobilidade, não ofereceríamos essa opção em primeiro lugar.

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS - 05/17/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

78 / 98 → 80%

Teclado

77%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

62 / 80 → 78%

Peso

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Bateria

69 / 95 → 73%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

93%

Desempenho da aplicação

93%

Temperatura

78 / 95 → 82%

Ruído

59 / 90 → 66%

Audio

74%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Médio

74%

83%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS: Visualmente discreto, acusticamente perceptível

Florian Glaser, 2020-05- 2 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS audio analysis

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison