Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS: Visualmente discreto, acusticamente perceptível
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS (GS66 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-10980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 930 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, Full-HD, G-Sync, Brilhante: não, 300 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB
, NVMe, slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280
peso
2.167 kg, Suprimento de energia: 732 g
Preço
2849 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.8 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.3 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.8 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
13.3 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 323 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 310.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 316 cd/m²
Contraste: 1505:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -7% | -5% | -6% | -8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.5 | 64.6 -7% | 65.3 -6% | 66.2 -5% | 64 -8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 92.6 -7% | 95.5 -4% | 92.3 -7% | 90.3 -9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.8 | 66 -7% | 66.5 -6% | 67.2 -5% | 65.4 -8% |
| Response Times | 23% | -13% | -11% | 3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14 ? | 5.2 ? 63% | 15.2 ? -9% | 15.2 ? -9% | 9.6 ? 31% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9.6 ? | 11.2 ? -17% | 11.2 ? -17% | 10.8 ? -13% | 12 ? -25% |
| PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | ||||
| Screen | -7% | -8% | -34% | -12% | |
| Brightness middle | 316 | 288 -9% | 266 -16% | 324.8 3% | 313 -1% |
| Brightness | 311 | 265 -15% | 248 -20% | 316 2% | 295 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 84 -9% | 89 -3% | 84 -9% | 89 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.22 -5% | 0.31 -48% | 0.26 -24% | 0.3 -43% |
| Contrast | 1505 | 1309 -13% | 858 -43% | 1249 -17% | 1043 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.03 | 3.22 -6% | 2.78 8% | 4.96 -64% | 3.33 -10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.32 | 6.26 14% | 5.96 19% | 8.95 -22% | 6.25 15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.5 -36% | 0.91 17% | 3.23 -194% | 1.77 -61% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 3.43 12% | 3.58 8% | 5 -28% | 3.1 21% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.21 100% | 2.51 88% |
| CCT | 7439 87% | 7290 89% | 7186 90% | 7742 84% | 6930 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65 | 60 -8% | 62 -5% | 59.8 -8% | 59 -9% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 93 -7% | 96 -4% | 91.8 -8% | 90 -10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-4% | -9% /
-8% | -17% /
-26% | -6% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)
Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 | |
| 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
| 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
| Geekbench 5.5 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -4% | -4% | 2% | -12% | |
| Write 4K | 131.3 | 108.8 -17% | 115.5 -12% | 137.4 5% | 108.7 -17% |
| Read 4K | 45.84 | 40.31 -12% | 58 27% | 41.37 -10% | 41.4 -10% |
| Write Seq | 2370 | 2488 5% | 1555 -34% | 2500 5% | 1083 -54% |
| Read Seq | 1509 | 1916 27% | 2590 72% | 1576 4% | 917 -39% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 481.5 | 382.4 -21% | 369.3 -23% | 446.7 -7% | 468.5 -3% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 560 | 421.8 -25% | 441.7 -21% | 522 -7% | 530 -5% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2392 | 2542 6% | 1547 -35% | 2796 17% | 3057 28% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3232 | 3320 3% | 2969 -8% | 3415 6% | 3422 6% |
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3232 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2392 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
560 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
481.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1509 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2370 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
45.84 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
131.3 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 21934 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 45202 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17312 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7272 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø71.1 (67-75)
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 182 | 174 | 153 | 83.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 131 | 70.5 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 153 | 138 | 128 | 120 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 113 | 97.4 | 82.3 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 102 | 91 | ||
| Battlefield V (2018) | 121 | 113 | ||
| Apex Legends (2019) | 140 | 139 | ||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 76.3 | 58.9 | ||
| FIFA 20 (2019) | 196 | 190 | ||
| Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 88.2 | 80.7 | ||
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 95 | 88.8 | ||
| Escape from Tarkov (2020) | 121 | 119 | ||
| Hunt Showdown (2020) | 91.6 | |||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 141 | 137 | ||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 116 | 90.6 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 34 / 39 dB |
| Carga |
| 53 / 53 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 0% | 8% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 31 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 30 6% | 31 3% | 30.5 5% | 31 3% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 33 3% | 34 -0% | 31.5 7% | 34 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 39 | 39 -0% | 39 -0% | 31.5 19% | 37 5% |
| Load Average * | 53 | 45 15% | 46 13% | 40.6 23% | 47 11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 49 -2% | 53 -10% | 49.5 -3% | 50 -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 53 | 51 4% | 55 -4% | 53.4 -1% | 54 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 0% | -10% | -24% | -13% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 53 | 49 8% | 58 -9% | 48.8 8% | 60 -13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 55 | 59 -7% | 64 -16% | 55 -0% | 66 -20% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 28 -0% | 30 -7% | 41 -46% | 30 -7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29 | 29 -0% | 31 -7% | 45.6 -57% | 32 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 1.4 / 1.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 13 / 16 / 27 Watt |
| Carga |
109 / 236 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 24% | -17% | -109% | 15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 13 | 7 46% | 21 -62% | 46 -254% | 11 15% |
| Idle Average * | 16 | 12 25% | 23 -44% | 59 -269% | 15 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27 | 22 19% | 32 -19% | 65.5 -143% | 21 22% |
| Load Average * | 109 | 86 21% | 97 11% | 99.8 8% | 94 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 155 | 144 7% | 148 5% | 154.1 1% | 143 8% |
| Load Maximum * | 236 | 177 25% | 213 10% | 222.7 6% | 173 27% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 19% | 34% | -48% | -14% | -0% | |
| Reader / Idle | 505 | 666 32% | 545 8% | 221 -56% | 439 -13% | 565 ? 12% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 364 | 478 31% | 421 16% | 129 -65% | 340 -7% | 375 ? 3% |
| Load | 102 | 96 -6% | 181 77% | 80 -22% | 79 -23% | 85.6 ? -16% |
| H.264 | 408 | 409 ? |
Pro
+ Mais opções de manutenção que no seu predecessor
+ A carcaça é significativamente mais robusta
+ Maior ângulo de abertura da tampa da tela
+ Conexões USB modernas (incl. TB3)
+ Bateria poderosa
+ Design elegante
+ Painel de 300-Hz
Contra
- A CPU não se encaixa no conceito de portátil / sistema de refrigeração
- Ventiladores irritantes (acelerando, características, nível de ruído)
- Leva um tempo se acostumar ao teclado
- Sem leitor de cartões
- Som medíocre
O GS66 representa um progresso claro em comparação com o GS65.
A MSI cuidou das reclamações mais importantes e forneceu mais opções de estabilidade e manutenção à carcaça compacta. Também merece elogios pelo equipamento de conexão atualizado (Thunderbolt 3), o painel de 300 Hz rápido e rico em contraste, bem como a enorme bateria, mesmo que não seja capaz de aproveitar seu potencial.
Achamos um pouco difícil de entender a escolha do processador. Enquanto o Core i9-10980HK é obviamente muito atraente do ponto de vista de marketing e em termos de ganhos, se o cliente tiver que lidar mais com as desvantagens (temperatura e desenvolvimento de ruídos muito altos) do que com as vantagens (maior potencial de desempenho) e o portátil geralmente é projetado para mobilidade, não ofereceríamos essa opção em primeiro lugar.
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
- 05/17/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
