Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US (GTX 1060)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 250.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 784:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.5
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US AUO80ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD LQ156D1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -1% | 0% | 15% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.8 | 66.2 1% | 63.6 -3% | 66.1 0% | 79.1 20% | 64.4 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.1 | 92.1 0% | 93.8 2% | 92.7 1% | 98.8 7% | 93.4 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67 | 67.2 0% | 64.9 -3% | 67.2 0% | 79.2 18% | 65.5 -2% |
| Response Times | 3% | 12% | 40% | -150% | 16% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 20 ? | 17.6 ? 12% | 16.8 ? 16% | 6.6 ? 67% | 46.4 ? -132% | 13.6 ? 32% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 12.8 ? -7% | 11.2 ? 7% | 10.4 ? 13% | 32 ? -167% | 12 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 980 ? | |||||
| Screen | 19% | 26% | -10% | 3% | 16% | |
| Brightness middle | 250.9 | 254 1% | 313 25% | 307 22% | 494 97% | 304.3 21% |
| Brightness | 257 | 262 2% | 300 17% | 296 15% | 457 78% | 293 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 89 7% | 78 -6% | 89 7% | 88 6% | 80 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.22 31% | 0.33 -3% | 0.25 22% | 0.34 -6% | 0.38 -19% |
| Contrast | 784 | 1155 47% | 948 21% | 1228 57% | 1453 85% | 801 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.77 | 2.37 14% | 1.29 53% | 5.74 -107% | 5.2 -88% | 1.79 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.89 | 4.71 20% | 2.04 65% | 11.32 -92% | 17.5 -197% | 3.69 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.5 | 1.84 26% | 1.94 22% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 1.58 60% | 0.69 83% | 6.44 -61% | 2.7 32% | 1.1 72% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.48 89% | 2.43 91% | 2.48 89% | 2.1 105% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6901 94% | 6785 96% | 6550 99% | 8395 77% | 7038 92% | 6665 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60 0% | 60 0% | 60 0% | 71.2 19% | 59.8 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 92 0% | 94 2% | 93 1% | 98.8 7% | 92.8 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
13% | 12% /
18% | 10% /
-2% | -44% /
-15% | 10% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4676 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5731 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4646 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | |||||
| Score Total | 2039 | 2536 24% | 3649 79% | 3282 61% | 4095 101% |
| Score Write | 802 | 939 17% | 1446 80% | 1243 55% | 1955 144% |
| Score Read | 815 | 1092 34% | 1471 80% | 1350 66% | 1407 73% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.045 | 0.046 -2% | 0.041 9% | 0.041 9% | 0.037 18% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.071 | 0.119 -68% | 0.046 35% | 0.062 13% | 0.05 30% |
| 4K-64 Write | 570 | 742 30% | 1198 110% | 913 60% | 1664 192% |
| 4K-64 Read | 611 | 847 39% | 1218 99% | 1057 73% | 1177 93% |
| 4K Write | 83.8 | 80.4 -4% | 90.2 8% | 93 11% | 99.2 18% |
| 4K Read | 43.09 | 23.36 -46% | 43.42 1% | 41.47 -4% | 48.56 13% |
| Seq Write | 1475 | 1163 -21% | 1580 7% | 2372 61% | 1917 30% |
| Seq Read | 1612 | 2213 37% | 2091 30% | 2517 56% | 1820 13% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13554 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29930 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10311 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 274 | 223 | 220 | 159 |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 139 | 135 | 132 | 78 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 40 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 113 | 101 | 73 | 62 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 29.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 43.5 / 45.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) | ||
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | -9% | -10% | -3% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 28.4 | 29 -2% | 29 -2% | 31 -9% | 30 -6% | 28.1 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 30 -6% | 30 -6% | 33 -16% | 30 -6% | 28.1 1% |
| Idle Average * | 28.4 | 31 -9% | 31 -9% | 34 -20% | 31 -9% | 33 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 35 -18% | 33 -11% | 40 -35% | 34 -15% | 33.5 -13% |
| Load Average * | 43.5 | 49 -13% | 49 -13% | 41 6% | 43 1% | 42.2 3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.7 | 51 -12% | 50 -9% | 43 6% | 42 8% | 45.3 1% |
| Load Maximum * | 45.7 | 54 -18% | 52 -14% | 48 -5% | 44 4% | 45.7 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.8 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 1 / 1.34 Watt |
| Ocioso | 8.7 / 13 / 14.3 Watt |
| Carga |
107.4 / 151.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -47% | -16% | -104% | -3% | -5% | -20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8.7 | 14 -61% | 16 -84% | 12 -38% | 28 -222% | 7 20% | 9.48 -9% | 14.9 -71% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 18 -38% | 19 -46% | 16 -23% | 33 -154% | 11 15% | 16.1 -24% | 17.5 -35% |
| Idle Maximum * | 14.3 | 22 -54% | 26 -82% | 21 -47% | 41 -187% | 20 -40% | 16.9 -18% | 19.2 -34% |
| Load Average * | 107.4 | 91 15% | 103 4% | 85 21% | 94 12% | 98 9% | 90.8 15% | 103.2 4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 129 | 142 -10% | 164 -27% | 128 1% | 160 -24% | 132 -2% | 123.1 5% | |
| Load Maximum * | 151.5 | 173 -14% | 223 -47% | 162 -7% | 222 -47% | 182 -20% | 134.4 11% | 132.7 12% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 82 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 55 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 52.4 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 81% | -28% | -26% | -31% | 7% | 32% | 8% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 372 | 513 38% | 164 -56% | 232 -38% | 144 -61% | 362 -3% | 576 55% | 402 8% |
| Load | 70 | 156 123% | 70 0% | 61 -13% | 70 0% | 81 16% | 76 9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 762 | 237 | 340 | 150 | 507 | |||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 62 |
Pro
Contra
Para ser franco, a configuração atual do MSI GS65 faz pouco para resolver as reclamações que explicamos na Análise de maio do anterior SKU. As maiores desvantagens continuam sendo o acabamento questionável e a rigidez desapontadora (resultando em inevitáveis rangidos durante o uso), bem como os procedimentos de manutenção desnecessariamente difíceis e dispositivos de entrada medíocres. No entanto, a configuração comparativamente mais baixa de hoje, impulsionada por uma GTX 1060 e Core i7-8750H (e SSD NVMe menor de 256 GB), consegue sobreviver aos nossos testes de estresse sintético sem recorrer ao afogamento no lado da CPU ou da GPU, o que é uma melhoria bem-vinda em relação ao modelo GTX 1070 Max-Q que analisamos anteriormente. Correspondentemente, as temperaturas da superfície também apresentam uma queda significativa, como resultado do que parece ser um resfriamento um pouco mais agressivo em conjunto com uma GPU especialmente menos faminta por energia.
O resto do pacote, no entanto, é bastante positivo. O GS65 é ilusoriamente leve e relativamente silencioso sob carga. A tela anti-reflexo de 144 Hz possui boa precisão de cores e saturação, além de excelentes ângulos de visão (mesmo que o brilho e o contraste possam ser melhores). Além do espaçamento e da falta de um leitor de cartões, a conectividade está quase no nível do Aero 15X. E, finalmente, a máquina oferece um desempenho robusto devido à configuração, mesmo que a GTX 1060 não seja poderosa o suficiente para aproveitar ao máximo o esplendor de uma taxa de atualização de 144 Hz em jogos modernos (ainda assim, qualquer coisa acima de 60 quadros por segundo, beneficia).
De um ponto de vista puramente estatístico, apesar de suas notáveis fraquezas, o MSI GS65 continua sendo um dos melhores portáteis para jogos finos e leves atualmente disponíveis.
A $1.849, certamente não é barato, mas o preço é consistente com o de seus pares e talvez até um pouco abaixo. Antes de se comprometer com uma compra, também vale considerar concorrentes mais bem construídos, como o Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 e Razer Blade 15—mas tenha em mente que você pagará um pouco mais pelo privilégio.
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
- 09/14/2018 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein
Price comparison
