Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG (i7-9750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 282.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 882:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.06
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | -6% | -4% | -3% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.6 | 66.9 -1% | 63.5 -6% | 65.6 -3% | 65.3 -3% | 66.2 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.5 | 98.1 1% | 92.4 -5% | 92.2 -5% | 95.5 -2% | 92.1 -6% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.9 | 68.5 -1% | 64.7 -6% | 66.9 -3% | 66.5 -3% | 67.2 -2% |
Response Times | 7% | -24% | 35% | -1% | -18% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.6 ? | 12.8 ? 6% | 18.8 ? -38% | 7 ? 49% | 15.2 ? -12% | 17.6 ? -29% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 10.4 ? 13% | 13.2 ? -10% | 9.6 ? 20% | 11.2 ? 7% | 12.8 ? -7% |
PWM Frequency | 23260 ? | 23810 ? 2% | 23580 ? 1% | |||
Screen | -10% | -53% | -44% | -36% | -19% | |
Brightness middle | 282.3 | 293 4% | 320.4 13% | 323.6 15% | 266 -6% | 254 -10% |
Brightness | 269 | 270 0% | 298 11% | 315 17% | 248 -8% | 262 -3% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 85 -6% | 91 1% | 89 -1% | 89 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.29 9% | 0.42 -31% | 0.29 9% | 0.31 3% | 0.22 31% |
Contrast | 882 | 1010 15% | 763 -13% | 1116 27% | 858 -3% | 1155 31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.17 | 1.69 -44% | 3.21 -174% | 3.31 -183% | 2.78 -138% | 2.37 -103% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.29 | 3.37 -2% | 5.54 -68% | 5.74 -74% | 5.96 -81% | 4.71 -43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.06 | 1.24 -17% | 2.36 -123% | 2.73 -158% | 0.91 14% | 1.84 -74% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.3 -77% | 3.6 -177% | 2.9 -123% | 3.58 -175% | 1.58 -22% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.3 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.29 96% | 2.46 89% | 2.48 89% |
CCT | 6643 98% | 6758 96% | 6503 100% | 6765 96% | 7186 90% | 6785 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.8 | 63 -1% | 59 -8% | 59.7 -6% | 62 -3% | 60 -6% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.5 | 98.5 1% | 92 -6% | 91.8 -6% | 96 -2% | 92 -6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-6% | -28% /
-40% | -4% /
-26% | -13% /
-24% | -13% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise | |
↘ 5.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 23260 Hz | ≤ 19 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 23260 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 19 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 23260 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8734 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13) | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13) | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H () | |
MSI GE75 9SG |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4454 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5751 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5725 pontos | |
Ajuda |
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -5% | -23% | -42% | -6% | -21% | |
Seq Read | 2005 | 1832 -9% | 1953 -3% | 1239 -38% | 1266 -37% | 2517 26% |
Seq Write | 1580 | 1864 18% | 1629 3% | 920 -42% | 1834 16% | 924 -42% |
4K Read | 49.33 | 52.1 6% | 33.2 -33% | 45.74 -7% | 48.94 -1% | 59.1 20% |
4K Write | 103.8 | 108.3 4% | 88.1 -15% | 95.7 -8% | 107.2 3% | 126.5 22% |
4K-64 Read | 1241 | 1159 -7% | 757 -39% | 322 -74% | 1170 -6% | 876 -29% |
4K-64 Write | 1730 | 1807 4% | 1501 -13% | 722 -58% | 1760 2% | 922 -47% |
Access Time Read * | 0.054 | 0.05 7% | 0.077 -43% | 0.073 -35% | 0.073 -35% | 0.042 22% |
Access Time Write * | 0.036 | 0.034 6% | 0.043 -19% | 0.047 -31% | 0.035 3% | 0.065 -81% |
Score Read | 1490 | 1394 -6% | 985 -34% | 492 -67% | 1346 -10% | 1186 -20% |
Score Write | 1991 | 2102 6% | 1752 -12% | 910 -54% | 2051 3% | 1141 -43% |
Score Total | 4230 | 4221 0% | 3230 -24% | 1654 -61% | 4122 -3% | 2870 -32% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 3025 | 2083 -31% | 1872 -38% | 1236 -59% | 2086 -31% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 713 | 496.5 -30% | 478.2 -33% | 703 -1% | 454.2 -36% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1554 | 977 -37% | 1165 -25% | 812 -48% | 1141 -27% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 20209 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37220 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16598 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7099 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (65.7 - 92.7, n=22) | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (71 - 105, n=8) | |
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 306.4 | 273 | 254.1 | 156.9 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 279 | 216 | 125.5 | 66.9 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 223.3 | 176.7 | 139.8 | 108.6 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 133 | 102 | 97 | 84 |
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H | MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | -0% | -8% | -12% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.3 -0% | 30 -6% | 28.7 -1% | 30 -6% | 28.2 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 28.8 5% | 30 1% | 29.8 2% | 31 -2% | 30.4 -0% |
Idle Average * | 30.5 | 28.8 6% | 31 -2% | 32.4 -6% | 34 -11% | 30.4 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.6 | 29 5% | 34 -11% | 38 -24% | 39 -27% | 33.4 -9% |
Load Average * | 37.6 | 33.5 11% | 43 -14% | 38.2 -2% | 46 -22% | 37.1 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 | 45 2% | 42 9% | 56.6 -23% | 53 -15% | 54.2 -18% |
Load Maximum * | 55.1 | 45.2 18% | 44 20% | 56.6 -3% | 55 -0% | 56.4 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.5 / 30.6 dB |
Carga |
| 37.6 / 55.1 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 1.47 / 1.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 18.3 / 22 / 28.8 Watt |
Carga |
93 / 215.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15 W9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | 27% | -2% | 7% | -10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 18.3 | 12.5 32% | 7 62% | 22.9 -25% | 18 2% | 13.9 24% |
Idle Average * | 22 | 15.3 30% | 11 50% | 27.2 -24% | 20 9% | 18.8 15% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.8 | 20.7 28% | 20 31% | 27.5 5% | 28 3% | 23.1 20% |
Load Average * | 93 | 90.2 3% | 98 -5% | 83.4 10% | 87 6% | 112.3 -21% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 142.6 | 162 -14% | 132 7% | 143.6 -1% | 135 5% | 231 -62% |
Load Maximum * | 215.9 | 209.3 3% | 182 16% | 160.5 26% | 175 19% | 291.5 -35% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 9% | -54% | 28% | 0% | -50% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 362 | 393 9% | 166 -54% | 463 28% | 362 0% | 181 -50% |
Reader / Idle | 953 | 235 | 627 | 507 | ||
Load | 102 | 46 | 103 | 81 |
Pro
Contra
Se você quer a melhor experiência de jogos do GS65, então não há dúvida de que a SKU de 240 Hz com gráficos RTX 2080 Max-Q vai oferecer. Tudo o que elogiamos e criticamos sobre o GS65 no passado ainda se aplica aqui para esta atualização mais recente de 2019, incluindo o design leve, a manutenção difícil, a duração da bateria respeitável e a rigidez medíocre.
Para a melhor relação preço/desempenho, no entanto, a tela de 240 Hz e a GPU RTX 2080 Max-Q podem não ser a melhor opção. A diferença entre o painel base de 144 Hz e o painel mais rápido de 240 Hz é difícil de perceber, enquanto a RTX 2080 Max-Q é meramente até 8% mais rápida do que a RTX 2070 Max-Q. Você pode economizar quase $ 900 USD optando pelo SKU de 144 Hz, RTX 2070 Max-Q e i7-8750H em vez dos 240 Hz, RTX 2080 Max-Q e i7-9750H SKU sem sacrificar todo o desempenho de jogos.
O RTX 2080 Max-Q é menos de 10% mais rápido que o RTX 2070 Max-Q e ainda custa cerca de $ 500 USD a mais. É um preço alto a pagar se você quiser o melhor desempenho de GPU possível da série GS65.
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
- 09/20/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo