Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GS65 8RF Stealth Thin (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, Full-HD)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 222 cd/m²
Contraste: 1155:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.37 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.84
ΔE Greyscale 1.58 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 25% | -2% | 0% | -5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.2 | 91.6 38% | 63.6 -4% | 66.1 0% | 62.5 -6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.1 | 100 9% | 93.8 2% | 92.7 1% | 88.7 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.2 | 86.6 29% | 64.9 -3% | 67.2 0% | 63.5 -6% |
| Response Times | 45% | 9% | 41% | -143% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17.6 ? | 10.4 ? 41% | 16.8 ? 5% | 6.6 ? 62% | 44.8 ? -155% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12.8 ? | 6.6 ? 48% | 11.2 ? 12% | 10.4 ? 19% | 29.6 ? -131% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | ||||
| Screen | -10% | 12% | -52% | -55% | |
| Brightness middle | 254 | 269 6% | 313 23% | 307 21% | 291 15% |
| Brightness | 262 | 254 -3% | 300 15% | 296 13% | 277 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 85 -4% | 78 -12% | 89 0% | 84 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.21 5% | 0.33 -50% | 0.25 -14% | 0.22 -0% |
| Contrast | 1155 | 1281 11% | 948 -18% | 1228 6% | 1323 15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.37 | 3 -27% | 1.29 46% | 5.74 -142% | 5.52 -133% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.71 | 5.62 -19% | 2.04 57% | 11.32 -140% | 10.72 -128% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.84 | 1.94 -5% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.58 | 3.18 -101% | 0.69 56% | 6.44 -308% | 6.59 -317% |
| Gamma | 2.48 89% | 2.25 98% | 2.43 91% | 2.48 89% | 2.44 90% |
| CCT | 6785 96% | 7274 89% | 6550 99% | 8395 77% | 7816 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 77 28% | 60 0% | 60 0% | 58 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 100 9% | 94 2% | 93 1% | 89 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 20% /
5% | 6% /
9% | -4% /
-30% | -68% /
-57% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4665 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5621 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5095 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -9% | -2% | 45% | ||
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2466 | 2627 7% | 3157 28% | 3417 39% | |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1919 | 1375 -28% | 1659 -14% | 2771 44% | |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 353.7 | 332.8 -6% | 325.6 -8% | 564 59% | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 309.9 | 268.6 -13% | 269.5 -13% | 460.6 49% | |
| Read Seq | 1322 | 1404 6% | 1104 -16% | 2664 102% | |
| Write Seq | 1883 | 1335 -29% | 1652 -12% | 2631 40% | |
| Read 4K | 40.13 | 37.65 -6% | 46.2 15% | 45.45 13% | |
| Write 4K | 95.3 | 94.4 -1% | 96 1% | 109.2 15% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 15782 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30373 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12733 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=166, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 95.5 | 52.7 | ||
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 135 | 116 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 196 | |||
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 116 | 78.7 | ||
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 222 | 217 | ||
| The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 51.7 | 50.5 | ||
| Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) | 98.4 | 92.2 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 71 | 61 | ||
| Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 115 | 101 | ||
| Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 92.5 | 88.6 | ||
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 89.2 | 75.9 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 127 | 105 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 49.5 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 71.2 | 54.2 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 83 | 78 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 31 / 34 dB |
| Carga |
| 43 / 44 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | -8% | -6% | -7% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 29 3% | 31 -3% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 31 -3% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 33 -10% | 25.5 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 31 | 34 -10% | 31 -0% | 31 -0% | 34 -10% | 27.3 ? 12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 34 | 35 -3% | 35 -3% | 33 3% | 40 -18% | 30.3 ? 11% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 42 2% | 49 -14% | 49 -14% | 41 5% | 42.5 ? 1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 | 44 -5% | 51 -21% | 50 -19% | 43 -2% | |
| Load Maximum * | 44 | 46 -5% | 54 -23% | 52 -18% | 48 -9% | 53.4 ? -21% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | -10% | -9% | -21% | -8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 47 4% | 53 -8% | 52 -6% | 61 -24% | 46.2 ? 6% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 63 | 63 -0% | 65 -3% | 49 22% | 69 -10% | 49.2 ? 22% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 24 | 25 -4% | 26 -8% | 31 -29% | 29 -21% | 31.2 ? -30% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25 | 27 -8% | 30 -20% | 31 -24% | 32 -28% | 32.2 ? -29% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.5 / 1.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7 / 11 / 20 Watt |
| Carga |
98 / 182 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -16% | -28% | -47% | -107% | -49% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7 | 12 -71% | 14 -100% | 16 -129% | 28 -300% | 13.5 ? -93% |
| Idle Average * | 11 | 16 -45% | 18 -64% | 19 -73% | 33 -200% | 18.9 ? -72% |
| Idle Maximum * | 20 | 21 -5% | 22 -10% | 26 -30% | 41 -105% | 26.6 ? -33% |
| Load Average * | 98 | 85 13% | 91 7% | 103 -5% | 94 4% | 106.7 ? -9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 132 | 128 3% | 142 -8% | 164 -24% | 160 -21% | |
| Load Maximum * | 182 | 162 11% | 173 5% | 223 -23% | 222 -22% | 249 ? -37% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 52.4 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 54 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -33% | 57% | -44% | -54% | 9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 507 | 340 -33% | 762 50% | 237 -53% | 150 -70% | 566 ? 12% |
| H.264 | 356 | 229 -36% | 504 42% | 159 -55% | 106 -70% | 408 ? 15% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 362 | 232 -36% | 513 42% | 164 -55% | 144 -60% | 376 ? 4% |
| Load | 81 | 61 -25% | 156 93% | 70 -14% | 70 -14% | 85.6 ? 6% |
Pro
Contra
O GS65 não consegue igualar o pacote geral que o Gigabyte Aero 15X oferece, apesar dos melhor esforço da MSI.
Enquanto o GS65 parece elegante com seu chassi de alumínio, o Aero 15X é mais sólido e é melhor construído. Especificamente, há rangidos audíveis e sons de rachaduras quando o GS65 está sujeito a forte pressão física. Além disso, a bateria maior, melhor capacidade de manutenção, inclusão de um leitor de cartões e melhor experiência de digitação, todos favorecem o Aero 15X.
No entanto, se você gosta do maior silencio possível quando estiver jogando, então você deve optar pelo GS65 dado que os ventiladores são muito mais silenciosos durante os jogos. Ambos os dispositivos têm controles manuais do ventilador com os quais você pode experimentar.
Apesar de algumas fraquezas, o dispositivo compacto de 15 polegadas é um dos melhores portáteis de jogos com menos de 2,5 kg, o que coloca a MSI GS65 entre os nossos Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos Finos e Leves.
A MSI fez grandes progressos a partir do GS63 com o GS65.
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
- 05/08/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
