Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE - A melhor tela em um portátil para jogos de gama média

Name: MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Brand: MSI

Máquina de Plástico Fantástica.

Apesar de algumas desvantagens na qualidade de construção e no gerenciamento térmico, o MSI GP65 Leopard é um excelente portátil para jogos de US$ 1.500. Surpreendentemente, a máquina possui uma das telas mais precisas em cores que medimos em um portátil para jogos. A luz de fundo brilhante da tela e a taxa de atualização de 144 Hz estão no topo do bolo.

Sam Medley, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 09/02/2019 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook MSI Virtual Reality (VR) / Augmented Reality (AR) Windows

Test device courtesy of MSI

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US (GP65 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1335 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, GeForce Game Ready Driver 425.31, NVIDIA Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, DDR4-2666/PC4-21300, 2x 8 GB, Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD0625, IPS, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Cannon Lake HM370

Disco rígido

Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, 512 GB

Placa de Som

Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 Mic in, 1 headphon (HiFi/SPDIF) out, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD/SDXC/SDHC, tamanho normal

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27.5 x 357.7 x 248

Bateria

51 Wh Lítio-Ion, 6 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2x 2 Watt, Teclado: Chiclet, RGB por tecla, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, MSI Dragon Center, SteelSeries Engine 3, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

2.322 kg, Suprimento de energia: 729 g

Preço

1550 USD

Links

MSI página inicial
MSI Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US HP Omen 15-dc1303ng CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	185.5 MB/s +643%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s +284%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	81.1 MB/s +225%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	78.4 MB/s +214%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US	24.96 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	219.2 MB/s +652%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s +312%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	87.6 MB/s +201%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	85.3 MB/s +193%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US	29.14 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	679 MBit/s +5%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	644 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	630 MBit/s -2%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z Intel Wireless-AC 9560	611 MBit/s -5%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	601 (562^min - 639^max) MBit/s -7%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	548 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	677 MBit/s
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	672 MBit/s -1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	666 (597^min - 686^max) MBit/s -2%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	660 MBit/s -3%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z Intel Wireless-AC 9560	638 MBit/s -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	619 MBit/s -9%


318.6 cd/m²	332.9 cd/m²	330.2 cd/m²
314.9 cd/m²	348.3 cd/m²	334.2 cd/m²
297.2 cd/m²	346.3 cd/m²	324.2 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LGD0625 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 348.3 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 327.4 cd/m² Minimum: 17.46 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 348.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 871:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.203

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US LG Philips LGD0625, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE BOE 084D, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Panda LM156LF-GL02, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		-2%	-3%	-37%	-1%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	64.8	63.8 -2%	63.6 -2%	40.13 -38%	64.5 0%	65.2 1%
sRGB Coverage	96.2	93.4 -3%	91.7 -5%	60.3 -37%	93 -3%	90.9 -6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.3	65 -2%	65.2 -2%	41.48 -37%	65.7 -1%	66.3 0%
Response Times		-26%	-4%	-159%	-29%	-21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	9.6 ?(6, 3.6)	14 ?(7, 7) -46%	8.8 ?(4, 4.4) 8%	26 ?(13.6, 12.4) -171%	13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8) -42%	14.4 ?(7.2, 7.2) -50%
Response Time Black / White *	10.4 ?(6, 4.4)	11 ?(7, 4) -6%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -15%	25.6 ?(14.8, 10.8) -146%	12 ?(7.6, 4.4) -15%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 8%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-17%	-30%	-99%	-26%	-45%
Brightness middle	348.3	316 -9%	299 -14%	290.1 -17%	306.8 -12%	331 -5%
Brightness	327	295 -10%	290 -11%	274 -16%	309 -6%	327 0%
Brightness Distribution	85	84 -1%	89 5%	86 1%	87 2%	83 -2%
Black Level *	0.4	0.42 -5%	0.29 27%	0.54 -35%	0.38 5%	0.35 12%
Contrast	871	752 -14%	1031 18%	537 -38%	807 -7%	946 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.6	2.7 -69%	3.7 -131%	5.16 -223%	3.16 -98%	4.22 -164%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.07	5.65 -11%	7 -38%	18.09 -257%	6.05 -19%	6.95 -37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1	1.58 -58%	2 -100%	4.35 -335%	2.4 -140%	3.27 -227%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	2.35 -2%	4.1 -78%	4.4 -91%	2.3 -0%	3.9 -70%
Gamma	2.203 ^100%	2.41 ^91%	2.19 ^100%	2.1 ^105%	2.17 ^101%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6707 ^97%	6904 ^94%	7166 ^91%	7362 ^88%	6557 ^99%	7392 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	61	60 -2%	59.3 -3%	38.1 -38%	60 -2%	59 -3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	96	93 -3%	91.5 -5%	60 -37%	92.6 -4%	90.5 -6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-15% / -15%	-12% / -22%	-98% / -95%	-19% / -21%	-23% / -34%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1137 (993.64-1270.77)

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1006 (997.68-1086.13)

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1157 (1151.34-1211.72)

Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1103 (1087.93-1223.2)

CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1190 (1182.24-1239.66)

Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1072 (1059.41-1260.12)

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +44%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Intel Core i7-9850H	193 Points 0%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H	193 Points
SCHENKER Slim 15 Comet Lake U Intel Core i7-10510U	189 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82)	183.7 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-8565U	179 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	171 Points -11%
SCHENKER Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	171 Points -11%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H	171 Points -11%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	157 Points -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3433 Points +180%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H	1288 Points +5%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H	1227 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85)	1182 Points -4%
SCHENKER Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	1116 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Intel Core i7-9850H	1114 (896^min - 1114^max) Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	850 Points -31%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	799 Points -35%
SCHENKER Slim 15 Comet Lake U Intel Core i7-10510U	796 Points -35%
SCHENKER Slim 15 Comet Lake U Intel Core i7-10510U	790 Points -36%
SCHENKER Slim 15 Comet Lake U Intel Core i7-10510U	760 Points -38%
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-8565U	557 Points -55%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)	3.33 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Intel Core i7-9850H	2.13 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1.96 - 2.19, n=10)	2.1 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H	1.96 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)	37.2 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H	14.11 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (11.3 - 14.1, n=10)	13 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Intel Core i7-9850H	12.47 Points

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years)	63783 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13)	33539 Points
SCHENKER Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	32846 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Intel Core i7-9850H	31938 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	25656 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years)	9755 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Intel Core i7-9850H	7169 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13)	6923 Points
SCHENKER Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H	6579 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	6421 Points

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Average of class Gaming (64 - 1021, n=12, last 2 years)	308 s *
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Intel Core i7-9850H	278 s *
Average Intel Core i7-9750H ()	154.4 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

193 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1227 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

115.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7803 Points +34%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G	5834 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	5814 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	5716 Points -2%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8	5678 Points -3%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5609 Points -4%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5528 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (4395 - 5997, n=16)	5523 Points -5%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10833 Points +14%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	10098 Points +6%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	9859 Points +4%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G	9502 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (8361 - 10056, n=16)	9263 Points -3%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9245 Points -3%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8	9158 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	9020 Points -5%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9904 Points +22%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G	8106 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	7671 Points -5%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8	7546 Points -7%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7431 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	7430 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (6098 - 8106, n=16)	7382 Points -9%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	7328 Points -10%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12134 Points +73%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	7564 Points +8%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8	7190 Points +3%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G	6999 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	6886 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (4344 - 8069, n=16)	6727 Points -4%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6673 Points -5%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	6631 Points -5%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=19, last 2 years)	5222 Points +17%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5077 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	4507 Points +1%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8	4459 Points 0%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G	4456 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (3533 - 5185, n=11)	4396 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4251 Points -5%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	4240 Points -5%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=17, last 2 years)	6098 Points +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5857 Points +1%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G	5808 Points
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8	5696 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (4450 - 5931, n=11)	5532 Points -5%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	5497 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5419 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	5041 Points -13%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4456 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5808 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5834 pontos
Ajuda

	MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8	Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB	Average Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
AS SSD		119%	151%	55%	89%	196%	12%
Seq Read	1307	2485 90%	2927 124%	1280 -2%	1283 -2%	2168 66%	1326 ?(1307 - 1348, n=3) 1%
Seq Write	730	1575 116%	2149 194%	905 24%	1730 137%	2194 201%	755 ?(730 - 789, n=3) 3%
4K Read	27.58	53.4 94%	42.43 54%	48.73 77%	49.89 81%	53.2 93%	39 ?(27.6 - 50.6, n=3) 41%
4K Write	80.3	113.5 41%	147.1 83%	107 33%	110.1 37%	128.5 60%	92.6 ?(80.3 - 115.7, n=3) 15%
4K-64 Read	878	725 -17%	1286 46%	321.1 -63%	904 3%	1320 50%	873 ?(825 - 916, n=3) -1%
4K-64 Write	246.8	1371 456%	1432 480%	761 208%	792 221%	2162 776%	349 ?(247 - 488, n=3) 41%
Access Time Read *	0.231	0.059 74%	0.065 72%	0.058 75%	0.036 84%	0.04 83%	0.1463 ?(0.081 - 0.231, n=3) 37%
Access Time Write *	0.223	0.032 86%	0.026 88%	0.046 79%	0.042 81%	0.029 87%	0.2073 ?(0.188 - 0.223, n=3) 7%
Score Read	1036	1027 -1%	1621 56%	498 -52%	1082 4%	1590 53%	1045 ?(999 - 1099, n=3) 1%
Score Write	400	1642 311%	1794 349%	958 140%	1075 169%	2510 528%	517 ?(400 - 649, n=3) 29%
Score Total	1940	3163 63%	4208 117%	1711 -12%	2745 41%	4924 154%	2075 ?(1940 - 2147, n=3) 7%
Copy ISO MB/s	993			1519 53%	3089 211%		935 ?(876 - 993, n=2) -6%
Copy Program MB/s	309.5			749 142%	549 77%		260 ?(210 - 310, n=2) -16%
Copy Game MB/s	582			943 62%	1171 101%		591 ?(582 - 599, n=2) 2%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1581 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 686 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 581 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 240.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.96 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 99.3 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 268.1 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 977 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +104%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	31826 Points +48%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	27732 Points +29%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	26582 Points +24%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	22749 Points +6%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	21492 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (19143 - 24662, n=40)	21459 Points 0%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	20784 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	14569 Points -32%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	13512 Points -37%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	12388 Points -42%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	4274 Points -80%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Average of class Gaming (1251 - 26759, n=183, last 2 years)	20964 Points +64%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	16253 Points +27%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	15274 Points +20%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	12758 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	12424 Points -3%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	12421 Points -3%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	11829 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (1107 - 14726, n=40)	11688 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	11099 Points -13%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	9773 Points -23%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	8801 Points -31%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	4097 Points -68%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +84%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	22820 Points +33%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	20466 Points +20%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	20434 Points +19%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	18060 Points +5%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	17119 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (14768 - 18358, n=43)	16301 Points -5%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	15343 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	11640 Points -32%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	9534 Points -44%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	8532 Points -50%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	3321 Points -81%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Average of class Gaming (261 - 21745, n=189, last 2 years)	12971 Points +112%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	9177 Points +50%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	7968 Points +30%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	7907 Points +29%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	6709 Points +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5679 - 6926, n=41)	6254 Points +2%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	6117 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5872 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	3676 Points -40%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	3607 Points -41%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	1099 Points -82%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Average of class Gaming (4312 - 18867, n=189, last 2 years)	13179 Points +158%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	9447 Points +85%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	8112 Points +59%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	7774 Points +52%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	7098 Points +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (4463 - 9287, n=41)	6766 Points +33%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	6755 Points +32%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	6502 Points +27%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	5104 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	3993 Points -22%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	2514 Points -51%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13118 Points +107%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	9480 Points +50%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	8153 Points +29%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK	7754 Points +22%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	6748 Points +6%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	6340 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5660 - 6910, n=41)	6206 Points -2%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5699 Points -10%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	3547 Points -44%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK	3353 Points -47%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	1000 Points -84%

3DMark 11 Performance		18447 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		37504 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		15252 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		6117 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 | Rocket League | Monster Hunter World | Hitman 2 | F1 2019

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming (108.2 - 718, n=95, last 2 years)	458 fps +82%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	306 fps +21%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	297.8 fps +18%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	266.7 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (188.7 - 295, n=27)	256 fps +2%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	252 fps
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming (168.5 - 617, n=98, last 2 years)	365 fps +105%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	209 fps +17%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	200 fps +12%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	189.9 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (152.2 - 215, n=24)	185.1 fps +4%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	178 fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years)	242 fps +118%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	122 fps +10%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	120.4 fps +8%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	117.4 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (74.4 - 131, n=33)	111.3 fps 0%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	111 fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +117%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	63.3 fps +7%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	63 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.6 - 74, n=40)	61.1 fps +4%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	60.5 fps +3%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	59 fps
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	53.1 (50^min, 51^P1 - 58^max) fps -10%

Rocket League
1280x720 Performance
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	250 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (244 - 252, n=4)	249 fps 0%
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	250 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (242 - 250, n=5)	248 fps -1%
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	244 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (180.6 - 247, n=5)	231 fps -5%

Monster Hunter World
1280x720 Low Preset (Image Quality High)
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	141 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile ()	141 fps 0%
1920x1080 Mid Preset (Image Quality High)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (102 - 104, n=2)	103 fps +1%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	102 fps
1920x1080 High Preset (Image Quality High)
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	96 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (89.9 - 96, n=2)	93 fps -3%
1920x1080 Highest Preset (Image Quality High)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (70 - 70.2, n=2)	70.1 fps 0%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	70 fps

Hitman 2
1280x720 Low AF:Trilinear
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	116 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile ()	116 fps 0%
1920x1080 Medium AF:4x
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	90 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (89.4 - 90, n=2)	89.7 fps 0%
1920x1080 High AF:8x
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	85 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (81.4 - 85, n=2)	83.2 fps -2%
1920x1080 Ultra AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (74 - 78.4, n=2)	76.2 fps +3%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	74 fps

F1 2019
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (166 - 231, n=4)	197.8 fps +19%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	166 fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (146 - 177, n=4)	163.8 fps +12%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	146 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (122 - 149, n=4)	136.5 fps +12%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	122 fps
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (97 - 127, n=4)	106.8 fps +3%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	104 fps

MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G: Ø58.8 (54-63)

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G: Ø53.1 (50-58)

Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø55.8 (52-60)

CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8: Ø59.7 (57-64)

Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB: Ø54.3 (50-59)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	252	178	111	59
Rocket League (2017)	250	250	244
Monster Hunter World (2018)	141	102	96	70
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	116	70	66	54
Hitman 2 (2018)	116	90	85	74
F1 2019 (2019)	166	146	122	104

	MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8	Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
Noise		-10%	1%	-9%	-12%	-8%
off / environment *	28.2	30.5 -8%	29.3 -4%	28.2 -0%	28.6 -1%	28.4 -1%
Idle Minimum *	29.5	32.8 -11%	29.3 1%	28.8 2%	30.8 -4%	28.6 3%
Idle Average *	29.6	32.8 -11%	29.3 1%	31.4 -6%	30.8 -4%	28.6 3%
Idle Maximum *	29.6	32.8 -11%	29.3 1%	33.3 -13%	35 -18%	28.6 3%
Load Average *	33	42.5 -29%	35.7 -8%	46.2 -40%	45 -36%	47.8 -45%
Witcher 3 ultra *	47.2		44.2 6%	50.5 -7%	51.6 -9%	53.7 -14%
Load Maximum *	52	47.5 9%	45.6 12%	51.3 1%	57.8 -11%	53.7 -3%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso		29.5 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB
Carga		33 / 52 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


40 °C	48.8 °C	40.4 °C
41 °C	46.4 °C	37.6 °C
32.4 °C	34 °C	32.6 °C

Máximo: 48.8 °C
Médio: 39.2 °C


53 °C	34.8 °C	44.2 °C
32.2 °C	54 °C	41.2 °C
30 °C	32 °C	33.2 °C

Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 49 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


33.8 °C	34.6 °C	32.4 °C
33.2 °C	34.6 °C	31.4 °C
31 °C	31 °C	29.6 °C

Máximo: 34.6 °C
Médio: 32.4 °C


36.8 °C	32.8 °C	38.4 °C
31.6 °C	37.2 °C	36.6 °C
31 °C	34.2 °C	34.6 °C

Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C

Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


38.8 °C	46.4 °C	36 °C
38.2 °C	42.8 °C	34.6 °C
28.4 °C	30 °C	26.8 °C

Máximo: 46.4 °C
Médio: 35.8 °C


52.8 °C	33.2 °C	42.6 °C
31 °C	50.2 °C	33.4 °C
28.4 °C	33 °C	29.4 °C

Máximo: 52.8 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 46.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.37 / 0.68 Watt
Ocioso	13.6 / 17.9 / 20.6 Watt
Carga	96 / 218.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		6%	5%	-6%	-30%	-18%
Idle Minimum *	13.6	14.7 -8%	14.5 -7%	10.9 20%	23.5 -73%	16.8 -24%
Idle Average *	17.9	18.6 -4%	18.5 -3%	14.7 18%	28 -56%	29 -62%
Idle Maximum *	20.6	22.6 -10%	20 3%	32.4 -57%	32 -55%	30.8 -50%
Load Average *	96	90 6%	81.6 15%	121.9 -27%	102.4 -7%	89.2 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	154.6		132 15%	143.5 7%	142.8 8%	141.1 9%
Load Maximum *	218.6	120 45%	208.1 5%	209.6 4%	209 4%	192.3 12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		5h 59min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 54min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 05min

	MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh	Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh	Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 66 Wh	CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 46.74 Wh	Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh
Battery Runtime		-9%	-18%	-52%	-24%	-9%
Reader / Idle	359	301 -16%	240 -33%
WiFi v1.3	234	197 -16%	145 -38%	112 -52%	178 -24%	214 -9%
Load	65	69 6%	76 17%

Pro

+ Excelente experiência de digitação

+ Teclado RGB por tecla com muitas opções predefinidas

+ Dois slots PCIe NVMe com baia de 2,5 polegadas

+ Tela brilhante

+ Excelente precisão das cores

+ Painel de 144 Hz

+ Bom desempenho térmico

+ Ótimo desempenho de jogos

+ Boa relação de preço/desempenho

+ Boa variedade de portas

Contra

- A carcaça de plástico se sente barata

- Os botões do touchpad se sentem ocos

- As teclas são pequenas

- A tampa é fina e se flexiona muito facilmente

- Alto-falantes pobres sem corpo

- Posicionamento inadequado das portas no lado direito

- Sem Thunderbolt 3

- Sem G-Sync

- Desempenho pobre dos cartões SD

- Ventiladores barulhentos sob carga máxima

In Review: MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE. Review unit courtesy of MSI.

O MSI GP65 Leopard continua pavimentando a estrada iniciada pelo GP62 e GP63. Enquanto o chassi parece e se sente barato, o hardware alojado no interior é excelente para o preço. A tela de 144 Hz, em particular, é a estrela do show. A tela não apenas oferece uma jogabilidade fluente, mas também é incrivelmente precisa nas cores, algo inédito em um portátil para jogos de nível intermediário.

Outras sutilezas premium começaram a aparecer no meio do mercado de portáteis para jogos, como mostra o GP65. O teclado continua com a excelente reputação das marcas SteelSeries e a luz de fundo RGB por tecla é uma adição bem-vinda (e divertida). A seleção de portas é variada, embora o posicionamento seja estranho e frustrante. Finalmente, os jogos e desempenho geral são ótimos por US$ 1.500; o GP65 seria um portátil de criação de conteúdo decente e uma máquina de jogos.

No entanto, o GP65 não foi criado no vácuo. Existem alguns candidatos que oferecem melhores pacotes gerais nesta faixa de preço. Por exemplo, o Lenovo Legion Y540 possui melhor gerenciamento térmico (com ventiladores mais silenciosos) e desempenho de jogos comparável, por US$ 100 a menos. O CUK Model Z oferece uma carcaça melhor, um teclado mecânico e uma GPU mais poderosa (RTX 2070 Max-Q) pelo mesmo preço de US$ 1.500. No entanto, o Modelo Z esquenta muito mais que o GP65 e isso com os ventiladores mais barulhentos.

A decisão se resume ao que você deseja que seu portátil faça. Se seu objetivo principal são os jogos (e as térmicas que se danem), oCUK Model Z é difícil de superar nesta faixa de preço. Se o orçamento for de maior preocupação, o Lenovo Legion Y540 tem um bom preço com uma pequena desvantagem no desempenho dos jogos. (A Lenovo frequentemente também tem ofertas.)

Embora comprometa a qualidade da construção e o gerenciamento térmico, o MSI GP65 Leopard representa um excelente valor e é um ótimo portátil "polifuncional”. A excelente tela é boa o suficiente para a criação de conteúdo, e o desempenho dos jogos certamente deixará a maioria dos jogadores satisfeitos no futuro próximo. Por US$ 1.500, o GP65 Leopard fica no extremo do mercado de gama média, mas também é um dos melhores portáteis de jogos disponíveis atualmente.

MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US - 08/25/2019 v6 ^(old)
Sam Medley

Acabamento

70 / 98 → 71%

Teclado

83%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

58 / 81 → 71%

Peso

61 / 10-66 → 91%

Bateria

74%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

98%

Desempenho da aplicação

97%

Temperatura

84 / 95 → 88%

Ruído

84 / 90 → 94%

Audio

40%

Camera

61 / 85 → 71%

Médio

75%

84%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Sam Medley - Senior Tech Writer - 1399 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2016

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE - A melhor tela em um portátil para jogos de gama média

Sam Medley, 2019-09- 2 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US audio analysis

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison