Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE - A melhor tela em um portátil para jogos de gama média

Máquina de Plástico Fantástica.

Apesar de algumas desvantagens na qualidade de construção e no gerenciamento térmico, o MSI GP65 Leopard é um excelente portátil para jogos de US$ 1.500. Surpreendentemente, a máquina possui uma das telas mais precisas em cores que medimos em um portátil para jogos. A luz de fundo brilhante da tela e a taxa de atualização de 144 Hz estão no topo do bolo.
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US (GP65 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1335 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, GeForce Game Ready Driver 425.31, NVIDIA Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4-2666/PC4-21300, 2x 8 GB, Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD0625, IPS, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, 512 GB 
Placa de Som
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 Mic in, 1 headphon (HiFi/SPDIF) out, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD/SDXC/SDHC, tamanho normal
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27.5 x 357.7 x 248
Bateria
51 Wh Lítio-Ion, 6 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 2 Watt, Teclado: Chiclet, RGB por tecla, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, MSI Dragon Center, SteelSeries Engine 3, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.322 kg, Suprimento de energia: 729 g
Preço
1550 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

383 mm 260 mm 29 mm 2.3 kg365 mm 260 mm 26 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 258 mm 29.9 mm 2.5 kg360 mm 274 mm 25.9 mm 2.4 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
185.5 MB/s +643%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s +283%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.1 MB/s +225%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.4 MB/s +214%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
 
24.96 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
219.2 MB/s +652%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)
119.3 MB/s +309%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.6 MB/s +201%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s +193%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
 
29.14 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
679 MBit/s +5%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
644 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
630 MBit/s -2%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
611 MBit/s -5%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
601 (562min - 639max) MBit/s -7%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
548 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
677 MBit/s
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
672 MBit/s -1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
666 (597min - 686max) MBit/s -2%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
660 MBit/s -3%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
638 MBit/s -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
619 MBit/s -9%
318.6
cd/m²
332.9
cd/m²
330.2
cd/m²
314.9
cd/m²
348.3
cd/m²
334.2
cd/m²
297.2
cd/m²
346.3
cd/m²
324.2
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG Philips LGD0625 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 348.3 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 327.4 cd/m² Minimum: 17.46 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 348.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 871:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.203
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
LG Philips LGD0625, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
BOE 084D, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Panda LM156LF-GL02, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display
-2%
-3%
-37%
-1%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
64.8
63.8
-2%
63.6
-2%
40.13
-38%
64.5
0%
65.2
1%
sRGB Coverage
96.2
93.4
-3%
91.7
-5%
60.3
-37%
93
-3%
90.9
-6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.3
65
-2%
65.2
-2%
41.48
-37%
65.7
-1%
66.3
0%
Response Times
-26%
-4%
-159%
-29%
-21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.6 ?(6, 3.6)
14 ?(7, 7)
-46%
8.8 ?(4, 4.4)
8%
26 ?(13.6, 12.4)
-171%
13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8)
-42%
14.4 ?(7.2, 7.2)
-50%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
11 ?(7, 4)
-6%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-15%
25.6 ?(14.8, 10.8)
-146%
12 ?(7.6, 4.4)
-15%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
8%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-17%
-30%
-99%
-26%
-45%
Brightness middle
348.3
316
-9%
299
-14%
290.1
-17%
306.8
-12%
331
-5%
Brightness
327
295
-10%
290
-11%
274
-16%
309
-6%
327
0%
Brightness Distribution
85
84
-1%
89
5%
86
1%
87
2%
83
-2%
Black Level *
0.4
0.42
-5%
0.29
27%
0.54
-35%
0.38
5%
0.35
12%
Contrast
871
752
-14%
1031
18%
537
-38%
807
-7%
946
9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
2.7
-69%
3.7
-131%
5.16
-223%
3.16
-98%
4.22
-164%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.07
5.65
-11%
7
-38%
18.09
-257%
6.05
-19%
6.95
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1
1.58
-58%
2
-100%
4.35
-335%
2.4
-140%
3.27
-227%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
2.35
-2%
4.1
-78%
4.4
-91%
2.3
-0%
3.9
-70%
Gamma
2.203 100%
2.41 91%
2.19 100%
2.1 105%
2.17 101%
2.26 97%
CCT
6707 97%
6904 94%
7166 91%
7362 88%
6557 99%
7392 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
60
-2%
59.3
-3%
38.1
-38%
60
-2%
59
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
93
-3%
91.5
-5%
60
-37%
92.6
-4%
90.5
-6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-15% / -15%
-12% / -22%
-98% / -95%
-19% / -21%
-23% / -34%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1137 (993.64-1270.77)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1006 (997.68-1086.13)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1157 (1151.34-1211.72)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1103 (1087.93-1223.2)
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1190 (1182.24-1239.66)
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1072 (1059.41-1260.12)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=196, last 2 years)
276 Points +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
193 Points 0%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H
193 Points
SCHENKER Slim 15 Comet Lake U
Intel Core i7-10510U
189 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
183.7 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-8565U
179 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points -11%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points -11%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
171 Points -11%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
157 Points -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=199, last 2 years)
3392 Points +176%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1288 Points +5%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H
1227 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points -4%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1114 (896min - 1114max) Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
850 Points -31%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
799 Points -35%
SCHENKER Slim 15 Comet Lake U
Intel Core i7-10510U
796 Points -35%
SCHENKER Slim 15 Comet Lake U
Intel Core i7-10510U
790 Points -36%
SCHENKER Slim 15 Comet Lake U
Intel Core i7-10510U
760 Points -38%
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-8565U
557 Points -55%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)
3.33 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
2.13 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=10)
2.1 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1.96 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)
37.2 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H
14.11 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=10)
13 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
12.47 Points
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years)
63783 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28251 - 36304, n=13)
33539 Points
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
32846 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
31938 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
25656 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years)
9755 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
7169 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (6659 - 7214, n=13)
6923 Points
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
6579 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
6421 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Average of class Gaming
  (64 - 1021, n=12, last 2 years)
308 s *
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
278 s *
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  ()
154.4 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
193 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1227 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
115.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=169, last 2 years)
7771 Points +33%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
5834 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
5814 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5716 Points -2%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8
5678 Points -3%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5609 Points -4%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5528 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (4395 - 5997, n=16)
5523 Points -5%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=168, last 2 years)
10833 Points +14%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
10098 Points +6%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9859 Points +4%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
9502 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (8361 - 10056, n=16)
9263 Points -3%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
9245 Points -3%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8
9158 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
9020 Points -5%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=168, last 2 years)
9878 Points +22%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
8106 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
7671 Points -5%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8
7546 Points -7%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7431 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7430 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (6098 - 8106, n=16)
7382 Points -9%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7328 Points -10%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=168, last 2 years)
12018 Points +72%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7564 Points +8%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8
7190 Points +3%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
6999 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
6886 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (4344 - 8069, n=16)
6727 Points -4%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6673 Points -5%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6631 Points -5%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +17%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5077 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
4507 Points +1%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8
4459 Points 0%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
4456 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (3533 - 5185, n=11)
4396 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4251 Points -5%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
4240 Points -5%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5857 Points +1%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
5808 Points
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8
5696 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (4450 - 5931, n=11)
5532 Points -5%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
5497 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5419 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5041 Points -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4456 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5808 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5834 pontos
Ajuda
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
Average Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
 
AS SSD
119%
151%
55%
89%
196%
12%
Seq Read
1307
2485
90%
2927
124%
1280
-2%
1283
-2%
2168
66%
Seq Write
730
1575
116%
2149
194%
905
24%
1730
137%
2194
201%
4K Read
27.58
53.4
94%
42.43
54%
48.73
77%
49.89
81%
53.2
93%
4K Write
80.3
113.5
41%
147.1
83%
107
33%
110.1
37%
128.5
60%
4K-64 Read
878
725
-17%
1286
46%
321.1
-63%
904
3%
1320
50%
873 ?(825 - 916, n=3)
-1%
4K-64 Write
246.8
1371
456%
1432
480%
761
208%
792
221%
2162
776%
349 ?(247 - 488, n=3)
41%
Access Time Read *
0.231
0.059
74%
0.065
72%
0.058
75%
0.036
84%
0.04
83%
0.1463 ?(0.081 - 0.231, n=3)
37%
Access Time Write *
0.223
0.032
86%
0.026
88%
0.046
79%
0.042
81%
0.029
87%
Score Read
1036
1027
-1%
1621
56%
498
-52%
1082
4%
1590
53%
Score Write
400
1642
311%
1794
349%
958
140%
1075
169%
2510
528%
517 ?(400 - 649, n=3)
29%
Score Total
1940
3163
63%
4208
117%
1711
-12%
2745
41%
4924
154%
Copy ISO MB/s
993
1519
53%
3089
211%
935 ?(876 - 993, n=2)
-6%
Copy Program MB/s
309.5
749
142%
549
77%
260 ?(210 - 310, n=2)
-16%
Copy Game MB/s
582
943
62%
1171
101%

* ... smaller is better

Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1581 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 686 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 581 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 240.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.96 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 99.3 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 268.1 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 977 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=187, last 2 years)
43524 Points +103%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
31826 Points +48%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
27732 Points +29%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK
26582 Points +24%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
22749 Points +6%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
21492 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (19143 - 24662, n=40)
21459 Points 0%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
20784 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
14569 Points -32%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
13512 Points -37%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
12388 Points -42%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
4274 Points -80%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Average of class Gaming
  (1251 - 26759, n=187, last 2 years)
20841 Points +63%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK
16253 Points +27%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
15274 Points +20%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
12758 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12424 Points -3%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12421 Points -3%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
11829 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (1107 - 14726, n=40)
11688 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11099 Points -13%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9773 Points -23%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
8801 Points -31%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
4097 Points -68%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=197, last 2 years)
31252 Points +83%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
22820 Points +33%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
20466 Points +20%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK
20434 Points +19%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
18060 Points +5%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
17119 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (14768 - 18358, n=43)
16301 Points -5%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
15343 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11640 Points -32%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9534 Points -44%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
8532 Points -50%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
3321 Points -81%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Average of class Gaming
  (261 - 21745, n=193, last 2 years)
12841 Points +110%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
9177 Points +50%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK
7968 Points +30%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
7907 Points +29%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
6709 Points +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5679 - 6926, n=41)
6254 Points +2%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
6117 Points
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5872 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
3676 Points -40%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
3607 Points -41%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
1099 Points -82%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (4312 - 18867, n=192, last 2 years)
13155 Points +158%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK
9447 Points +85%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
8112 Points +59%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
7774 Points +52%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
7098 Points +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (4463 - 9287, n=41)
6766 Points +33%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
6755 Points +32%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
6502 Points +27%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
5104 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
3993 Points -22%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
2514 Points -51%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=192, last 2 years)
13032 Points +106%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
9480 Points +50%
Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8153 Points +29%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9980HK
7754 Points +22%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
6748 Points +6%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
6340 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5660 - 6910, n=41)
6206 Points -2%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5699 Points -10%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
3547 Points -44%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK
3353 Points -47%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
1000 Points -84%
3DMark 11 Performance
18447 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37504 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15252 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6117 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (108.2 - 718, n=99, last 2 years)
453 fps +80%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
306 fps +21%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
297.8 fps +18%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
266.7 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (188.7 - 295, n=27)
256 fps +2%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
252 fps
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (168.5 - 617, n=102, last 2 years)
361 fps +103%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
209 fps +17%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
200 fps +12%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
189.9 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (152.2 - 215, n=24)
185.1 fps +4%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
178 fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years)
238 fps +114%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
122 fps +10%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
120.4 fps +8%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
117.4 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (74.4 - 131, n=33)
111.3 fps 0%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
111 fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)
126.8 fps +115%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
63.3 fps +7%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
63 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (50.6 - 74, n=40)
61.1 fps +4%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
60.5 fps +3%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
59 fps
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
53.1 (50min, 51P1 - 58max) fps -10%
Rocket League
1280x720 Performance
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
250 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (244 - 252, n=4)
249 fps 0%
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
250 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (242 - 250, n=5)
248 fps -1%
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
244 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (180.6 - 247, n=5)
231 fps -5%
Monster Hunter World
1280x720 Low Preset (Image Quality High)
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
141 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  ()
141 fps 0%
1920x1080 Mid Preset (Image Quality High)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (102 - 104, n=2)
103 fps +1%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
102 fps
1920x1080 High Preset (Image Quality High)
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
96 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (89.9 - 96, n=2)
93 fps -3%
1920x1080 Highest Preset (Image Quality High)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (70 - 70.2, n=2)
70.1 fps 0%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
70 fps
Hitman 2
1280x720 Low AF:Trilinear
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
116 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  ()
116 fps 0%
1920x1080 Medium AF:4x
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
90 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (89.4 - 90, n=2)
89.7 fps 0%
1920x1080 High AF:8x
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
85 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (81.4 - 85, n=2)
83.2 fps -2%
1920x1080 Ultra AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (74 - 78.4, n=2)
76.2 fps +3%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
74 fps
F1 2019
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (166 - 231, n=4)
197.8 fps +19%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
166 fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (146 - 177, n=4)
163.8 fps +12%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
146 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (122 - 149, n=4)
136.5 fps +12%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
122 fps
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (97 - 127, n=4)
106.8 fps +3%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
104 fps
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G: Ø58.8 (54-63)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G: Ø53.1 (50-58)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø55.8 (52-60)
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8: Ø59.7 (57-64)
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB: Ø54.3 (50-59)
baixomédiaaltoultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 252 178 111 59
Rocket League (2017) 250 250 244
Monster Hunter World (2018) 141 102 96 70
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 116 70 66 54
Hitman 2 (2018) 116 90 85 74
F1 2019 (2019) 166 146 122 104
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
Noise
-10%
1%
-9%
-12%
-8%
off / environment *
28.2
30.5
-8%
29.3
-4%
28.2
-0%
28.6
-1%
28.4
-1%
Idle Minimum *
29.5
32.8
-11%
29.3
1%
28.8
2%
30.8
-4%
28.6
3%
Idle Average *
29.6
32.8
-11%
29.3
1%
31.4
-6%
30.8
-4%
28.6
3%
Idle Maximum *
29.6
32.8
-11%
29.3
1%
33.3
-13%
35
-18%
28.6
3%
Load Average *
33
42.5
-29%
35.7
-8%
46.2
-40%
45
-36%
47.8
-45%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47.2
44.2
6%
50.5
-7%
51.6
-9%
53.7
-14%
Load Maximum *
52
47.5
9%
45.6
12%
51.3
1%
57.8
-11%
53.7
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
29.5 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB
Carga
33 / 52 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
 40 °C48.8 °C40.4 °C 
 41 °C46.4 °C37.6 °C 
 32.4 °C34 °C32.6 °C 
Máximo: 48.8 °C
Médio: 39.2 °C
53 °C34.8 °C44.2 °C
32.2 °C54 °C41.2 °C
30 °C32 °C33.2 °C
Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  49 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.845.92539.540.33138.838.84037.538.45037.738.76336.240.38034.837.110035.136.112533.53516033.134.420032.338.425031.539.631530.848.240030.453.350030.753.463029.962.880029.873.4100029.280125028.979.716002979.7200028.880.8250028.878.5315028.680.7400028.781500028.475.4630028.475.5800028.174.41000028.275.7125002877.31600028.380.2SPL41.190.4N4.178median 29median 75.5Delta0.913.733.832.833.832.836.832.837.736.137.732.532.532.531.132.831.129.327.129.330.225.530.229.226.529.227.626.527.637.626.137.645.524.445.545.322.545.353.320.953.363.221.163.26019.76061.519.761.563.318.763.361.518.161.559.617.959.664.917.764.962.817.362.86017.9606017.76057.21857.257.91857.957.11857.162.518.162.567.41867.464.417.964.451.517.951.573.730.573.7311.331median 60median 18.1median 607.82.17.831.533.228.530.827.430.326.528.724.927.825.327.42328.52228.522.328.822.239.922.151.320.958.220.657.620.357.619.660.419.365.518.766.318.463.818.166.417.265.516.766.516.468.315.667.715.565.415.661.715.564.215.561.815.357.114.960.91560.429.377.41.240.7median 18.1median 61.72.57.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225USHP Omen 15-dc1303ngLenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.37 / 0.68 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 13.6 / 17.9 / 20.6 Watt
Carga midlight 96 / 218.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
6%
5%
-6%
-30%
-18%
Idle Minimum *
13.6
14.7
-8%
14.5
-7%
10.9
20%
23.5
-73%
16.8
-24%
Idle Average *
17.9
18.6
-4%
18.5
-3%
14.7
18%
28
-56%
29
-62%
Idle Maximum *
20.6
22.6
-10%
20
3%
32.4
-57%
32
-55%
30.8
-50%
Load Average *
96
90
6%
81.6
15%
121.9
-27%
102.4
-7%
89.2
7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
154.6
132
15%
143.5
7%
142.8
8%
141.1
9%
Load Maximum *
218.6
120
45%
208.1
5%
209.6
4%
209
4%
192.3
12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 59min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 54min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 05min
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 66 Wh
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 46.74 Wh
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh
Battery Runtime
-9%
-18%
-52%
-24%
-9%
Reader / Idle
359
301
-16%
240
-33%
WiFi v1.3
234
197
-16%
145
-38%
112
-52%
178
-24%
214
-9%
Load
65
69
6%
76
17%

Pro

+ Excelente experiência de digitação
+ Teclado RGB por tecla com muitas opções predefinidas
+ Dois slots PCIe NVMe com baia de 2,5 polegadas
+ Tela brilhante
+ Excelente precisão das cores
+ Painel de 144 Hz
+ Bom desempenho térmico
+ Ótimo desempenho de jogos
+ Boa relação de preço/desempenho
+ Boa variedade de portas

Contra

- A carcaça de plástico se sente barata
- Os botões do touchpad se sentem ocos
- As teclas são pequenas
- A tampa é fina e se flexiona muito facilmente
- Alto-falantes pobres sem corpo
- Posicionamento inadequado das portas no lado direito
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Sem G-Sync
- Desempenho pobre dos cartões SD
- Ventiladores barulhentos sob carga máxima
In Review: MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE. Review unit courtesy of MSI.
In Review: MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE. Review unit courtesy of MSI.

O MSI GP65 Leopard continua pavimentando a estrada iniciada pelo GP62 e GP63. Enquanto o chassi parece e se sente barato, o hardware alojado no interior é excelente para o preço. A tela de 144 Hz, em particular, é a estrela do show. A tela não apenas oferece uma jogabilidade fluente, mas também é incrivelmente precisa nas cores, algo inédito em um portátil para jogos de nível intermediário.

Outras sutilezas premium começaram a aparecer no meio do mercado de portáteis para jogos, como mostra o GP65. O teclado continua com a excelente reputação das marcas SteelSeries e a luz de fundo RGB por tecla é uma adição bem-vinda (e divertida). A seleção de portas é variada, embora o posicionamento seja estranho e frustrante. Finalmente, os jogos e desempenho geral são ótimos por US$ 1.500; o GP65 seria um portátil de criação de conteúdo decente e uma máquina de jogos.

No entanto, o GP65 não foi criado no vácuo. Existem alguns candidatos que oferecem melhores pacotes gerais nesta faixa de preço. Por exemplo, o Lenovo Legion Y540 possui melhor gerenciamento térmico (com ventiladores mais silenciosos) e desempenho de jogos comparável, por US$ 100 a menos. O CUK Model Z oferece uma carcaça melhor, um teclado mecânico e uma GPU mais poderosa (RTX 2070 Max-Q) pelo mesmo preço de US$ 1.500. No entanto, o Modelo Z esquenta muito mais que o GP65 e isso com os ventiladores mais barulhentos. 

A decisão se resume ao que você deseja que seu portátil faça. Se seu objetivo principal são os jogos (e as térmicas que se danem), oCUK Model Z é difícil de superar nesta faixa de preço. Se o orçamento for de maior preocupação, o Lenovo Legion Y540 tem um bom preço com uma pequena desvantagem no desempenho dos jogos. (A Lenovo frequentemente também tem ofertas.)

Embora comprometa a qualidade da construção e o gerenciamento térmico, o MSI GP65 Leopard representa um excelente valor e é um ótimo portátil "polifuncional”. A excelente tela é boa o suficiente para a criação de conteúdo, e o desempenho dos jogos certamente deixará a maioria dos jogadores satisfeitos no futuro próximo. Por US$ 1.500, o GP65 Leopard fica no extremo do mercado de gama média, mas também é um dos melhores portáteis de jogos disponíveis atualmente.

MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US - 08/25/2019 v6 (old)
Sam Medley

Acabamento
70 / 98 → 71%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
58 / 81 → 71%
Peso
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Bateria
74%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
98%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
84 / 95 → 88%
Ruído
84 / 90 → 94%
Audio
40%
Camera
61 / 85 → 71%
Médio
75%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE - A melhor tela em um portátil para jogos de gama média
Sam Medley, 2019-09- 2 (Update: 2019-09- 4)