Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GP65 10SFK: O Intel Core i7 de 10a geração deixa sua marca

Poder do Intel de 10a Geração.

A MSI venceu a maioria dos outros OEMs no mercado com portáteis com os mais recentes processadores Comet Lake-H da Intel. Depois de experimentar o Core i5-10300H e o Core i9-10980HK, vamos ver como o Core i7-10750H se encaixa na linha.
Gaming Geforce Comet Lake MSI Laptop / Notebook
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US (GP65 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1260 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 445.87, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, Apacer DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3, IPS, LGD0625, Brilhante: não, 144 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
, Secundário: Seagate ST2000LM007
Placa de Som
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo audio, Card Reader: Leitor SD
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27.5 x 357.7 x 248
Bateria
51 Wh Lítio-Ion, 6-cell
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 2 W, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Dragon Center 2.0, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.322 kg, Suprimento de energia: 729 g
Preço
1500 USD
Links
MSI página inicial
MSI Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
83.2 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.3 kg27.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.1 %
v7 (old)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.4 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
80.4 %
v6 (old)
07/2019
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		2.2 kg26.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.2 %
v6 (old)
06/2019
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.4 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.5 %
v6 (old)
06/2019
Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.1 kg24.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
❌
383 mm 260 mm 29 mm 2.5 kg360.4 mm 262 mm 26.8 mm 2.2 kg361 mm 246 mm 24.4 mm 2.1 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 275 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.4 MB/s +186%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.4 MB/s
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
 
24.96 MB/s -9%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.84 MB/s -28%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s +167%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
31.92 MB/s
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
 
29.14 MB/s -9%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
18.73 MB/s -41%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1645 (1401min - 1773max) MBit/s +15%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1434 (736min - 1523max) MBit/s 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1427 (808min - 1646max) MBit/s
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1330 MBit/s -7%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1030 (722min - 1235max) MBit/s -28%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1379 (858min - 1529max) MBit/s +5%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1320 MBit/s 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1314 (949min - 1439max) MBit/s
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1295 (1184min - 1487max) MBit/s -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1242 (1133min - 1283max) MBit/s -5%
ColorChecker
1.9 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GP65 10SFK-047US: 4.6 ∆E min: 1.93 - max: 10.21 ∆E
350.5
cd/m²		361.9
cd/m²		370.9
cd/m²
336.7
cd/m²		384.9
cd/m²		366.3
cd/m²
339.7
cd/m²		360.8
cd/m²		354
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 384.9 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 358.4 cd/m² Minimum: 19.19 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 384.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 574:1 (Preto: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
LG Philips LGD0625, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
CMN N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display
2%
4%
-37%
-0%
23%
Display P3 Coverage
63.5
64.8
2%
66.2
4%
39.56
-38%
63.8
0%
85.8
35%
sRGB Coverage
94.4
96.2
2%
97.1
3%
59.5
-37%
93.4
-1%
100
6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.1
66.3
2%
67.6
4%
40.91
-37%
65
0%
84.2
29%
Response Times
11%
-10%
-161%
-14%
-174%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
10.4 ?(6.4, 4)
9.6 ?(6, 3.6)
8%
15 ?(8, 7)
-44%
30.4 ?(14, 16.4)
-192%
14 ?(7, 7)
-35%
34.4 ?(22.4, 12.4)
-231%
Response Time Black / White *
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
13%
9 ?(5, 4)
25%
27.6 ?(17.6, 10)
-130%
11 ?(7, 4)
8%
26 ?(20, 6)
-117%
PWM Frequency
250 ?(20)
200 ?(99)
Screen
15%
-16%
-61%
2%
-104%
Brightness middle
384.9
348.3
-10%
309
-20%
286.2
-26%
316
-18%
265.7
-31%
Brightness
358
327
-9%
284
-21%
267
-25%
295
-18%
243
-32%
Brightness Distribution
87
85
-2%
88
1%
84
-3%
84
-3%
87
0%
Black Level *
0.67
0.4
40%
0.42
37%
0.33
51%
0.42
37%
0.63
6%
Contrast
574
871
52%
736
28%
867
51%
752
31%
422
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.43
1.6
34%
3.99
-64%
5.45
-124%
2.7
-11%
9.6
-295%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.58
5.07
-11%
8.3
-81%
18.08
-295%
5.65
-23%
18.5
-304%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.03
1
51%
1.12
45%
4.47
-120%
1.58
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
2.3
12%
5.43
-109%
5.3
-104%
2.35
10%
12.7
-388%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.203 100%
2.57 86%
2.1 105%
2.41 91%
2.01 109%
CCT
6981 93%
6707 97%
7767 84%
7679 85%
6904 94%
13654 48%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59.7
61
2%
63
6%
37.6
-37%
60
1%
76
27%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93.9
96
2%
97
3%
59.1
-37%
93
-1%
100
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
9% / 12%
-7% / -11%
-86% / -69%
-4% / -0%
-85% / -88%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.4 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

 
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1240 (1233.16-1291.57)
Maingear Vector 15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1181 (1168.74-1264.9)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1496 (1486.55-1622.78)
Dell G7 17 7790 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1081 (1056.8-1189.87)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points +45%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3795 Points +28%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
3677 Points +24%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
3505 Points +18%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3431 Points +16%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
2960 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (2017 - 3133, n=55)
2564 Points -13%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
2333 Points -21%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1906 Points -36%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
1737 Points -41%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1633 Points -45%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
499 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points +7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
479 Points +3%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
474 Points +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
463 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (416 - 486, n=55)
443 Points -4%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
437 Points -6%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
418 Points -10%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
416 Points -10%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
403 Points -13%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
352 Points -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
211 Points +11%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
202 Points +6%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
198 Points +4%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H
193 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
190 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
183.7 Points -3%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
180 Points -5%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
173 Points -9%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points -10%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
157 (155min - 159max) Points -17%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
143 Points -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points +44%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1821 Points +41%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1671 (1548.11min - 1671.4max) Points +29%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
1623 Points +26%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1617 (1603min - 1630max) Points +25%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
1292 (1233.16min - 1291.57max) Points
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H
1227 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points -9%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points -14%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
839 (755.39min - 839.42max) Points -35%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
797 Points -38%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
734 Points -43%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
555 Seconds * -51%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
527 Seconds * -44%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (342 - 495, n=21)
433 Seconds * -18%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
367 Seconds *
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
317 Seconds * +14%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * +19%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
290 Seconds * +21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5413 MIPS +9%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
5367 MIPS +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
4954 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4580 - 5090, n=21)
4846 MIPS -2%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4662 MIPS -6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS -6%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS +34%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
44829 MIPS +23%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
43805 MIPS +20%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
36370 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28512 - 35174, n=21)
32357 MIPS -11%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
22139 MIPS -39%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1233 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1218 Points +1%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
1206 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1117 - 1251, n=13)
1190 Points -1%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1143 Points -5%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
874 Points -28%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
7675 Points +16%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
7431 Points +13%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
6604 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4859 - 6262, n=13)
5597 Points -15%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4032 Points -39%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3537 Points -46%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
12.35 fps +20%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.19 fps +18%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.1 fps +17%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.3 fps
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (7.1 - 10.7, n=21)
8.72 fps -15%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.34 fps -38%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
86.6 s *
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
84.3 s * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (54.5 - 64.7, n=9)
59 s * +32%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
58.9 s * +32%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.676 sec * -9%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (0.608 - 0.695, n=14)
0.643 sec * -3%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.623 sec *
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.556 sec * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
13457
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7275
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
37009
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
78.7 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
118 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1292 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
463 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2960 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6254 Points
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
5834 Points -7%
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5761 Points -8%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5625 Points -10%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5609 Points -10%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4732 Points -24%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
4568 Points -27%
Essentials
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
10017 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9859 Points -2%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
9502 Points -5%
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
9379 Points -6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8912 Points -11%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8355 Points -17%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
7644 Points -24%
Productivity
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8193 Points
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
8106 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7507 Points -8%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7328 Points -11%
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7311 Points -11%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
6713 Points -18%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6518 Points -20%
Digital Content Creation
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8088 Points
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7570 Points -6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7221 Points -11%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
6999 Points -13%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6631 Points -18%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5282 Points -35%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
5040 Points -38%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5081 Points +13%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5077 Points +12%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4860 Points +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4516 Points
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
4456 Points -1%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
3928 Points -13%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3917 Points -13%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5913 Points 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5894 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5857 Points -1%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
5808 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5697 Points -3%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
5130 Points -13%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4701 Points -20%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4516 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5894 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
6254 pontos
Ajuda
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1172 μs *

* ... smaller is better

MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP		MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
AS SSD
-79%
-46%
-19%
-49%
-94%
Seq Read
2066
1163
-44%
1019
-51%
2485
20%
1848
-11%
1307
-37%
Seq Write
2418
919
-62%
889
-63%
1575
-35%
601
-75%
730
-70%
4K Read
54.2
48.88
-10%
48.22
-11%
53.4
-1%
35.84
-34%
27.58
-49%
4K Write
129
90.1
-30%
115.5
-10%
113.5
-12%
112
-13%
80.3
-38%
4K-64 Read
1865
323.8
-83%
321.5
-83%
725
-61%
628
-66%
878
-53%
4K-64 Write
1878
403.8
-78%
787
-58%
1371
-27%
428.2
-77%
246.8
-87%
Access Time Read *
0.042
0.24
-471%
0.065
-55%
0.059
-40%
0.079
-88%
0.231
-450%
Access Time Write *
0.091
0.046
49%
0.047
48%
0.032
65%
0.034
63%
0.223
-145%
Score Read
2126
489
-77%
472
-78%
1027
-52%
849
-60%
1036
-51%
Score Write
2249
586
-74%
992
-56%
1642
-27%
600
-73%
400
-82%
Score Total
5482
1332
-76%
1717
-69%
3163
-42%
1829
-67%
1940
-65%
Copy ISO MB/s
2927
1269
-57%
942
-68%
1128
-61%
993
-66%
Copy Program MB/s
728
452.8
-38%
444.5
-39%
326.3
-55%
309.5
-57%
Copy Game MB/s
1614
755
-53%
867
-46%
442.8
-73%
582
-64%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-34%
-33%
-27%
-25%
-33%
Write 4K
145
133.3
-8%
137.5
-5%
50.2
-65%
158.4
9%
99.3
-32%
Read 4K
46.84
55.3
18%
57
22%
35.32
-25%
45.04
-4%
46.96
0%
Write Seq
2377
980
-59%
984
-59%
991
-58%
622
-74%
Read Seq
2185
1406
-36%
1564
-28%
1526
-30%
1592
-27%
Write 4K Q32T1
463.5
286.3
-38%
237.4
-49%
445.1
-4%
434.2
-6%
240.1
-48%
Read 4K Q32T1
527
331.5
-37%
340.7
-35%
526
0%
590
12%
581
10%
Write Seq Q32T1
2395
976
-59%
959
-60%
1647
-31%
630
-74%
686
-71%
Read Seq Q32T1
3470
1520
-56%
1732
-50%
3427
-1%
2108
-39%
1581
-54%
Write 4K Q8T8
748
268.1
Read 4K Q8T8
344.6
977
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-57% / -63%
-40% / -41%
-23% / -22%
-37% / -41%
-64% / -75%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3470 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2395 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 527 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 463.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2185 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2377 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.84 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 145 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
33935 Points +66%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
25497 Points +25%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
23833 Points +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
22326 Points +9%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
20392 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (18169 - 21138, n=19)
20123 Points -1%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
17466 Points -14%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
17119 Points -16%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
15164 Points -26%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
12441 Points -39%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11563 Points -43%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
9428 Points -54%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7866 Points -61%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
14492 Points +93%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
9854 Points +32%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
9656 Points +29%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
8379 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (7006 - 8028, n=18)
7651 Points +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
7492 Points
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6695 Points -11%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
6340 Points -15%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5931 Points -21%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
4298 Points -43%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
3568 Points -52%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
2330 Points -69%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
14057 Points +90%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
10012 Points +35%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
9508 Points +28%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
8043 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (6890 - 8253, n=18)
7537 Points +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
7404 Points
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6521 Points -12%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
6117 Points -17%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5944 Points -20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
4105 Points -45%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
3559 Points -52%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
2474 Points -67%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
43576 Points +68%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
34846 Points +34%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
30746 Points +18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
30456 Points +17%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
26005 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (23335 - 27298, n=21)
25775 Points -1%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
22523 Points -13%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
21492 Points -17%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
20862 Points -20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
16335 Points -37%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14723 Points -43%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
13575 Points -48%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
9394 Points -64%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
18934 Points +38%
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
18534 Points +35%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13804 Points +1%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
13722 Points
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
12758 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
12708 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (8716 - 16364, n=21)
12534 Points -9%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
11914 Points -13%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
9839 Points -28%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
9107 Points -34%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
7309 Points -47%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7163 Points -48%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
6838 Points -50%
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark 06 Standard Score
39513 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
21386 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
39359 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17768 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
7404 pontos
Ajuda
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
178 fps +32%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
135 fps 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
135 fps
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
133 fps -1%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
129 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (91.3 - 160, n=9)
124.5 fps -8%
Asus G752VS
Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
111 (83min) fps -18%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
95 (65min) fps -30%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
141 fps +32%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
116 fps +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
107 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (86 - 114, n=10)
100.4 fps -6%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
100 fps -7%
Asus G752VS
Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
86 (71min) fps -20%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
84 (56min) fps -21%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
81 fps -24%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
124 fps +33%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
110 fps +18%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
93 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (74.2 - 97, n=11)
88.7 fps -5%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
83 fps -11%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
79 (52min) fps -15%
Asus G752VS
Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
72 (59min) fps -23%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
64 fps -31%
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
414.3 fps +27%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
326.4 (306min - 354max) fps
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
301 (256min - 341max) fps -8%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
295.3 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (193.9 - 357, n=12)
290 fps -11%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
287.9 fps -12%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
284.2 fps +16%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
263 (219min - 293max) fps +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
244.5 (232min - 258max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (154 - 250, n=12)
222 fps -9%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
215.4 fps -12%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
191.6 fps -22%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
182 (156min - 213max) fps +13%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
175.9 fps +9%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
160.8 (152min - 177max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (115.7 - 160.8, n=17)
140.1 fps -13%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
131 fps -19%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
116 fps -28%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
109 (94min - 120max) fps +33%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
95.5 fps +16%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
82.1 (77min - 86max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (64 - 82.1, n=21)
74.3 fps -10%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.9 fps -16%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
60.6 fps -26%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø70.5 (64-79)
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 352 316 288.9 164.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 326.4 244.5 160.8 82.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 152 139 128 120
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 102 91.7 77.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 135 107 102 93
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP		MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
Noise
5%
10%
3%
7%
12%
off / environment *
29.3
30
-2%
28.2
4%
30.5
-4%
28
4%
28.2
4%
Idle Minimum *
31.9
30.6
4%
28.2
12%
32.8
-3%
32.2
-1%
29.5
8%
Idle Average *
31.9
30.6
4%
28.2
12%
32.8
-3%
32.2
-1%
29.6
7%
Idle Maximum *
33.5
37.7
-13%
31.4
6%
32.8
2%
32.2
4%
29.6
12%
Load Average *
47
36.5
22%
39.8
15%
42.5
10%
40.9
13%
33
30%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.8
52.1
3%
47
13%
45.4
16%
47.2
12%
Load Maximum *
56.7
48.1
15%
50.2
11%
47.5
16%
48.6
14%
52
8%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
31.9 / 31.9 / 33.5 dB
Carga
47 / 56.7 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.3 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 40.8 °C49.4 °C36.4 °C 
 38.6 °C49 °C36.4 °C 
 28.6 °C30.8 °C26.6 °C 
Máximo: 49.4 °C
Médio: 37.4 °C
55.2 °C33.4 °C57.2 °C
32 °C38.8 °C43.6 °C
28.6 °C32.8 °C30 °C
Máximo: 57.2 °C
Médio: 39.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  51 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57.2 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.647.846.62541.140.441.13138.638.838.64039.837.739.85039.637.939.66338.737.138.78038.636.338.610038.335.438.312540.536.340.516046.936.646.920052.533.252.525052.13252.131554.332.154.340057315750056.130.356.163068.230.368.28007530.975100082.729.282.7125080.429.280.4160079.72979.7200078.729.178.7250076.228.876.2315077.928.677.9400079.128.579.150007628.276630075.52875.5800079.127.979.11000079.327.779.31250078.227.878.21600071.827.771.8SPL90.341.390.3N81.54.281.5median 76median 29.2median 76Delta10.7210.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GP65 10SFK-047USApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 1.23 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 14.2 / 18.8 / 23.9 Watt
Carga midlight 96.9 / 233.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
11%
12%
22%
-4%
8%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
14.2
11.4
20%
14.7
-4%
14.6
-3%
20
-41%
13.6
4%
15
-6%
Idle Average *
18.8
13.5
28%
18.6
1%
17.2
9%
23
-22%
17.9
5%
19
-1%
Idle Maximum *
23.9
21.6
10%
22.6
5%
17.3
28%
29
-21%
20.6
14%
26
-9%
Load Average *
96.9
106
-9%
90
7%
82.7
15%
87
10%
96
1%
101
-4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
185
186
-1%
107
42%
136
26%
154.6
16%
177
4%
Load Maximum *
233.4
196
16%
120
49%
136.7
41%
173
26%
218.6
6%
245
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
3h 40min
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh		Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48 Wh		HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh		MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 41 Wh		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh		MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh
Battery Runtime
51%
30%
-10%
-21%
-23%
6%
WiFi v1.3
220
333
51%
285
30%
197
-10%
174
-21%
169
-23%
234
6%
Reader / Idle
466
301
259
208
359
Load
87
69
41
122
65

Pro

+ Taxa de atualização de 144 Hz e tempos de resposta velozes do branco e preto como padrão
+ Leve para um portátil GeForce RTX 2070
+ Tela bem calibrada de fábrica
+ M.2 2280 + baia SATA III de 2,5 polegadas
+ Teclado confortável
+ Tela brilhante
+ Leitor SD

Contra

- A manutenção exige quebrar um selo de fábrica
- Temperaturas altas durante os jogos
- As portas estão cheias e bem amontoadas
- Sem melhoria na duração da bateria
- Ventiladores barulhentos durante os jogos
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
In review: MSI GP65 10SFK-047US. Test unit provided by Computer Upgrade King
In review: MSI GP65 10SFK-047US. Test unit provided by Computer Upgrade King

Na série Comet Lake-U, as diferenças de desempenho entre gerações e a série Whiskey Lake-U de saída são mínimas, a menos que você opte pelo Comet Lake-U Core i7-10710U de gama alta. Caso contrário, opções menores como o Core i7-10510U terão o mesmo desempenho que o Core i7-8565U mais antigo.

O mesmo pode ser dito para a série Comet Lake-H. O Core i7-10750H se desempenha muito próximo do Core i7-9750H até o ponto em que qualquer diferença seria imperceptível, especialmente se os jogos têm maior probabilidade de vincular à GPU do que à CPU. Em vez disso, os usuários podem considerar a mais avançada opção Core i7-10875H para quaisquer ganhos brutos significativos de desempenho em relação ao Core i7-9750H.

Embora não sejam as notícias que a maioria dos entusiastas gostam de ouvir, são boas notícias para os jogadores que desejam atualizar seus portáteis antigos. O fato de o Comet Lake-H de 10ª geração ser apenas marginalmente mais rápido que o Coffee Lake-H de 9ª geração no nível SKU de gama média significa que você pode atualizar para um portátil de jogos Intel de 9ª geração e ainda obter essencialmente a mesma experiência de jogo que um modelo mais caro Intel de 10a geração. O dinheiro economizado pode ser usado para atualizar outros aspectos mais tangíveis do portátil, como tela ou RAM, ou mesmo um modelo melhor como o MSI GS65, GE65, ou GS65.

O MSI GP65 10SFK é o mesmo portátil que o GP65 9SE do ano passado, mas com um processador um pouco mais rápido e mais novo. Os usuários não perderão nenhum recurso interessante ou enormes vantagens de desempenho ao usar uma CPU Coffee Lake-H.

MSI GP65 10SFK-047US - 05/06/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
68 / 98 → 69%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
61 / 80 → 77%
Peso
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Bateria
56 / 95 → 59%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
93%
Desempenho da aplicação
92%
Temperatura
84 / 95 → 88%
Ruído
67 / 90 → 75%
Audio
75%
Camera
54 / 85 → 64%
Médio
74%
83%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

MSI GP65 10SFK-047US (GP65 Serie)
Análise
•
Breve Análise do Portátil MSI ...

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GP65 10SFK: O Intel Core i7 de 10a geração deixa sua marca
Allen Ngo, 2020-05-12 (Update: 2020-05-18)