Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GL75 9SEK - Um portátil para jogos de gama média com ventiladores barulhentos
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GL73 8SE-010US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GL73 8SE-010US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 259.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 1036:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.49% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.12% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.076
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US AU Optronics AUO479D (B173HAN04.7), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV AU Optronics AUO B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GL73 8SE-010US CMN1747, TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY AUO_B173HAN03, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 AU Optronics AUO309D, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng LGD05CE, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl BOE0825, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 49% | 96% | 53% | 54% | -7% | 51% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.12 | 62.9 53% | 91.1 122% | 64.4 57% | 65.4 59% | 38.37 -7% | 63.3 54% |
| sRGB Coverage | 61.1 | 87.2 43% | 100 64% | 91.3 49% | 90 47% | 57.6 -6% | 90.2 48% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.49 | 63.8 50% | 85.4 101% | 65.6 54% | 65.8 55% | 39.69 -7% | 64.3 51% |
| Response Times | 63% | 59% | 55% | 46% | -38% | -1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26 ? | 6.8 ? 74% | 12.8 ? 51% | 14 ? 46% | 17.6 ? 32% | 40 ? -54% | 31.6 ? -22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24.4 ? | 12 ? 51% | 8.2 ? 66% | 9 ? 63% | 10 ? 59% | 29.6 ? -21% | 19.6 ? 20% |
| PWM Frequency | 25770 ? | ||||||
| Screen | 12% | -50% | -28% | 2% | -22% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 259.1 | 312.3 21% | 326.4 26% | 335 29% | 343.6 33% | 251 -3% | 299.6 16% |
| Brightness | 261 | 297 14% | 317 21% | 300 15% | 320 23% | 232 -11% | 285 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 90 -3% | 82 -12% | 87 -6% | 76 -18% | 86 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.21 16% | 0.28 -12% | 0.7 -180% | 0.34 -36% | 0.17 32% | 0.33 -32% |
| Contrast | 1036 | 1487 44% | 1166 13% | 479 -54% | 1011 -2% | 1476 42% | 908 -12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.23 | 3.6 15% | 7.83 -85% | 4.99 -18% | 3.74 12% | 6.2 -47% | 3.68 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 23.39 | 6.74 71% | 13.36 43% | 9.32 60% | 5.33 77% | 18.6 20% | 8.05 66% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.9 | 3.95 -1% | 2.83 27% | 1.93 51% | 3.49 11% | 4.8 -23% | 3.15 19% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 3.1 -138% | 10.9 -738% | 5.2 -300% | 3.7 -185% | 4.2 -223% | 3.8 -192% |
| Gamma | 2.076 106% | 2.26 97% | 1.97 112% | 2.49 88% | 2.36 93% | 2.32 95% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 6542 99% | 7002 93% | 11056 59% | 7719 84% | 6388 102% | 7454 87% | 7240 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39 | 56.6 45% | 75.8 94% | 59 51% | 58 49% | 36.5 -6% | 58.1 49% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 61 | 86.6 42% | 100 64% | 91 49% | 90 48% | 57.4 -6% | 89.8 47% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 41% /
25% | 35% /
-9% | 27% /
-3% | 34% /
17% | -22% /
-21% | 16% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4241 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5428 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5748 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GL73 8SE-010US Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -29% | -79% | -33% | 17% | 5% | |
| Seq Read | 1296 | 940 -27% | 794 -39% | 972 -25% | 1473 14% | 1709 32% |
| Seq Write | 1391 | 921 -34% | 427.6 -69% | 838 -40% | 1962 41% | 1345 -3% |
| 4K Read | 29.67 | 48.05 62% | 21.91 -26% | 38.57 30% | 31.66 7% | 49.73 68% |
| 4K Write | 104.3 | 56.6 | 80.7 | 84.4 | 108.2 | |
| 4K-64 Read | 1042 | 320.1 -69% | 354.3 -66% | 723 -31% | 1125 8% | 731 -30% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1284 | 703 -45% | 285.7 -78% | 647 -50% | 1866 45% | 1233 -4% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.108 | 0.079 27% | 0.237 -119% | 0.071 34% | 0.073 32% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.031 | 0.046 -48% | 0.09 -190% | 0.054 -74% | 0.047 -52% | 0.034 -10% |
| Score Read | 1201 | 462 -62% | 456 -62% | 859 -28% | 1304 9% | 951 -21% |
| Score Write | 1542 | 900 -42% | 385 -75% | 812 -47% | 2147 39% | 1476 -4% |
| Score Total | 3363 | 1616 -52% | 1061 -68% | 4142 23% | 2909 -13% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1416 | 811 | 868 | 1080 | 1284 | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 569 | 278 | 337 | 481.1 | 589 | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 971 | 556 | 590 | 875 | 1107 | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -13% | -49% | -37% | -6% | 22% | |
| Write 4K | 149.1 | 129.3 -13% | 71.2 -52% | 79.2 -47% | 110.7 -26% | 135.3 -9% |
| Read 4K | 48.58 | 54.4 12% | 32.7 -33% | 39.69 -18% | 35.49 -27% | 63.7 31% |
| Write Seq | 978 | 404.5 | 950 | 1665 | 1337 | |
| Read Seq | 1447 | 8.3 | 1087 | 1284 | 1617 | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 462 | 476.8 3% | 204 -56% | 189.6 -59% | 340.2 -26% | 568 23% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 606 | 338.1 -44% | 303.2 -50% | 304 -50% | 407.5 -33% | 645 6% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1454 | 982 -32% | 386.5 -73% | 948 -35% | 2038 40% | 1428 -2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1724 | 1622 -6% | 1214 -30% | 1488 -14% | 2367 37% | 3184 85% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1211 | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1104 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-23% | -64% /
-68% | -35% /
-35% | 6% /
8% | 14% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (19143 - 24662, n=40) | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Average of class Gaming (1251 - 26759, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (1107 - 14726, n=40) | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18769 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 38284 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15035 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6245 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 262 | 182 | 115 | 58 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 252 | 249 | 246 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 120 | 96 | 90 | 80 |
| F1 2019 (2019) | 209 | 166 | 138 | 99 |
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GL73 8SE-010US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -2% | -2% | 1% | 11% | 11% | |
| off / environment * | 28.1 | 28.2 -0% | 28.6 -2% | 30.4 -8% | 27.8 1% | 28.8 -2% | 28.2 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.9 | 29.5 5% | 33.8 -9% | 31.2 -1% | 31.1 -1% | 28.8 7% | 30.1 3% |
| Idle Average * | 30.9 | 30.3 2% | 34 -10% | 35.3 -14% | 31.1 -1% | 29.5 5% | 30.1 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31 | 31.9 -3% | 34.1 -10% | 35.3 -14% | 35 -13% | 31.1 -0% | 30.1 3% |
| Load Average * | 39 | 50.4 -29% | 36.5 6% | 44.4 -14% | 42 -8% | 35.2 10% | 34.2 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.5 | 50.1 6% | 47.8 11% | 41 23% | 44.5 17% | 35.2 34% | 34.2 36% |
| Load Maximum * | 53.5 | 50.1 6% | 52.2 2% | 45.2 16% | 46.5 13% | 41 23% | 43.8 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.9 / 30.9 / 31 dB |
| Carga |
| 39 / 53.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
MSI GL75 9SEK-056US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.03 / 0.67 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10.7 / 15.2 / 17.8 Watt |
| Carga |
88.2 / 206.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GL73 8SE-010US i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -37% | 4% | -58% | -37% | 38% | 26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10.7 | 16.2 -51% | 8.8 18% | 20.4 -91% | 17.8 -66% | 4.04 62% | 5.4 50% |
| Idle Average * | 15.2 | 24.8 -63% | 16.2 -7% | 26.5 -74% | 24.7 -63% | 7.2 53% | 9.2 39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 17.8 | 28.6 -61% | 18.3 -3% | 37 -108% | 29.6 -66% | 11.4 36% | 13 27% |
| Load Average * | 88.2 | 127.6 -45% | 86.1 2% | 129 -46% | 110 -25% | 80.8 8% | 85.9 3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 147.8 | 147.1 -0% | 146.7 1% | 186 -26% | 167.8 -14% | 93.6 37% | 107.9 27% |
| Load Maximum * | 206.5 | 212.7 -3% | 186.4 10% | 216 -5% | 178.6 14% | 144.5 30% | 182.2 12% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GL75 9SEK-056US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh | MSI GL73 8SE-010US i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 41 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 72 Wh | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 86 Wh | HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh | Asus Strix Hero III G731GV i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 66 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -32% | -10% | 6% | 26% | 6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 474 | 388 -18% | 253 -47% | 268 -43% | 695 47% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 254 | 168 -34% | 174 -31% | 253 0% | 339 33% | 270 6% |
| Load | 60 | 33 -45% | 88 47% | 97 62% | 59 -2% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 66 |
Pro
Contra
O MSI GL75 é talvez a definição de um saco misto. Por US$ 1.500, há algumas coisas para gostar na máquina. A taxa de atualização de 120 Hz da tela combina bem com o hardware poderoso para criar uma excelente máquina de jogos FHD. O excelente teclado e a luz de fundo RGB por tecla são toques excelentes a esse preço, e os alto-falantes tornam o consumo de mídia agradável.
No entanto, alguns problemas e aborrecimentos prejudicam o portátil e o mantêm longe da excelência. Os ventiladores são barulhentos e os pontos quentes ao longo da base do chassi tornam o uso sobre as pernas desconfortável. Além disso, a luz de fundo da tela é fraca e sem brilho.
Por causa desses pontos difíceis, os compradores em potencial vão querer conferir os concorrentes. A Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU oferece qualidade de construção muito melhor, melhor gerenciamento de calor e ventiladores mais uniformes, ao custo de um desempenho gráfico um pouco menor. O GP65 Leopard da MSI possui desempenho semelhante, o mesmo teclado e uma tela muito superior em um pacote menor, embora também sofra com pontos quentes e ventiladores estridentes. Esses dois dispositivos provam que os jogadores não precisam de opções a esse preço, dificultando ainda mais sua decisão.
No geral, o GL75 não consegue arrancar um "uau". O portátil é uma boa máquina, mas, a menos que você precise de um portátil para jogos de 17,3 polegadas com um bom teclado RGB e alto-falantes, existem melhores opções disponíveis.
MSI GL75 9SEK-056US
- 09/30/2019 v7 (old)
Sam Medley
Price comparison
