Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GL72 7RD-028 (Core i7, Full HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 300 cd/m²
Contraste: 1196:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.16 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 Chi Mei CMN1735 N173HGE-E11, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 AU Optronics, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Nexoc G739 CMN1738, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus GL753VE-DS74 LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE72 7RE-046 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), , 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GL72 6QF 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | 0% | 25% | 1% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.2 | 63.1 -3% | 66.7 2% | 90.7 39% | 65.9 1% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.3 | 86.5 -8% | 91 -3% | 99.9 6% | 95.6 1% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.6 | 63.3 -4% | 66.4 1% | 85.2 30% | 66.7 2% | |
| Response Times | -18% | -39% | -5% | 36% | -18% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29 ? | 38 ? -31% | 45 ? -55% | 36 ? -24% | 27 ? 7% | 45.6 ? -57% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 27 ? -4% | 28 ? -8% | 22 ? 15% | 9 ? 65% | 25.6 ? 2% |
| PWM Frequency | 961 | 450 ? -53% | 980 ? 2% | |||
| Screen | 12% | 23% | 19% | 16% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 299 | 301 1% | 312 4% | 366 22% | 253 -15% | 194.7 -35% |
| Brightness | 274 | 270 -1% | 304 11% | 348 27% | 230 -16% | 183 -33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 79 -1% | 85 6% | 90 13% | 86 8% | 79 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.38 -52% | 0.23 8% | 0.35 -40% | 0.24 4% | 0.247 1% |
| Contrast | 1196 | 792 -34% | 1357 13% | 1046 -13% | 1054 -12% | 788 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 12.92 | 3.49 73% | 4.19 68% | 4.4 66% | 5.01 61% | 11.44 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.91 | 7.49 62% | 8.7 56% | 9.7 51% | 10.4 48% | 18.78 6% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.16 | 1.88 86% | 3.72 72% | 3 77% | 7.26 45% | 11.36 14% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.35 94% | 2.29 96% | 2.1 105% | 2.09 105% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 15046 43% | 6587 99% | 7104 91% | 6362 102% | 6329 103% | 12948 50% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 56 -7% | 59 -2% | 56 -7% | 76 27% | 60.8 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94 | 86 -9% | 91 -3% | 86 -9% | 100 6% | 95.3 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
5% | -5% /
7% | 7% /
15% | 26% /
20% | -8% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 961 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 961 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 961 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3220 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3553 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4735 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Nexoc G739 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus GL753VE-DS74 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | MSI GL72 6QF Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 67% | 17392% | 5607% | 14630% | |
| Read Seq | 135.3 | 117.6 -13% | 1666 1131% | 1049 675% | 2217 1539% |
| Write Seq | 127 | 109.1 -14% | 1192 839% | 584 360% | 950 648% |
| Read 512 | 45.57 | 39.93 -12% | 857 1781% | 583 1179% | 938 1958% |
| Write 512 | 58.3 | 98.6 69% | 827 1319% | 458 686% | 719 1133% |
| Read 4k | 0.582 | 0.435 -25% | 60.7 10330% | 14.1 2323% | 51.9 8818% |
| Write 4k | 1.022 | 3.152 208% | 154.5 15017% | 108 10468% | 149.7 14548% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 1.068 | 1.008 -6% | 636 59451% | 57.8 5312% | 634 59263% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 1.102 | 4.705 327% | 544 49265% | 264 23856% | 322.1 29129% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7594 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 63241 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19306 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5622 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Nexoc G739 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Asus GL753VE-DS74 | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 178.2 | 146.7 | 140 | 65.2 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 94.1 | 64 | 36.3 | 23.8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 110.4 | 63.3 | 38.4 | 32.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32.4 / 32.4 / 32.8 dB |
| HDD |
| 32.8 dB |
| DVD |
| 47 / dB |
| Carga |
| 40.9 / 43.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.8 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nexoc G739 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.73 / 0.9 Watt |
| Ocioso | 9.6 / 15 / 16.5 Watt |
| Carga |
104 / 129 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Nexoc G739 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus GL753VE-DS74 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE72 7RE-046 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GL72 6QF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | 21% | -23% | -58% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9.6 | 7 27% | 7.5 22% | 14 -46% | 22.1 -130% |
| Idle Average * | 15 | 14 7% | 11.3 25% | 20 -33% | 28.3 -89% |
| Idle Maximum * | 16.5 | 23 -39% | 11.8 28% | 25 -52% | 29.8 -81% |
| Load Average * | 104 | 82 21% | 82.1 21% | 82 21% | 87 16% |
| Load Maximum * | 129 | 163 -26% | 116.6 10% | 135 -5% | 134.1 -4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 96.3 |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GL72 7RDX-602 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 43.2 Wh | Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Nexoc G739 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | Asus GL753VE-DS74 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh | MSI GE72 7RE-046 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 51.4 Wh | MSI GL72 6QF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 43 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 37% | 110% | 31% | 3% | -7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 327 | 613 87% | 520 59% | 238 -27% | ||
| H.264 | 169 | 322 91% | 195 15% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 203 | 278 37% | 288 42% | 235 16% | 184 -9% | 107 -47% |
| Load | 40 | 128 220% | 47 18% | 61 53% |
Pro
Contra
Um portátil de jogos grande e rápido a um preço acessível. Isto é o que o MSI GL72 quer ser. Para poder oferecer um portátil de jogos por $1100, você deve fazer alguns sacrifícios. Isso começa com a elegante carcaça mate. Infelizmente, ela é feita inteiramente de plástico. O acabamento e a qualidade cumprem as expectativas básicas, mas poderiam ser melhores. Particularmente irritante: As impressões digitais "adornam" a carcaça muito rapidamente. A tela melhorou e é mais brilhante do que a de seu antecessor, embora esta melhoria seja limitada - nossos dispositivos de comparação apresentaram melhores telas para oferecer. O uso de um painel TN não está atualizado. Todos os aparelhos de comparação foram equipados com telas IPS. Além desta desvantagem, o novo MSI GL72 tem uma grande vantagem: a sua prontidão para trabalhar. O portátil de 17 polegadas demonstra perfeitamente como os portáteis de jogos devem fazer uso de seus componentes.
O nível de ruído e as temperaturas permanecem em um nível aceitável. Os jogadores casuais que procuram um portátil grande e tenham uma ideia clara do preço que estão dispostos a pagar serão bastante felizes com o MSI GL72.
Por um pouco mais de dinheiro, você também pode obter um painel IPS mais brilhante, SSD PCIe e um impulso gráfico com o Asus GL753VE ou o Nexoc G739.
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
- 06/21/2017 v6 (old)
Nino Ricchizzi
Price comparison
