Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GL63 8RC (i5-8300H, GTX 1050)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 286.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 843:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.16
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.72% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell G5 15 5587 LGD053F, 156WF6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 Chi Mei N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE LG Philips LGD0533, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Sabre 15G ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | 97% | 0% | -2% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.4 | 38.13 -3% | 85.4 117% | 39.53 0% | 38.81 -1% | 38.97 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.2 | 56.8 -4% | 100 69% | 59.2 0% | 57.9 -2% | 58.2 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.72 | 39.47 -3% | 83.8 106% | 40.86 0% | 40.03 -2% | 40.3 -1% |
| Response Times | 1% | -26% | -19% | -16% | -1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.6 ? | 33 ? 2% | 44 ? -31% | 42 ? -25% | 38.8 ? -15% | 32 ? 5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 24 ? -0% | 29 ? -21% | 27 ? -13% | 28 ? -17% | 25.6 ? -7% |
| PWM Frequency | 198 ? | 24900 ? | 20000 ? | |||
| Screen | -7% | -17% | -3% | 11% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 286.5 | 229 -20% | 258 -10% | 243 -15% | 256.6 -10% | 248.4 -13% |
| Brightness | 258 | 224 -13% | 234 -9% | 231 -10% | 243 -6% | 241 -7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 87 6% | 79 -4% | 87 6% | 81 -1% | 84 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.28 18% | 0.54 -59% | 0.24 29% | 0.19 44% | 0.3 12% |
| Contrast | 843 | 818 -3% | 478 -43% | 1013 20% | 1351 60% | 828 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.57 | 6.1 -10% | 9.74 -75% | 6.36 -14% | 5 10% | 7.5 -35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.8 | 12.2 27% | 14.6 13% | 12.76 24% | 20.1 -20% | 25.2 -50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.16 | 6.12 -47% | 6.51 -56% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 5.68 -23% | 11.59 -152% | 5.63 -22% | 2.7 41% | 6.5 -41% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.4 92% | 2.19 100% | 2.47 89% | 2.32 95% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 7564 86% | 6989 93% | 11851 55% | 7411 88% | 6599 98% | 7852 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.4 | 36 -4% | 76 103% | 38 2% | 36.7 -2% | 37 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58.9 | 57 -3% | 100 70% | 59 0% | 57.7 -2% | 57.9 -2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-5% | 18% /
5% | -7% /
-5% | -2% /
5% | -5% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8300H (206 - 286, n=4) | |
| MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US | |
| MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3927 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5270 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3912 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | Dell G5 15 5587 SK hynix SC311 M.2 | Gigabyte Sabre 15G Liteonit CV3-8D128 | MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -8% | 26% | 82% | 145% | -91% | |
| Write 4K | 60.2 | 67 11% | 66.3 10% | 132.7 120% | 108.5 80% | 0.296 -100% |
| Read 4K | 19.94 | 25.8 29% | 36.68 84% | 32.25 62% | 37.67 89% | 0.363 -98% |
| Write Seq | 443.1 | 238 -46% | 469.2 6% | 476.5 8% | 1120 153% | 102.3 -77% |
| Read Seq | 527 | 506 -4% | 536 2% | 867 65% | 1300 147% | 85.3 -84% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 140.5 | 155.2 10% | 182 30% | 400.9 185% | 243.9 74% | 0.403 -100% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 215.8 | 195.8 -9% | 357.9 66% | 281.5 30% | 311.6 44% | 0.822 -100% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 489 | 232.7 -52% | 507 4% | 474.9 -3% | 1395 185% | 79.8 -84% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 544 | 549 1% | 562 3% | 1558 186% | 2667 390% | 97 -82% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 214 | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 205 |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Aorus X5 v8 | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB | |
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (14979 - 40201, n=40) | |
| Asus GL552VW-DH74 | |
| MSI PX60 6QD | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Aorus X5 v8 | |
| MSI GV62 8RE-016US | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 2GB | |
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (4935 - 6651, n=43) | |
| Asus GL552VW-DH74 | |
| MSI PX60 6QD | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7709 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20894 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5594 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 192.7 | 160.8 | 155.5 | 64 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 125.1 | 74.9 | 42.4 | 21.9 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 121.9 | 74.9 | 40.1 | 33.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.6 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 38.6 / 56.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) | ||
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | Dell G5 15 5587 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 M.2 | Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128 | MSI GV62 8RE-016US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-8300H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus GL503VD-DB74 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -8% | -8% | -14% | -2% | |
| off / environment * | 28.6 | 30.3 -6% | 28.2 1% | 28.2 1% | 30 -5% | 28.3 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.6 | 31.1 -9% | 33 -15% | 33.5 -17% | 33 -15% | 30.6 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 31.6 | 31.1 2% | 33.3 -5% | 33.5 -6% | 35 -11% | 30.8 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.6 | 34.2 -8% | 34.7 -10% | 33.7 -7% | 40 -27% | 32.8 -4% |
| Load Average * | 38.6 | 34.9 10% | 44.5 -15% | 41 -6% | 45 -17% | 37.6 3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.6 | 42.7 -5% | 49.2 -21% | 52.3 -29% | 50 -23% | 47 -16% |
| Load Maximum * | 56.8 | 44 23% | 52.8 7% | 52.3 8% | 55 3% | 53.5 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
MSI GL63 8RC-069US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.39 / 0.58 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7.1 / 9.8 / 10.4 Watt |
| Carga |
88.8 / 132.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G5 15 5587 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus GL503VD-DB74 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus X5 v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | 0% | -5% | -58% | -148% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.1 | 4.9 31% | 8 -13% | 8.2 -15% | 16.2 -128% | 25 -252% |
| Idle Average * | 9.8 | 8.5 13% | 10.9 -11% | 11.1 -13% | 18.2 -86% | 31 -216% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.4 | 9.1 12% | 11 -6% | 11.8 -13% | 18.9 -82% | 33 -217% |
| Load Average * | 88.8 | 90.7 -2% | 76.7 14% | 81 9% | 82.7 7% | 102 -15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 93.3 | 110 -18% | 94.9 -2% | 95.1 -2% | 125.7 -35% | 194 -108% |
| Load Maximum * | 132.5 | 144 -9% | 106.4 20% | 123.3 7% | 162.3 -22% | 239 -80% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GL63 8RC-069US i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 41 Wh | Dell G5 15 5587 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 56 Wh | Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 47 Wh | Asus GL503VD-DB74 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 64 Wh | MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 41 Wh | MSI GL62M 7RD-077 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 41 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 112% | 34% | 54% | -39% | -8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 440 | 705 60% | 493 12% | 647 47% | 166 -62% | 387 -12% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 255 | 391 53% | 261 2% | 348 36% | 115 -55% | 225 -12% |
| Load | 41 | 133 224% | 77 88% | 73 78% | 41 0% | 41 0% |
Pro
Contra
O chassi do MSI GL63 é claramente capaz de alojar GPUs mais exigentes do que a GTX 1050 devido às suas várias grades de ventilação e à solução de resfriamento de grandes dimensões. A consequência disso é positiva, porque os compradores receberão um sistema que, subsequentemente, funcionará mais frio e mais silencioso como resultado direto. Não podemos enfatizar a importância dessas qualidades em um portátil para jogos, pois muitos são notórios por serem barulhentos e quentes durante cargas pesadas. Os proprietários dos Razer Blade 14, MSI GS73VR, Aorus X5, ou Asus GL503VD saberão como as ventoinhas de seus sistemas podem distrair ao jogar seus títulos favoritos.
Outras surpresas incluem os alto-falantes acima da média e excelente desempenho da CPU com Turbo Boost sustentável, devido à grande sobrecarga de temperatura. Portáteis de jogos mais poderosos e caros têm uma ou duas coisas para aprender com o GL63.
Há desvantagens notáveis e cantos cortados para refletir o preço econômico. Em especial, recomendamos que verifique bem as teclas WLAN e do mouse e atualize o Windows imediatamente após a compra, uma vez que tivemos problemas em nossa unidade de teste. O leitor de SD é incrivelmente lento, tanto o Thunderbolt 3 quanto o NVMe estão ausentes, o módulo WLAN é apenas 1x1, e luxos comuns como iluminação RGB por tecla ou 4K UHD não estão incluídos. Este é um sistema que se concentra nos elementos essenciais para os jogos e achamos que ele alcança essa marca, desde que os pontos negativos acima não sejam grandes obstáculos.
Temperaturas mais frias, ventiladores mais silenciosos e Turbo Boost sustentável da CPU. O GL63 é um excelente sistema de jogos de nível de entrada que verifica todas as caixas certas para jogadores casuais e tradicionais. Algumas questões de controle de qualidade em nossa unidade de teste significam que os usuários devem ter cuidado com certos defeitos.
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
- 07/13/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
