Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR: Para jogadores econômicos
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.2 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 78.5 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 23.1 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.6 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.6 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.6 kg | 27.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 252 cd/m²
Contraste: 1096:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 3.64
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.31% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.196
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR B173HAN04.9 (AUO978F), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR AU Optronics B173HAN04.7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 BOE NV173FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS AU Optronics B173HAN04.7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 1% | -1% | 64% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.98 | 39.46 -1% | 40.55 1% | 39.47 -1% | 65.6 64% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.9 | 58.4 -3% | 59.7 0% | 58.9 -2% | 98.1 64% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.31 | 40.77 -1% | 41.89 1% | 40.77 -1% | 67.8 64% |
| Response Times | 8% | 36% | 8% | 75% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.4 ? | 34 ? 11% | 22.4 ? 42% | 35 ? 9% | 6.8 ? 82% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 ? | 26.4 ? 4% | 19.2 ? 30% | 26 ? 6% | 8.8 ? 68% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | ||||
| Screen | -13% | -3% | -19% | 31% | |
| Brightness middle | 252 | 251.2 0% | 264.8 5% | 263 4% | 337.9 34% |
| Brightness | 253 | 242 -4% | 253 0% | 246 -3% | 305 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 92 0% | 90 -2% | 85 -8% | 81 -12% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.34 -48% | 0.31 -35% | 0.47 -104% | 0.29 -26% |
| Contrast | 1096 | 739 -33% | 854 -22% | 560 -49% | 1165 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.24 | 4.5 -6% | 4.73 -12% | 5.07 -20% | 2.18 49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.4 | 20 7% | 18.89 12% | 20.5 4% | 3.9 82% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.64 | 3.91 -7% | 4.64 -27% | 4.9 -35% | 0.69 81% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 4 -43% | 1.4 50% | 2.55 9% | 3.1 -11% |
| Gamma | 2.196 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.16 102% | 2.37 93% | 2.07 106% |
| CCT | 7027 93% | 5882 111% | 6641 98% | 6446 101% | 6882 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 41 | 37.3 -9% | 38.4 -6% | 37 -10% | 62 51% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 58.1 -2% | 59.3 1% | 59 0% | 98.2 66% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-8% | 11% /
2% | -4% /
-13% | 57% /
43% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 9% | 23% | 16% | 36% | |
| Write 4K | 138.8 | 140.7 1% | 189.7 37% | 140 1% | 139.2 0% |
| Read 4K | 50.6 | 43.18 -15% | 62.3 23% | 49.04 -3% | 53 5% |
| Write Seq | 1032 | 1829 77% | 1681 63% | 1963 90% | 1950 89% |
| Read Seq | 1199 | 1095 -9% | 1608 34% | 1455 21% | 2328 94% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 464.6 | 431.7 -7% | 468.6 1% | 398.2 -14% | 408.9 -12% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 550 | 527 -4% | 541 -2% | 461.9 -16% | 551 0% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1216 | 1831 51% | 1770 46% | 1969 62% | 1938 59% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2275 | 1708 -25% | 1898 -17% | 1927 -15% | 3467 52% |
Sustained Read Speed: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 17704 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13396 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5677 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (93 - 120.4, n=17) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (51.6 - 65.1, n=21) | |
| Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 178 | 170 | 139 | 73.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 106 | 56.6 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 146 | 133 | 124 | 116 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 108 | 92.1 | 78.4 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 83 | 73 | ||
| Battlefield V (2018) | 104 | 95.7 | ||
| Hunt Showdown (2020) | 69.1 | |||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 90.2 | 63.6 | ||
| F1 2020 (2020) | 122 | 87 | ||
| Death Stranding (2020) | 88.3 | 85.5 | ||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 75 | 58 | ||
| Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) | 39.4 | 26.8 | ||
| Serious Sam 4 (2020) | 67.1 | 52.3 | ||
| Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 66.8 | |||
| Star Wars Squadrons (2020) | 159 | 156 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 35 / 37 / 39 dB |
| Carga |
| 45 / 46 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | 2% | 6% | 2% | 12% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 28.4 -14% | 28.7 -15% | 30.2 -21% | 28.4 -14% | 24 ? 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 35 | 33 6% | 28.7 18% | 30.2 14% | 30.2 14% | 25.5 ? 27% |
| Idle Average * | 37 | 33 11% | 30.5 18% | 30.2 18% | 30.2 18% | 27.2 ? 26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 39 | 33.1 15% | 32.5 17% | 30.2 23% | 32 18% | 30.2 ? 23% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 37.7 16% | 42.5 6% | 41.5 8% | 33.2 26% | 42.4 ? 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44 | 39.2 11% | 50.1 -14% | 44.5 -1% | 55 -25% | |
| Load Maximum * | 46 | 46 -0% | 53.4 -16% | 44.6 3% | 55 -20% | 53.4 ? -16% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -18% | -9% | -5% | -18% | -10% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 51 | 42 18% | 47.6 7% | 50.6 1% | 44.2 13% | 46.2 ? 9% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 53.4 -1% | 50.8 4% | 53.8 -2% | 49 8% | 49.2 ? 7% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 34.2 -37% | 33 -32% | 26.6 -6% | 33.6 -34% | 31.2 ? -25% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25 | 37.4 -50% | 29 -16% | 27.8 -11% | 39.6 -58% | 32.2 ? -29% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.6 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 8 / 10 / 15 Watt |
| Carga |
95 / 193 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -17% | -2% | 9% | -55% | -56% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8 | 13 -63% | 7.4 7% | 5.4 32% | 14.7 -84% | 13.6 ? -70% |
| Idle Average * | 10 | 15.7 -57% | 10.5 -5% | 9.8 2% | 20.4 -104% | 19 ? -90% |
| Idle Maximum * | 15 | 21 -40% | 17 -13% | 10.9 27% | 26.9 -79% | 26.8 ? -79% |
| Load Average * | 95 | 87 8% | 103.7 -9% | 104 -9% | 93.2 2% | 106.9 ? -13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 133 | 96.4 28% | 128.1 4% | 134.3 -1% | 185.4 -39% | |
| Load Maximum * | 193 | 145.8 24% | 183.2 5% | 193 -0% | 237.8 -23% | 251 ? -30% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 51 Wh | MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 51 Wh | Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 90 Wh | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 57.48 Wh | MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 65 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 12% | 128% | 76% | -7% | 46% | |
| Reader / Idle | 435 | 463 6% | 543 25% | 661 52% | 565 ? 30% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 238 | 283 19% | 512 115% | 396 66% | 222 -7% | 375 ? 58% |
| Load | 57 | 63 11% | 196 244% | 120 111% | 85.3 ? 50% | |
| H.264 | 439 | 408 ? |
Pro
Contra
O GF75 10SDR-253 foi feito para jogadores que buscam o melhor desempenho por um preço inferior a US$ 1.200.
O GeForce GTX 1660 Ti é muito mais rápido que o GTX 1650 (Ti) que geralmente é encontrado em portáteis com preços semelhantes. O desempenho da CPU também é impressionante, embora tivéssemos desejado um Ryzen 5 4600H em vez do Core i7-10750H, o que teria sido não apenas potencialmente mais rápido, mas também mais eficiente, mais frio e, portanto, também mais silencioso graças ao seu processo de fabricação de 7 nm (em comparação com 14 nm). O resto do hardware era adequado. 16 GB of RAM, an M.2 PCIe SSD, and a 144 Hz panel are up to date.
Uma pontuação mais alta poderia ter sido alcançada com melhor conectividade (sem Thunderbolt 3, sem leitor de cartão, sem DisplayPort), melhor gerenciamento do ventilador e uma bateria de maior capacidade. Os Patinhas entre nós ainda terão dificuldade em resistir. Considerando que uma licença do Windows 10 pode ser adquirida por cerca de US$ 50 já, o fato de o dispositivo ser vendido sem ela em alguns países só será problemático para iniciantes inexperientes.
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR
-
10/06/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
