Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GF63 Thin 9SC: Gamer leve por pouco menos de $1000

Bom pacote com algumas limitações.

Enquanto portáteis de jogos de orçamento frequentemente têm dificuldades rodando os jogos atuais com detalhes máximos, a relação de preço-desempenho é boa, na maioria dos casos. O MSI GF63 Thin 9SC é um digno representante desta espécie.
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC (GF63 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-9300H 4 x 2.4 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1020 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 441.87, Optimus
Memória
8 GB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Single Channel, 1 de 2 Slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN02.1 (AUO21ED), IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G, 512 GB 
, NVMe SSD. Slots: 1x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2,5 polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 microfone, 1 fone
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22 x 359 x 254
Bateria
51 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 3 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de CA 120-watts, marco de 2,5 polegadas, cartão de garantia, Recovery instructions, Guia de início rápido, Dragon Center, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.78 kg, Suprimento de energia: 450 g
Preço
949 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
77.6 %
v7 (old)
01/2020
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
1.8 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080
79.6 %
v7 (old)
10/2019
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.7 kg23.7 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.5 %
v6 (old)
05/2019
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.2 kg27 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.5 %
v7 (old)
07/2019
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
77 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.1 kg23.9 mm15.60"1920x1080

Size Comparison

363 mm 255 mm 27 mm 2.2 kg364 mm 273 mm 23.7 mm 2.7 kg363 mm 254.6 mm 23.9 mm 2.1 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 254 mm 22 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
247
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
242
cd/m²
240
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B156HAN02.1 (AUO21ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 260 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 249.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 260 cd/m²
Contraste: 1130:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.56
ΔE Greyscale 2.83 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.01% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.76% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
AU Optronics B156HAN02.1 (AUO21ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO23ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
LG LP156WFC-SPD1 (LGD0563), IPS, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
LGD05CE, IPS, 1920x1080
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
CMN 156HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
115%
1%
2%
13%
Display P3 Coverage
37.76
83.1
120%
37.97
1%
38.37
2%
42.81
13%
sRGB Coverage
56.5
99.9
77%
57
1%
57.6
2%
63.8
13%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
39.01
96.8
148%
39.23
1%
39.69
2%
44.31
14%
Response Times
-1%
11%
9%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44.8 ?(22, 22.8)
48 ?(22.8, 25.2)
-7%
42 ?(20.8, 21.2)
6%
40 ?(21.2, 18.8)
11%
45.6 ?(23.6, 22)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
31.6 ?(17.2, 14.4)
30 ?(16.8, 13.2)
5%
26.8 ?(16, 10.8)
15%
29.6 ?(17.2, 12.4)
6%
30.8 ?(16.8, 14)
3%
PWM Frequency
25910 ?(20)
Screen
-19%
-2%
-21%
-16%
Brightness middle
260
234
-10%
238
-8%
251
-3%
275
6%
Brightness
249
216
-13%
226
-9%
232
-7%
253
2%
Brightness Distribution
92
87
-5%
83
-10%
76
-17%
83
-10%
Black Level *
0.23
0.22
4%
0.27
-17%
0.17
26%
0.18
22%
Contrast
1130
1064
-6%
881
-22%
1476
31%
1528
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.1
6.52
-59%
4.11
-0%
6.2
-51%
5.4
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.93
10.58
-33%
6.89
13%
18.6
-135%
21.3
-169%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.56
3.56
-0%
3.76
-6%
4.8
-35%
4.4
-24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.83
5.33
-88%
1.78
37%
4.2
-48%
3.7
-31%
Gamma
2.53 87%
2.86 77%
2.41 91%
2.32 95%
2.12 104%
CCT
6158 106%
5983 109%
6311 103%
7454 87%
6376 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36
36
0%
36
0%
36.5
1%
40.8
13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56
57
2%
57
2%
57.4
3%
63.6
14%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
32% / 8%
3% / 0%
-3% / -13%
-1% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
04590135180225270315360405450495540585630675720765810Tooltip
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø737 (729.39-797)
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø771 (679.21-818)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø707 (700.72-757)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø748 (730.55-769.02)
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø755 (746.1-761.43)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=190, last 2 years)
722 Points +73%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
419 Points 0%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
418 Points
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
404 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
398 Points -5%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=190, last 2 years)
8254 Points +375%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
1821 Points +5%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
1737 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
1723 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
1530 Points -12%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=194, last 2 years)
277 Points +60%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points +2%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
173 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points -1%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
169 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=197, last 2 years)
3399 Points +326%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
818 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
801 (748.64min - 797.24max) Points +1%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
797 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
769 Points -4%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
757 Points -5%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
173 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
797 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1737 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
418 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=167, last 2 years)
7777 Points +59%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4973 Points +2%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i5-9300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G
4889 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4873 Points 0%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, KBG30ZMS128G
4615 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
4400 Points -10%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
KBG30ZMS128G
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-43%
48%
105%
34%
Write 4K
80.6
65.3
-19%
109.1
35%
112.1
39%
103.6
29%
Read 4K
41.82
29.71
-29%
42.05
1%
42.01
0%
39.91
-5%
Write Seq
597
128.8
-78%
1457
144%
1964
229%
1160
94%
Read Seq
963
859
-11%
1421
48%
2065
114%
990
3%
Write 4K Q32T1
188.8
95.8
-49%
287.8
52%
318.2
69%
283.4
50%
Read 4K Q32T1
403.7
197.6
-51%
317.9
-21%
406.7
1%
344.5
-15%
Write Seq Q32T1
689
132.5
-81%
1455
111%
2534
268%
1455
111%
Read Seq Q32T1
1583
1208
-24%
1739
10%
3438
117%
1690
7%
Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1583 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 689 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 403.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 188.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 963 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 597 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.82 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 80.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
10378 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
17713 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7177 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
3136 pontos
Ajuda
051015202530Tooltip
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i5-9300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G: Ø31.9 (29-34)
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=195, last 2 years)
31290 Points +283%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9536 Points +17%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9292 Points +14%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9239 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9221 Points +13%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
8161 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=190, last 2 years)
13056 Points +335%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3565 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3517 Points +17%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3488 Points +16%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3004 Points
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=185, last 2 years)
43596 Points +280%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
13447 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
13270 Points +16%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
13233 Points +15%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
13125 Points +15%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
11458 Points
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (35.6 - 449, n=124, last 2 years)
239 fps +349%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
62.2 fps +17%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
61.1 (51min) fps +15%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
59.8 (50min) fps +12%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i5-9300H
53.2 (44min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=167, last 2 years)
127.2 fps +318%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
37 fps +22%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
35.4 (28min) fps +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
34.5 (32min, 32P1 - 37max) fps +13%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
34.4 (26min) fps +13%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i5-9300H
30.4 (24min) fps
baixomédiaaltoultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 146 99 53.2 30.4
Apex Legends (2019) 144 71.1 58.4 57
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 72 52 49 46
Metro Exodus (2019) 73.3 36.9 27.5 22.6
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 154 81.6 68.8 38.7
The Division 2 (2019) 82 56 45 32
Anno 1800 (2019) 60.4 52.2 34.7 18
Rage 2 (2019) 103 46.5 39.7 38.9
F1 2019 (2019) 127 83 69 46
Control (2019) 120 39.9 29.1
Borderlands 3 (2019) 86 53.6 34.9 26
FIFA 20 (2019) 150 118 115 114
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 63 41 39 26
GRID 2019 (2019) 92.4 65.9 53.4 36.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 94.1 59 49.8 40.6
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 67.6 52.2 46.8 37.2
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 57.2 49.7 44.4
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 56.3 43.5 29.3 18.6
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.735.332.933.435.32539.843.741.940.644.93133.537.234.83434.94034.435.532.230.4355033.440.639.730.232.46333.334.634.130.735.68028.936.636.226.53110027.529.829.824.83112531.830.630.224.732.816030.334.631.125.628.820028.628.226.522.627.925027.629.328.521.627.4315292625.521.728.540030.124.623.719.829.75003124.92418.729.763031.72624.818.331.480033.326.125.919.932.9100033.426.926.319.432.8125035.127.126.119.534.116003627.126.717.834.9200034.324.722.417.333.3250032.52120.317.430.9315029.320.719.41728.1400026.519.718.817.225500026.119.718.517.424.6630021.718.417.817.220.7800019.318.517.617.218.6100001918.617.717.218.21250018.618.217.717.2181600019.318.417.717.117.9SPL43.836.335.330.342.8N4.32.62.31.44median 29.3median 24.9median 24median 18.3median 28.8Delta4.54.34.21.85.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI GF63 Thin 9SC

Barulho

Ocioso
35 / 36 / 37 dB
Carga
44 / 43 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-3%
1%
14%
16%
11%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
28.4
5%
Idle Minimum *
35
31
11%
30
14%
28.8
18%
28.4
19%
Idle Average *
36
32
11%
31
14%
29.5
18%
28.4
21%
Idle Maximum *
37
35
5%
33
11%
31.1
16%
28.4
23%
Load Average *
44
49
-11%
46
-5%
35.2
20%
30.1
32%
Witcher 3 ultra *
41
47
-15%
46
-12%
35.2
14%
40.2
2%
Load Maximum *
43
53
-23%
49
-14%
41
5%
40.2
7%

* ... smaller is better

 47 °C47 °C47 °C 
 40 °C44 °C43 °C 
 28 °C32 °C32 °C 
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 40 °C
41 °C47 °C47 °C
39 °C37 °C45 °C
28 °C29 °C23 °C
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-4%
2%
6%
-8%
-12%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
49
-4%
47
-0%
40.3
14%
44.8
5%
Maximum Bottom *
47
55
-17%
50
-6%
48.5
-3%
58.1
-24%
Idle Upper Side *
26
25
4%
24
8%
23.9
8%
27.9
-7%
Idle Bottom *
26
26
-0%
25
4%
24.6
5%
27.9
-7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.434.42540.640.8313432.44030.435.25030.234.56330.740.18026.535.310024.836.612524.742.916025.639.520022.643.825021.657.331521.759.940019.866.550018.77263018.378.980019.983.3100019.477.6125019.574.3160017.869.3200017.368.6250017.463.431501766.2400017.265.1500017.464.3630017.271.2800017.267.81000017.266.71250017.262.41600017.158.8SPL30.385.9N1.461.6median 18.3median 66.2Delta1.85.332.537.439.446.531.535.533.93831.132.92933.128.529.824.933.123.341.826.85022.150.821.960.72167.419.870.61972.818.277.317.67917.778.818.874.419.176.317.678.617.877.217.876.117.670.317.868.617.655.817.86417.759.717.870.717.569.530.487.21.469.7median 17.8median 70.31.49.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GF63 Thin 9SCDell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7 / 9 / 13 Watt
Carga midlight 79 / 164 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
9%
8%
9%
20%
-79%
Idle Minimum *
7
4
43%
5
29%
4.04
42%
3.8
46%
Idle Average *
9
7
22%
7
22%
7.2
20%
6.6
27%
Idle Maximum *
13
12
8%
11
15%
11.4
12%
8.9
32%
Load Average *
79
95
-20%
89
-13%
80.8
-2%
78.4
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
73
86
-18%
90
-23%
93.6
-28%
82
-12%
Load Maximum *
164
135
18%
132
20%
144.5
12%
124
24%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 27min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 12min
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 51 Wh
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 60 Wh
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 57 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 45 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
79%
71%
45%
5%
24%
Reader / Idle
507
867
71%
1044
106%
951
88%
469
-7%
WiFi v1.3
262
482
84%
486
85%
385
47%
368
40%
Load
72
131
82%
88
22%
71
-1%
59
-18%
H.264
482
Witcher 3 ultra
59

Pro

+ Boa relação de preço-desempenho
+ Carcaça leve e estável
+ Temperaturas moderadas

Contra

- Tela com tempos de resposta breves e brilho baixo
- Seleção de portas escassa
- Bastante barulhento durante o modo inativo
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC, test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC, test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Se deixar de lado a escassa seleção de portas (sem leitor de cartões, sem DisplayPort, sem Thunderbolt 3 ou USB 3.1 Gen2), o controle do ventilador que poderia ser melhorado (modo inativo!) e a tela relativamente escura e lenta, o MSI GF63 Thin 9SC não apresenta maiores fraquezas.

O gamer de 15 polegadas é compacto, tem pouco peso e oferece uma boa relação de preço-desempenho, o que deve agradar os gamers que procuram um portátil para jogos portável e acessível. Os dispositivos de entrada, duração da bateria, qualidade da carcaça e desempenho, são todos adequados para este preço de compra.

Mas este é um campo muito competitivo e existem alternativas similares ou até melhores disponíveis, de outros fabricantes (como Dell, Acer, HP e Lenovo).

MSI GF63 Thin 9SC - 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
74 / 98 → 76%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
72%
Conectividade
51 / 80 → 63%
Peso
66 / 10-66 → 99%
Bateria
60 / 95 → 63%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
80%
Desempenho da aplicação
88%
Temperatura
87 / 95 → 91%
Ruído
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
70%
Camera
38 / 85 → 44%
Médio
70%
78%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GF63 Thin 9SC: Gamer leve por pouco menos de $1000
Florian Glaser, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2024-11- 4)