Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GF63 8RC (i5-8300H, GTX 1050)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Strix GL504GM | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
Dell G5 15 5587 | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
MSI GF63 8RC | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
Asus Strix GL504GM | |
Dell G5 15 5587 | |
MSI GF63 8RC |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 266.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 919:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.6
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.73% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.43% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
MSI GF63 8RC AU Optronics B156HAN02.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US AUO80ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Strix GL504GM AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU BOE NV156FHM-N42 , a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 Chi Mei N156HGA-EAL, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell G5 15 5587 LGD053F, 156WF6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 62% | 62% | 2% | 97% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.43 | 65.8 67% | 65.3 66% | 40.53 3% | 85.6 117% | 38.13 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.3 | 92.1 55% | 92.8 56% | 59.9 1% | 99.9 68% | 56.8 -4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.73 | 67 64% | 66.7 64% | 41.87 3% | 83.9 106% | 39.47 -3% |
Response Times | 48% | 70% | -40% | -20% | 7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.2 ? | 20 ? 40% | 7.8 ? 77% | 49 ? -48% | 49.6 ? -49% | 33 ? 1% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 12 ? 56% | 10.4 ? 62% | 36 ? -32% | 24.4 ? 10% | 24 ? 12% |
PWM Frequency | 20000 ? | 25510 ? | ||||
Screen | 24% | 29% | 11% | -19% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 266.6 | 250.9 -6% | 350 31% | 267 0% | 223.9 -16% | 229 -14% |
Brightness | 257 | 257 0% | 338 32% | 250 -3% | 208 -19% | 224 -13% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 83 -7% | 90 1% | 82 -8% | 88 -1% | 87 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.32 -10% | 0.33 -14% | 0.31 -7% | 0.56 -93% | 0.28 3% |
Contrast | 919 | 784 -15% | 1061 15% | 861 -6% | 400 -56% | 818 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.93 | 2.77 53% | 4.3 27% | 4.65 22% | 9.7 -64% | 6.1 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.28 | 5.89 64% | 7.78 52% | 8.2 50% | 19.7 -21% | 12.2 25% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.6 | 2.5 31% | 2.83 21% | 6.12 -70% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 4 41% | 4.4 35% | 2.65 61% | 12.9 -90% | 5.68 16% |
Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.27 97% | 2.26 97% | 2.44 90% | 2.18 101% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 7192 90% | 6901 94% | 7517 86% | 6820 95% | 15225 43% | 6989 93% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.6 | 60 60% | 60 60% | 38 1% | 75 99% | 36 -4% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.3 | 92 55% | 92.5 56% | 59 -1% | 100 69% | 57 -4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 45% /
34% | 54% /
40% | -9% /
2% | 19% /
4% | -1% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3704 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4609 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3711 pontos | |
Ajuda |
MSI GF63 8RC Seagate BarraCuda Pro Compute 1TB ST1000LM049 | Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048 | Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR-81D2005JGE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Dell G3 15 3579 Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172 | Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -14% | -39% | -40% | -13% | |
Write 4K | 1.244 | 1.145 -8% | 0.217 -83% | 0.202 -84% | 1.216 -2% |
Read 4K | 0.544 | 0.453 -17% | 0.367 -33% | 0.461 -15% | 0.451 -17% |
Write Seq | 97.1 | 52.2 -46% | 98.8 2% | 53.5 -45% | 117.6 21% |
Read Seq | 162.1 | 122.7 -24% | 131.1 -19% | 107.2 -34% | 120 -26% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 1.674 | 2.428 45% | 0.222 -87% | 0.882 -47% | 1.212 -28% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 0.998 | 1.063 7% | 0.781 -22% | 1.057 6% | 0.844 -15% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 134.8 | 73.7 -45% | 97 -28% | 63.7 -53% | 115.1 -15% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 154.8 | 120.4 -22% | 93.3 -40% | 77.1 -50% | 121.6 -21% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 | |
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPL | |
MSI GF63 8RC | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (14979 - 40201, n=40) | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 | |
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD | |
MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPL | |
MSI GF63 8RC | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (4935 - 6651, n=43) | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 | |
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD | |
MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPL | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (6744 - 8903, n=42) | |
MSI GF63 8RC | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046 | |
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD | |
MSI GF63 8RC | |
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (4446 - 7607, n=42) | |
MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPL | |
MSI GE72-6QF8H11 | |
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 | |
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7529 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19994 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5511 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 234.1 | 180.8 | 159.8 | 64.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 123.5 | 72.5 | 40.1 | 20.6 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 124.7 | 72.8 | 38.6 | 33.7 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 33.8 / 34 / 34.2 dB |
Carga |
| 37.3 / 46 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28 dB(A) |
MSI GF63 8RC GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate BarraCuda Pro Compute 1TB ST1000LM049 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus Strix GL504GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Dell G5 15 5587 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 M.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 0% | 6% | -5% | 3% | |
off / environment * | 28 | 28.4 -1% | 28.5 -2% | 30.4 -9% | 28.1 -0% | 30.3 -8% |
Idle Minimum * | 33.8 | 28.4 16% | 30 11% | 30.4 10% | 33.5 1% | 31.1 8% |
Idle Average * | 34 | 28.4 16% | 30 12% | 30.8 9% | 33.5 1% | 31.1 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 34.2 | 29.6 13% | 30 12% | 30.8 10% | 33.5 2% | 34.2 -0% |
Load Average * | 37.3 | 43.5 -17% | 41.8 -12% | 33.6 10% | 41.3 -11% | 34.9 6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.4 | 45.7 -5% | 47.6 -10% | 48.5 -12% | 42.7 2% | |
Load Maximum * | 46 | 45.7 1% | 50 -9% | 43.4 6% | 53.5 -16% | 44 4% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.7 °C / -8.5 F).
MSI GF63 8RC audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.91 / 1.05 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.4 / 10.4 / 10.5 Watt |
Carga |
84.7 / 119.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI GF63 8RC i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Seagate BarraCuda Pro Compute 1TB ST1000LM049, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GL63 8RC-069US i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL504GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G5 15 5587 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -71% | -7% | -60% | -1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 16.2 -200% | 7.1 -31% | 10 -85% | 4.9 9% |
Idle Average * | 10.4 | 18.2 -75% | 9.8 6% | 16.9 -63% | 8.5 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.5 | 18.9 -80% | 10.4 1% | 21.1 -101% | 9.1 13% |
Load Average * | 84.7 | 82.7 2% | 88.8 -5% | 112.4 -33% | 90.7 -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 92.7 | 125.7 -36% | 93.3 -1% | 135.5 -46% | 110 -19% |
Load Maximum * | 119.9 | 162.3 -35% | 132.5 -11% | 157.3 -31% | 144 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI GF63 8RC i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 51 Wh | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 82 Wh | Asus Strix GL504GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 66 Wh | Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 41 Wh | Dell G5 15 5587 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 56 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 19% | 7% | 24% | -54% | 60% | |
Reader / Idle | 571 | 592 4% | 166 -71% | 705 23% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 332 | 372 12% | 355 7% | 336 1% | 115 -65% | 391 18% |
Load | 56 | 70 25% | 94 68% | 41 -27% | 133 138% |
Pro
Contra
O MSI GF63 reduz o preço de entrada para portáteis de jogos com borda estreita para apenas $750 e é significativamente mais leve e menor que os concorrentes em sua faixa de preço. Se você quer um portátil para jogos convencionais que também seja portátil o suficiente para trabalhos escolares, por menos de 1.000 USD, então o GF63 é uma excelente opção. Sua combinação de desempenho de jogos, acessibilidade e mobilidade era inédita há apenas um ano, quando os marcos estreitos eram limitados a modelos caros como o XPS 15 9560 ou Gigabyte Aero 15X.
A fim de oferecer um portátil de jogos leve de 15,6 polegadas por um preço baixo, a MSI teve que deixar de lado vários recursos do GF62VR. Os compradores em potencial devem estar cientes de que o GF63 é mais simples, sem teclado numérico, iluminação RGB de zona tripla ou leitor SD. Os usuários que desejarem gráficos GTX 1060 também estarão sem sorte, já que a opção de GPU mais alta é a GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q. Felizmente, o desempenho do núcleo de jogos é confiável quando ligado na tomada e com uma bateria decente para tarefas menos exigentes.
Talvez nossas maiores queixas com o sistema sejam seu clickpad esponjoso e rigidez média do chassi quando comparado a outros portáteis de 15,6 polegadas Asus GL504, HP Spectre x360 15, Razer Blade 15, ou Dell e Gigabyte mencionado anteriormente. Quando comparado com alternativas mais dentro de sua faixa de preço, como o Gigabyte Sabre 15, Dell G7, ou Acer Nitro 5, no entanto, o GF63 é a opção mais leve e mais versátil, no geral.
O MSI GF63 estabelece um melhor equilíbrio entre acessibilidade, portabilidade e desempenho de jogos do que muitos de seus concorrentes devido ao novo design de marcos estreitos. Se você é um gamer com um orçamento apertado e quer algo mais poderoso do que um Ultrabook tradicional, mas sem o peso adicional, o GF62 é uma excelente opção.
MSI GF63 8RC
- 10/23/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo