Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GE75 Raider 9SG (Core i9-9880H, RTX 2080)

Debute do Core i9-9880H.

Depois de uma má estreia no ano passado com a 8ª geração do Core i9-8950HK, a 9ª geração do Core i9-9880H é uma ótima compra, especialmente se você valoriza o alto número de threads simultâneos disponíveis. Os gamers também se beneficiarão do aumento de desempenho em relação ao Core i7-8750H, embora apenas marginalmente.
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook MSI
MSI GE75 9SG (GE75 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-9880H 8 x 2.3 - 4.8 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1380 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 430.64, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, DDR4-2666, PC4-21300, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, CMN175C, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
Placa de Som
NVIDIA TU104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/)
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27.5 x 397 x 268.5
Bateria
65 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dynaudio Stereo, Teclado: SteelSeries, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Dragon Center 2.5, Norton Security, MSI True Color, SteelSeries Engine 3, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.66 kg, Suprimento de energia: 978 g
Preço
3300 USD
Links
MSI página inicial
MSI Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
428 mm 314 mm 58 mm 4.6 kg428 mm 314 mm 30 mm 3.7 kg419 mm 287 mm 30 mm 2.9 kg399 mm 279 mm 27.6 mm 2.7 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.7 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg393 mm 266 mm 18.9 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
176.6 MB/s +551%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s +195%
MSI GE75 9SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.14 MB/s
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207.8 MB/s +526%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s +162%
MSI GE75 9SG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.17 MB/s
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s -4%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s 0%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
680 MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
551 MBit/s -19%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
327 (275min - 394max) MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s +4%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
682 MBit/s +3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
661 MBit/s
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
271 (246min - 281max) MBit/s -59%
376.4
cd/m²		393.6
cd/m²		362.8
cd/m²
358.6
cd/m²		400.7
cd/m²		361.7
cd/m²
358.8
cd/m²		383.3
cd/m²		356.3
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 400.7 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 372.5 cd/m² Minimum: 21.44 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 400.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 1179:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.39
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
MSI GE75 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 17.3", 1920x1080		Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080		Acer Predator Triton 700
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN WLED, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display
-1%
31%
-1%
31%
Display P3 Coverage
61.5
62.9
2%
90.9
48%
62.5
2%
90.8
48%
sRGB Coverage
92
87.8
-5%
100
9%
88.7
-4%
99.9
9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
63.5
63.9
1%
86.2
36%
63.5
0%
85.8
35%
Response Times
-383%
-23%
1%
-435%
-133%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
40 ?(20, 20)
-456%
7.2 ?(3.6, 3.6)
-0%
8 ?(4.4, 3.6)
-11%
44.8 ?(21.2, 23.6)
-522%
28 ?(16.4, 11.6)
-289%
Response Time Black / White *
6.6 ?(3.2, 3.4)
27 ?(16, 11)
-309%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
-45%
5.6 ?(3.8, 1.8)
15%
29.6 ?(15.6, 14)
-348%
13.6 ?(11.8, 1.8)
-106%
PWM Frequency
26040 ?(10)
26000 ?(19)
0%
25000 ?(14)
-4%
Screen
-34%
-17%
-14%
-94%
-40%
Brightness middle
400.7
322
-20%
288
-28%
240
-40%
291
-27%
273
-32%
Brightness
372
303
-19%
287
-23%
248
-33%
277
-26%
273
-27%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
91
2%
83
-7%
84
-6%
90
1%
Black Level *
0.34
0.32
6%
0.2
41%
0.22
35%
0.22
35%
0.26
24%
Contrast
1179
1006
-15%
1440
22%
1091
-7%
1323
12%
1050
-11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.33
2.97
-123%
2.33
-75%
2.14
-61%
5.52
-315%
3.52
-165%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.51
5.08
-45%
5.34
-52%
5.04
-44%
10.72
-205%
6.34
-81%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.39
2.29
-65%
2.47
-78%
1.54
-11%
2.09
-50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
2.26
-74%
1.19
8%
1.62
-25%
6.59
-407%
3.11
-139%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.45 90%
2.41 91%
2.28 96%
2.44 90%
2.43 91%
CCT
6735 97%
6892 94%
6710 97%
6846 95%
7816 83%
6999 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58.2
57
-2%
57
-2%
77
32%
58
0%
76
31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92.1
87
-6%
88
-4%
100
9%
89
-3%
100
9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-209% / -87%
-14% / -15%
6% / -3%
-177% / -121%
-47% / -44%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.2 ms rise
↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 26040 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1887 (1855.46-1948.65)
Eurocom Sky X4C GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1307 (1221.26-1330.45)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points +12%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points +8%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
192 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (181 - 198, n=11)
190.1 Points +1%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points +1%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
176.3 Points -7%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points -7%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
142 Points -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
Intel Core i9-9900K
1968 Points +14%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (1317 - 1721, n=11)
1506 Points -12%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points -20%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1359 Points -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points -35%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
1069 (913.12min - 1068.63max) Points -38%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points -48%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
757 Points -56%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
742 Points -57%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (2953 - 3712, n=7)
3271 Points -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points -35%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1685 Points -55%
CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (441 - 474, n=7)
459 Points +4%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points -3%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
362 Points -18%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15071
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
42456
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6967
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
82 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.11 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
18.94 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
189 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
133.4 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1721 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3712 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
441 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points +4%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points +1%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6306 Points
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5816 Points -8%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4237 Points -33%
Essentials
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
9777 Points +2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
9776 Points +2%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9608 Points
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
8968 Points -7%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7471 Points -22%
Productivity
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8968 Points +7%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8416 Points
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
8277 Points -2%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7759 Points -8%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
6209 Points -26%
Digital Content Creation
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
8740 Points +4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
8732 Points +4%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8419 Points
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7697 Points -9%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4451 Points -47%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points +29%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points +26%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4918 Points +8%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4550 Points
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4041 Points -11%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6055 Points +1%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6004 Points
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5801 Points -3%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5574 Points -7%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4877 Points -19%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4550 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6004 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
6306 pontos
Ajuda
MSI GE75 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)		Acer Predator Triton 700
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)		MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
AS SSD
-28%
9%
10%
-2%
-84%
Seq Read
1358
1419
4%
911
-33%
3058
125%
2517
85%
511
-62%
Seq Write
2381
828
-65%
2347
-1%
2196
-8%
2372
0%
425.7
-82%
4K Read
27.02
35.71
32%
53
96%
38.37
42%
41.47
53%
14.07
-48%
4K Write
89.2
86.8
-3%
122.5
37%
97.7
10%
93
4%
38.34
-57%
4K-64 Read
1642
848
-48%
1577
-4%
1347
-18%
1057
-36%
351.4
-79%
4K-64 Write
1799
708
-61%
1734
-4%
1236
-31%
913
-49%
172.7
-90%
Access Time Read *
0.067
0.063
6%
0.08
-19%
0.056
16%
0.062
7%
0.235
-251%
Access Time Write *
0.05
0.044
12%
0.031
38%
0.038
24%
0.041
18%
0.097
-94%
Score Read
1805
1026
-43%
1721
-5%
1691
-6%
1350
-25%
417
-77%
Score Write
2127
878
-59%
2091
-2%
1553
-27%
1243
-42%
254
-88%
Score Total
4899
2405
-51%
4771
-3%
4066
-17%
3282
-33%
881
-82%
Copy ISO MB/s
3193
687
-78%
412.5
-87%
Copy Program MB/s
198.2
234.7
18%
192.9
-3%
Copy Game MB/s
1054
474.7
-55%
295.5
-72%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3087 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2399 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 453.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 337.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1465 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2370 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.98 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 116.1 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
27620 Points +12%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
25203 Points +2%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
24623 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
21515 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
21104 Points -14%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
18120 Points -26%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
17980 Points -27%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
17335 Points -30%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
15731 Points -36%
Schenker Compact 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14193 Points -42%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9292 Points -62%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
7374 Points -70%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H
6331 Points -74%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
11294 Points +16%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
9816 Points +1%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
9754 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8512 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
6977 Points -28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
6716 Points -31%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
5783 Points -41%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5697 Points -42%
Schenker Compact 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5408 Points -45%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H
1789 Points -82%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
5538 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4655 Points -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
3721 Points -33%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3020 Points -45%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
10820 Points +17%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
9266 Points
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
9018 Points -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8098 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
6942 Points -25%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
6639 Points -28%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5773 Points -38%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
5679 Points -39%
Schenker Compact 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5569 Points -40%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H
1909 Points -79%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
37989 Points +12%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
34050 Points
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
33741 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
29453 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
28621 Points -16%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
23694 Points -30%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
23261 Points -32%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
22005 Points -35%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
20157 Points -41%
Schenker Compact 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
18750 Points -45%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
13125 Points -61%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
9032 Points -73%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H
8220 Points -76%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
16523 Points
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13644 Points -17%
Schenker Compact 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12916 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
12643 Points -23%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11825 Points -28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
11625 Points -30%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
11339 Points -31%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11115 Points -33%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9159 Points -45%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
9099 Points -45%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ
9075 Points -45%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
8450 Points -49%
Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H
6399 Points -61%
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark 06 Standard Score
39973 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
27116 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
41840 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18947 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
9266 pontos
Ajuda
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
110 fps +1%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
109 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (69 - 124, n=7)
102.9 fps -6%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
99 fps -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
78 (42min) fps -28%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
65 fps -40%
Schenker Compact 15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
65 (43min) fps -40%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
44 (9min) fps -60%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø89.4 (84-96)
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 341.4 303.9 280.7 190.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 289.7 250.1 173 95.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 250.6 187.2 161.7 144.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 146 120 115 109
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ		Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)		MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Noise
-9%
-18%
-1%
-9%
-3%
off / environment *
28.2
30
-6%
30
-6%
29
-3%
30
-6%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
30.4
30
1%
36
-18%
29
5%
32
-5%
32
-5%
Idle Average *
30.4
34
-12%
37
-22%
32
-5%
34
-12%
33
-9%
Idle Maximum *
33.4
37
-11%
43
-29%
33
1%
37
-11%
34
-2%
Load Average *
37.1
52
-40%
50
-35%
47
-27%
43
-16%
41
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54.2
53
2%
57
-5%
49
10%
57
-5%
50
8%
Load Maximum *
56.4
54
4%
61
-8%
51
10%
62
-10%
54
4%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
30.4 / 30.4 / 33.4 dB
Carga
37.1 / 56.4 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 45 °C45 °C43.6 °C 
 38.4 °C48.8 °C36 °C 
 30.8 °C28.4 °C29.6 °C 
Máximo: 48.8 °C
Médio: 38.4 °C
52 °C45 °C51.8 °C
29.6 °C29 °C39.6 °C
25.6 °C26.6 °C27 °C
Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 36.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.744.52538.440.53138.738.84038.740.5503742.16335.443.48034.946.710034.253.31253457.116032.461.82003265.92503269.131531.47140030.366.350029.571.763029.382.980029.285.3100029.280.4125028.976.5160028.580.7200028.886.6250028.583.1315028.377.6400028.174.9500028.275.3630028.171.780002874.9100002880.91250027.679.61600027.775.2SPL40.892.9N497.9median 28.9median 75.3Delta1535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GE75 9SGApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GE75 9SG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.06 / 1.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 13.9 / 18.8 / 23.1 Watt
Carga midlight 112.3 / 291.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3"		MSI GE75 8SG Raider
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Acer Predator Triton 700
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption
19%
-3%
-61%
-31%
4%
Idle Minimum *
13.9
7
50%
19
-37%
31
-123%
28
-101%
15
-8%
Idle Average *
18.8
15
20%
22
-17%
35
-86%
33
-76%
20
-6%
Idle Maximum *
23.1
22
5%
30
-30%
45
-95%
41
-77%
26
-13%
Load Average *
112.3
92
18%
104
7%
130
-16%
94
16%
97
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
231
207
10%
167
28%
268
-16%
160
31%
186
19%
Load Maximum *
291.5
254
13%
203
30%
374
-28%
222
24%
239
18%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
4h 54min
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh		Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072
R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 64 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 700
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh		MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh		MSI GE75 8SG Raider
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh
Battery Runtime
46%
-22%
-51%
-37%
-4%
WiFi v1.3
294
430
46%
230
-22%
144
-51%
186
-37%
281
-4%
Reader / Idle
757
298
150
303
468
Load
122
52
70
38
53
Witcher 3 ultra
50

Pro

+ Surpreendentemente pequeno e leve para um portátil de jogos RTX 2080 de 17 polegadas com potência plena
+ Ganhos de alto desempenho multi-thread sobre o Core i7-8750H
+ Desempenho de jogos ligeiramente mais rápido
+ Manutenção e atualização fáceis
+ Quatro falantes muito fortes
+ Iluminação RGB por tecla

Contra

- Bleeding irregular moderado a alto
- Temperaturas da CPU mais altas durante os jogos
- A manutenção rasgará um adesivo anti-violação
- Consumo de energia ligeiramente maior
- Ainda muito barulhento durante os jogos
- Ainda sem Thunderbolt 3
- Lento leitor de cartões SD
- Sem G-Sync
In review: MSI GE75 9SG. Test model provided by MSI
In review: MSI GE75 9SG. Test model provided by MSI

O Core i9-9880H é o que o Core i9-8950HK deveria ter sido. Os dois núcleos extras proporcionam a vantagem de desempenho que ele precisa tanto sobre o Core i7-8750H e o Core i7-9750H. O i7-8750H médio é cerca de 36% mais lento antes de contabilizar qualquer limitação de desempenho.

As desvantagens são o que você esperaria de uma CPU mais rápida baseada na mesma arquitetura subjacente. Ou seja, as temperaturas do núcleo e o consumo de energia são maiores quando a CPU está sob estresse total. O i9-9880H estabiliza a 90 °C ao rodar o Prime95 em comparação com 73 °C no SKU i7-8750H. Enquanto isso, durante os jogos consome 231 W contra 207 W no GE73 8SG do ano passado. Os aplicativos que não utilizam totalmente todos os oito núcleos terão um ganho de desempenho menor do que a série Core i7 de seis núcleos.

É claro que o GE75 9SG é apenas um exemplo do Core i9-9880H. A faixa de freqüência muito grande do i9-9880H (2,3 - 3,8 GHz) significa que outros OEMs podem implementar o mesmo processador em velocidades mais lentas para um desempenho potencialmente mais lento do que o que observamos aqui. No entanto, nossa primeira pitada da 9ª geração do Core i9 já parece muito promissora.

Os entusiastas vão querer considerar o Core i9 de 9na geração especialmente se eles confiarem em aplicações otimizadas para oito núcleos de CPU. Os jogadores também têm algo a ganhar com o i9-9880H, embora com um aumento muito menor de 10% no desempenho para a maioria dos títulos. Em ambos os casos, a nova CPU está em um lugar muito melhor em comparação com o Core i9-8950HK do ano passado.

MSI GE75 9SG - 07/02/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
75 / 98 → 76%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
59 / 80 → 74%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Bateria
63 / 95 → 66%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
98%
Desempenho da aplicação
93%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 87%
Ruído
75 / 90 → 84%
Audio
81%
Camera
48 / 85 → 56%
Médio
77%
86%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GE75 Raider 9SG (Core i9-9880H, RTX 2080)
Allen Ngo, 2019-05-20 (Update: 2019-05-21)