Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil MSI GE75 Raider 8SF (i7-8750H, RTX 2070)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI GE73VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE75 8SF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GE73VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE75 8SF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 370.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 1277:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.21
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| MSI GE75 8SF Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN WLED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -3% | -3% | 27% | 27% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.1 | 64 1% | 62.9 0% | 62.9 0% | 90.8 44% | 90.9 44% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.4 | 90.4 -4% | 87.8 -7% | 87.1 -8% | 99.9 6% | 100 6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.2 | 64.8 -1% | 63.9 -2% | 63.7 -2% | 85.8 32% | 86.2 32% |
| Response Times | -43% | 17% | -46% | -75% | 21% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 9.6 ? | 15.6 ? -63% | 7.2 ? 25% | 17.6 ? -83% | 28 ? -192% | 8 ? 17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 12.8 ? -23% | 9.6 ? 8% | 11.2 ? -8% | 13.6 ? -31% | 5.6 ? 46% |
| PWM Frequency | 25770 ? | 25000 ? -3% | 26000 ? 1% | |||
| Screen | -107% | -23% | -42% | -46% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 370.4 | 299.1 -19% | 288 -22% | 295 -20% | 273 -26% | 240 -35% |
| Brightness | 348 | 273 -22% | 287 -18% | 291 -16% | 273 -22% | 248 -29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 81 -9% | 91 2% | 96 8% | 90 1% | 83 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.27 7% | 0.2 31% | 0.24 17% | 0.26 10% | 0.22 24% |
| Contrast | 1277 | 1108 -13% | 1440 13% | 1229 -4% | 1050 -18% | 1091 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.26 | 5.07 -302% | 2.33 -85% | 3.2 -154% | 3.52 -179% | 2.14 -70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.02 | 10.55 -249% | 5.34 -77% | 6.64 -120% | 6.34 -110% | 5.04 -67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.21 | 3.31 -174% | 2.47 -104% | 2.52 -108% | 2.09 -73% | 1.54 -27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 6.8 -386% | 1.19 15% | 2.16 -54% | 3.11 -122% | 1.62 -16% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.46 89% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.43 91% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6747 96% | 7805 83% | 6710 97% | 6872 95% | 6999 93% | 6846 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.7 | 58.5 -2% | 57 -5% | 57 -5% | 76 27% | 77 29% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94.4 | 89.9 -5% | 88 -7% | 87 -8% | 100 6% | 100 6% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -50% /
-79% | -3% /
-15% | -30% /
-35% | -31% /
-38% | 10% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25770 Hz | ≤ 17 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25770 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25770 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3662 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5338 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5138 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI GE75 8SF Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 51% | 103% | 20% | -53% | 95% | |
| Seq Read | 949 | 1153 21% | 911 -4% | 1315 39% | 511 -46% | 3058 222% |
| Seq Write | 823 | 1328 61% | 2347 185% | 927 13% | 425.7 -48% | 2196 167% |
| 4K Read | 25.36 | 35.05 38% | 53 109% | 52.4 107% | 14.07 -45% | 38.37 51% |
| 4K Write | 67.1 | 96 43% | 122.5 83% | 122.8 83% | 38.34 -43% | 97.7 46% |
| 4K-64 Read | 748 | 727 -3% | 1577 111% | 326.5 -56% | 351.4 -53% | 1347 80% |
| 4K-64 Write | 650 | 1212 86% | 1734 167% | 727 12% | 172.7 -73% | 1236 90% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.173 | 0.063 64% | 0.08 54% | 0.11 36% | 0.235 -36% | 0.056 68% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.059 | 0.04 32% | 0.031 47% | 0.045 24% | 0.097 -64% | 0.038 36% |
| Score Read | 869 | 878 1% | 1721 98% | 510 -41% | 417 -52% | 1691 95% |
| Score Write | 799 | 1441 80% | 2091 162% | 942 18% | 254 -68% | 1553 94% |
| Score Total | 2109 | 2784 32% | 4771 126% | 1715 -19% | 881 -58% | 4066 93% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1121 | 1487 33% | 412.5 -63% | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 532 | 608 14% | 192.9 -64% | |||
| Copy Game MB/s | 380.5 | 1162 205% | 295.5 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 17817 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25784 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16541 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7061 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 231 | 208.9 | 193.1 | 136.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 193.9 | 154 | 115.7 | 70.9 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 120 | 111.3 | 92.2 | 89.4 |
| MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | 1% | -2% | 0% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.3 -0% | 29 -2% | 29 -2% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33.5 | 31.5 6% | 29 13% | 29 13% | 32 4% | 32 4% |
| Idle Average * | 33.6 | 31.6 6% | 32 5% | 32 5% | 33 2% | 34 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 35 | 31.6 10% | 33 6% | 40 -14% | 34 3% | 37 -6% |
| Load Average * | 38 | 32.3 15% | 47 -24% | 46 -21% | 41 -8% | 43 -13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 43 14% | 49 2% | 51 -2% | 50 -0% | 57 -14% |
| Load Maximum * | 56.9 | 45.5 20% | 51 10% | 52 9% | 54 5% | 62 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33.5 / 33.6 / 35 dB |
| Carga |
| 38 / 56.9 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
MSI GE75 8SF audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.11 / 0.26 Watt |
| Ocioso | 16.4 / 21.9 / 25.4 Watt |
| Carga |
90.7 / 222.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -7% | 2% | -62% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 16.4 | 20.2 -23% | 19 -16% | 15 9% | 31 -89% |
| Idle Average * | 21.9 | 27.2 -24% | 22 -0% | 20 9% | 35 -60% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.4 | 28.7 -13% | 29 -14% | 26 -2% | 45 -77% |
| Load Average * | 90.7 | 90.8 -0% | 102 -12% | 97 -7% | 130 -43% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 203.3 | 152.1 25% | 190 7% | 186 9% | 268 -32% |
| Load Maximum * | 222.9 | 165.4 26% | 231 -4% | 239 -7% | 374 -68% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 65 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -10% | 8% | 11% | -12% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 212 | 190 -10% | 230 8% | 235 11% | 186 -12% | |
| Reader / Idle | 298 | 372 | 303 | 225 | ||
| Load | 52 | 67 | 38 | 63 | ||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 52 |
Pro
Contra
O GE75 é uma boa alternativa para o recém lançado GS75. É um pouco mais barato, um pouco mais grosso e um pouco mais rápido, pois não depende das GPUs Max-Q. Também faz com que o GE73 de última geração, pareça obsoleto, já que é 19 por cento menor e 10 por cento mais leve, sendo 35 por cento mais brilhante e até 35 por cento mais rápida. Os upgrades gen-to-gen são certamente tangíveis e estão longe de ser menores.
Ainda há alguns aspectos que esperamos que futuras revisões abordem. O ruído do ventilador não melhorou e a duração da bateria não é muito melhor. A facilidade de manutenção poderia ser mais direta e a falta do Thunderbolt 3 é indesculpável para uma faixa de preço de $2.000. O G-Sync também teria sido melhor para a série GE, em vez do Optimus para aproveitar mais a tela de 144 Hz.
O maior concorrente do GE75 no momento é a série Asus ROG GL704. Embora o sistema Asus seja mais fraco e não tenha iluminação RGB por tecla, achamos que ele tem o chassi mais rígido e os componentes mais úteis que o público gamer alvo apreciaria. Ainda é a ligação entre os dois.
Menor, mais leve e mais rápido. O GE75 é um amálgama da principal série GT e da super-fina série GS para dar o melhor dos dois mundos por um preço inicial mais barato. Existem alguns cantos recortados, como o leitor SD lento e a falta de Thunderbolt 3 e Ethernet de 10 Gbps, mas eles não prejudicam a experiência de jogo.
MSI GE75 8SF
- 10/03/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
