Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil MSI GE75 8SG Raider (i7-8750H, RTX 2080)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 363 cd/m²
Contraste: 1344:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.29 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.45
ΔE Greyscale 3.02 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider CMN N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), , 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), , 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE75 8SF Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 3% | 1% | 32% | 4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 60.6 | 62.9 4% | 64 6% | 62.9 4% | 90.8 50% | 63.1 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.2 | 87.8 -4% | 90.4 -1% | 87.1 -4% | 99.9 10% | 94.4 4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.6 | 63.9 2% | 64.8 4% | 63.7 2% | 85.8 37% | 65.2 4% |
| Response Times | 3% | -67% | -71% | 11% | -11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8 ? | 7.2 ? 10% | 15.6 ? -95% | 17.6 ? -120% | 7.8 ? 2% | 9.6 ? -20% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9.2 ? | 9.6 ? -4% | 12.8 ? -39% | 11.2 ? -22% | 6.2 ? 33% | 10.4 ? -13% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 25510 ? -2% | 25770 ? -1% | |||
| Screen | 3% | -43% | -8% | -9% | 17% | |
| Brightness middle | 363 | 288 -21% | 299.1 -18% | 295 -19% | 262 -28% | 370.4 2% |
| Brightness | 342 | 287 -16% | 273 -20% | 291 -15% | 261 -24% | 348 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 81 -6% | 96 12% | 94 9% | 89 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.2 26% | 0.27 -0% | 0.24 11% | 0.2 26% | 0.29 -7% |
| Contrast | 1344 | 1440 7% | 1108 -18% | 1229 -9% | 1310 -3% | 1277 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.29 | 2.33 -2% | 5.07 -121% | 3.2 -40% | 3.96 -73% | 1.26 45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.54 | 5.34 -18% | 10.55 -132% | 6.64 -46% | 7.29 -61% | 3.02 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.45 | 2.47 -1% | 3.31 -35% | 2.52 -3% | 2.18 11% | 1.21 51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.02 | 1.19 61% | 6.8 -125% | 2.16 28% | 3.09 -2% | 1.4 54% |
| Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.46 89% | 2.48 89% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 7048 92% | 6710 97% | 7805 83% | 6872 95% | 6977 93% | 6747 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 57 -2% | 58.5 1% | 57 -2% | 76 31% | 59.7 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 88 -3% | 89.9 -1% | 87 -4% | 100 10% | 94.4 4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
3% | -36% /
-38% | -26% /
-14% | 11% /
2% | 3% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26040 Hz | ≤ 17 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (4124 - 4918, n=3) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (5574 - 5697, n=3) | |
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4918 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 8493 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5574 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5816 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI GE75 8SF Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 88% | 31% | 11% | 38% | -12% | 1% | |
| Seq Read | 888 | 911 3% | 1153 30% | 1315 48% | 1749 97% | 949 7% | 1215 ? 37% |
| Seq Write | 906 | 2347 159% | 1328 47% | 927 2% | 1173 29% | 823 -9% | 897 ? -1% |
| 4K Read | 22.26 | 53 138% | 35.05 57% | 52.4 135% | 42.81 92% | 25.36 14% | 32.4 ? 46% |
| 4K Write | 83 | 122.5 48% | 96 16% | 122.8 48% | 98.4 19% | 67.1 -19% | 87.7 ? 6% |
| 4K-64 Read | 861 | 1577 83% | 727 -16% | 326.5 -62% | 1238 44% | 748 -13% | 796 ? -8% |
| 4K-64 Write | 697 | 1734 149% | 1212 74% | 727 4% | 691 -1% | 650 -7% | 672 ? -4% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.117 | 0.08 32% | 0.063 46% | 0.11 6% | 0.077 34% | 0.173 -48% | 0.115 ? 2% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.046 | 0.031 33% | 0.04 13% | 0.045 2% | 0.038 17% | 0.059 -28% | 0.07544 ? -64% |
| Score Read | 972 | 1721 77% | 878 -10% | 510 -48% | 1456 50% | 869 -11% | 950 ? -2% |
| Score Write | 870 | 2091 140% | 1441 66% | 942 8% | 906 4% | 799 -8% | 849 ? -2% |
| Score Total | 2340 | 4771 104% | 2784 19% | 1715 -27% | 3083 32% | 2109 -10% | 2274 ? -3% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 22658 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35054 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19661 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9018 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 276 | 230 | 162 | 92.1 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 134.8 | 125.5 | 109 | 103.9 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 236 | 174 | 155 | 145 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 102 | 89 | 75 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 126 | 111 | 106 | 99 |
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 86 | 75 | 73 | 65 |
| Battlefield V (2018) | 144 | 132 | 117 | 111 |
| Darksiders III (2018) | 195 | 129 | 126 | 121 |
| Just Cause 4 (2018) | 181 | 161 | 118 | 116 |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 109 | 94 | 90 | 82 |
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 216 | 159 | 144 | 96 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 34 / 37 dB |
| HDD |
| 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 52 / 54 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | 14% | 3% | 7% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29 3% | 28.3 6% | 29 3% | 30 -0% | 28.3 6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 29 3% | 31.5 -5% | 29 3% | 30 -0% | 33.5 -12% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 32 6% | 31.6 7% | 32 6% | 34 -0% | 33.6 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 37 | 33 11% | 31.6 15% | 40 -8% | 36 3% | 35 5% |
| Load Average * | 52 | 47 10% | 32.3 38% | 46 12% | 43 17% | 38 27% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53 | 49 8% | 43 19% | 51 4% | 45 15% | 50 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 54 | 51 6% | 45.5 16% | 52 4% | 45 17% | 56.9 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
MSI GE75 8SG Raider audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.1 / 0.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7 / 15 / 22 Watt |
| Carga |
92 / 254 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -38% | -40% | -41% | 6% | -30% | -101% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7 | 19 -171% | 20.2 -189% | 19 -171% | 8 -14% | 16.4 -134% | 24.6 ? -251% | 13.5 ? -93% |
| Idle Average * | 15 | 22 -47% | 27.2 -81% | 22 -47% | 14 7% | 21.9 -46% | 31.4 ? -109% | 19 ? -27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 22 | 30 -36% | 28.7 -30% | 29 -32% | 22 -0% | 25.4 -15% | 41.8 ? -90% | 26.7 ? -21% |
| Load Average * | 92 | 104 -13% | 90.8 1% | 102 -11% | 92 -0% | 90.7 1% | 112 ? -22% | 106.7 ? -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 207 | 167 19% | 152.1 27% | 190 8% | 154 26% | 203.3 2% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 254 | 203 20% | 165.4 35% | 231 9% | 207 19% | 222.9 12% | 344 ? -35% | 251 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh | MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 65 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -19% | -32% | -2% | -14% | -25% | 43% | |
| Reader / Idle | 468 | 298 -36% | 372 -21% | 346 -26% | 565 ? 21% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 281 | 230 -18% | 190 -32% | 235 -16% | 200 -29% | 212 -25% | 375 ? 33% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 50 | 52 4% | 78.3 ? 57% | ||||
| Load | 53 | 52 -2% | 67 26% | 60 13% | 85.3 ? 61% |
Pro
Contra
Verdict – The upgrade is a good investment
O novo MSI GE75 Raider é visivelmente mais compacto comparado ao seu antecessor, mas agora possui uma GPU muito mais potente. Se você estiver disposto a pagar o alto preço pela RTX 2080, não desperdiçará seu dinheiro graças à boa utilização do desempenho em comparação aos SKUs mais baratos com o RTX 2070 ou RTX 2060. O desempenho da CPU certamente pode ser um pouco melhor, mas atualmente não há limitações nos jogos.
Menor, mais fino, mais rápido - esse é um grande desafio para a solução de resfriamento. A MSI gerencia uma dissipação eficaz do calor sem grandes penalidades sobre o desempenho. A desvantagem é o barulho do ventilador, e você também ouve o murmúrio da rápida unidade de 7200 rpm enquanto está no modo inativo.
Outras desvantagens incluem as superfícies, que rapidamente atraem sujeira e digitais e precisam ser limpas regularmente. Um portátil por 3000 Euros também deve contar com o Thunderbolt 3. Não temos certeza sobre a falta do G-Sync. O portátil é relativamente compacto para um dispositivo de 17 polegadas, mas a mobilidade certamente não é o aspecto mais importante para os compradores em potencial.
A atualização da GPU para o MSI GE75 Raider é um bom investimento e você pode realmente usar o desempenho adicional, apesar do chassi fino. Existem algumas falhas em termos de conectividade, mas não podemos encontrar problemas importantes que afetem a experiência de jogo.
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
-
03/25/2019 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
