Breve Análise do Portátil MSI Creator 15: Uma tela 4K brilhante para criadores de conteúdo
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.7 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | MSI Creator 15 i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
85 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.9 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI Creator 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Creator 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) |
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 463 cd/m²
Contraste: 1326:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
84.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
MSI Creator 15 Sharp SHP14A1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 AU Optronics AUO41EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 11% | -12% | -11% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 85.4 | 84.4 -1% | 99.9 17% | 69.4 -19% | 69.7 -18% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 98.8 -1% | 99.7 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.9 | 98.5 16% | 98.2 16% | 70.5 -17% | 71.1 -16% |
Response Times | 24% | 31% | 89% | 78% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 62 ? | 51 ? 18% | 2.2 ? 96% | 3.2 ? 95% | 14 ? 77% |
Response Time Black / White * | 44 ? | 31 ? 30% | 1.8 ? 96% | 8 ? 82% | 9.6 ? 78% |
PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 60 ? -100% | |||
Screen | -20% | 13% | -12% | -4% | |
Brightness middle | 464 | 445 -4% | 385 -17% | 345.4 -26% | 283 -39% |
Brightness | 446 | 462 4% | 390 -13% | 342 -23% | 289 -35% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 83 -2% | 93 9% | 90 6% | 90 6% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.5 -43% | 0.34 3% | 0.24 31% | |
Contrast | 1326 | 890 -33% | 1016 -23% | 1179 -11% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.39 | 4.75 -99% | 2.46 -3% | 3.18 -33% | 2.26 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 7.79 -30% | 4.01 33% | 6.57 -10% | 5.64 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.97 | 4.49 -13% | 1.39 65% | 3.8 4% | 3.4 14% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.49 88% | 2.31 95% | 2.15 102% | 2.228 99% |
CCT | 6817 95% | 7374 88% | 6395 102% | 7109 91% | 7249 90% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 75 | 87 16% | 98 31% | 64.3 -14% | 71 -5% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99 -1% | 93 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.6 | 1.77 | 1.11 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-9% | 18% /
16% | 22% /
2% | 21% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 32 ms rise | |
↘ 30 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (430 - 524, n=32) | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1986 - 4176, n=32) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38) | |
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (29844 - 49562, n=31) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29) | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6514 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI Creator 15 |
* ... smaller is better
MSI Creator 15 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Average 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 10% | 4% | 2% | -8% | 10% | |
Write 4K | 134.4 | 105.6 -21% | 127.4 -5% | 139.8 4% | 127.4 -5% | 136.7 ? 2% |
Read 4K | 45.7 | 46.32 1% | 147.5 223% | 48.62 6% | 46.38 1% | 47.2 ? 3% |
Write Seq | 2480 | 2910 17% | 485.9 -80% | 2260 -9% | 2034 -18% | 2841 ? 15% |
Read Seq | 2583 | 2820 9% | 1352 -48% | 2135 -17% | 2172 -16% | 2626 ? 2% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 351.8 | 545 55% | 476.5 35% | 499.3 42% | 413.7 18% | 404 ? 15% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 526 | 632 20% | 531 1% | 552 5% | 354 -33% | 513 ? -2% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3227 | 3349 4% | 1061 -67% | 2960 -8% | 3063 -5% | 3640 ? 13% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3491 | 3333 -5% | 2552 -27% | 3269 -6% | 3396 -3% | 4598 ? 32% |
AS SSD | 2% | -35% | -13% | 12% | -5% | |
Seq Read | 3015 | 2860 -5% | 1200 -60% | 1957 -35% | 2714 -10% | 3466 ? 15% |
Seq Write | 2742 | 2604 -5% | 836 -70% | 2092 -24% | 928 -66% | 2556 ? -7% |
4K Read | 43.22 | 45.15 4% | 65.8 52% | 50.2 16% | 42.83 -1% | 42.7 ? -1% |
4K Write | 122.9 | 100.2 -18% | 103.8 -16% | 96.5 -21% | 120.5 -2% | 126.2 ? 3% |
4K-64 Read | 1420 | 1428 1% | 789 -44% | 1594 12% | 978 -31% | 1402 ? -1% |
4K-64 Write | 1113 | 1401 26% | 929 -17% | 2005 80% | 2797 151% | 1307 ? 17% |
Access Time Read * | 0.056 | 0.049 12% | 0.103 -84% | 0.057 -2% | 0.057 -2% | 0.04533 ? 19% |
Access Time Write * | 0.032 | 0.037 -16% | 0.045 -41% | 0.112 -250% | 0.032 -0% | 0.06933 ? -117% |
Score Read | 1765 | 1759 0% | 975 -45% | 1840 4% | 1292 -27% | 1791 ? 1% |
Score Write | 1510 | 1762 17% | 1117 -26% | 2310 53% | 3011 99% | 1689 ? 12% |
Score Total | 4166 | 4411 6% | 2594 -38% | 5103 22% | 4881 17% | 4351 ? 4% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1793 | 2307 ? | ||||
Copy Program MB/s | 573 | 875 ? | ||||
Copy Game MB/s | 1418 | 1795 ? | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
5% | -16% /
-19% | -6% /
-7% | 2% /
4% | 3% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 20251 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 45260 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15264 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (56 - 83.8, n=31) | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
3840x2160 High Quality | |
Average of class Multimedia (8.98 - 81.9, n=12, last 2 years) | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (23.3 - 27, n=2) | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (55.1 - 62.9, n=3) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years) |
Far Cry 5 | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Multimedia (18 - 59, n=6, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (30 - 37, n=3) | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Multimedia (26 - 117, n=31, last 2 years) | |
MSI Creator 15 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (60 - 68, n=3) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (67 - 101, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (17 - 145, n=59, last 2 years) |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 56 | |||||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 153 | 136 | 132 | 123 | 94.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 61 | 27 | ||||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 66 | 33 | ||||
Doom Eternal (2020) | 54.8 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.7 dB |
Carga |
| 45.5 / 49.1 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25.2 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.3 °C / 86.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
MSI Creator 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.8 / 1.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 18.7 / 24.9 / 27 Watt |
Carga |
109 / 209 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI Creator 15 i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 22% | -8% | -4% | 9% | 9% | 50% | |
Idle Minimum * | 18.7 | 9.4 50% | 18 4% | 14.3 24% | 7 63% | 15.4 ? 18% | 6.54 ? 65% |
Idle Average * | 24.9 | 17.4 30% | 21 16% | 22.3 10% | 13 48% | 20 ? 20% | 11.3 ? 55% |
Idle Maximum * | 27 | 19.6 27% | 38 -41% | 36.9 -37% | 25 7% | 26.7 ? 1% | 13.3 ? 51% |
Load Average * | 109 | 103 6% | 113 -4% | 118.4 -9% | 148 -36% | 105.2 ? 3% | 70.7 ? 35% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 147 | 149 -1% | 153.7 -5% | 175 -19% | |||
Load Maximum * | 209 | 216 -3% | 256 -22% | 220.8 -6% | 232 -11% | 201 ? 4% | 116.1 ? 44% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI Creator 15 i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 76 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 41% | 66% | 62% | 17% | 163% | |
Reader / Idle | 274 | 577 111% | 518 89% | 520 90% | 1168 ? 326% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 235 | 357 52% | 364 55% | 380 62% | 181 -23% | 640 ? 172% |
Load | 107 | 65 -39% | 166 55% | 90 -16% | 97.1 ? -9% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Manutenção do modelo
O design compacto e a tela de alta resolução são os dois destaques do MSI Creator 15. Combinado com os dispositivos de entrada, isso o torna um dispositivo muito favorável à produtividade que também pode ser carregado com você. A seleção de portas contém todas as portas básicas e pode ser expandida sem limites graças ao seu conector Thunderbolt 3. Os vários modos de desempenho e espaços de cores mutáveis também permitem outras aplicações.
O MSI Creator 15 oferece um painel UHD muito bom, mas desempenho apenas médio.
O hardware é bom e garante um bom desempenho do sistema. Comparado com a concorrência, mas também com o MSI P65 Creator 9SF do próprio fabricante, por exemplo, o resultados dos testes estão na gama média alta. A duração da bateria poderia ser melhor, o que provavelmente é causado pelo painel UHD, que possui um alto consumo de energia. Os usuários que procuram uma tela excelente em um portátil compacto de 15 polegadas ainda podem achar que o MSI Creator 15 é a escolha certa para eles.
MSI Creator 15
- 10/18/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker