Breve Análise do Portátil MSI Bravo 17: Máquina de jogos exclusivamente AMD

Name: MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
Brand: MSI

Balcão único.

Enquanto a Intel e a Nvidia dominaram o mercado de portáteis para jogos nos últimos anos, agora estão aparecendo cada vez mais dispositivos baseados exclusivamente em componentes da AMD. O Bravo 17 da MSI trinfa com os modernos componentes de 7 nm. Uma Ryzen 7 4800H é usada como processador, enquanto uma Radeon RX 5500M cuida dos gráficos.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/14/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook MSI Ryzen (Zen)

Test device courtesy of MSI Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR (Bravo 17 Serie)

Processador

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, Renoir-H (Zen 2)

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon RX 5500M - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1448 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, Adrenalin 19.40.30, Switchable Graphics

Memória

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 3200, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.7 (AUO479D), IPS, Full HD, FreeSync, Brilhante: não, 120 Hz

placa mãe

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Disco rígido

Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G, 512 GB

, PCIe SSD, slots: 1x M.2 type 2280 e 1x 2,5-polegadas (livre)

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC233 @ AMD K17.6 - Audio Processor

Conexões

4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 fone, 1 microfone

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 23 x 397 x 260

Bateria

51 Wh Lítio-Ion, 3 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2x 2W, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 180-watts, guia de início rápido, informação de recuperação, Dragon Center, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.244 kg, Suprimento de energia: 590 g

Preço

1300 EUR

Links

MSI página inicial
MSI Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
80.9 % v7 ^(old)	07/2020	MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5500M	2.2 kg	23 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
78.8 % v7 ^(old)	02/2020	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M	2.3 kg	27.5 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
78 % v7 ^(old)	07/2019	MSI GF75 Thin 9SC i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	2.3 kg	23.1 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
77.8 % v7 ^(old)		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	2.7 kg	26.6 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	2.6 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
82.3 % v7 ^(old)		Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	2.8 kg	26.3 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Size comparison

Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 MSI GF75 Thin 9SC MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 DIN A4 ❌

Left side: power supply, HDMI, 2x USB-A 3.0

Right side: Kensington lock, headphone, microphone, USB-A 3.0, USB-C 3.0, RJ45 LAN

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	880 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Wireless-AC 9560	684 MBit/s -22%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC Intel Wireless-AC 9560	658 MBit/s -25%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	634 MBit/s -28%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	623 (577^min - 656^max) MBit/s -29%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	201 (89^min - 272^max) MBit/s -77%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1520 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Wireless-AC 9560	680 MBit/s -55%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	665 MBit/s -56%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC Intel Wireless-AC 9560	649 MBit/s -57%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	634 (621^min - 646^max) MBit/s -58%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	215 (199^min - 221^max) MBit/s -86%

ColorChecker MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR: 12.99 ∆E min: 7.14 - max: 20.5 ∆E


243 cd/m²	236 cd/m²	242 cd/m²
250 cd/m²	264 cd/m²	242 cd/m²
246 cd/m²	237 cd/m²	233 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B173HAN04.7 (AUO479D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 264 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 243.7 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 264 cd/m²
Contraste: 1148:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.54% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AU Optronics B173HAN04.7 (AUO479D), IPS, 1920x1080	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GF75 Thin 9SC AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 1920x1080	Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 1920x1080	Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 BOE NV173FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080	Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH AU Optronics B173HAN04.4 (AUO449D), IPS, 1920x1080
Display		58%	52%	51%	-0%	68%
Display P3 Coverage	40.54	66.4 64%	62.5 54%	62.3 54%	40.55 0%	69 70%
sRGB Coverage	60.1	91 51%	90 50%	89.1 48%	59.7 -1%	98.3 64%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	41.88	66.6 59%	64 53%	63.7 52%	41.89 0%	70.7 69%
Response Times		74%	6%	-2%	40%	56%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40 ?(19.2, 20.8)	7 ?(3.4, 3.6) 82%	34 ?(17.6, 16.4) 15%	41 ?(20, 21) -3%	22.4 ?(11.6, 10.8) 44%	18 ?(8.4, 9.6) 55%
Response Time Black / White *	29.6 ?(16.4, 13.2)	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) 65%	30.4 ?(18, 12.4) -3%	30 ?(16, 14) -1%	19.2 ?(9.6, 9.6) 35%	12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2) 57%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-2%	9%	7%	-18%	13%
Brightness middle	264	310 17%	344.7 31%	316 20%	264.8 0%	286 8%
Brightness	244	310 27%	332 36%	294 20%	253 4%	282 16%
Brightness Distribution	88	86 -2%	91 3%	84 -5%	90 2%	87 -1%
Black Level *	0.23	0.29 -26%	0.3 -30%	0.32 -39%	0.31 -35%	0.19 17%
Contrast	1148	1069 -7%	1149 0%	988 -14%	854 -26%	1505 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.85	4.78 -24%	3.08 20%	3.39 12%	4.73 -23%	3.57 7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.13	8.1 11%	6.32 31%	5.56 39%	18.89 -107%	7.5 18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.4	2.36 31%	2.94 14%	2.14 37%	4.64 -36%	1.31 61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.95	4.78 -145%	3.8 -95%	3.17 -63%	1.4 28%	4.51 -131%
Gamma	2.52 ^87%	2.43 ^91%	2.17 ^101%	2.39 ^92%	2.16 ^102%	2.36 ^93%
CCT	6371 ^102%	7739 ^84%	7284 ^89%	7098 ^92%	6641 ^98%	7411 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	42	59 40%	58 38%	51 21%	38.4 -9%	64 52%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	60	91 52%	89.6 49%	89 48%	59.3 -1%	98 63%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		43% / 18%	22% / 17%	19% / 14%	7% / -8%	46% / 29%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.2 ms rise
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1847 (1814.88-1892.51)

Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1773 (1724.58-1815.79)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC Intel Core i7-9750H	189 Points 0%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	189 Points 0%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	189 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	171 Points -10%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	144 Points -24%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	143 Points -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1892 (1814.88^min - 1892.51^max) Points
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1816 (1724.58^min - 1815.79^max) Points -4%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC Intel Core i7-9750H	1071 Points -43%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	850 Points -55%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	742 Points -61%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	734 Points -61%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	271 Seconds * -3%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	262 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4717 MIPS 0%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4699 MIPS
7z b 4
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	51468 MIPS
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	48837 MIPS -5%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	481 Points
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	477 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	427 Points -11%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	361 Points -25%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	352 Points -27%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4339 Points
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4132 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H	1877 Points -57%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	1659 Points -62%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	1633 Points -62%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1197 Points
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1189 Points -1%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	874 Points -27%
Multi-Core
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	8068 Points
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	7782 Points -4%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	3537 Points -56%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	13.1 fps
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	12.2 fps -7%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	95.8 s *
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	61.4 s * +36%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.596 sec * -5%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.568 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1892 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

123 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

189 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4339 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

481 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 - Score
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Radeon RX 5500M, R7 4800H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G	5970 Points
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5617 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5613 Points -6%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Crucial P1 SSD CT1000P1SSD8	5249 Points -12%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4605 Points -23%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4339 Points -27%

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	8852 μs * -868%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Radeon RX 5500M, R7 4800H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G	914 μs *

* ... smaller is better

	MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	MSI GF75 Thin 9SC Crucial P1 SSD CT1000P1SSD8	Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-1%	43%	15%	56%	8%
Write 4K	94.6	105.4 11%	133 41%	145 53%	189.7 101%	105.1 11%
Read 4K	47.12	33.24 -29%	55.6 18%	45.28 -4%	62.3 32%	34.41 -27%
Write Seq	850	1029 21%	1623 91%	1301 53%	1681 98%	1298 53%
Read Seq	1157	1098 -5%	1386 20%	1362 18%	1608 39%	1099 -5%
Write 4K Q32T1	277.7	322.1 16%	501 80%	249.1 -10%	468.6 69%	335.7 21%
Read 4K Q32T1	546	352 -36%	584 7%	342.1 -37%	541 -1%	231.4 -58%
Write Seq Q32T1	908	1036 14%	1696 87%	1301 43%	1770 95%	1454 60%
Read Seq Q32T1	1632	1606 -2%	1572 -4%	1732 6%	1898 16%	1740 7%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1632 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 908 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 546 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 277.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1157 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 850 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.12 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 94.6 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	15334 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	14186 Points +11%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Radeon RX 5500M	12753 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Radeon RX 5500M	12441 Points -2%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	9350 Points -27%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	9274 Points -27%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	5744 Points +33%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	5590 Points +29%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Radeon RX 5500M	4331 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Radeon RX 5500M	4298 Points -1%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	3506 Points -19%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	3470 Points -20%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	20793 Points +23%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	19733 Points +17%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR AMD Radeon RX 5500M	16937 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Radeon RX 5500M	16335 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	13337 Points -21%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	13143 Points -22%

3DMark 11 Performance		16271 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		39492 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		11461 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		4712 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Radeon RX 5500M, R7 4800H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G: Ø45.3 (41-47)

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-9300H	109.6 fps +52%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H	103 (98^min - 108^max) fps +43%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H	73.3 fps +2%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Radeon RX 5500M, R7 4800H	72 (55^min) fps
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H	67.6 fps -6%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H	59.1 fps -18%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H	55.6 (53^min - 60^max) fps +22%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-9300H	55.1 fps +21%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Radeon RX 5500M, R7 4800H	45.4 (38^min) fps
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H	44.7 fps -2%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H	37.7 fps -17%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H	33.3 fps -27%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)	168		104	53.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)			72	45.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	120	113	106	103
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	49.4	37.9	34.1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)			65	54
Battlefield V (2018)			93	88.2
Borderlands 3 (2019)			47.9	35.9
Escape from Tarkov (2020)			81.5	64.5
Hunt Showdown (2020)			56.5
Doom Eternal (2020)			0	0
Gears Tactics (2020)			78.5	55.1

Barulho

Ocioso		33 / 34 / 35 dB
Carga		39 / 52 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5500M	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M	MSI GF75 Thin 9SC i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Noise		-13%	6%	6%	3%	0%
off / environment *	30	29 3%	28.2 6%	30.8 -3%	28.7 4%	30 -0%
Idle Minimum *	33	36 -9%	33.6 -2%	30.8 7%	28.7 13%	30 9%
Idle Average *	34	37 -9%	33.6 1%	30.8 9%	30.5 10%	32 6%
Idle Maximum *	35	46 -31%	33.8 3%	32.2 8%	32.5 7%	34 3%
Load Average *	39	50 -28%	37.2 5%	38.6 1%	42.5 -9%	44 -13%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	51 -6%	40.6 15%		50.1 -4%	50 -4%
Load Maximum *	52	57 -10%	44.4 15%	44.8 14%	53.4 -3%	52 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


48 °C	45 °C	46 °C
41 °C	43 °C	41 °C
33 °C	33 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 40.1 °C


44 °C	50 °C	49 °C
42 °C	49 °C	36 °C
28 °C	29 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 39.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 49 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


24 °C	24 °C	24 °C
24 °C	25 °C	24 °C
23 °C	24 °C	24 °C

Máximo: 25 °C
Médio: 24 °C


24 °C	24 °C	24 °C
26 °C	26 °C	24 °C
23 °C	24 °C	23 °C

Máximo: 26 °C
Médio: 24.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 25 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


49 °C	45 °C	46 °C
41 °C	43 °C	43 °C
32 °C	33 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 40.3 °C


42 °C	47 °C	45 °C
42 °C	47 °C	33 °C
29 °C	29 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).

	MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5500M	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M	MSI GF75 Thin 9SC i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Heat		-1%	-15%	-1%	-11%	-26%
Maximum Upper Side *	48	44 8%	47.8 -0%	41.6 13%	47.6 1%	48 -0%
Maximum Bottom *	50	49 2%	57 -14%	38 24%	50.8 -2%	56 -12%
Idle Upper Side *	25	26 -4%	30.2 -21%	31.7 -27%	33 -32%	36 -44%
Idle Bottom *	26	28 -8%	32 -23%	29.5 -13%	29 -12%	38 -46%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.5 / 0.8 Watt
Ocioso	9 / 10 / 13 Watt
Carga	69 / 214 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5500M	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M	MSI GF75 Thin 9SC i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Power Consumption		-44%	-13%	29%	-9%	-63%
Idle Minimum *	9	14 -56%	6.1 32%	3.9 57%	7.4 18%	19 -111%
Idle Average *	10	18 -80%	11.2 -12%	9.6 4%	10.5 -5%	22 -120%
Idle Maximum *	13	32 -146%	24.5 -88%	12.2 6%	17 -31%	30 -131%
Load Average *	69	64 7%	94.7 -37%	59 14%	103.7 -50%	79 -14%
Witcher 3 ultra *	128	123 4%	105.8 17%		128.1 -0%	134 -5%
Load Maximum *	214	193 10%	192.2 10%	80 63%	183.2 14%	201 6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		7h 44min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 14min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 15min

	MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5500M, 51 Wh	MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 R7 3750H, Radeon RX 5500M, 51 Wh	MSI GF75 Thin 9SC i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 51 Wh	Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 64 Wh	Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh
Battery Runtime		-27%	-10%	63%	80%	-24%
Reader / Idle	464	349 -25%		815 76%	543 17%	311 -33%
WiFi v1.3	314	245 -22%	284 -10%	469 49%	512 63%	220 -30%
Load	75	49 -35%		124 65%	196 161%	68 -9%
H.264		234		485		202

Pro

+ Relativamente compacto e leve para um dispositivo de 17 polegadas

+ Excelente desempenho da CPU

+ Superfícies mecânicas

Contra

- A tela poderia ser melhor (brilho, espaço de cor, tempos de resposta)

- Altas emissões de ruído do sob uso de aplicativos 3D

- Configuração pobre das portas

MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR. Review device provided by MSI Germany.

A AMD está de volta – e um uma surpresa: Não necessariamente do lado da GPU, mas definitivamente do lado da CPU.

A Ryzen 7 4800H impressiona com um desempenho muito alto que coloca a concorrência Intel comparável em preço (por exemplo o Core i7-9750H) em seu lugar. Essa quantidade de potência da CPU era anteriormente reservada para portáteis de jogos acima de 1.500 Euros (~$1.696).

Com exceção da baixa conectividade, da tela de baixo brilho e do alto nível de ruído sob carga, o restante do Bravo 17 também causa uma boa impressão. Os fãs da AMD, que precisam/querem ter cuidado com o orçamento, podem acionar a compra com confiança.

MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR - 07/02/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

76 / 98 → 78%

Teclado

77%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

53 / 80 → 66%

Peso

61 / 10-66 → 92%

Bateria