Breve Análise do Portátil MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR: Para caçadores de barganhas

Name: MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Brand: MSI

AMD pronta para atacar.

Líderes de mercado de longa data em termos de desempenho, Intel e Nvidia estão experimentando cada vez mais pressão de preços. Essa é a "falha" de dispositivos como o MSI Bravo 15, que testamos em sua configuração com uma Ryzen 7 4800H e uma Radeon RX 5300M.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/14/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook MSI Renoir Ryzen (Zen)

Test device courtesy of MSI Taiwan

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR (Bravo 15 Serie)

Processador

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, Renoir-H (Zen 2)

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon RX 5300M - 3 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1036 MHz, Memoría: 14000 MHz, GDDR6, Adrenalin 19.40.30, Switchable Graphics

Memória

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual Channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS-Level, Full-HD, FreeSync, Brilhante: não, 144 Hz

placa mãe

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Disco rígido

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB

, NVMe SSD, slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 (todos ocupados)

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC233 @ AMD K17.6 - Audio Processor

Conexões

4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22 x 359 x 254

Bateria

51 Wh, 4500 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 3 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD (720p)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2x 2W, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 180 Watts, Dragon Center, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

1.96 kg, Suprimento de energia: 632 g

Links

MSI página inicial
MSI Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
79.5 % v7 ^(old)	07/2020	MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M	2 kg	22 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
79.8 % v7 ^(old)	07/2020	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	2.2 kg	24 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
80.4 % v6 ^(old)	07/2019	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	2.2 kg	26.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
79.6 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	2.7 kg	23.7 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81.5 % v7 ^(old)	07/2019	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	2.3 kg	25 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Size Comparison

Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT HP Omen 15-dc1020ng MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR DIN A4 ❌

Right side: audio, 2x USB-A 3.0, 2x USB-C 3.0, RJ45-LAN, Kensington Lock

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1340 MBit/s +13%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1190 MBit/s
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	680 MBit/s -43%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ Intel Wireless-AC 9560	676 MBit/s -43%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	617 MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1390 MBit/s +4%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1340 MBit/s
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ Intel Wireless-AC 9560	691 MBit/s -48%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	646 MBit/s -52%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	586 MBit/s -56%

ColorChecker MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR: 11.29 ∆E min: 3.76 - max: 20.52 ∆E


322 cd/m²	317 cd/m²	317 cd/m²
291 cd/m²	311 cd/m²	314 cd/m²
292 cd/m²	324 cd/m²	329 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 329 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 313 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 311 cd/m²
Contraste: 723:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.65
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.129

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS-Level, 1920x1080	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT Panda LM156LF-2F01 (NCP004D), IPS, 1920x1080	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 1920x1080	Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO23ED), IPS, 1920x1080	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng LGD05CE, IPS, 1920x1080
Display		-32%	-34%	34%	-36%
Display P3 Coverage	62	41.16 -34%	39.56 -36%	83.1 34%	38.37 -38%
sRGB Coverage	86.8	61.8 -29%	59.5 -31%	99.9 15%	57.6 -34%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	62.7	42.56 -32%	40.91 -35%	96.8 54%	39.69 -37%
Response Times		-172%	-128%	-194%	-168%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	16 ?(7.6, 8.4)	40.8 ?(19.2, 21.6) -155%	30.4 ?(14, 16.4) -90%	48 ?(22.8, 25.2) -200%	40 ?(21.2, 18.8) -150%
Response Time Black / White *	10.4 ?(6, 4.4)	30 ?(16.8, 13.2) -188%	27.6 ?(17.6, 10) -165%	30 ?(16.8, 13.2) -188%	29.6 ?(17.2, 12.4) -185%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-11%	-30%	-19%	-23%
Brightness middle	311	287 -8%	286.2 -8%	234 -25%	251 -19%
Brightness	313	271 -13%	267 -15%	216 -31%	232 -26%
Brightness Distribution	88	88 0%	84 -5%	87 -1%	76 -14%
Black Level *	0.43	0.25 42%	0.33 23%	0.22 49%	0.17 60%
Contrast	723	1148 59%	867 20%	1064 47%	1476 104%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	4.77 -6%	5.45 -21%	6.52 -45%	6.2 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.97	17.15 -115%	18.08 -127%	10.58 -33%	18.6 -133%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.65	3.73 -41%	4.47 -69%	3.56 -34%	4.8 -81%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	2.7 18%	5.3 -61%	5.33 -62%	4.2 -27%
Gamma	2.129 ^103%	2.115 ^104%	2.1 ^105%	2.86 ^77%	2.32 ^95%
CCT	7227 ^90%	7187 ^90%	7679 ^85%	5983 ^109%	7454 ^87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	63	43 -32%	37.6 -40%	36 -43%	36.5 -42%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	86	61 -29%	59.1 -31%	57 -34%	57.4 -33%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-72% / -35%	-64% / -43%	-60% / -31%	-76% / -43%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR: Ø1697 (1664.03-1741.33)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +49%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	186 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	178 Points -4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	171 Points -8%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ Intel Core i5-9300H	169 Points -9%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	157 Points -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3417 Points +96%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1741 (1664.03^min - 1741.33^max) Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1398 (1313.46^min - 1397.77^max) Points -20%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ Intel Core i5-9300H	818 Points -53%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	799 Points -54%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	769 Points -56%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	643 Seconds * -126%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	345 Seconds * -21%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	284 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)	170.8 Seconds * +40%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)	6305 MIPS +38%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	4626 MIPS +1%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4584 MIPS
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	4471 MIPS -2%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)	85207 MIPS +79%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	47520 MIPS
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	36693 MIPS -23%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	20736 MIPS -56%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	725 Points +52%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	477 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	428 Points -10%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	419 Points -12%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ Intel Core i5-9300H	404 Points -15%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	386 Points -19%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8300 Points +110%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	3956 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	3224 Points -19%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ Intel Core i5-9300H	1821 Points -54%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	1793 Points -55%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	1723 Points -56%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)	1892 Points +64%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1154 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1108 Points -4%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)	14993 Points +101%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	7453 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	5260 Points -29%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)	23.5 fps +101%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	11.7 fps
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	9.27 fps -21%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	5.7 fps -51%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	93.9 s *
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	64.1 s * +32%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years)	47.3 s * +50%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	0.626 sec * -5%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.597 sec *
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)	0.438 sec * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1741 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

111 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

186 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3956 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

477 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7791 Points +38%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5639 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI	4892 Points -13%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G	4873 Points -14%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4732 Points -16%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, KBG30ZMS128G	4615 Points -18%

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1423 μs *
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI	1000 μs * +30%

* ... smaller is better

	MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ KBG30ZMS128G	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-31%	-31%	-67%	-14%
Write 4K	118.3	94.7 -20%	137.5 16%	65.3 -45%	112.1 -5%
Read 4K	43.73	38.91 -11%	57 30%	29.71 -32%	42.01 -4%
Write Seq	2854	1056 -63%	984 -66%	128.8 -95%	1964 -31%
Read Seq	2302	1183 -49%	1564 -32%	859 -63%	2065 -10%
Write 4K Q32T1	418.5	445.3 6%	237.4 -43%	95.8 -77%	318.2 -24%
Read 4K Q32T1	517	477.7 -8%	340.7 -34%	197.6 -62%	406.7 -21%
Write Seq Q32T1	3008	1063 -65%	959 -68%	132.5 -96%	2534 -16%
Read Seq Q32T1	3568	2154 -40%	1732 -51%	1208 -66%	3438 -4%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3568 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3008 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 517 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 418.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2302 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2854 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 43.73 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 118.3 MB/s

3DMark 06 Standard Score		36032 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		39264 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		14048 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		32417 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9404 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		3872 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø38.5 (34-41)

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)	31443 Points +198%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M	10550 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	10209 Points -3%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	9536 Points -10%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	9428 Points -11%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	9239 Points -12%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)	13142 Points +271%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	3773 Points +7%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	3568 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	3565 Points +1%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M	3539 Points
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	3488 Points -1%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)	43857 Points +204%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M	14437 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	13927 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	13575 Points -6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	13447 Points -7%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	13233 Points -8%

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years)	242 fps +303%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H	67.7 (56^min) fps +13%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H	62.7 fps +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	62.2 fps +4%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	60 (48^min) fps
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	59.8 (50^min) fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +235%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H	38.3 (29^min) fps 0%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H	38.3 (31^min) fps
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	37 fps -3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H	36.2 fps -5%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	34.4 (26^min) fps -10%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
GTA V (2015)	163		86.1	42.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)	178	122	60	38.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	113	108	97.9	94.7
Fortnite (2018)	131	114	81.8	58.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	98.4	51.6	29.3
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)	118	70.4	60.8	38.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	51.5	39.5	34.9
Monster Hunter World (2018)	80.6	60.1	52.2	42.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	114	60	48	36
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018)	72	59	42	25
Hitman 2 (2018)	74.5	65.7	55.8	48.8
Battlefield V (2018)	140	91.8	79.4	70.8
Darksiders III (2018)	155	76.8	62.2	54.9
Just Cause 4 (2018)	108	79.1	56	52.5
Apex Legends (2019)	143	87.2	68.6	67.6
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	88	69	64	58
Metro Exodus (2019)	105	51.2	36.1	28.6
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)	190	110	89.9	49.5
The Division 2 (2019)	120	75	63	42
Anno 1800 (2019)	83.4	60.3	39.7	20.6
Rage 2 (2019)	121	54.8	30.4	29.8
F1 2019 (2019)	176	106	94	81
Control (2019)	132	41.8	29.4
Borderlands 3 (2019)	97.3	63.6	40.9	36
FIFA 20 (2019)	190	172	160	153
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019)	82	51	41	22
GRID 2019 (2019)	164	76.8	54.8	25.5
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019)	127	72.2	57.9	47
Need for Speed Heat (2019)	78.6	67.9	58.6	52.9
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)		71.2	61.1	53.1
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)	95.4	41.2	32.1
Escape from Tarkov (2020)	121	80.5	70.1	56.7
Hunt Showdown (2020)	137	53	43.2
Doom Eternal (2020)	0 game wont start	0 game wont start	0 game wont start	0 game wont start
Gears Tactics (2020)	231	100	66.4	47.5

Barulho

Ocioso		31 / 32 / 40 dB
Carga		48 / 54 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		5%	11%	2%	17%	15%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	28.2 6%	30 -0%	28.8 4%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=153, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Minimum *	31	30 3%	28.2 9%	31 -0%	28.8 7%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=154, last 2 years) 18%
Idle Average *	32	32 -0%	28.2 12%	32 -0%	29.5 8%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=154, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Maximum *	40	34 15%	31.4 21%	35 12%	31.1 22%	30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=154, last 2 years) 24%
Load Average *	48	46 4%	39.8 17%	49 -2%	35.2 27%	42.8 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=154, last 2 years) 11%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	47 2%	47 2%	47 2%	35.2 27%
Load Maximum *	54	49 9%	50.2 7%	53 2%	41 24%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=154, last 2 years) 1%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


51 °C	51 °C	48 °C
47 °C	47 °C	41 °C
34 °C	35 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 42.9 °C


42 °C	49 °C	50 °C
32 °C	39 °C	41 °C
31 °C	31 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 38.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


29 °C	30 °C	30 °C
29 °C	30 °C	30 °C
28 °C	29 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 29.3 °C


30 °C	30 °C	30 °C
31 °C	29 °C	30 °C
30 °C	29 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 31 °C
Médio: 29.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 29 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


49 °C	48 °C	46 °C
45 °C	46 °C	40 °C
35 °C	36 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 41.9 °C


42 °C	47 °C	47 °C
34 °C	39 °C	41 °C
32 °C	32 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 38.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 42 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).

	MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		5%	3%	7%	16%	1%
Maximum Upper Side *	51	49 4%	41.2 19%	49 4%	40.3 21%	46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=153, last 2 years) 10%
Maximum Bottom *	50	50 -0%	40 20%	55 -10%	48.5 3%	49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=153, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Upper Side *	30	28 7%	34.6 -15%	25 17%	23.9 20%	31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=153, last 2 years) -4%
Idle Bottom *	31	28 10%	34.4 -11%	26 16%	24.6 21%	32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=153, last 2 years) -4%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.4 / 0.7 Watt
Ocioso	11 / 14 / 25 Watt
Carga	72 / 163 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		33%	25%	28%	29%	-33%
Idle Minimum *	11	5 55%	7 36%	4 64%	4.04 63%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=153, last 2 years) -23%
Idle Average *	14	8 43%	9.9 29%	7 50%	7.2 49%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=153, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Maximum *	25	13 48%	12 52%	12 52%	11.4 54%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=153, last 2 years) -7%
Load Average *	72	69 4%	68.4 5%	95 -32%	80.8 -12%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=152, last 2 years) -48%
Witcher 3 ultra *	100	78 22%	94.9 5%	86 14%	93.6 6%
Load Maximum *	163	124 24%	130.9 20%	135 17%	144.5 11%	250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=153, last 2 years) -53%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		6h 58min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 28min
Carga (máximo brilho)		0h 53min

	MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M, 51 Wh	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 57.48 Wh	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48 Wh	Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 60 Wh	HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		82%	27%	111%	69%	46%
Reader / Idle	418	828 98%	466 11%	867 107%	951 128%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) 35%
WiFi v1.3	268	520 94%	285 6%	482 80%	385 44%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=152, last 2 years) 40%
Load	53	82 55%	87 64%	131 147%	71 34%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) 62%
H.264					482	409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra					59	78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Dimensões compactas

+ Muito bom desempenho da CPU

+ Baixo peso

+ Painel de 144-Hz

Contra

- Leva um tempo se acostumar ao layout do teclado

- Ruído de sistema alto sob uso intenso

- A base poderia ser mais estável

- Número reduzido de portas

MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR, test unit provided by MSI Taiwan

Os fãs de chips AMD ficarão (muito) satisfeitos com o Bravo 15.

Se você deixar de lado a escassa seleção de portas, a duração bastante curta da bateria e o alto nível de ruído durante os aplicativos 3D, o Bravo 15 é um pacote atraente para jogadores sensíveis ao preço que estabelece novos padrões para o desempenho da CPU na faixa de US$ 1.000. O Ryzen 7 4800H oferece muita potência e está preparado para o futuro. A tela de 144-Hz é satisfatória em grande medida.

No entanto, recomendamos que os possíveis compradores escolham a configuração com o Radeon RX 5500M devido à memória de vídeo limtada do Radeon RX 5300M (4 GB em vez de 3 GB GDDR6). A vantagem que traz aos usuários definitivamente vale a pena.

MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR - 07/07/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

73 / 98 → 74%

Teclado

75%

Mouse

75%

Conectividade

53 / 80 → 66%

Peso

64 / 10-66 → 96%

Bateria