Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL: O conversível premium Ice Lake é um forte concorrente do Dell XPS 13
#compare_competitor
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.2 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 14.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
86 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 14.7 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.1 % v7 (old) | 10/2018 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.90" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size & weight
|
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 383 cd/m²
Contraste: 2259:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL LP140WF9-SPE2, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, , 1920x1200, 13.4" | HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng M133NVF3, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 AUO B139HAN03_0, , 1920x1080, 13.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | -6% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66 | 69.9 6% | 63 -5% | 62.7 -5% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.9 | 99.2 1% | 89.8 -8% | 92.6 -5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.3 | 71.5 6% | 64.1 -5% | 64.7 -4% |
Response Times | 4% | 37% | 23% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49.6 ? | 47.6 ? 4% | 29.2 ? 41% | 34.4 ? 31% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 29.2 ? 3% | 20 ? 33% | 25.6 ? 15% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 1000 ? | ||
Screen | 0% | -44% | -68% | |
Brightness middle | 384 | 549.8 43% | 272 -29% | 312 -19% |
Brightness | 363 | 520 43% | 298 -18% | 295 -19% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 84 -7% | 87 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.39 -129% | 0.39 -129% | 0.43 -153% |
Contrast | 2259 | 1410 -38% | 697 -69% | 726 -68% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 2.12 39% | 4.3 -23% | 7.6 -117% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.5 | 3.66 33% | 9 -64% | 15.06 -174% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 1.37 -37% | 2.4 -140% | 1.96 -96% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 2.6 43% | 4.4 4% | 8.8 -91% |
Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.3 96% | 1.97 112% | 2.01 109% |
CCT | 6884 94% | 6884 94% | 5825 112% | 6874 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 65.4 5% | 58.9 -5% | 59.1 -5% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.7 | 99.7 2% | 89.8 -8% | 92.3 -6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
1% | -4% /
-27% | -17% /
-45% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 13.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4003 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5158 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4583 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -16% | -26% | -30% | -8% | |
Write 4K | 128.4 | 106.7 -17% | 105.1 -18% | 108.7 -15% | 126.7 ? -1% |
Read 4K | 46.37 | 49.94 8% | 42.3 -9% | 40.91 -12% | 44 ? -5% |
Write Seq | 1863 | 1223 -34% | 677 -64% | 798 -57% | 1617 ? -13% |
Read Seq | 2340 | 1801 -23% | 2092 -11% | 1610 -31% | 1716 ? -27% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 451.1 | 325.3 -28% | 378.8 -16% | 385.1 -15% | 413 ? -8% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 415.3 | 551 33% | 271.3 -35% | 305.8 -26% | 420 ? 1% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2985 | 1224 -59% | 527 -82% | 779 -74% | 2076 ? -30% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2565 | 2350 -8% | 3175 24% | 2359 -8% | 3130 ? 22% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 4929 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 945 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Average of class Convertible (28 - 257, n=40, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (20.8 - 36.8, n=18) |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 111.9 | 71.9 | 61.2 | 21.7 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 56 | 35.8 | 18.9 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 101 | 60 | 34.2 | 29.3 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 98.2 | 61.5 | 33.6 | 27.7 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 45.7 | 28.7 | 15.4 | |
Rocket League (2017) | 123 | 64.8 | 45.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 42.9 | 20.7 | 19.4 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 29 | 14 | ||
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 24 | |||
Battlefield V (2018) | 43 | 20.6 | 17.2 | |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 32 | 17 | ||
The Division 2 (2019) | 27 | |||
Anno 1800 (2019) | 41 | 15.6 | ||
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 63.3 | 13.1 | ||
F1 2019 (2019) | 35 | 23 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 29.3 dB |
Carga |
| 33.3 / 33.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.45 / 0.53 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.2 / 7 / 8.9 Watt |
Carga |
47.6 / 63.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 19% | 4% | -9% | 2% | -22% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 2.6 19% | 4.32 -35% | 3.4 -6% | 3.91 ? -22% | 5.18 ? -62% |
Idle Average * | 7 | 5.3 24% | 6.84 2% | 7.5 -7% | 7.33 ? -5% | 8.18 ? -17% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.9 | 7 21% | 8.64 3% | 11.8 -33% | 9.16 ? -3% | 11.1 ? -25% |
Load Average * | 47.6 | 43.1 9% | 31.8 33% | 47.7 -0% | 39.2 ? 18% | 46.8 ? 2% |
Load Maximum * | 63.1 | 49 22% | 53 16% | 63.2 -0% | 49.8 ? 21% | 67.2 ? -6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-ap0312ng i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 61 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -16% | 25% | 4% | 22% | |
H.264 | 793 | 643 -19% | 765 ? -4% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 636 | 537 -16% | 531 -17% | 664 4% | 599 ? -6% |
Load | 64 | 135 111% | 113.1 ? 77% |
Pro
Contra
A Lenovo continua sua linha Yoga de gama alta com o Yoga C940-14IIL e a equipou com os mais recentes processadores Ice Lake pela primeira vez. Esta é uma atualização evolutiva bem executada.
Sem dúvida, o novo Intel Core i7 2617M é o coração da tablet Yoga. Em termos de CPU e especialmente de desempenho da GPU, as novas plataformas de CPU trazem uma enorme melhoria no desempenho, o que torna o Yoga C940 adequado inclusive para jogos leves. Isso foi feito sem aumento de calor ou ruído - pelo contrário, há uma diminuição nas duas áreas. A duração da bateria continua sendo boa. Em comparação com o Yoga C930, existe uma tela FHD nova e mais brilhante, que é definitivamente uma melhoria bem-vinda. Além disso, a Lenovo carrega muitas coisas boas dos antecessores, como a construção de metal premium, a caneta integrada ou o forte sistema de alto-falantes quádruplos.
Quase não existem pontos fracos. Um dos poucos é definitivamente a falta de portas, bem como p pouco de ruído de bobina. Além disso, é desnecessariamente complicado abrir o Yoga C940 (pois os parafusos estão escondidos sob os pés de borracha). Seria bom também se a Lenovo oferecesse uma opção de tela mate e se o painel LCD atingisse o valor de brilho prometido de 400 cd/m².
A Lenovo não comete nenhum erro neste caso - e é por isso que o Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL provavelmente entrará em muitas listas de desejos nesta temporada de férias.
Esses pontos fracos não são decisivos para nós. Podemos recomendar sinceramente o Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL. É um portátil premium que oferece muita qualidade e flexibilidade, que os grupos-alvo, como os alunos, apreciarão. O Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 tem um concorrente difícil aqui.
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
- 10/12/2019 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig