Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB (i5-7200U, SSD de 256 GB)

Cofre fraco. Enquanto os novos processadores Intel representam o maior impulso de desempenho em anos, o Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB ainda está equipado com processadores Kaby Lake mais antigos. Você pode descobrir nesta análise, porque o conversível não recebeu nossa recomendação final.
80X80097GE (Yoga 520 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR4-2400, 1 de 1 slot ocupado
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, 10 points, native pen support, BOE NV140FHM-N49, IPS LED, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, 256 GB 
, 164 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado, Card Reader: 4 em 1 SD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.9 x 328 x 229
Bateria
53 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Lenovo Active Stylus, Lenovo App Explorer, Lenovo Companion, Lenovo Settings, McAfee LiveSafe, Microsoft Office trial, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.73 kg, Suprimento de energia: 210 g
Preço
889 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

336 mm 232 mm 20.9 mm 1.7 kg334.8 mm 226.9 mm 19.9 mm 1.7 kg330 mm 222 mm 19 mm 1.7 kg328 mm 229 mm 20 mm 1.7 kg328 mm 229 mm 19.9 mm 1.7 kg321 mm 219 mm 14 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left: power connection, HDMI, USB Type-A 3.0, USB Type-C 3.0, Combo audio
Left: power connection, HDMI, USB Type-A 3.0, USB Type-C 3.0, Combo audio
Right: Power key, Recovery key, SD card reader, USB Type-A 3.0, Kensington Lock
Right: Power key, Recovery key, SD card reader, USB Type-A 3.0, Kensington Lock
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81 MB/s +2%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79.6 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
 
23.7 MB/s -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88.8 MB/s
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.9 MB/s -1%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
 
26.4 MB/s -70%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
665 MBit/s +99%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
349 MBit/s +4%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
335 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
495 MBit/s +71%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
310 MBit/s +7%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
290 MBit/s

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 347 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 347 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 347 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

255
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
220
cd/m²
241
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE NV140FHM-N49 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 265 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 246.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 255 cd/m²
Contraste: 1214:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.96 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.08% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.76% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
BOE NV140FHM-N49, , 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
BOE0637 / BOE DT NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14"
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Samsung SDC864D / 133HL [Dell P/N: PVFF5], , 1920x1080, 13.3"
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 14"
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
B133HAB01.0, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
AU Optronics B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display
5%
1%
5%
1%
58%
Display P3 Coverage
39.76
41.78
5%
40.31
1%
41.82
5%
39.99
1%
64.1
61%
sRGB Coverage
59.3
62.9
6%
60.5
2%
61.6
4%
59.5
0%
91.8
55%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
41.08
43.17
5%
41.65
1%
43.33
5%
41.32
1%
65.2
59%
Response Times
-9%
17%
2384%
1%
-14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47 ?(24, 23)
53 ?(20, 33)
-13%
38 ?(19, 19)
19%
41 ?(23, 18)
13%
56 ?(18, 38)
-19%
36 ?(15, 21)
23%
Response Time Black / White *
34 ?(20, 14)
39 ?(12, 27)
-15%
29 ?(6, 23)
15%
22 ?(14, 10)
35%
27 ?(8, 19)
21%
27 ?(6, 21)
21%
PWM Frequency
347 ?(90)
350 ?(60)
1%
25000 ?(50)
7105%
50 ?(50)
-86%
Screen
-19%
-43%
-35%
-6%
4%
Brightness middle
255
243
-5%
253
-1%
252
-1%
245
-4%
368
44%
Brightness
247
248
0%
232
-6%
237
-4%
233
-6%
350
42%
Brightness Distribution
83
91
10%
83
0%
90
8%
87
5%
87
5%
Black Level *
0.21
0.32
-52%
0.28
-33%
0.21
-0%
0.21
-0%
0.29
-38%
Contrast
1214
759
-37%
904
-26%
1200
-1%
1167
-4%
1269
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.5
5.44
-21%
6.36
-41%
7.29
-62%
4.2
7%
5.26
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.21
9.73
-35%
12.72
-76%
17.55
-143%
8.75
-21%
8.78
-22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.96
4.74
-60%
10.26
-247%
7.48
-153%
3.94
-33%
5.87
-98%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.38 92%
2.28 96%
2.45 90%
2.66 83%
2.42 91%
CCT
6965 93%
7799 83%
6500 100%
6953 93%
6096 107%
6998 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
39.6
4%
38
0%
40
5%
38
0%
60
58%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
62.5
6%
60
2%
61
3%
59
0%
92
56%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-8% / -13%
-8% / -26%
785% / 426%
-1% / -3%
16% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Color values (calibrated)
Color values (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Saturation (calibrated)
Grayscales (calibrated)
Grayscales (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Caches
Caches
Mainboard
Mainboard
Memory
Memory
SPD
SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
170 Points +37%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points +5%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Core i5-7200U
125 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
124 Points
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Intel Core i7-6500U
120 Points -3%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel Core i3-6100U
96 Points -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7
Intel Core i7-8550U
576 Points +99%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
335 Points +16%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
332 Points +15%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel Core i5-7200U
326 Points +13%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Intel Core i7-6500U
310 Points +7%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
289 Points
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel Core i3-6100U
240 Points -17%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
37.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
289 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
124 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
3665 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Radeon R5 M430, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3550 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
3455 Points
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
3435 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit LCH-256V2S
3224 Points -7%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND
3224 Points -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
4556 Points
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit LCH-256V2S
4207 Points -8%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND
4121 Points -10%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3455 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4556 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
3329 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Liteonit LCH-256V2S
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-37%
-33%
-40%
-24%
Read Seq
1171
486.3
-58%
519
-56%
478.4
-59%
518
-56%
Write Seq
605
283.7
-53%
328.2
-46%
419.9
-31%
476.5
-21%
Read 512
720
337.5
-53%
408.1
-43%
351.7
-51%
408
-43%
Write 512
472.8
283.5
-40%
170.2
-64%
294.2
-38%
274.5
-42%
Read 4k
35.92
26.75
-26%
35.29
-2%
24
-33%
35.66
-1%
Write 4k
132.5
85.3
-36%
95.5
-28%
87
-34%
106.7
-19%
Read 4k QD32
290.1
309.7
7%
398.4
37%
199.3
-31%
368.7
27%
Write 4k QD32
389.6
250.8
-36%
161.2
-59%
232.4
-40%
246.3
-37%
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Sequential Read: 1171 MB/s
Sequential Write: 605 MB/s
512K Read: 720 MB/s
512K Write: 472.8 MB/s
4K Read: 35.92 MB/s
4K Write: 132.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 290.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 389.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2543 Points +81%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
1643 Points +17%
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1569 Points +11%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1408 Points
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1268 Points -10%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
1213 Points -14%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6595 Points
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
6249 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
5896 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
5249 Points -20%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
989 Points +28%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
771 Points
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U
752 Points -2%
3DMark 11 Performance
1518 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4933 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
722 pontos
Ajuda
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 38.97 23 19.02
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 17.33
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 16.73

Barulho

Ocioso
30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB
Carga
37.2 / 35.2 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.832.23134.531.82533.83228.933.233.83131.429.835.33831.44027.83029.232.527.85035.334.734.233.535.36327.929.129.63027.9802728.826.626.927100262625.226.42612525.225.1242625.216024.124.52424.124.120023.423.422.522.923.425023.423.521.622.523.431523.62421.420.923.640022.222.619.920.222.250022.622.819.919.722.66302222.318.819228002223.118.818.222100027.329.218.317.927.3125026.728.317.717.826.7160023.625.317.617.423.6200024.326.217.717.524.3250025.527.417.617.525.5315022.628.217.717.722.640002022.217.917.820500019.220.118.117.919.2630018.519.217.91818.5800018.418.618.21818.41000018.318.318.318.118.31250018.218.218.21818.21600018.418.418.118.118.4SPL35.337.330.430.335.3N2.22.51.41.42.2median 22.6median 23.4median 18.3median 18.1median 22.6Delta2.831.31.22.837.534.641.637.437.536.535.436.132.736.535.436.335.331.735.431.631.231.431.131.631.832.129.830.831.833.138.332.333.933.128.329.829.729.128.330.131.230.229.330.126.528.426.424.226.527.328.826.824.827.325.928.725.625.525.925.125.223.821.925.124.725.923.523.324.724.724.122.32124.725.624.621.520.825.625.924.520.92025.9292720.519.22930.627.220.418.330.631.528.419.217.731.531.628.318.517.131.632.328.918.316.532.334.128.917.816.634.132.326.517.616.232.329.524.517.516.329.525.921.717.416.325.923.520.417.316.223.520.519.117.316.220.519.219.317.316.419.218.819.317.416.318.820.62217.816.720.642.138.431.23042.13.72.91.61.43.7median 25.9median 25.9median 19.2median 17.7median 25.94.13.42.62.74.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GEHP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Carga Máxima
 32 °C35 °C32.6 °C 
 29.6 °C32.7 °C28 °C 
 26.2 °C24.8 °C25.6 °C 
Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 29.6 °C
28.9 °C29.6 °C26.5 °C
27.1 °C28.6 °C25.4 °C
25.5 °C24.4 °C24.4 °C
Máximo: 29.6 °C
Médio: 26.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  36.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.234.534.22537.733.237.73135.63835.64030.332.530.3503433.5346327.73027.78027.926.927.910026.126.426.11253126311604224.1422004722.94725050.522.550.531558.320.958.340063.320.263.35006119.76163061.21961.280071.118.271.1100066.317.966.3125058.917.858.916005917.459200059.517.559.5250061.117.561.1315060.817.760.8400055.917.855.9500054.817.954.8630057.11857.1800057.51857.51000059.718.159.71250060.91860.9160005418.154SPL74.330.374.3N33.31.433.3median 58.9median 18.1median 58.9Delta5.91.25.937.442.332.737.531.739.531.138.630.841.333.94429.143.229.34524.245.824.847.625.550.221.952.823.3622163.620.865.82069.319.266.418.365.917.763.617.164.816.566.116.666.916.265.716.363.216.363.116.262.516.265.916.466.616.360.716.755.33077.31.443median 17.7median 63.62.75.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GEHP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.26 / 0.39 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.5 / 6.2 / 7.4 Watt
Carga midlight 32.2 / 26.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14"
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
6500U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit LCH-256V2S, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
6100U, HD Graphics 520, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Power Consumption
0%
-47%
0%
-14%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
3.5
4
-14%
4.2
-20%
4.1
-17%
4.2
-20%
3.9
-11%
Idle Average *
6.2
4.8
23%
7.2
-16%
6.8
-10%
7.4
-19%
7.1
-15%
Idle Maximum *
7.4
7.6
-3%
9.8
-32%
7.9
-7%
8.6
-16%
7.7
-4%
Load Average *
32.2
30
7%
44
-37%
20.4
37%
32
1%
33.4
-4%
Load Maximum *
26.4
29.3
-11%
61
-131%
26.8
-2%
30.2
-14%
55.9
-112%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
14h 47min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)
8h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 55min
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53 Wh
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 41.5 Wh
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51
6100U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh
Battery Runtime
-14%
-25%
-16%
40%
-29%
Reader / Idle
887
886
0%
749
-16%
722
-19%
H.264
602
WiFi v1.3
500
486
-3%
373
-25%
463
-7%
702
40%
373
-25%
Load
175
109
-38%
133
-24%
100
-43%

Pro

+ Carcaça funcional de alumínio e plástico
+ Touchpad muito bom
+ Teclado adequado
+ Digitalizador ativo incluído
+ Permanece sempre frio e quase silencioso
+ Melhor duração da bateria graças à bateria maior

Contra

- A CPU não usa toda sua capacidade
- Tela: baixo brilho e cobertura do espaço de cores, efeito de ondulação estranho, PWM
- USB-C sem DisplayPort ou fornecimento de energia
- As dobradiças são muito frouxas
- 1x1 WLAN
- Opções de GPU e CPU desatualizadas
The Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB, provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
The Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB, provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

Já mencionamos na seção sobre a carcaça, que o Yoga 520-14IKB é muito parecido com o IdeaPad 520s-14IKB. Isso não se aplica apenas ao design, mas também ao hardware em geral. O Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB é quase a versão conversível do IdeaPad.

Portanto, a lista de pros e contras também são muito similares. Assim como no IdeaPad, a carcaça, teclado, e touchpad estão em um bom nível. Embora dispositivos mais caros possam até mesmo ser significativamente melhores aqui, até certo ponto, considerando o preço, você não pode pedir muito mais do Yoga, que não possui fraquezas reais nessas categorias. O mesmo também pode ser dito sobre a emissão de ruído e a temperatura. O Yoga 520-14IKB permanece sempre frio e silencioso. Além disso, graças a uma bateria maior, sua duração foi significantemente melhorada em comparação com o predecessor.

Encontramos a primeira diferença em comparação com o IdeaPad 520s-14IKB na temperatura. Enquanto o IdeaPad esquenta um pouco mais (também devido ao GPU da Nvidia, é claro), o Yoga 520 permanece sempre frio. Isso também é devido ao seu primeiro ponto negativo forte: o desempenho da CPU é limitado significativamente e permanece longe do possível máximo do Core i5-7200U. Esta limitação de desempenho se deve à limitação do TDP do fabricante de 8 watts para a CPU. Portanto, não é surpreendente que a carcaça quase não esquente dessa maneira. Outro ponto negativo é a tela. Embora ofereça a capacidade táctil e um digitalizador ativo, a qualidade da cor não é boa devido ao espaço de cores limitado. O brilho também é muito baixo para compensar a superfície brilhante em uso externo. Mas ficamos realmente aborrecidos com o efeito de onda estranho que pode ser visto no painel quando olhamos de perto e também pela baixa frequência de PWM. Além dessas fraquezas, como no IdeaPad também sentimos falta de uma conexão USB-C que lida com mais que USB aqui. Além disso, as dobradiças são muito balançantes para nosso gosto. E finalmente, como no IdeaPad 520s-14IKB, temos que reclamar sobre o WLAN 1x1.

As fraquezas da tela e o mau desempenho da CPU combinados com os componentes envelhecidos tornam o Yoga 520-14IKB um conversível que dificilmente pode ser recomendado.

Devido a essas fraquezas, é difícil para nós dar uma recomendação ao Yoga 520-14IKB. Em particular, os pontos fracos da tela e o desempenho da CPU pesam muito. Além disso, está o fato de que o Yoga 520-14IKB está simplesmente ultrapassado, dado que a GPU opcional e a CPU já possuem um sucessor. Portanto, nossa recomendação é para um conversível diferente, ou para aguardar uma atualização do Yoga com o Kaby Lake e oMX150. Talvez as coisas também funcionem melhor em termos de tela e desempenho da CPU.

Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE - 11/17/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
78 / 98 → 79%
Teclado
78%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
44 / 80 → 56%
Peso
66 / 35-78 → 73%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
79%
Desempenho do jogos
55 / 68 → 81%
Desempenho da aplicação
86 / 87 → 98%
Temperatura
95%
Ruído
96%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
31 / 85 → 37%
Médio
73%
81%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB (i5-7200U, SSD de 256 GB)
Benjamin Herzig, 2017-12-12 (Update: 2017-12-22)