Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB (i5-7200U, SSD de 256 GB)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 347 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 347 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 347 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
|
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 255 cd/m²
Contraste: 1214:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.96 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.08% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.76% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE BOE NV140FHM-N49, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB BOE0637 / BOE DT NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Samsung SDC864D / 133HL [Dell P/N: PVFF5], , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 B133HAB01.0, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T AU Optronics B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 1% | 5% | 1% | 58% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.76 | 41.78 5% | 40.31 1% | 41.82 5% | 39.99 1% | 64.1 61% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.3 | 62.9 6% | 60.5 2% | 61.6 4% | 59.5 0% | 91.8 55% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.08 | 43.17 5% | 41.65 1% | 43.33 5% | 41.32 1% | 65.2 59% |
Response Times | -9% | 17% | 2384% | 1% | -14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47 ? | 53 ? -13% | 38 ? 19% | 41 ? 13% | 56 ? -19% | 36 ? 23% |
Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 39 ? -15% | 29 ? 15% | 22 ? 35% | 27 ? 21% | 27 ? 21% |
PWM Frequency | 347 ? | 350 ? 1% | 25000 ? 7105% | 50 ? -86% | ||
Screen | -19% | -43% | -35% | -6% | 4% | |
Brightness middle | 255 | 243 -5% | 253 -1% | 252 -1% | 245 -4% | 368 44% |
Brightness | 247 | 248 0% | 232 -6% | 237 -4% | 233 -6% | 350 42% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 91 10% | 83 0% | 90 8% | 87 5% | 87 5% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.32 -52% | 0.28 -33% | 0.21 -0% | 0.21 -0% | 0.29 -38% |
Contrast | 1214 | 759 -37% | 904 -26% | 1200 -1% | 1167 -4% | 1269 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 5.44 -21% | 6.36 -41% | 7.29 -62% | 4.2 7% | 5.26 -17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.21 | 9.73 -35% | 12.72 -76% | 17.55 -143% | 8.75 -21% | 8.78 -22% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.96 | 4.74 -60% | 10.26 -247% | 7.48 -153% | 3.94 -33% | 5.87 -98% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.38 92% | 2.28 96% | 2.45 90% | 2.66 83% | 2.42 91% |
CCT | 6965 93% | 7799 83% | 6500 100% | 6953 93% | 6096 107% | 6998 93% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 39.6 4% | 38 0% | 40 5% | 38 0% | 60 58% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 62.5 6% | 60 2% | 61 3% | 59 0% | 92 56% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -8% /
-13% | -8% /
-26% | 785% /
426% | -1% /
-3% | 16% /
11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE | |
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE | |
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3455 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4556 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3329 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 Liteonit LCH-256V2S | HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP | Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -37% | -33% | -40% | -24% | |
Read Seq | 1171 | 486.3 -58% | 519 -56% | 478.4 -59% | 518 -56% |
Write Seq | 605 | 283.7 -53% | 328.2 -46% | 419.9 -31% | 476.5 -21% |
Read 512 | 720 | 337.5 -53% | 408.1 -43% | 351.7 -51% | 408 -43% |
Write 512 | 472.8 | 283.5 -40% | 170.2 -64% | 294.2 -38% | 274.5 -42% |
Read 4k | 35.92 | 26.75 -26% | 35.29 -2% | 24 -33% | 35.66 -1% |
Write 4k | 132.5 | 85.3 -36% | 95.5 -28% | 87 -34% | 106.7 -19% |
Read 4k QD32 | 290.1 | 309.7 7% | 398.4 37% | 199.3 -31% | 368.7 27% |
Write 4k QD32 | 389.6 | 250.8 -36% | 161.2 -59% | 232.4 -40% | 246.3 -37% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T | |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE | |
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 | |
Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB | |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE | |
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1518 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4933 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 722 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 38.97 | 23 | 19.02 | |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 17.33 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 16.73 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB |
Carga |
| 37.2 / 35.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.26 / 0.39 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.5 / 6.2 / 7.4 Watt |
Carga |
32.2 / 26.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit LCH-256V2S, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 0% | -47% | 0% | -14% | -29% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 4 -14% | 4.2 -20% | 4.1 -17% | 4.2 -20% | 3.9 -11% |
Idle Average * | 6.2 | 4.8 23% | 7.2 -16% | 6.8 -10% | 7.4 -19% | 7.1 -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.4 | 7.6 -3% | 9.8 -32% | 7.9 -7% | 8.6 -16% | 7.7 -4% |
Load Average * | 32.2 | 30 7% | 44 -37% | 20.4 37% | 32 1% | 33.4 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 26.4 | 29.3 -11% | 61 -131% | 26.8 -2% | 30.2 -14% | 55.9 -112% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53 Wh | Dell Inspiron 13 7359-4839 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 41.5 Wh | Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | Asus Zenbook Flip UX360UAK-BB351T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -14% | -25% | -16% | 40% | -29% | |
Reader / Idle | 887 | 886 0% | 749 -16% | 722 -19% | ||
H.264 | 602 | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 500 | 486 -3% | 373 -25% | 463 -7% | 702 40% | 373 -25% |
Load | 175 | 109 -38% | 133 -24% | 100 -43% |
Pro
Contra
Já mencionamos na seção sobre a carcaça, que o Yoga 520-14IKB é muito parecido com o IdeaPad 520s-14IKB. Isso não se aplica apenas ao design, mas também ao hardware em geral. O Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB é quase a versão conversível do IdeaPad.
Portanto, a lista de pros e contras também são muito similares. Assim como no IdeaPad, a carcaça, teclado, e touchpad estão em um bom nível. Embora dispositivos mais caros possam até mesmo ser significativamente melhores aqui, até certo ponto, considerando o preço, você não pode pedir muito mais do Yoga, que não possui fraquezas reais nessas categorias. O mesmo também pode ser dito sobre a emissão de ruído e a temperatura. O Yoga 520-14IKB permanece sempre frio e silencioso. Além disso, graças a uma bateria maior, sua duração foi significantemente melhorada em comparação com o predecessor.
Encontramos a primeira diferença em comparação com o IdeaPad 520s-14IKB na temperatura. Enquanto o IdeaPad esquenta um pouco mais (também devido ao GPU da Nvidia, é claro), o Yoga 520 permanece sempre frio. Isso também é devido ao seu primeiro ponto negativo forte: o desempenho da CPU é limitado significativamente e permanece longe do possível máximo do Core i5-7200U. Esta limitação de desempenho se deve à limitação do TDP do fabricante de 8 watts para a CPU. Portanto, não é surpreendente que a carcaça quase não esquente dessa maneira. Outro ponto negativo é a tela. Embora ofereça a capacidade táctil e um digitalizador ativo, a qualidade da cor não é boa devido ao espaço de cores limitado. O brilho também é muito baixo para compensar a superfície brilhante em uso externo. Mas ficamos realmente aborrecidos com o efeito de onda estranho que pode ser visto no painel quando olhamos de perto e também pela baixa frequência de PWM. Além dessas fraquezas, como no IdeaPad também sentimos falta de uma conexão USB-C que lida com mais que USB aqui. Além disso, as dobradiças são muito balançantes para nosso gosto. E finalmente, como no IdeaPad 520s-14IKB, temos que reclamar sobre o WLAN 1x1.
As fraquezas da tela e o mau desempenho da CPU combinados com os componentes envelhecidos tornam o Yoga 520-14IKB um conversível que dificilmente pode ser recomendado.
Devido a essas fraquezas, é difícil para nós dar uma recomendação ao Yoga 520-14IKB. Em particular, os pontos fracos da tela e o desempenho da CPU pesam muito. Além disso, está o fato de que o Yoga 520-14IKB está simplesmente ultrapassado, dado que a GPU opcional e a CPU já possuem um sucessor. Portanto, nossa recomendação é para um conversível diferente, ou para aguardar uma atualização do Yoga com o Kaby Lake e oMX150. Talvez as coisas também funcionem melhor em termos de tela e desempenho da CPU.
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
- 11/17/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig