Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo V330-14IKB (i5, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 3490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 3490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 3490 | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Dell Latitude 3490 | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 225 cd/m²
Contraste: 433:1 (Preto: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 12.41 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.47% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE NT140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP 14-ma0312ng AU Optronics B140XTN07.2, , 1366x768, 14" | Dell Latitude 3490 LP140WF6 / LGD059D, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES LGD04B2, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Innolux N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -4% | -4% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.47 | 39.31 -5% | 39.81 -4% | 39.56 -5% | 41.88 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 61.4 | 59.2 -4% | 59.6 -3% | 59.3 -3% | 62.8 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.98 | 40.61 -6% | 41.16 -4% | 40.88 -5% | 43.29 1% |
| Response Times | -16% | -45% | -69% | 2281% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 40 ? 2% | 36.4 ? 11% | 40 ? 2% | 44 ? -7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 16 ? -33% | 24 ? -100% | 28.8 ? -140% | 31.2 ? -160% |
| PWM Frequency | 350 ? | 24880 ? 7009% | |||
| Screen | -8% | 28% | 25% | 43% | |
| Brightness middle | 225 | 240 7% | 250 11% | 236 5% | 251 12% |
| Brightness | 216 | 216 0% | 241 12% | 221 2% | 231 7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 79 | 84 6% | 81 3% | 88 11% | 80 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.52 | 0.56 -8% | 0.25 52% | 0.26 50% | 0.19 63% |
| Contrast | 433 | 429 -1% | 1000 131% | 908 110% | 1321 205% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.58 | 13.14 -24% | 5.5 48% | 5.7 46% | 5.1 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.52 | 21.06 -14% | 23.5 -27% | 22 -19% | 10.6 43% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12.41 | 14.89 -20% | 3.5 72% | 3.8 69% | 4.5 64% |
| Gamma | 2.5 88% | 2.62 84% | 2.27 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 14034 46% | 19625 33% | 7049 92% | 7318 89% | 6146 106% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 43 | 38 -12% | 37.9 -12% | 37.7 -12% | 39.8 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 68 | 59 -13% | 59.4 -13% | 59.2 -13% | 62.5 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 12.71 | 4.8 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-8% | -7% /
12% | -16% /
7% | 775% /
455% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 350 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 350 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 350 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 3490 | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=97) | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 3490 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=101) | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Office (4252 - 4830, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 3490 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2986 - 4458, n=69) | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2699 - 5106, n=58) | |
| Average of class Office (2900 - 5526, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3675 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4850 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3612 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | HP 14-ma0312ng Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS541010B7E610 1 TB HDD | Dell Latitude 3490 SK hynix SC311 M.2 | HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | Average SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 13% | -33% | 1% | 21% | 6% | |
| Write 4K | 98.5 | 88.2 -10% | 71.7 -27% | 135.3 37% | 120.3 22% | 101.8 ? 3% |
| Read 4K | 42.25 | 166.4 294% | 28.66 -32% | 34.35 -19% | 43.48 3% | 40.9 ? -3% |
| Write Seq | 809 | 158.4 -80% | 415.9 -49% | 601 -26% | 986 22% | 673 ? -17% |
| Read Seq | 1177 | 895 -24% | 500 -58% | 1175 0% | 1395 19% | 1464 ? 24% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 225.5 | 162.1 -28% | 278 23% | 377.6 67% | 250 11% | 294 ? 30% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 257 | 496.8 93% | 252.9 -2% | 288.3 12% | 491.5 91% | 302 ? 18% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 809 | 159.9 -80% | 502 -38% | 591 -27% | 1047 29% | 760 ? -6% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2584 | 933 -64% | 553 -79% | 1574 -39% | 1781 -31% | 2561 ? -1% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| Dell Latitude 3490 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE | |
| Dell Latitude 3490 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (1089 - 9375, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE | |
| Dell Latitude 3490 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1906 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7702 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1003 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 61.7 | 32.9 | 26.8 | 8.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 16.3 | |||
| Civilization VI (2016) | 35.7 | 14.9 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 31 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.1 / 32.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.1 °C / 95.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-7.4 °C / -13.3 F).
Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP 14-ma0312ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.46 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.8 / 5.8 / 6.9 Watt |
| Carga |
34 / 35 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP 14-ma0312ng i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS541010B7E610 1 TB HDD, TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -28% | -35% | -42% | -24% | -45% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 4.7 -68% | 3.2 -14% | 4.4 -57% | 4.1 -46% | 3.81 ? -36% | 4.54 ? -62% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 6.3 -9% | 5.5 5% | 7.1 -22% | 6.3 -9% | 6.94 ? -20% | 7.49 ? -29% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 6.8 1% | 8.1 -17% | 10.2 -48% | 7.1 -3% | 8.75 ? -27% | 9.14 ? -32% |
| Load Average * | 34 | 15 56% | 40.8 -20% | 36.5 -7% | 54.8 -61% | 35 ? -3% | 42.8 ? -26% |
| Load Maximum * | 35 | 30.4 13% | 68.1 -95% | 48.7 -39% | 66.4 -90% | 47.5 ? -36% | 61.3 ? -75% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.8 |
* ... smaller is better
| Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Average of class Office (300 - 1349, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE | |
| Dell Latitude 3490 | |
| HP 14-ma0312ng | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
Pro
Contra
Com o V330-14IKB, a Lenovo mostra que pode produzir portáteis empresariais para empresas que não necessariamente precisam levar a marca ThinkPad. O hardware deste portátil acessível é feito sob medida para uso de escritório em empresas, o que tem consequências positivas e negativas.
Uma das consequências positivas é que o V330-14IKB possui muitos recursos empresariais, às vezes até superando os ThinkPads recentes em termos de flexibilidade. Por exemplo, nenhum ThinkPad possui um slot UltraBay e o VGA também não aparece mais em nenhum portátil com o TrackPoint vermelho. O obturador de câmera mecânico está disponível nos ThinkPads, embora apenas nos modelos mais caros - os ThinkPads na faixa de preço do V330-14IKB não o têm. O V330-14IKB também é bastante atualizável (1 SSD M.2 2280, 1 SSD/HD de 2,5, 1 Slot de RAM) e o chassi de plástico oferece suporte suficiente para evitar que o teclado se flexione muito (o que geralmente é um problema com portáteis mais baratos). O V330-14IKB não emite muito ruído ou calor, enquanto ainda oferece um bom desempenho da CPU. Faz tudo isto por um preço acessível.
O maior e mais decisivo ponto de crítica que temos sobre o Lenovo V330-14IKB é a tela. Que portáteis muito acessíveis ainda estão disponíveis com opções TN por causa do custo é compreensível, em princípio - mas, neste caso, não é uma opção TN. As telas TN são obrigatória para qualquer pessoa que comprar o V330-14IKB, já que a Lenovo não oferece nenhuma opção de tela IPS. Isso significa que é preciso suportar ângulos de visão ruins e cores fracas devido ao baixo contraste ao usar o V330-14IKB. Isso pode ser aceitável para alguns clientes corporativos que se concentram apenas no custo de compra, mas para nós isso é um fator decisivo.
As restantes características negativas do V330-14IKB como o SSD lento, a má posição da porta USB Type-C do lado esquerdo, o leitor de cartões SD lento, a luz de fundo do teclado ausente e a garantia curta são de menor importância em comparação com a tela ruim. A duração da bateria comparativamente curta do V330-14IKB sem uma bateria UltraBay também merece críticas - embora, pelo menos neste caso, haja uma opção para resolver este problema. Com a bateria UltraBay opcional e a capacidade combinada de 69 Wh, a duração da bateria provavelmente se tornaria um ponto forte deste portátil Lenovo.
Sem importar quantas boas características o V330-14IKB tenha: A tela TN ruim nos obriga a não recomendar este portátil para ninguém.
Pena que a Lenovo não colocou em uma tela melhor para este dispositivo. Simplesmente não podemos recomendar o Lenovo V330-14IKB. Máquinas como o Lenovo ThinkPad E480, Dell Latitude 3490 e HP ProBook 440 G5 não oferecem uma bateria UltraBay, mas, pelo menos, eles incluem telas IPS aceitáveis.
Lenovo V330-14IKB-81B0004MGE
- 02/05/2019 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
