Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo V320-17IKB (7200U, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 17-x066ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP 17-x066ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 412 cd/m²
Contraste: 1056:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.28 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP 17-x066ng IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Pavilion 17-x110ng IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 8% | 0% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.5 | 71.3 7% | 63.6 -4% | 63.6 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 84.5 | 91.7 9% | 86.5 2% | 86.5 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.8 | 67.1 9% | 63.3 2% | 63.3 2% |
| Response Times | -38% | -9% | -47% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35 ? | 42 ? -20% | 38 ? -9% | 41 ? -17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 23 ? 4% | 26 ? -8% | 30 ? -25% |
| PWM Frequency | 119000 ? | 1000 ? -99% | 200 ? -100% | |
| Screen | -19% | -2% | -13% | |
| Brightness middle | 412 | 353 -14% | 331 -20% | 288 -30% |
| Brightness | 377 | 320 -15% | 310 -18% | 285 -24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 82 -1% | 87 5% | 88 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.38 3% | 0.33 15% | 0.61 -56% |
| Contrast | 1056 | 929 -12% | 1003 -5% | 472 -55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.04 | 5.07 -1% | 4.58 9% | 4.56 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.84 | 10.12 -14% | 7.83 11% | 7.76 12% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.28 | 13.38 -153% | 6.18 -17% | 4.95 6% |
| Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.69 82% | 2.34 94% | 2.48 89% |
| CCT | 6900 94% | 15991 41% | 6076 107% | 7669 85% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 60.1 9% | 56 2% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 91.6 9% | 86 2% | 93 11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-17% | -4% /
-2% | -20% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 119000 Hz | ≤ 80 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 119000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 119000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 5479 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3820 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4587 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4706 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3285 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND | Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0 | HP 17-x066ng WDC WD10JPVX-08JC3T5 | HP Pavilion 17-x110ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -90% | -89% | -7% | |
| Read Seq | 473.7 | 88.9 -81% | 98.6 -79% | 500 6% |
| Write Seq | 260.8 | 70.9 -73% | 98.2 -62% | 325.1 25% |
| Read 512 | 337 | 33.01 -90% | 33.8 -90% | 290.2 -14% |
| Write 512 | 263.3 | 51.6 -80% | 45.98 -83% | 300.3 14% |
| Read 4k | 29.41 | 0.381 -99% | 0.395 -99% | 11.24 -62% |
| Write 4k | 73.3 | 1.117 -98% | 0.96 -99% | 86 17% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 298.3 | 0.891 -100% | 1.039 -100% | 145.4 -51% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 242.5 | 1.13 -100% | 0.959 -100% | 272.7 12% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 10189 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1703 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 65525 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6489 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 935 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 378 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001GE | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP 17-y044ng | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
| HP 17-x066ng | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA | |
| HP Pavilion 17-x110ng | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 87.3 | 44 | 26.9 | 12.5 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 56.5 | 32.5 | 26.5 | 9 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19 | 11.8 | 6.4 | 4.3 |
| Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 15.6 | 6.4 | ||
| Prey (2017) | 27.8 | 11.6 | 9.2 | |
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 44.8 | 12.4 | 9.9 | |
| Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 76.7 | 71 | 40 | 18 |
| F1 2017 (2017) | 31 | 13 | 13 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 35 / 35.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP 17-x066ng 6006U, HD Graphics 520 | HP Pavilion 17-x110ng i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | -1% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30.5 -2% | 30.6 -2% | 29 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.5 | 30.8 -1% | 32.7 -7% | 31 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 30.5 | 30.8 -1% | 32.7 -7% | 31 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 30.8 -1% | 32.7 -7% | 31 -2% |
| Load Average * | 35 | 32.1 8% | 33 6% | 33.8 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.8 | 33.8 6% | 32.7 9% | 44.8 -25% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-3.9 °C / -7 F).
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP 17-x066ng 6006U, HD Graphics 520 | HP Pavilion 17-x110ng i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 14% | 5% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 37.3 | 30.4 18% | 36.5 2% | 40.3 -8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 37 | 30.6 17% | 37.2 -1% | 46.1 -25% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.7 | 26.7 7% | 26 9% | 23.8 17% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30.1 | 26 14% | 27.1 10% | 23.4 22% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.25 / 0.36 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 9.6 / 10.4 Watt |
| Carga |
35.4 / 34 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP 17-x066ng 6006U, HD Graphics 520 | HP Pavilion 17-x110ng i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -10% | -8% | -50% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 5.3 -39% | 5.5 -45% | 7.7 -103% |
| Idle Average * | 9.6 | 10.1 -5% | 9.9 -3% | 14 -46% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.4 | 10.5 -1% | 14.6 -40% | 15.1 -45% |
| Load Average * | 35.4 | 34.3 3% | 28 21% | 33 7% |
| Load Maximum * | 34 | 37 -9% | 24.6 28% | 54.6 -61% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 35 Wh | Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | HP 17-x066ng 6006U, HD Graphics 520, 41.5 Wh | HP Pavilion 17-x110ng i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M440, 41 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 6% | 24% | 0% | |
| Reader / Idle | 759 | 527 -31% | ||
| H.264 | 285 | 287 1% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 302 | 320 6% | 375 24% | 346 15% |
| Load | 78 | 90 15% |
Pro
Contra
A Lenovo criou um portátil de escritório de 17,3 polegadas, destinado principalmente para freelancers e pequenas empresas. Mas também pode atrair usuários particulares com seu processador Kaby Lake que oferece poder de processamento suficiente para todas as áreas de aplicação. O aparelho não esquenta e geralmente funciona silenciosamente.
O Lenovo V320-17IKB é um portátil de escritório bem feito de 17,3 polegadas, adequado para trabalhar em casa.
O aparelho está equipado com um SSD rápido, que permite um desempenho rápido do sistema. É possível trocar o SSD, embora a carcaça precise ser aberta, pois o aparelho não possui uma escotilha de manutenção.
A tela é surpreendentemente boa: o modelo IPS mate oferece alto brilho, uma boa relação de contraste e ângulos de visão estáveis. Vimos telas piores em aparelhos similares.
O teclado nos deu uma impressão muito boa e é adequado para digitação regular. NO entanto, sentimos falta da iluminação do teclado. Isso deveria ser obrigatório para um portátil de escritório desta faixa de preços. O preço comparativamente alto de cerca de 720 € (~$860) é devido ao sistema operacional Windows 10 Pro. Os usuários que poderiam ficar sem a versão Pro podem encontrar uma opção mais barata entre a série Ideapad V320 17IKB com a mesma compilação.
Só havia uma coisa a criticar: a garantia de um ano. O padrão hoje em dia seria de dois anos, mas, por sorte, não é muito caro expandir a garantia para este aparelho Lenovo.
Lenovo V320-17IKB 81AH0002GE
- 09/04/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
