Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad X395: Uma luta pela hegemonia dos portáteis empresariais
#compare_competitor
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X395 R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
90.3 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % v6 (old) | 06/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.95 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
84.2 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 13.00" | 2160x1440 | |
89.5 % v7 (old) | 08/2018 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.8 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
84.9 % v7 (old) | Dell Latitude 5300 i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 19 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 5300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 5300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 300 cd/m²
Contraste: 2225:1 (Preto: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.92
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 LP133WF7-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 LP133WF7-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Chi Mei CMN1380, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 LP133WF7-SPA1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW Chi Mei CMN8201, , 2160x1440, 13" | Dell Latitude 5300 LGD05ED-133WF6, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 3% | 2% | 5% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.1 | 65.3 2% | 66.1 3% | 65.2 2% | 68.1 6% | 68.2 6% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.2 | 95.9 1% | 97.8 3% | 97 2% | 99.3 4% | 94.4 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.8 | 66.6 1% | 67.8 3% | 67.3 2% | 69.7 6% | 68.7 4% |
Response Times | -6% | 25% | -2% | 13% | 23% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55 ? | 57.6 ? -5% | 39.2 ? 29% | 59.2 ? -8% | 43.2 ? 21% | 38 ? 31% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 34 ? -6% | 25.6 ? 20% | 30.8 ? 4% | 30.4 ? 5% | 27.2 ? 15% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 60240 ? | ||||
Screen | 0% | -9% | -21% | -21% | -14% | |
Brightness middle | 356 | 356 0% | 470.1 32% | 319 -10% | 356 0% | 326 -8% |
Brightness | 336 | 336 0% | 443 32% | 306 -9% | 346 3% | 313 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 88 0% | 90 2% | 86 -2% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.16 | 0.16 -0% | 0.38 -138% | 0.15 6% | 0.35 -119% | 0.27 -69% |
Contrast | 2225 | 2225 0% | 1237 -44% | 2127 -4% | 1017 -54% | 1207 -46% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 3.6 -0% | 2.47 31% | 6.1 -69% | 3.3 8% | 3.2 11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.5 | 5.5 -0% | 5.73 -4% | 9.7 -76% | 8.7 -58% | 6.3 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.11 | 1.1 1% | 1.52 -37% | 1 10% | 1.1 1% | 1.6 -44% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 4.7 -0% | 3.7 21% | 8.6 -83% | 5.8 -23% | 3.8 19% |
Gamma | 2.92 75% | 2.48 89% | 2.35 94% | 2.62 84% | 2.21 100% | 2.14 103% |
CCT | 6222 104% | 6374 102% | 7373 88% | 6613 98% | 6670 97% | 6900 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 61.3 0% | 62 2% | 61.9 1% | 64.1 5% | 63.8 5% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 95.7 0% | 98.2 2% | 96.8 1% | 99.4 4% | 94.8 -1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-0% | 6% /
-3% | -7% /
-14% | -1% /
-12% | 4% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 29 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11845 - 82102, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U () | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (13726 - 68857, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U () |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3260 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4356 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3606 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Dell Latitude 5300 SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Average Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -2% | -57% | -9% | 13% | 35% | 8% | |
Write 4K | 129.4 | 120.7 -7% | 64.3 -50% | 119.2 -8% | 144.1 11% | 191.2 48% | 135.2 ? 4% |
Read 4K | 41.6 | 58.5 41% | 34.13 -18% | 41.43 0% | 63.5 53% | 53.1 28% | 44.6 ? 7% |
Write Seq | 2334 | 1491 -36% | 466.4 -80% | 1240 -47% | 1496 -36% | 1768 -24% | 2091 ? -10% |
Read Seq | 2151 | 2760 28% | 498.3 -77% | 1668 -22% | 2677 24% | 1710 -21% | 2097 ? -3% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 234 | 237.5 1% | 193.3 -17% | 381.7 63% | 357.4 53% | 575 146% | 370 ? 58% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 325.7 | 336.1 3% | 179.7 -45% | 371.5 14% | 482.3 48% | 654 101% | 372 ? 14% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2348 | 1512 -36% | 396.8 -83% | 1369 -42% | 1558 -34% | 2544 8% | 2308 ? -2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3563 | 3154 -11% | 547 -85% | 2652 -26% | 3021 -15% | 3433 -4% | 3395 ? -5% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 1065 | 989 | 208 ? | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 891 | 883 | 383 ? | ||||
AS SSD | 26% | -63% | -12% | 21% | 30% | 5% | |
Seq Read | 2234 | 2689 20% | 488.2 -78% | 2123 -5% | 2742 23% | 2934 31% | 2276 ? 2% |
Seq Write | 2110 | 1462 -31% | 403.2 -81% | 744 -65% | 1511 -28% | 2407 14% | 1486 ? -30% |
4K Read | 45.78 | 63.8 39% | 31.07 -32% | 43.02 -6% | 66.3 45% | 48.31 6% | 49.6 ? 8% |
4K Write | 102.7 | 139.8 36% | 70.8 -31% | 117.4 14% | 175.2 71% | 179.7 75% | 129.5 ? 26% |
4K-64 Read | 903 | 865 -4% | 255.1 -72% | 680 -25% | 873 -3% | 1296 44% | 683 ? -24% |
4K-64 Write | 986 | 1041 6% | 156.5 -84% | 1039 5% | 594 -40% | 1459 48% | 895 ? -9% |
Access Time Read * | 0.064 | 0.037 42% | 0.093 -45% | 0.057 11% | 0.035 45% | 0.103 -61% | 0.06433 ? -1% |
Access Time Write * | 0.042 | 0.024 43% | 0.048 -14% | 0.051 -21% | 0.021 50% | 0.021 50% | 0.04793 ? -14% |
Score Read | 1172 | 1198 2% | 335 -71% | 935 -20% | 1213 3% | 1638 40% | 960 ? -18% |
Score Write | 1300 | 1328 2% | 268 -79% | 1230 -5% | 920 -29% | 1879 45% | 1173 ? -10% |
Score Total | 3075 | 3095 1% | 781 -75% | 2586 -16% | 2712 -12% | 4334 41% | 2598 ? -16% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1008 | 1290 28% | 208.1 -79% | 1725 71% | 1474 ? 46% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 237.6 | 436.5 84% | 74.3 -69% | 418.3 76% | 426 ? 79% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 572 | 1147 101% | 164.5 -71% | 687 20% | 760 ? 33% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
16% | -60% /
-61% | -11% /
-11% | 17% /
18% | 33% /
32% | 7% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 3425 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 10619 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2025 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Average of class Subnotebook (48 - 187, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (38 - 39, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11.2 - 71, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (7.4 - 9.7, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (29.8 - 37.5, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (9.7 - 12.4, n=2) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 |
Rocket League | |
1280x720 Performance | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (52.6 - 138.1, n=2) | |
1920x1080 Performance | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (42.2 - 78.9, n=2) | |
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (26.9 - 47.9, n=2) | |
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (17.4 - 27.7, n=2) |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 38 | 9.7 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 37.5 | 12.4 | ||
Rocket League (2017) | 138.1 | 47.9 | 27.7 |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Dell Latitude 5300 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 2% | 6% | 1% | 4% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 30.2 | 29.2 3% | 28.5 6% | 29.2 3% | 29.2 3% | 28.8 5% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.2 | 29.2 3% | 28.5 6% | 29.2 3% | 29.2 3% | 28.8 5% |
Idle Average * | 30.2 | 29.2 3% | 28.5 6% | 29.2 3% | 29.2 3% | 28.8 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.2 | 29.2 3% | 28.5 6% | 29.2 3% | 29.2 3% | 29.8 1% |
Load Average * | 34.3 | 34.8 -1% | 31.3 9% | 35 -2% | 31.7 8% | 31.7 8% |
Load Maximum * | 34.3 | 34.8 -1% | 33.5 2% | 35 -2% | 33 4% | 33.2 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB |
Carga |
| 34.3 / 34.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Dell Latitude 5300 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 4% | -4% | -11% | 2% | -5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38.4 | 44.6 -16% | 38 1% | 41.7 -9% | 39.7 -3% | 43 -12% |
Maximum Bottom * | 39.7 | 41.1 -4% | 45.4 -14% | 50.1 -26% | 44.4 -12% | 53 -34% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.1 | 23.2 17% | 26.4 6% | 27.8 1% | 24.7 12% | 23.9 15% |
Idle Bottom * | 28 | 22.8 19% | 30 -7% | 30.2 -8% | 25.3 10% | 24.7 12% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.3 / 0.55 Watt |
Ocioso | 4 / 6.3 / 9.3 Watt |
Carga |
34 / 42 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 2160x1440, 13" | Dell Latitude 5300 i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -10% | 4% | -14% | -20% | -12% | -13% | -26% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4 | 3.4 15% | 3.8 5% | 3.46 13% | 3.84 4% | 3.8 5% | 5.15 ? -29% | 4.43 ? -11% |
Idle Average * | 6.3 | 5.6 11% | 7.5 -19% | 5.88 7% | 7.68 -22% | 6.9 -10% | 7.75 ? -23% | 7.58 ? -20% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.3 | 8.7 6% | 8.6 8% | 9.12 2% | 9.36 -1% | 7.5 19% | 9.45 ? -2% | 9.43 ? -1% |
Load Average * | 34 | 43.6 -28% | 33.1 3% | 45.6 -34% | 43.2 -27% | 41.4 -22% | 36 ? -6% | 45.8 ? -35% |
Load Maximum * | 42 | 65 -55% | 31.8 24% | 65.9 -57% | 64.8 -54% | 63.1 -50% | 44 ? -5% | 68.7 ? -64% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh | Dell Latitude 5300 i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 41.7 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -20% | 0% | -24% | -29% | -23% | 19% | |
Reader / Idle | 1103 | 1381 25% | 1416 28% | 1808 ? 64% | |||
H.264 | 620 | 764 23% | 600 -3% | 917 ? 48% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 655 | 499 -24% | 602 -8% | 500 -24% | 492 -25% | 419 -36% | 729 ? 11% |
Load | 227 | 94 -59% | 189 -17% | 91 -60% | 88 -61% | 116.5 ? -49% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Um excelente subportátil com afogamento de CPU tolerável
O ThinkPad X390 e sua CPU Intel obtiveram 90% quando analisamos em abril, 1% a mais do que o ThinkPad X395. Isso não torna o primeiro melhor do que o último, já que passamos para um novo sistema de classificação desde abril. O ThinkPad X390 e o X395 são tão bons quanto os outros, mas ambos têm suas idiossincrasias.
Os dois dispositivos compartilham os mesmos excelentes dispositivos de entrada e excelente tela, junto com o slot para cartão microSD com posicionamento desconfortável. A Lenovo equipou ambos os dispositivos com RAM soldada e um respiradouro do ventilador no lado direito do chassi também, o qual expulsará o ar quente sobre a mão segurando o mouse se você for destro.
No entanto, o X395 oferece mais recursos de segurança do que o X390, além de desempenho gráfico significativamente melhor, além de usar menos energia sob uso intenso. Portanto, o X395 pode ficar à frente do X390 em uma comparação direta.
Dito isso, embora o X395 ofereça melhor desempenho da GPU que o X390, ele também afoga sua CPU mais fortemente sob uso intenso contínuo. A Lenovo parece ter feito isso para manter o X395 funcionando silenciosamente, de forma fria e econômica, embora à custa do desempenho da CPU. Aliás, o X395 também não possui uma porta Thunderbolt 3, que atualmente permanece como uma interface proprietária da Intel, mas possui HDMI 2.0 em vez do padrão 1.4 mais antigo.
O Lenovo ThinkPad X395 é um ótimo subportátil para escritório que revelou poucas fraquezas durante nossos testes. A máquina impulsionada por AMD é pelo menos igual à irmã Intel, mas funciona de forma mais silenciosa, fria e econômica. O X395 também tem um desempenho de GPU mais potente que o X390, o que é um bônus.
Atualmente, a Lenovo vende nossa configuração de teste por cerca de 927 Euros (~US$ 1.022), mas varejistas terceirizados poderão em breve começar a oferecer o X395 a preços mais acessíveis. No geral, recomendamos o X395 não apenas para empresas, mas também para particulares que buscam um sólido subportátil de 13,3 polegadas.
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
- 10/14/2019 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze