Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 1: Com AMD Renoir, o portátil ThinkPad de 13 polegadas mais veloz
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.5 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
88.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X395 R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Dell Latitude 7310 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 18.3 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size & weight comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 7310 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 7310 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 331 cd/m²
Contraste: 1576:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.77
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 B133HAK01.1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X395 LP133WF7-SPB1, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7310 AU Optronics B133HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 N140HCG-GQ2, IPS , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Lenovo B133HAK01.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | 8% | 3% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.8 | 64.1 -1% | 71.8 11% | 66.8 3% | 66 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.6 | 95.2 0% | 99.3 4% | 97.9 2% | 96.2 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.7 | 65.8 0% | 72.4 10% | 69 5% | 67.2 2% |
Response Times | -2% | 16% | 46% | 5% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56.8 ? | 55 ? 3% | 40.8 ? 28% | 32.4 ? 43% | 52.8 ? 7% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 32 ? -7% | 28.8 ? 4% | 15.2 ? 49% | 29.2 ? 3% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | ||||
Screen | 18% | 16% | 19% | -1% | |
Brightness middle | 331 | 356 8% | 332.7 1% | 404 22% | 359 8% |
Brightness | 315 | 336 7% | 329 4% | 371 18% | 342 9% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 88 -2% | 89 -1% | 88 -2% | 90 0% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.16 24% | 0.25 -19% | 0.34 -62% | 0.21 -0% |
Contrast | 1576 | 2225 41% | 1331 -16% | 1188 -25% | 1710 9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 3.6 41% | 2.15 65% | 1.4 77% | 6.7 -10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10 | 5.5 45% | 3.89 61% | 3.2 68% | 10.9 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 1.11 7% | 1.09 9% | 0.8 33% | 1.3 -8% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.3 | 4.7 25% | 2.5 60% | 1.6 75% | 7.4 -17% |
Gamma | 2.77 79% | 2.92 75% | 2.3 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.85 77% |
CCT | 6938 94% | 6222 104% | 6347 102% | 6480 100% | 6309 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.7 | 61 0% | 64.1 6% | 63 4% | 61.7 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.4 | 96 1% | 99.4 4% | 97.9 3% | 95.9 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
12% | 13% /
14% | 23% /
20% | 2% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29.2 ms rise | |
↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (2935 - 3302, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (461 - 479, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (1287 - 1417, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (180 - 184, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (340 - 403, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (4413 - 4467, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (37081 - 42173, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (1117 - 1157, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (5456 - 6609, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (8.33 - 10.3, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (58.4 - 73.4, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2020-20UAS04T00 | |
Dell Latitude 7310 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (0.61 - 0.621, n=5) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4349 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5573 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4956 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X395 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Dell Latitude 7310 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Average Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -4% | 9% | 5% | 11% | |
Write 4K | 95.7 | 129.4 35% | 135.2 41% | 131.1 37% | 140.8 ? 47% |
Read 4K | 37.47 | 41.6 11% | 50.7 35% | 45.48 21% | 48.6 ? 30% |
Write Seq | 2032 | 2334 15% | 2155 6% | 2042 0% | 2106 ? 4% |
Read Seq | 2207 | 2151 -3% | 2504 13% | 2259 2% | 2099 ? -5% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 517 | 234 -55% | 395.6 -23% | 429.1 -17% | 451 ? -13% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 387 | 325.7 -16% | 394.5 2% | 370.7 -4% | 482 ? 25% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2977 | 2348 -21% | 2987 0% | 2963 0% | 2903 ? -2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3556 | 3563 0% | 3564 0% | 3564 0% | 3511 ? -1% |
Continuous load reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 4897 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18790 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2720 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1082 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 56.1 | 17.6 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 90.5 | 69.9 | 42.2 | 39.5 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.2 | 28.5 | 25.6 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 44.4 | 17 | ||
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 49.3 | 15 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 29.1 dB |
Carga |
| 31.1 / 31.8 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.2 °C / 93.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.9 °C / -10.7 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.41 / 0.78 Watt |
Ocioso | 6 / 8.9 / 11.3 Watt |
Carga |
34.2 / 37.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X395 R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7310 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | 16% | 11% | 1% | -12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6 | 4 33% | 2.7 55% | 2.9 52% | 4.66 ? 22% | 4.44 ? 26% |
Idle Average * | 8.9 | 6.3 29% | 4.4 51% | 5.6 37% | 7.56 ? 15% | 7.55 ? 15% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.3 | 9.3 18% | 4.8 58% | 8.9 21% | 8.95 ? 21% | 9.45 ? 16% |
Load Average * | 34.2 | 34 1% | 33.4 2% | 30.1 12% | 38.7 ? -13% | 45.8 ? -34% |
Load Maximum * | 37.2 | 42 -13% | 69.7 -87% | 61.3 -65% | 51.9 ? -40% | 68.4 ? -84% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X395 R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6, 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 7310 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 66% | 30% | 38% | 42% | 49% | |
H.264 | 495 | 620 25% | 792 60% | 704 42% | 911 ? 84% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 522 | 655 25% | 758 45% | 612 17% | 559 7% | 726 ? 39% |
Load | 92 | 227 147% | 106 15% | 127 38% | 163 77% | 115.4 ? 25% |
Reader / Idle | 1103 | 2246 | 1750 ? |
Pro
Contra
O Ryzen 4000 está atualmente ganhando participação de mercado para a AMD no espaço de portáteis. Nesse empreendimento, o segmento empresarial provavelmente desempenha um papel importante. Um subportátil compacto tradicional como o Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 1 pode ser um grande trunfo na luta pelo mercado corporativo.
Como a Lenovo mantém o design testado e comprovado do Lenovo ThinkPad X390 / X395, a CPU AMD Renoir com oito núcleos é claramente a estrela deste show. Nenhum outro portátil ThinkPad com tela de 13,3 polegadas oferece um processador tão rápido. O versão Intel do X13 e do Dell Latitude 7310 estão longe de serem competitivos com o ThinkPad X13 AMD. O mesmo é verdade para o desempenho da GPU, que é quase bom o suficiente para competir com dGPUs de baixo custo.
Apesar do ótimo nível de desempenho, o ThinkPad X13 Gen 1 funciona de maneira fria e silenciosa. Outros pontos fortes deste Lenovo X13 incluem os dispositivos de entrada ThinkPad, a quantidade de portas no pequeno chassi, a boa tela mate e a robusta carcaça de magnésio. Em comparação com o ThinkPad X395, o Wi-Fi 6 é notório como um ganho.
Enquanto isso, a maioria dos problemas são assumidos diretamente do modelo anterior, como o slot microSD de difícil acesso e a RAM soldada. Comparado com o ThinkPad T14s Gen 1, o X13 tem um teclado facilmente substituível, mas pior duração da bateria e o teclado é menor. Por falar em duração da bateria: Além da porta Thunderbolt 3 ausente, esta é uma das únicas pequenas desvantagens em comparação com o Intel ThinkPad X13.
Subportátil com um soco: Não existem muitos portáteis compactos que podem oferecer um desempenho semelhante ao ThinkPad X13 Gen 1. Os maiores concorrentes são os primos maiores do ThinkPad e do HP EliteBook 835 G7.
Podemos recomendar o Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 1 com AMD Ryzen 4000 de todo o coração. Se alguém estiver procurando por um portátil de 13,3 polegadas, não há muitas opções que ofereçam o mesmo nível de desempenho. Um problema pode ser a competição com os ligeiramente maiores Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 1 com CPUs AMD. Para a maioria dos usuários, o T14s pode ser a melhor escolha.
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800
- 08/13/2020 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig