Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020: Conversível empresarial com pequenas melhorias
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.8 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89.6 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 90.5 % v7 (old) | 02/2019 | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 90.3 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 16.1 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 87.8 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 408 cd/m²
Contraste: 1948:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 LP140WF9-SPE1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 B140HAN05.8, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 AU Optronics AUO533D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA AUO5E2D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T BOE HF NE156QUM-N64, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 SHP14A2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | -0% | 6% | 3% | 6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 67.1 4% | 64.3 0% | 69 7% | 66.2 3% | 68.6 7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.5 | 98.2 3% | 94.1 -1% | 99.4 4% | 97.2 2% | 99.6 4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.6 | 68.9 5% | 65.5 0% | 70.9 8% | 68.3 4% | 70 7% |
| Response Times | -28% | -35% | -25% | -26% | -28% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52 ? | 61.6 ? -18% | 70.8 ? -36% | 60.8 ? -17% | 60 ? -15% | 56 ? -8% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 35.2 ? -38% | 34.4 ? -34% | 33.8 ? -32% | 35 ? -37% | 38 ? -48% |
| PWM Frequency | 735 ? | 1667 ? | ||||
| Screen | 0% | 0% | 17% | 7% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 409 | 372 -9% | 416.3 2% | 411 0% | 351 -14% | 277.2 -32% |
| Brightness | 405 | 368 -9% | 400 -1% | 388 -4% | 335 -17% | 263 -35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 88 -7% | 89 -6% | 87 -8% | 87 -8% | 83 -13% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.22 -5% | 0.29 -38% | 0.22 -5% | 0.31 -48% | 0.2 5% |
| Contrast | 1948 | 1691 -13% | 1436 -26% | 1868 -4% | 1132 -42% | 1386 -29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 4.6 6% | 2.69 45% | 1.8 63% | 1.74 64% | 2.1 57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.4 | 7.8 7% | 4.95 41% | 4.1 51% | 2.76 67% | 5.91 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 0.9 31% | 2.13 -64% | 1 23% | 1.03 21% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 5.9 -2% | 2.9 50% | 2.5 57% | 2.22 62% | 3.4 41% |
| Gamma | 2.53 87% | 2.58 85% | 2.4 92% | 2.26 97% | 2.35 94% | 2.241 98% |
| CCT | 7009 93% | 6516 100% | 6623 98% | 6448 101% | 6667 97% | 6030 108% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.7 | 62.7 3% | 60.1 -1% | 64.7 7% | 62 2% | 64 5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.3 | 97.8 3% | 94.5 -1% | 99.3 4% | 97 2% | 100 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -8% /
-2% | -12% /
-4% | -1% /
10% | -5% /
2% | -6% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 781, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (362 - 497, n=37) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Convertible (242 - 7303, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1015 - 1897, n=38) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 302, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=42) | |
| Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=45) | |
| Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (628 - 1051, n=31) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 | |
| Average of class Convertible (175 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3747 - 4981, n=31) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 | |
| Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (12196 - 21298, n=31) | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Convertible (319 - 2062, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (977 - 1287, n=31) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (2474 - 4484, n=31) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 22.4, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3.41 - 6.04, n=31) | |
| Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (50.7 - 77.8, n=27) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (0.637 - 0.81, n=28) | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4198 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5493 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5200 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4251 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Average Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 8% | -4% | -17% | 1% | -44% | 1% | |
| Write 4K | 158.5 | 194.3 23% | 122.7 -23% | 88 -44% | 137.8 -13% | 35.06 -78% | 140.8 ? -11% |
| Read 4K | 49.78 | 51.2 3% | 46.57 -6% | 132.1 165% | 44.15 -11% | 23.64 -53% | 48.6 ? -2% |
| Write Seq | 1534 | 1773 16% | 1725 12% | 503 -67% | 2073 35% | 1537 0% | 2106 ? 37% |
| Read Seq | 1464 | 2512 72% | 2392 63% | 1306 -11% | 2165 48% | 1782 22% | 2099 ? 43% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 435.5 | 431.7 -1% | 470.6 8% | 237.3 -46% | 431.9 -1% | 100.3 -77% | 451 ? 4% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 554 | 539 -3% | 313.2 -43% | 287.4 -48% | 427.7 -23% | 62.7 -89% | 482 ? -13% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2984 | 2538 -15% | 1869 -37% | 1242 -58% | 2253 -24% | 2698 -10% | 2903 ? -3% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3557 | 3489 -2% | 3380 -5% | 2480 -30% | 3480 -2% | 1073 -70% | 3511 ? -1% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1444 | 867 -40% | 914 ? -37% | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1052 | 1315 25% | 1017 ? -3% | ||||
| AS SSD | -15% | -21% | -64% | -24% | -97% | -17% | |
| Seq Read | 2724 | 2888 6% | 1816 -33% | 1096 -60% | 2739 1% | 2289 -16% | 2412 ? -11% |
| Seq Write | 2344 | 2381 2% | 1270 -46% | 305 -87% | 1307 -44% | 1163 -50% | 1983 ? -15% |
| 4K Read | 56.8 | 45.66 -20% | 46.25 -19% | 62.3 10% | 47.43 -16% | 22.29 -61% | 53.1 ? -7% |
| 4K Write | 148.3 | 162.4 10% | 104.1 -30% | 110.7 -25% | 126 -15% | 28.92 -80% | 131.1 ? -12% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1238 | 1276 3% | 1342 8% | 393.7 -68% | 1013 -18% | 415.6 -66% | 1201 ? -3% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1638 | 1432 -13% | 1209 -26% | 438.5 -73% | 1371 -16% | 199.5 -88% | 1726 ? 5% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.035 | 0.088 -151% | 0.043 -23% | 0.078 -123% | 0.082 -134% | 0.122 -249% | 0.05525 ? -58% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.025 | 0.023 8% | 0.035 -40% | 0.045 -80% | 0.029 -16% | 0.143 -472% | 0.05394 ? -116% |
| Score Read | 1567 | 1610 3% | 1569 0% | 566 -64% | 1335 -15% | 667 -57% | 1495 ? -5% |
| Score Write | 2021 | 1832 -9% | 1440 -29% | 580 -71% | 1628 -19% | 345 -83% | 2055 ? 2% |
| Score Total | 4381 | 4245 -3% | 3790 -13% | 1420 -68% | 3582 -18% | 1300 -70% | 4303 ? -2% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2191 | 1810 -17% | 2034 -7% | 1931 -12% | 1767 -19% | 1894 ? -14% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 570 | 498.3 -13% | 450.3 -21% | 457.9 -20% | 379.4 -33% | 539 ? -5% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1131 | 921 -19% | 1024 -9% | 1242 10% | 1055 -7% | 1193 ? 5% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-6% | -13% /
-15% | -41% /
-45% | -12% /
-15% | -71% /
-78% | -8% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2092 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 65793 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8015 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1099 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 545 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 436 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 75.9 | 39.3 | 33.5 | 11 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 75.4 | 42.5 | 19.1 | 17.3 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 12.2 | 9.89 | 9.54 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.4 / 29.4 / 30.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.7 / 33.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.4 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.4 °C / 93.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-6.4 °C / -11.5 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 3% | 5% | -2% | 3% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 44.1 | 44.1 -0% | 38.2 13% | 41.1 7% | 42.6 3% | 49.6 -12% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 48.4 | 47.8 1% | 48 1% | 47.5 2% | 41.5 14% | 60.2 -24% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 24 8% | 23.6 9% | 26.4 -2% | 26.4 -2% | 22.4 14% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.8 | 24.8 4% | 26.6 -3% | 29.7 -15% | 26.3 -2% | 23.2 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.28 / 0.9 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.9 / 6 / 9.6 Watt |
| Carga |
42.6 / 67.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -3% | 3% | 12% | -44% | 18% | 2% | -28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 3.8 -31% | 2.7 7% | 3.5 -21% | 2.3 21% | 2.6 10% | 3.81 ? -31% | 5.18 ? -79% |
| Idle Average * | 6 | 6.1 -2% | 6.5 -8% | 5.1 15% | 10.3 -72% | 4.3 28% | 6.94 ? -16% | 8.18 ? -36% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.6 | 9.1 5% | 11.5 -20% | 8.1 16% | 11 -15% | 5.5 43% | 8.75 ? 9% | 11.1 ? -16% |
| Load Average * | 42.6 | 38.6 9% | 38.7 9% | 35.6 16% | 77 -81% | 32 25% | 35 ? 18% | 46.8 ? -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 67.3 | 64.5 4% | 50.5 25% | 44.7 34% | 118 -75% | 78.8 -17% | 47.5 ? 29% | 67.2 ? -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 68 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00 i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 71 Wh | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -13% | 27% | 20% | 5% | 12% | 7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1297 | 1673 29% | 1169 -10% | 1330 ? 3% | |||
| H.264 | 556 | 588 6% | 717 29% | 669 20% | 770 ? 38% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 654 | 541 -17% | 623 -5% | 605 -7% | 566 -13% | 732 12% | 599 ? -8% |
| Load | 120 | 85 -29% | 187 56% | 166 38% | 149 24% | 113.1 ? -6% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - O ThinkPad X1 Yoga com leves melhorias
O Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga Gen 5 é muito semelhante ao seu antecessor e, portanto, oferece quase as mesmas vantagens e desvantagens. Isso ocorre porque os dois dispositivos têm o mesmo chassi, que é bastante rígido, porque é feito de materiais de alta qualidade.
A mudança para a CPU mais recente do Comet Lake forneceu algumas melhorias. No entanto, o desempenho bruto da CPU é um pouco menor quando comparado ao antecessor. Dito isto, o desempenho do sistema ainda é muito bom, graças em grande parte a um SSD PCIe muito rápido.
O novo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G5 é apenas uma pequena atualização. A Lenovo ainda oferece um conversível comercial muito bom, com chassi rígido e bom desempenho do sistema. No entanto, a atualização do modelo anterior não faz muito sentido.
Em termos de portas, o ThinkPad X1 Yoga oferece tudo o que você poderia precisar. Graças a duas portas Thunderbolt 3, o portátil está preparado para o futuro. O dispositivo não é menos à prova de futuro em termos de comunicação sem fio, porque suporta o rápido padrão Wi-Fi 6. Os pontos fracos antigos ainda estão lá, ou seja, o máximo de 16 GB de RAM e o fato de os usuários não poderem instalar um modem LTE após a compra. A bateria dura o suficiente para um dia normal no escritório.
À primeira vista, o preço normal de 2.300 Euros ($ 2.668) parece bastante alto. No entanto, o Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga Gen 5 é destinado principalmente a clientes corporativos, que valorizam a mobilidade e a duração da bateria. Como conversível, o dispositivo é muito versátil e a Active Pen Pro também está sempre lá. A tela brilhante é bastante boa, mas a superfície altamente refletiva da tela pode causar algum desconforto.
The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga Gen 5 is very similar to its predecessor and therefore offers almost the same exact advantages and disadvantages. This is because both devices have the same chassis, which is quite rigid, because it is made of high-quality materials.
The change to the newer Comet Lake CPU provided some improvements. However, the raw CPU performance is somewhat lower, when compared to the predecessor. That being said, the system performance is still very good, thanks in large part to a very fast PCIe SSD.
The new ThinkPad X1 Yoga G5 is only a small update. Lenovo still offers a very good business convertible with a rigid chassis and good system performance. However, upgrading from the predecessor model does not make much sense.
In terms of ports, the ThinkPad X1 Yoga offers everything one might need. Thanks to two Thunderbolt 3 ports, the laptop is quite future-proof. The device is no less future-proof in terms of wireless communication, because it supports the fast Wi-Fi 6 standard. The old weak points are still there, namely the maximum of 16 GB of RAM and the fact that users cannot install an LTE modem post-purchase. The battery lasts long enough for a normal day at the office.
At first glance, the regular price of 2300 Euros ($2668) seems quite high. However, the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga Gen 5 is primarily intended for business customers, who put a premium on mobility and battery life. As a convertible, the device is very versatile and the Active Pen Pro is also always there. The bright display is quite good, but the highly reflective screen surface can cause some discomfort.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00
- 07/11/2020 v7 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
