Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme (i7, 4K-HDR, GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE (ThinkPad X1 Extreme Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1291 MHz, Memoría: 1752 MHz, GDDR5, 398.27, Optimus
Memória
32 GB
, 2 x 16 GB Dual-Channel DDR4-2666, 2 Slots, up to 64 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, capacitiva, B156ZAN03.2, IPS, HDR, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel CM246
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB
, 914 GB livre
peso
1.842 kg, Suprimento de energia: 449 g
Preço
2799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
B156ZAN03.2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 396 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 380.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.1 cd/m²iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 397 cd/m²
Contraste: 1414:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE B156ZAN03.2, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) APPA040, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 B140QAN02.0, , 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 NV156QUM-N44, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -10% | -20% | 0% | 1% | -21% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 86.3 | 79.1 -8% | 67.8 -21% | 98.7 14% | 87.7 2% | 69.2 -20% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.8 -1% | 94.1 -6% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 90.7 -9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.4 | 79.2 -20% | 67.9 -32% | 86.6 -13% | 99.9 1% | 66.3 -33% |
| Response Times | 13% | 9% | 16% | -2% | 12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 61.6 ? | 46.4 ? 25% | 56 ? 9% | 43.2 ? 30% | 59.2 ? 4% | 51.2 ? 17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 32 ? -0% | 29 ? 9% | 31.2 ? 2% | 34.4 ? -8% | 29.6 ? 7% |
| PWM Frequency | 980 ? | 117000 ? | 952 ? | |||
| Screen | -10% | -17% | 29% | 20% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 396 | 494 25% | 440 11% | 520 31% | 578 46% | 310 -22% |
| Brightness | 380 | 457 20% | 389 2% | 492 29% | 533 40% | 283 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 88 -2% | 83 -8% | 88 -2% | 84 -7% | 87 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.34 -21% | 0.34 -21% | 0.39 -39% | 0.38 -36% | 0.24 14% |
| Contrast | 1414 | 1453 3% | 1294 -8% | 1333 -6% | 1521 8% | 1292 -9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 5.2 -30% | 5.04 -26% | 1.2 70% | 1.9 52% | 3.1 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.6 | 17.5 -130% | 6.99 8% | 2.3 70% | 3.8 50% | 7.6 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.9 | 2.04 -127% | 0.8 11% | 2.2 -144% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 2.7 56% | 4.98 18% | 1.3 79% | 3 51% | 2.3 62% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.1 105% | 2.48 89% | 2.18 101% | 2.14 103% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 7786 83% | 7038 92% | 7777 84% | 6738 96% | 6377 102% | 6876 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88.5 | 71.2 -20% | 61 -31% | 88.8 0% | 59.1 -33% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 98.8 -1% | 94 -6% | 100 0% | 90.1 -10% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-7% | -9% /
-14% | 15% /
20% | 6% /
13% | -8% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 61.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1218 (1194.56-1224.81)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1065 (1052.44-1126.79)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1168 (1123.47-1219.85)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1012 (980.27-1215.12)
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1015 (972-1114)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H; macOS Software Update: Ø1006 (962.51-1065.02)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H; macOS Software Update 2: Ø1031 (1009-1058)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H; macOS Catalina 10.15.5: Ø901 (863-971)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H; macOS: Ø832 (773-940)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1218 (1194.56-1224.81)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1065 (1052.44-1126.79)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1168 (1123.47-1219.85)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1012 (980.27-1215.12)
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3611 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4725 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4381 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4785 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -24% | -30% | -3% | -31% | 6% | |
| Write 4K | 123.7 | 79.1 -36% | 94.8 -23% | 131.9 7% | 131.4 6% | 165.7 ? 34% |
| Read 4K | 44.07 | 37.89 -14% | 26.45 -40% | 44.6 1% | 29.47 -33% | 44.6 ? 1% |
| Write Seq | 2215 | 1119 -49% | 1037 -53% | 1824 -18% | 878 -60% | 1982 ? -11% |
| Read Seq | 2242 | 1852 -17% | 1280 -43% | 2163 -4% | 883 -61% | 1764 ? -21% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 313.9 | 361.1 15% | 277.6 -12% | 338.1 8% | 256 -18% | 395 ? 26% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 359.8 | 257.9 -28% | 333.9 -7% | 351.9 -2% | 337.7 -6% | 434 ? 21% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2404 | 1131 -53% | 1037 -57% | 1972 -18% | 1723 -28% | 2351 ? -2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3333 | 3096 -7% | 3135 -6% | 3387 2% | 1778 -47% | 3234 ? -3% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1044 | 1408 ? | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 914 | 1449 ? |
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Sequential Read:
2699 MB/s
Sequential Write:
2198 MB/s
512K Read:
905 MB/s
512K Write:
2226 MB/s
4K Read:
59.2 MB/s
4K Write:
128.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
353.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
310.1 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 8886 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6424 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2361 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 31.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.4 / 39.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Radeon Pro 560X, i7-8850H, Apple SSD AP0512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | -8% | 2% | -0% | -8% | |
| off / environment * | 28.8 | 29.9 -4% | 30.25 -5% | 28.9 -0% | 29.3 -2% | 29.6 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.8 | 29.9 -4% | 30.25 -5% | 28.9 -0% | 29.3 -2% | 30.1 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 28.8 | 29.9 -4% | 30.25 -5% | 28.9 -0% | 29.3 -2% | 30.1 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.3 | 30.3 3% | 31.8 -2% | 32.5 -4% | 31.8 -2% | 30.1 4% |
| Load Average * | 36.4 | 36.5 -0% | 44.7 -23% | 35.1 4% | 35.8 2% | 46.8 -29% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.4 | 40.4 -11% | 35.8 2% | 36 1% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 39.2 | 40.4 -3% | 42 -7% | 35.1 10% | 38 3% | 46.8 -19% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.4 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.9 °C / -3.5 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.4 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.9 °C / -3.5 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000XGE i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 80 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 96 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 105 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 28% | 38% | 42% | 48% | 63% | 51% | |
| Reader / Idle | 691 | 1027 49% | 1328 92% | 1181 71% | 1146 ? 66% | ||
| H.264 | 371 | 738 99% | 581 57% | 566 53% | 565 52% | 701 89% | 821 ? 121% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 384 | 576 50% | 523 36% | 519 35% | 522 36% | 614 60% | 627 ? 63% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 63 | 62 -2% | 88 40% | 76.3 ? 21% | |||
| Load | 119 | 76 -36% | 128 8% | 106 -11% | 158 33% | 98.6 ? -17% |
O altamente antecipado ThinkPad X1 Extreme finalmente chegou. O dispositivo já está conosco há alguns dias e terminamos muitos testes. A impressão até agora é bastante positiva. Tem a aparência de um X1 Carbon maior e é definitivamente um ThinkPad. Você obtém um número de portas suficiente, bem como um leitor de cartões SD comuns.
A tela 4K HDR também é muito similar à do irmão menor, tanto em termos de impressão de imagem subjetiva quanto de gama de cores. Ainda assim, gostaríamos de ver uma melhor calibração de fábrica, já que há uma tonalidade azul visível. A superfície da tela muito refletiva é outro problema.
A solução de resfriamento parece ser bem capaz após nossos benchmarks iniciais. Os ventiladores permanecem silenciosos, mas isso afeta as temperaturas da superfície, bem como o desempenho da CPU sob uso intenso. Conseguimos melhorar o desempenho da CPU com alguns ajustes. O dispositivo é de fácil manutenção e você tem dois slots para SSDs M.2. A duração da bateria é preocupante até o momento e, às vezes, é menor que a dos concorrentes.
A próxima atualização abrangerá o novo módulo WLAN, os dispositivos de entrada, a funcionalidade HDR, bem como o consumo de energia.
Price comparison
