Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 2020: Mesmo visual, novo processador
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
Processador
Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.9 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 28.20.100.7528
Memória
16 GB
, 1333.3 MHz, Dual-Channel, 16-20-20-45, soldered
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 315 PPI, BOE NV140QUM-N53, IPS, LEN4160, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, 512 GB
peso
1.226 kg, Suprimento de energia: 356 g
Preço
2300 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.5 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 15.4 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 89.6 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 90.1 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
| 83.9 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.5 kg | 14.7 mm | 15.00" | 2496x1664 |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1130 (1072-1174)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1166 (1012-1299)
5.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NV140QUM-N53 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 536.7 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 512.9 cd/m² Minimum: 9.14 cd/m²iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 532 cd/m²
Contraste: 1298:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.52
ΔE Greyscale 10.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
74.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
83.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.98
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS BOE NV140QUM-N53, IPS, 14", 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QD00M7GE N140HCR-GA2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 LP140QH2-SPB1, IPS, 14", 2560x1440 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK Lenovo LEN40A9 / AUO B140HAK02.3, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE B140HAN03_1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch 20A7-002DGE LG Philips LP140GH1-SPA2, IPS-Panel, 14", 2560x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -11% | -8% | -13% | -21% | -30% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 83 | 68.3 -18% | 72.7 -12% | 68.3 -18% | 61.6 -26% | 54.1 -35% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 98.6 -1% | 97.9 -2% | 94.9 -5% | 87.6 -12% | 77.5 -22% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 83.1 | 70.3 -15% | 74.6 -10% | 69.3 -17% | 62.6 -25% | 55.2 -34% |
| Response Times | 4111% | 21% | 21% | 4% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49.2 ? | 40.8 ? 17% | 38 ? 23% | 40 ? 19% | 48 ? 2% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32.2 ? | 27.2 ? 16% | 26 ? 19% | 25 ? 22% | 30.4 ? 6% | |
| PWM Frequency | 201.6 ? | 25000 ? 12301% | ||||
| Screen | 20% | 1% | 19% | 11% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 532 | 406 -24% | 316 -41% | 298 -44% | 278 -48% | 228 -57% |
| Brightness | 513 | 372 -27% | 311 -39% | 287 -44% | 271 -47% | 226 -56% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 88 -2% | 84 -7% | 91 1% | 91 1% | 89 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.25 39% | 0.35 15% | 0.2 51% | 0.16 61% | 0.23 44% |
| Contrast | 1298 | 1624 25% | 903 -30% | 1490 15% | 1738 34% | 991 -24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.88 | 2.9 58% | 4.5 35% | 2.19 68% | 4.5 35% | 6.29 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.65 | 6.1 52% | 10.3 19% | 4.39 65% | 8.4 34% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.52 | 1.1 56% | 1.6 37% | 1.67 34% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.5 | 4.4 58% | 7.7 27% | 1.97 81% | 3.2 70% | 7.79 26% |
| Gamma | 1.98 111% | 2.24 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.43 91% | 2.02 109% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 7394 88% | 5967 109% | 6639 98% | 6571 99% | 7042 92% | 5531 118% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 74.1 | 63.4 -14% | 68.6 -7% | 62 -16% | 57 -23% | 51.7 -30% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.7 | 98.6 -1% | 97.9 -2% | 95 -5% | 87.5 -12% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1373% /
736% | 5% /
2% | 9% /
13% | -2% /
3% | -21% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 201.6 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø628 (486.69-776.19)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø632 (574.56-701.36)
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø755 (699.58-835.95)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø717 (684.67-772.41)
Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø620 (499-711)
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NEA001GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1015 - 1897, n=38) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (362 - 497, n=37) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NEA001GE | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=42) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NEA001GE | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=45) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NEA001GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (6763 - 26265, n=3) | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (5740 - 7748, n=3) | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3157 - 4251, n=13) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch 20A7-002DGE | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3734 - 5366, n=13) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch 20A7-002DGE | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3182 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4396 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4219 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 40% | 47% | 31% | 3% | |
| Seq Read | 1786 | 2978 67% | 2352 32% | 2888 62% | 2399 34% |
| Seq Write | 1259 | 2287 82% | 2106 67% | 2381 89% | 1343 7% |
| 4K Read | 45.86 | 47.39 3% | 55 20% | 45.66 0% | 46.21 1% |
| 4K Write | 147.9 | 175.6 19% | 138.1 -7% | 162.4 10% | 109.4 -26% |
| 4K-64 Read | 885 | 1209 37% | 1265 43% | 1276 44% | 664 -25% |
| 4K-64 Write | 950 | 1148 21% | 1952 105% | 1432 51% | 1020 7% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.058 | 0.053 9% | 0.088 -52% | 0.056 3% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.074 | 0.023 69% | 0.027 64% | 0.023 69% | 0.033 55% |
| Score Read | 1110 | 1554 40% | 1556 40% | 1610 45% | 950 -14% |
| Score Write | 1224 | 1553 27% | 2301 88% | 1832 50% | 1264 3% |
| Score Total | 2885 | 3874 34% | 4650 61% | 4245 47% | 2659 -8% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1384 | 1810 31% | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 525 | 498.3 -5% | |||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1008 | 921 -9% | |||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 9% | 1% | 10% | -24% | |
| Write 4K | 151.5 | 196.9 30% | 148.1 -2% | 194.3 28% | 98.6 -35% |
| Read 4K | 45.83 | 51.3 12% | 47.31 3% | 51.2 12% | 39.75 -13% |
| Write Seq | 2060 | 1715 -17% | 1414 -31% | 1773 -14% | 1757 -15% |
| Read Seq | 1973 | 2464 25% | 1320 -33% | 2512 27% | 1169 -41% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 489.8 | 429.1 -12% | 493.6 1% | 431.7 -12% | 333.8 -32% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 386.2 | 542 40% | 594 54% | 539 40% | 268 -31% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2703 | 2521 -7% | 2970 10% | 2538 -6% | 2069 -23% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3376 | 3481 3% | 3472 3% | 3489 3% | 3426 1% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 867 | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1315 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 25% /
26% | 24% /
28% | 21% /
23% | -11% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3376 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2703 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
386.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
489.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1973 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2060 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
45.83 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
151.5 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2232 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 61083 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9117 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1218 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 485 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G: Ø18.4 (15-22)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 81.2 | 39.7 | 34.3 | 11 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 20.7 | 11 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 44 | 27.7 | 20.6 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 14 |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch 20A7-002DGE HD Graphics 5000, 4550U, Samsung MZNTD512HAGL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | -0% | -4% | 0% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 28.5 -1% | 29.3 -4% | 29.6 -5% | 30.25 -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 28.5 -1% | 29.3 -4% | 29.6 -5% | 30.25 -7% | 28.8 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 28.2 | 28.5 -1% | 29.3 -4% | 29.6 -5% | 30.25 -7% | 28.8 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.4 | 28.5 3% | 31.1 -6% | 32.2 -10% | 30.25 -3% | 28.8 2% |
| Load Average * | 31.5 | 36.3 -15% | 32.7 -4% | 34.2 -9% | 31.3 1% | 33.7 -7% |
| Load Maximum * | 41.2 | 36.3 12% | 32.7 21% | 36.1 12% | 31.3 24% | 34 17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.3 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 29.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.5 / 41.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.6 °C / 72.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+5.1 °C / 9.2 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.6 °C / 72.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+5.1 °C / 9.2 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.42 / 0.46 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.5 / 10.8 / 12.5 Watt |
| Carga |
47.2 / 68.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2019 20QV000WGE i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch 20A7-002DGE 4550U, HD Graphics 5000, Samsung MZNTD512HAGL, IPS-Panel, 2560x1440, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -83% | 20% | 25% | 25% | 25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 8.5 -143% | 3 14% | 4.7 -34% | 3.8 -9% | 4.1 -17% |
| Idle Average * | 10.8 | 14.7 -36% | 6.3 42% | 7.3 32% | 7.1 34% | 8.7 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.5 | 19.4 -55% | 8.9 29% | 9.4 25% | 8.3 34% | 10.2 18% |
| Load Average * | 47.2 | 89.6 -90% | 40.8 14% | 28 41% | 34.2 28% | 26.3 44% |
| Load Maximum * | 68.8 | 129.8 -89% | 67.5 2% | 28.2 59% | 43.3 37% | 26.7 61% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 96.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QD00M7GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Touch 20A7-002DGE 4550U, HD Graphics 5000, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -24% | -10% | 4% | -9% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 598 | 456 -24% | 537 -10% | 621 4% | 547 -9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1468 | 819 | 723 | |||
| Load | 111 | 122 | 107 | |||
| WiFi | 389 |
Pro
+ 2 portas Thunderbolt 3, Lenovo Side Dock
+ Textura de fibra de carbono exclusiva e premium
+ Ruído silencioso da ventoinha sob a maioria das condições
+ Teclado e trackpad confortáveis
+ Carregador USB Tipo C versátil
+ WWAN 4G LTE opcional
+ Tela brilhante de 500 nit
+ Boa duração da bateria
Contra
- Desempenho flutuante da CPU quando sob estresse extremo
- Sem opções GeForce, Iris Plus ou Radeon RX Vega
- A tela poderia ser melhor calibrada "de fábrica"
- PWM em quase todos os níveis de brilho
- RAM ou WLAN não atualizáveis
- Imã de digitais
- Sem opções Wi-Fi 6
- Sem leitor SD
Se você está no mercado procurando um novo Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon, a seleção da melhor configuração é importante, especialmente porque o modelo não sai barato. Recomendamos pular o Core i7-10510U dado que se desempenha quase igual ao Core i5-8265U mais barato ou o Core i7-8565U. Apenas a opção Core i7-10710U hexa-core proporcionará um aumento notável no desempenho da CPU em relação às opções da última geração. Investir em RAM, 4G LTE ou na tela mais brilhante valeria mais a pena do que a mais recente CPU de 10a geração para o uso diário.
As principais desvantagens do sistema exigirão uma reformulação completa da perspectiva. A falta de Wi-Fi 6, leitor SD e melhores opções gráficas diminuem o potencial de escritório do X1 Carbon. A presença de modulação por largura de pulso nesta opção de tela mais brilhante também é uma chatice, pois os modelos da geração anterior não apresentavam o mesmo fenômeno. As velocidades de CPU flutuantes quando sob estresse muito alto impedem que os usuários avançados explorem as altas velocidades do Turbo Boost da CPU Intel por longos períodos. Torna o investimento nos processadores mais recentes menos atraente quando você não pode aproveitá-los da melhor maneira possível.
Combine um portátil Yoga fino com um portátil da série ThinkPad T e você terá o ThinkPad X1 Carbon. É definitivamente uma das máquinas ThinkPad mais portáteis e atraentes disponíveis, mas esteja preparado para alguns recursos ausentes. Se optar pelo modelo do ano passado, você terá quase o mesmo desempenho por um preço mais baixo.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G7 20R1-000YUS
-
06/22/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Office - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
