Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T480s (i5-8250U, FHD)

Difícil de vencer. Nem todo mundo precisa de um i7, GPU dedicada e tela WQHD. Mesmo sem essas características, o T480s ainda é um companheiro de escritório confiável, cujo desempenho formidável excede o de muitos concorrentes. Por volta de $1.600, a configuração Core i5-8250U + FHD de hoje, é a que a maioria apreciaria?
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS (ThinkPad T480s Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-8250U 4 x 1.6 - 3.4 GHz, Kaby Lake Refresh
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 23.20.16.5018
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR4-2400
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, NV140FHM-N46, TFT-LCD, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Sunrise Point-LP
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Realtek High Definition Audio
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo audio, Card Reader: SD (tamanho completo), 1 eSata, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19 x 331 x 227
Bateria
57 Wh Lítio-Ion, 3 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet AccuType, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.39 kg, Suprimento de energia: 288 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

292.9
cd/m²
286.7
cd/m²
279.4
cd/m²
286.6
cd/m²
288.3
cd/m²
269.5
cd/m²
286.6
cd/m²
287.8
cd/m²
253.2
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
NV140FHM-N46 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 292.9 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 281.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.37 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 288.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1373:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 4.51
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.517
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
NV140FHM-N46, TFT-LCD, 14", 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
B140QAN02.0, IPS, 14", 2560x1440
Dell Latitude 7490
AUO503D (D04YD_B140HAN), IPS, 14", 1920x1080
Dell Latitude 7390
LGD059B, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
IVO M140NVF7 R0, IPS, 14", 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00
LP140QH2-SPB1, IPS, 14", 2560x1440
Display
111%
66%
66%
51%
76%
Display P3 Coverage
39.69
87.7
121%
66.6
68%
67.8
71%
61
54%
72.8
83%
sRGB Coverage
59.2
100
69%
96.8
64%
95.1
61%
87.7
48%
97.9
65%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
41
99.9
144%
67.9
66%
67.8
65%
62.1
51%
74.1
81%
Response Times
-18%
6%
14%
88%
15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 ?(26, 18)
59.2 ?(28.4, 30.8)
-35%
41.6 ?(22, 19.6)
5%
36.8 ?(18, 18.8)
16%
33 ?(15, 18)
25%
38.4 ?(19.6, 18.8)
13%
Response Time Black / White *
34 ?(18.8, 15.2)
34.4 ?(16.4, 18)
-1%
32 ?(16.4, 15.6)
6%
30.4 ?(18.8, 11.6)
11%
26 ?(15, 11)
24%
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
16%
PWM Frequency
990
3125 ?(90)
216%
Screen
55%
20%
26%
34%
16%
Brightness middle
288.3
578
100%
308.6
7%
303.8
5%
655
127%
352
22%
Brightness
281
533
90%
294
5%
289
3%
630
124%
343
22%
Brightness Distribution
86
84
-2%
89
3%
86
0%
93
8%
91
6%
Black Level *
0.21
0.38
-81%
0.23
-10%
0.31
-48%
0.56
-167%
0.46
-119%
Contrast
1373
1521
11%
1342
-2%
980
-29%
1170
-15%
765
-44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.16
1.9
69%
6.07
1%
2.9
53%
3.27
47%
3.3
46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
18.99
3.8
80%
10.58
44%
5.79
70%
5.92
69%
7.3
62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.51
0.8
82%
1.67
63%
1.72
62%
3.22
29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.3
3
52%
7.3
-16%
3.7
41%
2.85
55%
5.3
16%
Gamma
2.517 87%
2.14 103%
2.061 107%
2.118 104%
2.45 90%
2.22 99%
CCT
6886 94%
6377 102%
7269 89%
6323 103%
6065 107%
6452 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37.67
88.8
136%
62
65%
63
67%
57
51%
68.4
82%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58.9
100
70%
97
65%
95
61%
88
49%
98
66%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
49% / 57%
31% / 27%
35% / 32%
58% / 47%
36% / 28%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 15.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 990 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 990 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 990 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
JetStream
JetStream
Cinebench R15, first run
Cinebench R15, first run
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Office
  (98 - 284, n=101, last 2 years)
226 Points +58%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
176 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Core i7-8550U
170 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U
168 Points +17%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
Intel Core i7-8550U
167 Points +17%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Core i5-8350U
153 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (81 - 147, n=97)
141.1 Points -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Office
  (242 - 2642, n=102, last 2 years)
1519 Points +112%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Core i7-8550U
723 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
716 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U
708 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel Core i7-8550U
648 Points -9%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
626 (578min - 626max) Points -13%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (320 - 730, n=101)
570 Points -20%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Core i5-8350U
569 Points -21%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
Intel Core i7-8550U
554 Points -23%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
143 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
716 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
46.61 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Office
  (4252 - 4830, n=7, last 2 years)
4559 Points +24%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02
3966 Points +8%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3886 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3752 Points +2%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
3723 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3672 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2986 - 4458, n=69)
3584 Points -2%
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Office
  (2463 - 7344, n=93, last 2 years)
5567 Points +48%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4053 Points +7%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02
3906 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3905 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3771 Points
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
3564 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3358 - 4081, n=67)
3296 Points -13%
Essentials
Average of class Office
  (5575 - 20841, n=93, last 2 years)
10024 Points +28%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
8253 Points +6%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02
8236 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7849 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7805 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5855 - 9289, n=67)
7398 Points -5%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
7376 Points -5%
Productivity
Average of class Office
  (3041 - 10415, n=93, last 2 years)
7672 Points +27%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7142 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6727 Points +11%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02
6651 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6053 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3851 - 6653, n=67)
5725 Points -5%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
5721 Points -5%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Office
  (1912 - 9773, n=93, last 2 years)
6243 Points +103%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3082 Points
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3068 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3062 Points -1%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02
2954 Points -4%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
2911 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2613 - 3082, n=67)
2733 Points -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3672 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
3771 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Latitude 7490
Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
Dell Latitude 7390
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Average Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
 
AS SSD
32%
-64%
-16%
-12%
32%
-115%
Copy Game MB/s
1107
352
905
1110
Copy Program MB/s
460.2
247.4
326.2
387.5
Copy ISO MB/s
1247
818
1688
1412
Score Total
3048
3529
16%
947
-69%
2215
-27%
2630
-14%
4115
35%
2565 ?(35 - 4653, n=61)
-16%
Score Write
921
1801
96%
357
-61%
501
-46%
1084
18%
1708
85%
587 ?(48 - 1029, n=61)
-36%
Score Read
1435
1168
-19%
391
-73%
1158
-19%
1070
-25%
1623
13%
Access Time Write *
0.038
0.027
29%
0.056
-47%
0.032
16%
0.055
-45%
0.033
13%
0.4637 ?(0.023 - 4.15, n=61)
-1120%
Access Time Read *
0.055
0.029
47%
0.112
-104%
0.063
-15%
0.059
-7%
0.045
18%
0.06777 ?(0.04 - 0.49, n=61)
-23%
4K-64 Write
706
1529
117%
248.1
-65%
302.4
-57%
908
29%
1456
106%
4K-64 Read
1183
876
-26%
316.1
-73%
932
-21%
813
-31%
1329
12%
4K Write
97.8
134.3
37%
79.2
-19%
115.2
18%
90
-8%
114.4
17%
4K Read
42.09
52.4
24%
26.66
-37%
49.43
17%
26.75
-36%
49.81
18%
Seq Write
1172
1376
17%
294.9
-75%
830
-29%
856
-27%
1382
18%
Seq Read
2094
2396
14%
486.2
-77%
1761
-16%
2300
10%
2440
17%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3303 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1267 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 304.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 219.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1065 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1204 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 40.79 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 105.8 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Office
  (1468 - 13132, n=94, last 2 years)
6644 Points +290%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U
3551 Points +108%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
1901 Points +12%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
1849 Points +9%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1144 - 3432, n=244)
1749 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1704 Points
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U
1697 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U
1648 Points -3%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Average of class Office
  (1731 - 10701, n=94, last 2 years)
5088 Points +274%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U
3547 Points +161%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
1891 Points +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
1880 Points +38%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (927 - 2505, n=244)
1578 Points +16%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U
1390 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1360 Points
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U
1313 Points -3%
3DMark 11 Performance
1862 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
55 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
56.9 fps +3%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
52 fps -5%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
56 fps +2%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02
80.3 fps +46%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
158.3 fps +188%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (18.3 - 90.2, n=187)
60.7 fps +10%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
30 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
36.2 fps +21%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
35 fps +17%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
30 fps 0%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02
40.4 fps +35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
87 fps +190%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (11.5 - 45.5, n=187)
32.8 fps +9%
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
24 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
30.4 fps +27%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
24 fps 0%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
24 fps 0%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02
34.3 fps +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
77 fps +221%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (8.1 - 35.9, n=187)
27.5 fps +15%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
10.4 fps +30%
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
8 fps 0%
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
8 fps 0%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02
11 fps +38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
28.89 fps +261%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4.5 - 17, n=176)
9.2 fps +15%
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 55 30 24 8

Barulho

Ocioso
28.1 / 28.1 / 28.1 dB
Carga
35.5 / 41.5 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G
Dell Latitude 7390
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise
-2%
3%
1%
-1%
-1%
off / environment *
28.1
28.9
-3%
28.2
-0%
28.2
-0%
30.3
-8%
29
-3%
Idle Minimum *
28.1
28.9
-3%
28.2
-0%
28.2
-0%
30.3
-8%
29
-3%
Idle Average *
28.1
28.9
-3%
28.2
-0%
28.2
-0%
30.3
-8%
29
-3%
Idle Maximum *
28.1
32.5
-16%
28.7
-2%
28.2
-0%
30.3
-8%
29
-3%
Load Average *
35.5
35.1
1%
29.9
16%
31.5
11%
33.8
5%
36.5
-3%
Load Maximum *
41.5
35.1
15%
40.2
3%
42.7
-3%
33.8
19%
38.2
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
32.8

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 28.4 °C36.6 °C38.6 °C 
 27 °C36.4 °C31.8 °C 
 26 °C28 °C26.2 °C 
Máximo: 38.6 °C
Médio: 31 °C
36.8 °C41 °C36.4 °C
34.4 °C39.4 °C33.4 °C
29.4 °C31.2 °C30.2 °C
Máximo: 39.4 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  33 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.3 °C / -0.5 F).
Thermal profile, top of base unit (max load)
Thermal profile, top of base unit (max load)
Thermal profile, side (max load)
Thermal profile, side (max load)
Thermal profile, underside (max load)
Thermal profile, underside (max load)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.138.140.12538.933.538.9313634364036.83536.85034.432.734.4633334.1338034.231.534.210030.430.930.412530.63030.616033.128.833.120037.92937.925044.727.744.731549.527.549.540050.926.650.950054.826.154.863057.425.557.480063.124.863.1100063.924.863.9125058.424.158.4160062.124.262.1200062.32462.3250057.42457.431505724.157400059.924.359.9500055.424.355.4630056.624.456.6800058.424.858.41000060.124.960.11250057.225.257.21600049.225.749.2SPL71.836.871.8N28.92.828.9median 57median 24.9median 57Delta7.30.97.336.241.636.234.73734.734.633.634.634.434.234.433.233.533.23234.13232.233.932.240.130.440.144.229.244.247.729.447.749.427.649.454.227.454.256.226.856.256.725.856.757.425.757.459.925.159.964.824.564.868.324.468.362.724.262.767246766.923.966.968.924.168.964.42464.458.623.858.665.223.665.263.823.563.866.223.566.265.323.465.357.723.457.762.223.562.277.336.377.340.52.740.5median 62.2median 24.2median 62.26.21.56.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUSDell Latitude 7490
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell Latitude 7490 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.32 / 0.54 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.1 / 6.4 / 9.4 Watt
Carga midlight 29.8 / 31.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TFT-LCD, 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14"
Dell Latitude 7490
i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Dell Latitude 7390
i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 14"
Power Consumption
-43%
9%
-11%
-21%
-51%
Idle Minimum *
3.1
3.8
-23%
2
35%
3.3
-6%
3.8
-23%
3.4
-10%
Idle Average *
6.4
8.9
-39%
4.7
27%
5.9
8%
8.3
-30%
7.5
-17%
Idle Maximum *
9.4
11.9
-27%
5.7
39%
6.2
34%
10.7
-14%
10.8
-15%
Load Average *
29.8
47.5
-59%
38.4
-29%
43.2
-45%
35.5
-19%
55.4
-86%
Load Maximum *
31.2
52.5
-68%
38.9
-25%
45.2
-45%
37
-19%
70.3
-125%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
9h 01min
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Dell Latitude 7490
i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Dell Latitude 7390
i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA
i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh
Battery Runtime
-4%
1%
23%
-18%
-2%
WiFi v1.3
541
519
-4%
548
1%
664
23%
444
-18%
530
-2%
Reader / Idle
1328
1366
Load
106
76

Pro

+ Carcaça forte e bem construída
+ Excelente desempenho da CPU com velocidades Turbo, mesmo sob uso intenso sustentado
+ Desempenho de GPU estável, também com as velocidades Turbo mais altas
+ Teclado superior e bom touchpad
+ Boa seleção e organização de portas
+ Temperaturas razoáveis
+ Ruído de sistema relativamente baixo sob uso intenso
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Recursos de segurança robustos

Contra

- Cores opacas da tela FHD devido à falta de saturação e calibração de fábrica abaixo do ideal
- Brilho de tela relativamente fraco em comparação com a tela WQHD
- Os pés de borracha não possuem aderência em superfícies duras
- Os botões integrados do clickpad são menos precisos do que os botões físicos separados dos concorrentes
- Alto-falantes pobres
- Somente 1 ano de garanti padrão
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad T480s
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad T480s

Como qualquer bom ThinkPad (ou, mais amplamente, qualquer máquina de empresarial de sucesso), são as coisas fundamentais que são o alicerce do sucesso do T480. Ainda presentes na configuração atual, é claro, todos os elementos básicos que aplaudimos durante nossas duas últimas avaliações: sólida construção CFRP de magnésio/híbrido, dispositivos de entrada de alta qualidade, muitas portas e opções de segurança robustas. O T480s é de fato um dos principais portáteis de escritório atualmente disponíveis, rivalizado por poucos em sua classe.

No entanto, para aqueles que podem ter encontrado anteriormente um preço de quase $2.000, difícil de engolir, a configuração de hoje de (aproximadamente) $1.600 somente apresenta sacrifícios menores em termos de desempenho geral. A CPU Core i5-8250U se posiciona acima da maioria dos concorrentes equipados da mesma forma, e o ainda SSD NVMe—embora abaixo do nível do ultra veloz PM981—permanece muito rápido, apesar de tudo. A opção de GPU MX150 faz sentido para aqueles interessados em um desempenho gráfico mais rápido, o Core i7 fornece um desempenho marginalmente melhor (tanto single- e multi-core), e, talvez mais significantemente—a tela WQHD está muitas ligas acima do painel FHD de hoje, que apresenta uma severa falta de saturação de cor e oferece um brilho apenas médio. Mas para um portátil de escritório básico, muito rápido e confiável, a configuração atual do T480s encaixa no perfil perfeitamente.

O T480s é de fato um dos principais portáteis de escritório atualmente disponíveis, rivalizado por poucos em sua classe. E para aqueles que podem ter encontrado anteriormente um preço de quase $2.000, difícil de engolir, a configuração de hoje de (aproximadamente) $1.600 somente apresenta sacrifícios menores em termos de desempenho geral.

Concorrentes como a venerável série Latitude 7000 da Dell (especificamente neste caso, o 7490 e 7390), o HP EliteBook 840 G5, e o excelente X1 Carbon da própria Lenovo, todos oferecem seu singular conjunto de benefícios, sem mencionar as garantias de 3 anos no local, contra a garantia de 1 ano do T480s, mas poucos conseguem alcançar o desempenho do T480s. Pelos nossos testes, um T480s equipado com um Core i5 pode ser tão capaz (ou mais) quanto um Dell Latitude 7000 ou HP EliteBook 840 equipado com um i7. É difícil errar com qualquer um destes dispositivos, mas com o T480s, a Lenovo claramente tem um vencedor em suas mãos.

Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS - 07/07/2018 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein

Acabamento
94 / 98 → 96%
Teclado
94%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
63 / 80 → 78%
Peso
70 / 20-67 → 100%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
56 / 68 → 83%
Desempenho da aplicação
91 / 92 → 98%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
94%
Audio
68%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Médio
79%
90%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T480s (i5-8250U, FHD)
Steve Schardein, 2018-07-11 (Update: 2018-07-22)