Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T470p (Core i7, GeForce 940MX)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD (jseb) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 (jseb) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 (jseb) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD (jseb) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 267 cd/m²
Contraste: 1084:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 9.21 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.72% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.49% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 IPS-Panel, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5480 IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -9% | -39% | -17% | -38% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.3 | 66.9 -3% | 64.8 -6% | 40.62 -41% | 55.8 -19% | 41.6 -40% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.9 | 96.5 2% | 84.8 -11% | 61.2 -36% | 80.7 -15% | 61.9 -35% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.5 | 68.8 -1% | 62 -11% | 41.96 -40% | 57.7 -17% | 43.06 -38% |
| Response Times | 17% | 15% | 20% | 20% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52.8 ? | 38.4 ? 27% | 39 ? 26% | 32.8 ? 38% | 39 ? 26% | 41.6 ? 21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.8 ? | 24.8 ? 7% | 26 ? 3% | 26.4 ? 1% | 23 ? 14% | 34 ? -27% |
| PWM Frequency | 220 | |||||
| Screen | 11% | -2% | -4% | -35% | -4% | |
| Brightness middle | 271 | 290 7% | 323 19% | 215.9 -20% | 346 28% | 306 13% |
| Brightness | 266 | 280 5% | 316 19% | 205 -23% | 317 19% | 287 8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 93 7% | 79 -9% | 90 3% | 86 -1% | 88 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.31 -24% | 0.57 -128% | 0.22 12% | 0.86 -244% | 0.3 -20% |
| Contrast | 1084 | 935 -14% | 567 -48% | 981 -10% | 402 -63% | 1020 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.68 | 3.88 42% | 3.68 45% | 5.1 24% | 8.64 -29% | 6.2 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.96 | 8.19 37% | 8.33 36% | 15.6 -20% | 13.58 -5% | 13.6 -5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.21 | 5.47 41% | 2.99 68% | 4 57% | 11.24 -22% | 5.8 37% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.33 94% | 2.49 88% | 2.41 91% | 2.62 84% | 2.04 108% |
| CCT | 6018 108% | 6469 100% | 6572 99% | 6856 95% | 12530 52% | 6277 104% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.49 | 63.3 3% | 55 -11% | 41.96 -32% | 52 -15% | 39.62 -36% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94.72 | 96.64 2% | 85 -10% | 61.15 -35% | 80 -16% | 61.44 -35% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
9% | 1% /
-1% | -8% /
-8% | -11% /
-24% | -15% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 5766 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3650 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4883 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4654 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | Dell Latitude 5480 Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -49% | -60% | -55% | 8% | -6% | |
| Read Seq | 1088 | 502 -54% | 465.4 -57% | 469.4 -57% | 1819 67% | 1155 6% |
| Write Seq | 1023 | 442 -57% | 363.1 -65% | 264.8 -74% | 1263 23% | 1076 5% |
| Read 512 | 731 | 411.4 -44% | 338.4 -54% | 408.1 -44% | 922 26% | 811 11% |
| Write 512 | 798 | 414.3 -48% | 246.1 -69% | 265.5 -67% | 804 1% | 862 8% |
| Read 4k | 60.9 | 29.18 -52% | 25.83 -58% | 24.66 -60% | 61.4 1% | 55.5 -9% |
| Write 4k | 166.8 | 86.5 -48% | 80.3 -52% | 114.8 -31% | 157.1 -6% | 134.6 -19% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 652 | 358.1 -45% | 246.1 -62% | 380.3 -42% | 513 -21% | 496.2 -24% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 563 | 319.8 -43% | 197.7 -65% | 207.2 -63% | 410.2 -27% | 425.4 -24% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3428 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 36216 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11802 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2253 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1089 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 737 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 129.4 | 79.3 | 68.3 | 25.5 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 98.8 | 69.1 | 48.8 | 19.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 49.2 | 28.4 | 14.6 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 51.8 | 30.6 | 17 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29 / 29 / 29 dB |
| Carga |
| 35.6 / 39.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce 940MX | Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 6700HQ, GeForce 940MX | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ, HD Graphics 530 | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 1% | -9% | -1% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 29.2 -1% | 30.3 -4% | 31 -7% | 28 3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 29.2 -1% | 30.3 -4% | 29.6 -2% | 31 -7% | 28 3% |
| Idle Average * | 29 | 29.2 -1% | 30.3 -4% | 29.6 -2% | 31 -7% | 28 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 29.2 -1% | 30.3 -4% | 29.6 -2% | 31 -7% | 29.4 -1% |
| Load Average * | 35.6 | 33.5 6% | 31.6 11% | 42 -18% | 33.5 6% | 31.4 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 39.7 | 38.8 2% | 35 12% | 47.1 -19% | 33.7 15% | 34.6 13% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.3 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-10.9 °C / -19.6 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce 940MX | Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 6700HQ, GeForce 940MX | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ, HD Graphics 530 | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -11% | -1% | 11% | 15% | 14% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 50.2 | 51.6 -3% | 43 14% | 36.4 27% | 37 26% | 37.2 26% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51.3 | 55.2 -8% | 43 16% | 45 12% | 39.4 23% | 45.1 12% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.3 | 30.7 -17% | 31.2 -19% | 26.4 -0% | 25.9 2% | 24.4 7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.5 | 31.5 -15% | 31.3 -14% | 26.8 3% | 25.6 7% | 25 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.2 / 0.35 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 6.5 / 7.2 Watt |
| Carga |
62.5 / 99.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 6700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN512HCHP, IPS-Panel, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ, HD Graphics 530, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -22% | 1% | 7% | 29% | 29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 5 -32% | 4.1 -8% | 6.64 -75% | 2.9 24% | 3.21 16% |
| Idle Average * | 6.5 | 9.9 -52% | 8.1 -25% | 6.67 -3% | 5.6 14% | 6.15 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.2 | 10.8 -50% | 11.4 -58% | 7.78 -8% | 8.15 -13% | 6.82 5% |
| Load Average * | 62.5 | 52.4 16% | 33.5 46% | 30.83 51% | 30.6 51% | 28.5 54% |
| Load Maximum * | 99.6 | 89.8 10% | 49 51% | 31.7 68% | 31 69% | 34.5 65% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce 940MX, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460p-20FXS05500 6700HQ, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ, HD Graphics 530, 62 Wh | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -34% | -12% | 64% | 39% | 14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1059 | 660 -38% | 913 -14% | 1448 37% | 1155 9% | |
| H.264 | 458 | 357 -22% | 411 -10% | 591 29% | 623 36% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 602 | 298 -50% | 432 -28% | 964 60% | 571 -5% | 438 -27% |
| Load | 82 | 61 -26% | 85 4% | 159 94% | 184 124% | 110 34% |
Pro
Contra
A Lenovo atualiza seus modelos e fornece o ThinkPad T470p com uma CPU Kaby Lake muito poderosa, cujo desempenho é mais do que suficiente para os usos previstos em qualquer aspecto. A memória (8 GB DDR4), que não é ampla, mas suficiente, pode ser estendida a qualquer momento, se necessário. Gostamos de todos os recursos de segurança que transformam o Lenovo ThinkPad T470p em um aparelho empresarial. No entanto, o fabricante também fornece o cavalo de trabalho com uma GPU dedicada, que é capaz de trazer alguns jogos para a tela com taxas de fotogramas passáveis. A solução de armazenamento oferece um desempenho muito bom e contribui significativamente para um sistema sem fluente. No entanto, a palavra final é sempre a do preço, que a 2099 euros (~ $2367) é considerável para este aparelho. Por este montante, você obtém um portátil empresarial de alto desempenho no formato de 14 polegadas, que está mais uma vez equipado com dispositivos de entrada muito bons.
No entanto, o Lenovo ThinkPad T470p ainda merece algumas críticas: Embora a tela ofereça um desempenho sólido, em termos de brilho, continua atrás das expectativas. Não temos simpatia ao fato de que a Lenovo não forneça um aparelho novo, que supostamente deveria ser usado durante alguns anos, com conectores modernos. Por esse preço, você deve obter pelo menos uma porta USB 3.1 Type-C que suporte Thunderbolt. Finalmente, o desempenho do resfriamento também deve ser melhorado no sucessor.
Como um quad-core de alto desempenho no formato de 14 polegadas, o T470p tem recursos realmente únicos neste momento.
No geral, o Lenovo ThinkPad T470p deixa uma boa impressão. O excelente desempenho do sistema e a GPU dedicada, fortalecem o aparelho e permitem cenários de uso versáteis. Além de trabalhar no escritório, o Lenovo ThinkPad T470p também gerencia tarefas multimídia muito bem, e até mesmo alguns jogos podem ser jogados nele sem problema algum.
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000
- 05/14/2017 v6 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
