Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen 1: Prejudicado pela falta de uma opção AMD
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 (ThinkPad T15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.9 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1594 MHz, Memoría: 1752 MHz, 1D16, 442.23, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4-2666, 16 GB integrados, 1 slot SO-DIMM livre
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, NE156QUM-N66, IPS LED, Brilhante: não, HDR, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02, 1024 GB
, M.2 2280, PCIe NVMe, 918 GB livre
peso
1.836 kg, Suprimento de energia: 354 g
Preço
1560 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.2 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 i7-10510U, GeForce MX330 | 1.8 kg | 19.95 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 87.2 % v7 (old) | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N40009GE i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.8 kg | 19.95 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | ||
| 82.1 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE i7-10510U, Radeon RX 640 | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA R7 4700U, Vega 7 | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1259-1688)
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø739 (671-839)
10.7 ∆E
16 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NE156QUM-N66 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 523 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 500.6 cd/m² Minimum: 11.5 cd/m²iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 494 cd/m²
Contraste: 1397:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
84.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
95.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 NE156QUM-N66, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N40009GE NE156QUM-N66, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE NV156FHM-N48, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA AUO, B156HW02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -49% | -51% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 80.7 | 80.2 -1% | 40.25 -50% | 37.92 -53% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.1 | 97.8 0% | 57.7 -41% | 57.1 -42% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.5 | 95 -1% | 41.59 -56% | 39.18 -59% |
| Response Times | -21% | -43% | -9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 48.4 ? -15% | 49.6 ? -18% | 41 ? 2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.6 ? | 27.2 ? -26% | 36 ? -67% | 26 ? -20% |
| PWM Frequency | 1250 ? | |||
| Screen | 3% | -126% | -86% | |
| Brightness middle | 489 | 531 9% | 283 -42% | 282 -42% |
| Brightness | 501 | 523 4% | 258 -49% | 264 -47% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 96 5% | 81 -11% | 88 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.37 -6% | 0.22 37% | 0.19 46% |
| Contrast | 1397 | 1435 3% | 1286 -8% | 1484 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3 | 2.5 17% | 7.9 -163% | 5.56 -85% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.1 | 4.4 14% | 23.6 -363% | 19.07 -274% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 1 -25% | 5.8 -625% | 4.5 -463% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 3.5 12% | 6.6 -65% | 3.57 11% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.31 95% | 2.18 101% | 2.61 84% |
| CCT | 7400 88% | 7189 90% | 5735 113% | 6895 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 84.7 | 84.3 0% | 37 -56% | 36 -57% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.1 | 97.7 0% | 57.1 -42% | 57 -42% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-1% | -73% /
-101% | -49% /
-70% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø689 (632.32-756.56)
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø537 (533-579)
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U: Ø905 (890.95-1068.26)
Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø620 (499-711)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=45) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=42) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1015 - 1897, n=38) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (362 - 497, n=37) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (628 - 1051, n=31) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3747 - 4981, n=31) | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (12196 - 21298, n=31) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (977 - 1287, n=31) | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (2474 - 4484, n=31) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3.41 - 6.04, n=31) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (50.7 - 77.8, n=27) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (0.637 - 0.81, n=28) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
| Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=95, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2971 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4456 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3861 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02 | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Average Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -15% | -26% | -8% | 9% | |
| Write 4K | 159.1 | 144.4 -9% | 141.9 -11% | 126.2 -21% | 162.2 ? 2% |
| Read 4K | 55.6 | 52.3 -6% | 37.25 -33% | 48.93 -12% | 54.8 ? -1% |
| Write Seq | 1435 | 946 -34% | 998 -30% | 1345 -6% | 1745 ? 22% |
| Read Seq | 1435 | 1608 12% | 1233 -14% | 1373 -4% | 1941 ? 35% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 512 | 592 16% | 338.4 -34% | 383.8 -25% | 493 ? -4% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 541 | 397.7 -26% | 431.1 -20% | 434.8 -20% | 542 ? 0% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2682 | 1364 -49% | 1367 -49% | 2966 11% | 2961 ? 10% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2902 | 2301 -21% | 2355 -19% | 3230 11% | 3190 ? 10% |
Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2902 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2682 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
541 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
512 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1435 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1435 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
55.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
159.1 MB/s
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4898 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12137 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3308 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1178 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Office (12 - 106.3, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (34.2 - 37, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 GeForce MX330, i7-10510U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02: Ø12 (11-13)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 64.7 | 34.2 | 19.9 | 12 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 116 | 107 | 53.9 | 38.2 | 21.9 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 33.4 | 47.3 | 35.9 | 18.1 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 52.4 | 17.1 | |||
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 52.9 | 16.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.4 / 29.4 / 29.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.2 / 34.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.4 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.2 °C / 139 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.6 °C / -6.5 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.2 °C / 139 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.6 °C / -6.5 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.3 / 5.9 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.3 / 13.8 / 16.2 Watt |
| Carga |
66 / 67.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 i7-10510U, GeForce MX330, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N40009GE i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE i7-10510U, Radeon RX 640, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA R7 4700U, Vega 7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | 30% | 35% | -7% | 26% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 4.3 -0% | 3.2 26% | 3.8 12% | 5.2 ? -21% | 4.5 ? -5% |
| Idle Average * | 13.8 | 12.4 10% | 6.8 51% | 7.7 44% | 13.4 ? 3% | 7.46 ? 46% |
| Idle Maximum * | 16.2 | 16.2 -0% | 9.5 41% | 10.5 35% | 14.9 ? 8% | 9.09 ? 44% |
| Load Average * | 66 | 65.6 1% | 44 33% | 32 52% | 69.4 ? -5% | 42.8 ? 35% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53 | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 67.4 | 69.5 -3% | 66.4 1% | 45.4 33% | 82.3 ? -22% | 61.8 ? 8% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 i7-10510U, GeForce MX330, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N40009GE i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE i7-10510U, Radeon RX 640, 45 Wh | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA R7 4700U, Vega 7, 45 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 13% | 30% | 12% | 53% | |
| H.264 | 483 | 625 29% | 402 -17% | 728 ? 51% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 426 | 363 -15% | 447 5% | 455 7% | 612 ? 44% |
| Load | 72 | 101 40% | 112 56% | 106 47% | 117.8 ? 64% |
Pro
+ Carcaça robusta
+ Conectividade abundante
+ Dispositivos de entrada muito confortáveis, com teclado numérico
+ Ventoinha desativada a maior parte do tempo.
+ Pacotes de garantia extensivos
+ Tela 4K UHD colorida e brilhante
+ Wi-Fi 6
Contra
- Leitor SD de tamanho reduzido
- Thunderbolt 3 conectado apenas com duas faixas PCIe
- A carcaça é difícil de abrir
- Altas temperaturas da superfície
- Menos versátil devido à falta de PowerBridge
- Problemas de latência de DPC
- Duração da bateria abaixo da média
- Sem opção AMD Ryzen 4000
O Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen 1 é o único ThinkPad da geração 2020 que não pode ser equipado com a CPU da série Ryzen 4000 da AMD. Consequentemente, estamos tendo dificuldades para recomendar este modelo em particular, considerando que o ThinkPad E15 e o ThinkPad L15 com AMD Renoir mais acessíveis têm um desempenho muito melhor.
É verdade que o ThinkPad T15 possui excelentes dispositivos de entrada e uma grande variedade de portas, mas seus irmãos mais acessíveis também. Exceto, é claro, o Thunderbolt 3, que não está disponível nesses modelos. Outro recurso exclusivo do T15 é a tela 4K/UHD, um painel de alta qualidade em quase todos os aspectos.
Sua única desvantagem, se você preferir, é seu alto consumo de energia, resultando em uma duração abaixo da média da bateria. Além disso, as temperaturas eram razoavelmente altas nesse SKU em particular, mas, em compensação o ventilador foi muito silencioso. O suporte para Wi-Fi 6 é frustrado pelas altas latências do DPC. Caso contrário, os pontos fortes e fracos do T15 são idênticos aos do ThinkPad T590.
O Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen 1 está um pouco perdido no espaço indefinido entre a relação preço-desempenho e qualidade. A falta de uma opção AMD fará desta uma alternativa muito menos desejável.
Por si só, o T15, sem dúvida é um ótimo portátil empresarial. No entanto, portáteis mais acessíveis, equipados com o Ryzen 4000, oferecerão um nível de desempenho muito mais alto. Se você insistir em um painel 4K/UHD e Thunderbolt 3, poderá querer dar uma olhada no Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 2.
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00
- 07/16/2020 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Office - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
