Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad T14: A atualização Comet Lake não adiciona muito
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
87.2 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 18.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 06/2018 | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
89.3 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=31, last 2 years) |
|
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 398 cd/m²
Contraste: 1985:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 B140HAN05.7, LTPS IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE NE140FHM-N61, IGZO IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH AU Optronics B140HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA IVO M140NVF7 R0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 B140HAN05.7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -0% | -8% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66 | 69.2 5% | 66.1 0% | 61 -8% | 67.1 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.8 | 92.3 -5% | 95.3 -2% | 87.7 -9% | 97.6 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.1 | 67.6 1% | 67.5 1% | 62.1 -7% | 68.5 2% |
Response Times | -46% | -24% | 23% | -26% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 58.4 ? | 71.2 ? -22% | 62 ? -6% | 33 ? 43% | 61.6 ? -5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 44.8 ? -70% | 37.6 ? -42% | 26 ? 2% | 38.8 ? -47% |
PWM Frequency | 2427 ? | 3125 ? | |||
Screen | -22% | -18% | -22% | -0% | |
Brightness middle | 397 | 428 8% | 289 -27% | 655 65% | 391 -2% |
Brightness | 394 | 409 4% | 286 -27% | 630 60% | 389 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 91 1% | 93 3% | 87 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.29 -45% | 0.16 20% | 0.56 -180% | 0.23 -15% |
Contrast | 1985 | 1476 -26% | 1806 -9% | 1170 -41% | 1700 -14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 4.6 -28% | 4.7 -31% | 3.27 9% | 3.4 6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.9 | 8.2 -39% | 8.7 -47% | 5.92 -0% | 4.7 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 2 -67% | 1.3 -8% | 3.22 -168% | 1.1 8% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 5.4 -38% | 6.4 -64% | 2.85 27% | 4 -3% |
Gamma | 2.48 89% | 2.09 105% | 2.54 87% | 2.45 90% | 2.49 88% |
CCT | 7090 92% | 7562 86% | 5977 109% | 6065 107% | 6809 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.4 | 60 -2% | 61.2 0% | 57 -7% | 62.4 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96.6 | 92.2 -5% | 95.1 -2% | 88 -9% | 97.4 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -23% /
-21% | -14% /
-15% | -2% /
-14% | -8% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
58.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.4 ms rise | |
↘ 30 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (320 - 790, n=35) | |
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (134 - 174, n=35) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (722 - 1820, n=30) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (322 - 428, n=30) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (585 - 1339, n=24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=94, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (3504 - 4467, n=24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (10920 - 21679, n=24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (949 - 1133, n=27) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (2079 - 4256, n=27) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (2.36 - 6.28, n=24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (49.6 - 80.3, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=92, last 2 years) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (0.658 - 0.901, n=24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=91, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3544 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5042 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3932 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G | Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Average Lite-On CA5-8D512 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -16% | -3% | -23% | -12% | 13% | |
Write 4K | 114.1 | 119.9 5% | 118.6 4% | 96.1 -16% | 122 7% | 132.9 ? 16% |
Read 4K | 53.6 | 39.94 -25% | 44.68 -17% | 31.12 -42% | 45.56 -15% | 55 ? 3% |
Write Seq | 1743 | 1334 -23% | 1866 7% | 919 -47% | 1497 -14% | 2155 ? 24% |
Read Seq | 2092 | 1357 -35% | 2173 4% | 2089 0% | 2385 14% | 2264 ? 8% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 394.8 | 311.2 -21% | 330.9 -16% | 425.6 8% | 240.9 -39% | 470 ? 19% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 372.6 | 400.6 8% | 343.1 -8% | 275.3 -26% | 338 -9% | 500 ? 34% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2176 | 1642 -25% | 1927 -11% | 958 -56% | 1528 -30% | 2217 ? 2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3204 | 2778 -13% | 3528 10% | 3118 -3% | 2915 -9% | 3228 ? 1% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1926 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7581 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 963 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 410 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 15.5 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 69.4 | 39.1 | 18.8 | 16.2 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 12.8 | 11 | 10.8 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 13 | |||
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 23.7 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.6 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB |
Carga |
| 33.5 / 33.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 67.2 °C / 153 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.7 °C / 94.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.29 / 0.67 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.2 / 6.1 / 10.4 Watt |
Carga |
45.6 / 68.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Lite-On CA5-8D512, LTPS IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G, IGZO IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KXG50ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 22% | 1% | 2% | 14% | 7% | -6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 2.34 27% | 3.9 -22% | 3.8 -19% | 2.62 18% | 3.81 ? -19% | 4.48 ? -40% |
Idle Average * | 6.1 | 5.22 14% | 6.1 -0% | 8.3 -36% | 5.16 15% | 6.94 ? -14% | 7.43 ? -22% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.4 | 8.82 15% | 8.2 21% | 10.7 -3% | 8.7 16% | 8.75 ? 16% | 8.91 ? 14% |
Load Average * | 45.6 | 35.8 21% | 41 10% | 35.5 22% | 40 12% | 35 ? 23% | 42 ? 8% |
Load Maximum * | 68.6 | 47.3 31% | 69.7 -2% | 37 46% | 64 7% | 47.5 ? 31% | 61.6 ? 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 7400-8N6DH i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX61EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 36% | 43% | -33% | 19% | 20% | |
H.264 | 624 | 677 8% | 862 38% | 834 34% | 716 ? 15% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 661 | 572 -13% | 696 5% | 444 -33% | 607 -8% | 608 ? -8% |
Load | 76 | 161 112% | 141 86% | 99 30% | 117.4 ? 54% |
Pro
Contra
Diferente em nome, mas quase o mesmo: O Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 1 é apenas uma pequena atualização do ThinkPad T490. De fato, existem algumas melhorias em detalhes, mas, em geral, surge a questão de saber se faz sentido.
Os pontos fortes do ThinkPad T490 foram adotados, mas certamente os pontos fracos também. Isso inclui a conexão Thunderbolt com PCIe de apenas duas faixas, o slot para cartão SD de tamanho completo ausente e a carcaça difícil de abrir. Quanto aos pontos fortes do portátil, temos a carcaça, os dispositivos de entrada, a conectividade, a tela e a garantia. Entre as mudanças positivas estão os alto-falantes aprimorados e que o ventilador agora funciona ainda mais silenciosamente.
De qualquer forma, o menor nível de ruído pode ser visto como uma vantagem. Mas você também pode considerar um aspecto negativo, porque o ThinkPad T14 2020 tem um problema de calor. Mais de 65 °C (~149 °F) na parte inferior do teste de estresse é demais (e isso para o modelo iGPU!). Outro ponto crucial é o desempenho da CPU, que quase não melhorou e até piorou até certo ponto. Isso levanta a questão de por que alguém deveria optar por um novo ThinkPad Intel.
O Lenovo ThinkPad T14 dificilmente fornece argumentos para se preferir ao seu antecessor.
Deve-se comprar o ThinkPad T14 com a CPU Intel Comet Lake? Se o modelo da AMD for muito mais rápido, a resposta é não. Somente o Thunderbolt 3 e a tela 4K UHD disponível opcionalmente fazem o modelo Intel fazer sentido. Caso contrário, o seguinte se aplica: A AMD é provavelmente a melhor escolha este ano, já que o Comet Lake não oferece muitos motivos para atualizar além do Wi-Fi 6.
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00
- 07/01/2020 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig