Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad P52s (i7-8650U, Quadro P500, 4K)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Precision 3520 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
| Average of class Workstation (49.6 - 200, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
| Dell Precision 3520 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Workstation (78.6 - 227, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 78 %
iluminação com acumulador: 305.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 1273:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 3.15
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS Lenovo LEN40BD, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA CMN15E7, IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE BOE NV156QUM-N44, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE NV156FHM-N47, IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Precision 3520 IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Precision 5520 UHD SHP1476, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US SAMSUNG LƒFL156FL02-101 , IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -32% | 3% | -34% | 7% | 5% | -25% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.3 | 43.05 -36% | 69.7 4% | 41.83 -38% | 72.7 8% | 67.4 0% | 47.43 -30% |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.4 | 64.7 -28% | 91.2 2% | 62.1 -31% | 94.8 6% | 98.5 10% | 71.4 -20% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.4 | 44.5 -32% | 66.8 2% | 43.22 -34% | 69.3 6% | 68.9 5% | 49 -25% |
| Response Times | 825% | -9% | 659% | -31% | -84% | -2% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 41.6 ? 4% | 38.4 ? 11% | 47.2 ? -9% | 48 ? -11% | 59.2 ? -37% | 36.8 ? 15% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 28.8 ? -60% | 24.8 ? -38% | 38.4 ? -113% | 34.4 ? -91% | 41.6 ? -131% | 28.4 ? -58% |
| PWM Frequency | 980 | 25770 ? 2530% | 980 ? 0% | 21550 ? 2099% | 1064 ? 9% | 1351 ? 38% | |
| Screen | -24% | -3% | -19% | -13% | 0% | -31% | |
| Brightness middle | 305.5 | 229 -25% | 317 4% | 291 -5% | 345 13% | 372.4 22% | 259.4 -15% |
| Brightness | 282 | 212 -25% | 290 3% | 284 1% | 329 17% | 368 30% | 247 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 78 | 88 13% | 85 9% | 91 17% | 88 13% | 90 15% | 85 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.23 4% | 0.32 -33% | 0.11 54% | 0.37 -54% | 0.48 -100% | 0.43 -79% |
| Contrast | 1273 | 996 -22% | 991 -22% | 2645 108% | 932 -27% | 776 -39% | 603 -53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.51 | 4.2 -20% | 3.6 -3% | 6.7 -91% | 5 -42% | 2.6 26% | 5.5 -57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.28 | 18 -147% | 6.6 9% | 20.2 -177% | 8 -10% | 5.6 23% | 12.7 -74% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.15 | 4.2 -33% | 4.5 -43% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 2 50% | 4.2 -5% | 4.5 -13% | 6.2 -55% | 3.7 7% | 3.6 10% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.35 94% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7291 89% | 6292 103% | 6740 96% | 7503 87% | 6702 97% | 7096 92% | 7163 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 41 -29% | 59.5 3% | 39.6 -32% | 61.8 7% | 63 9% | 45 -22% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 64.5 -28% | 91.1 2% | 61.7 -31% | 94.7 6% | 99 11% | 71 -20% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 256% /
124% | -3% /
-3% | 202% /
98% | -12% /
-13% | -26% /
-10% | -19% /
-25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 980 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 980 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 980 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8650U (268 - 335, n=3) | |
| MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3178 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4196 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3281 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell Precision 3520 Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Dell Precision 5520 UHD Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -11% | -15% | -50% | -57% | 19% | -38% | 13% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 721 | 742 | 747 | 921 | 1302 ? | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 411.5 | 324.8 | 340.4 | 372.8 | 558 ? | |||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1200 | 1146 | 1053 | 1659 | 2280 ? | |||
| Score Total | 4038 | 3131 -22% | 2771 -31% | 1697 -58% | 1646 -59% | 3681 -9% | 1979 -51% | 4588 ? 14% |
| Score Write | 1468 | 868 -41% | 1271 -13% | 710 -52% | 248 -83% | 1379 -6% | 557 -62% | 1942 ? 32% |
| Score Read | 1703 | 1504 -12% | 990 -42% | 689 -60% | 961 -44% | 1554 -9% | 962 -44% | 1747 ? 3% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.04 | 0.026 35% | 0.027 32% | 0.051 -28% | 0.034 15% | 0.023 42% | 0.033 17% | 0.05581 ? -40% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.04 | 0.065 -63% | 0.082 -105% | 0.103 -158% | 0.123 -208% | 0.038 5% | 0.128 -220% | 0.05158 ? -29% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1245 | 612 -51% | 1018 -18% | 564 -55% | 134.5 -89% | 1055 -15% | 314 -75% | 1625 ? 31% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1524 | 1312 -14% | 792 -48% | 488.4 -68% | 788 -48% | 1223 -20% | 710 -53% | 1502 ? -1% |
| 4K Write | 100.5 | 140 39% | 130.8 30% | 101.5 1% | 93.8 -7% | 155.3 55% | 114.6 14% | 109.7 ? 9% |
| 4K Read | 44.33 | 44.98 1% | 52.8 19% | 31.28 -29% | 32.58 -27% | 51.5 16% | 40.2 -9% | 46.4 ? 5% |
| Seq Write | 1220 | 1164 -5% | 1217 0% | 441 -64% | 201.9 -83% | 1694 39% | 1287 5% | 2036 ? 67% |
| Seq Read | 1351 | 1463 8% | 1450 7% | 1696 26% | 1406 4% | 2799 107% | 2133 58% | 1993 ? 48% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9301 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2093 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Far Cry 5 | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Workstation (60 - 175, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro P500 (30 - 32, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Workstation (38 - 148, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro P500 (12 - 15, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS | |
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro P500 () | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS | |
| Average NVIDIA Quadro P500 () | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 38 | 23 | 13 | 8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 42 | 26 | 12 | 11 |
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 39 | 15 | 14 | 8 |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 30 | 12 | 10 | 8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.3 / 28.3 / 29.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 40.6 / 40.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS Quadro P500, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE Quadro P500, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE Quadro M520, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA Radeon Pro WX 3100, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell Precision 3520 Quadro M620, i7-7820HQ, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Dell Precision 5520 UHD Quadro M1200, E3-1505M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 0% | 3% | -7% | -7% | -7% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 29 -2% | 29.2 -3% | 29.8 -5% | 29.6 -5% | 28.7 -1% | 28 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.3 | 29 -2% | 29.2 -3% | 29.8 -5% | 29.6 -5% | 28.7 -1% | 33.2 -17% |
| Idle Average * | 28.3 | 29 -2% | 29.2 -3% | 29.8 -5% | 29.6 -5% | 32.1 -13% | 33.2 -17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.8 | 31.2 -5% | 31.1 -4% | 30.8 -3% | 31.2 -5% | 32.1 -8% | 33.2 -11% |
| Load Average * | 40.6 | 32.5 20% | 36.7 10% | 32.9 19% | 43 -6% | 41.3 -2% | 41.4 -2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.6 | 32.5 20% | 36.5 10% | 45.5 -12% | 38.4 5% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 40.6 | 37.5 8% | 39.4 3% | 36.5 10% | 46.9 -16% | 45.5 -12% | 43.5 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Precision 5520 UHD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.33 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.9 / 11.7 / 15.6 Watt |
| Carga |
63 / 63.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS i7-8650U, Quadro P500, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE i5-8550U, Quadro P500, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE i7-7600U, Quadro M520, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA i5-8550U, Radeon Pro WX 3100, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Precision 3520 i7-7820HQ, Quadro M620, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5520 UHD E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P4000 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 22% | 2% | 20% | -17% | -54% | -69% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.9 | 4.1 31% | 5.8 2% | 3.2 46% | 5.8 2% | 8.9 -51% | 13.3 -125% |
| Idle Average * | 11.7 | 7.7 34% | 10.4 11% | 6.1 48% | 10.7 9% | 13.6 -16% | 17.2 -47% |
| Idle Maximum * | 15.6 | 10.7 31% | 13.5 13% | 9.7 38% | 13.3 15% | 14.1 10% | 17.9 -15% |
| Load Average * | 63 | 52 17% | 62.4 1% | 62 2% | 78.2 -24% | 100.3 -59% | 83.7 -33% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.4 | 38.8 20% | 48 1% | 58.8 -21% | 100.2 -107% | 101.9 -111% | |
| Load Maximum * | 63.1 | 65 -3% | 73.1 -16% | 71 -13% | 116 -84% | 126.3 -100% | 114.3 -81% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS i7-8650U, Quadro P500, 80 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE i5-8550U, Quadro P500, 104 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE i7-7600U, Quadro M520, 104 Wh | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA i5-8550U, Radeon Pro WX 3100, 56 Wh | Dell Precision 3520 i7-7820HQ, Quadro M620, 68 Wh | Dell Precision 5520 UHD E3-1505M v6, Quadro M1200, 97 Wh | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 75% | 60% | 13% | -27% | -50% | -71% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1031 | 2360 129% | 1581 53% | 1301 26% | 996 -3% | 724 -30% | 235 -77% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 665 | 974 46% | 712 7% | 514 -23% | 455 -32% | 254 -62% | 175 -74% |
| Load | 146 | 221 51% | 323 121% | 200 37% | 79 -46% | 61 -58% | 54 -63% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo P52s se posiciona em um lugar peculiar. A tentativa da Lenovo de casar componentes energeticamente eficientes com um dispositivo de classe de estação de trabalho é uma história de compromissos. Embora a meta de um workstation impulsionado com ULV esteja mais próxima do que nunca graças à série de CPUs Kaby Lake R da Intel, ainda há muito espaço para melhorias.
O ponto mais fraco está no poder gráfico. Considerando que o P52s é colocado como um workstation portátil, o fraco desempenho gráfico é desanimador. A maioria dos profissionais faria melhor em comprar um portátil de escritório com uma Nvidia MX150 ou GTX 1050, pois ofereceria melhor desempenho gráfico sem sacrificar muito a eficiência energética ou a duração da bateria. Em comparação com outros workstations finos e leves, o P52s não oferece tanto poder, mas compensa essa falha com uma duração de bateria muito superior.
E o que há sobre esta variante em particular? Será que a tela 4K vale o custo extra? Considerando o fraco Quadro P500, a atualização não vale a pena. A maioria dos aplicativos será forçada a rodar em Full HD devido à falta de potência gráfica, negando o benefício de um painel de resolução mais alta. Além disso, alguns aplicativos experimentam falhas ou problemas de renderização na resolução 4K nativa da tela.
Tudo dito, a variante 4K do P52s mantém as mesmas decepções do modelo Full HD. Pior ainda, algumas das reclamações que tivemos sobre essa máquina são ampliadas aqui devido à fraca GPU, aos controladores com bugs e ao desempenho geral fraco do workstation.
Aqueles que precisam de um workstation compacto devem procurar Dell ou MSI para ver suas ofertas. Todos os demais devem tolerar o leve aumento de espessura e comprar um workstation completo como o ThinkPad P51.
Lenovo ThinkPad P52S-20LB001FUS
-
07/07/2018 v6 (old)
Sam Medley
Price comparison
