Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad L570 (7200U, Full HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET (jseb) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET (jseb) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 | |
| Dell Vostro 15-5568 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 272 cd/m²
Contraste: 613:1 (Preto: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.68% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Vostro 15-5568 TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | 45% | 7% | 3% | 6% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 37.68 | 39 4% | 55.2 46% | 40.48 7% | 38.65 3% | 39.89 6% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 56.4 | 58.3 3% | 81.1 44% | 60.9 8% | 58 3% | 59.5 5% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38.97 | 40.33 3% | 57 46% | 41.82 7% | 39.94 2% | 41.24 6% | |
| Response Times | -73% | -67% | -77% | -69% | -96% | -79% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 39.2 ? 9% | 38 ? 12% | 47 ? -9% | 44.8 ? -4% | 51 ? -19% | 47.6 ? -11% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11 ? | 28 ? -155% | 27 ? -145% | 27 ? -145% | 25.6 ? -133% | 30 ? -173% | 27.2 ? -147% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 50 ? | |||||
| Screen | -18% | -35% | -41% | 10% | -46% | -44% | |
| Brightness middle | 276 | 262 -5% | 351 27% | 228 -17% | 242 -12% | 214 -22% | 229 -17% |
| Brightness | 252 | 250 -1% | 345 37% | 236 -6% | 243 -4% | 201 -20% | 222 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 92 8% | 95 12% | 90 6% | 75 -12% | 77 -9% | 82 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.29 36% | 0.65 -44% | 0.56 -24% | 0.24 47% | 0.43 4% | 0.56 -24% |
| Contrast | 613 | 903 47% | 540 -12% | 407 -34% | 1008 64% | 498 -19% | 409 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.01 | 8.49 -69% | 11.02 -120% | 10.02 -100% | 4.65 7% | 10.68 -113% | 10.36 -107% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.71 | 17.99 -85% | 17.68 -82% | 15.93 -64% | 9.64 1% | 18.07 -86% | 14.95 -54% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.69 | 8.11 -120% | 13.14 -256% | 10.66 -189% | 3.39 8% | 11.32 -207% | 10.9 -195% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.37 93% | 2.7 81% | 2.48 89% | 2.7 81% | 2.26 97% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 7023 93% | 6300 103% | 16626 39% | 11800 55% | 6246 104% | 12204 53% | 10084 64% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 37.07 3% | 52 44% | 39 8% | 36.69 2% | 38 6% | 37.69 5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56.3 | 57.94 3% | 81 44% | 61 8% | 57.66 2% | 59 5% | 57.92 3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -29% /
-21% | -19% /
-23% | -37% /
-36% | -19% /
-2% | -45% /
-42% | -62% /
-50% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5464 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3520 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3293 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4600 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0 | HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Dell Vostro 15-5568 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -96% | -97% | -59% | -28% | 8% | 16% | -6% | -6% | -55% | ||
| Read Seq | 1412 | 113.6 -92% | 109.4 -92% | 474.7 -66% | 1140 -19% | 2065 46% | 1827 29% | 1090 -23% | 1155 -18% | 497.8 -65% | |
| Write Seq | 1110 | 111.7 -90% | 99.9 -91% | 155 -86% | 468.1 -58% | 1550 40% | 1383 25% | 1088 -2% | 1076 -3% | 466.8 -58% | |
| Read 512 | 833 | 39.65 -95% | 16.34 -98% | 393.6 -53% | 759 -9% | 865 4% | 814 -2% | 753 -10% | 811 -3% | 363.4 -56% | |
| Write 512 | 920 | 55.3 -94% | 43.45 -95% | 119.7 -87% | 414 -55% | 1229 34% | 1098 19% | 911 -1% | 862 -6% | 368.5 -60% | |
| Read 4k | 56.8 | 0.488 -99% | 0.337 -99% | 34 -40% | 34.3 -40% | 54.7 -4% | 61 7% | 57.5 1% | 55.5 -2% | 29.02 -49% | |
| Write 4k | 138.9 | 1.022 -99% | 0.866 -99% | 96.6 -30% | 123.4 -11% | 139.4 0% | 172.2 24% | 140.2 1% | 134.6 -3% | 56 -60% | |
| Read 4k QD32 | 539 | 1.367 -100% | 0.826 -100% | 383.3 -29% | 530 -2% | 518 -4% | 601 12% | 497.1 -8% | 496.2 -8% | 296 -45% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 444.8 | 1.036 -100% | 0.859 -100% | 100.2 -77% | 319.2 -28% | 225.6 -49% | 495.6 11% | 416 -6% | 425.4 -4% | 229.4 -48% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 7810 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1550 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 52860 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5745 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 764 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 343 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 62.7 | 31.4 | 18.4 | 9.7 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 40.3 | 23.9 | 19.8 | 6.9 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 31 | 23 | 15.6 | 6.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB |
| DVD |
| 38.2 / dB |
| Carga |
| 33.2 / 33.1 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX | Dell Vostro 15-5568 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | -3% | -7% | -1% | -11% | 0% | |
| off / environment * | 30.3 | 29.4 3% | 30.7 -1% | 31.2 -3% | 29 4% | 31.6 -4% | 29 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.3 | 30.1 1% | 31.5 -4% | 31.2 -3% | 29 4% | 32.6 -8% | 29 4% |
| Idle Average * | 30.3 | 30.1 1% | 31.5 -4% | 33.2 -10% | 29 4% | 32.6 -8% | 29 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.3 | 30.1 1% | 31.5 -4% | 34.3 -13% | 29 4% | 33 -9% | 29 4% |
| Load Average * | 33.2 | 33.4 -1% | 34.6 -4% | 36.6 -10% | 34.3 -3% | 38.9 -17% | 33.9 -2% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.1 | 34.7 -5% | 33.3 -1% | 34.7 -5% | 40.1 -21% | 38.9 -18% | 37 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.3 °C / -0.5 F).
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX | Dell Vostro 15-5568 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -20% | 3% | -33% | -21% | -24% | -18% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 36.1 | 37.2 -3% | 31.9 12% | 37.3 -3% | 46.6 -29% | 44.3 -23% | 38 -5% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 33.1 | 36 -9% | 32.1 3% | 41.5 -25% | 49.1 -48% | 46.3 -40% | 39 -18% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 23.7 | 30.7 -30% | 23.5 1% | 34.2 -44% | 24.6 -4% | 27.8 -17% | 25.7 -8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 24.1 | 32.8 -36% | 25.3 -5% | 38.8 -61% | 25.1 -4% | 27.7 -15% | 33.8 -40% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4 / 7.4 / 7.7 Watt |
| Carga |
30.6 / 28.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX | Dell Vostro 15-5568 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -11% | 2% | -5% | -32% | -23% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 5 -25% | 4 -0% | 4.5 -13% | 2.8 30% | 3.8 5% | 3.3 17% |
| Idle Average * | 7.4 | 7.9 -7% | 6.9 7% | 7.6 -3% | 6.3 15% | 6.6 11% | 6.8 8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 8.6 -12% | 7.6 1% | 8.7 -13% | 6.9 10% | 11.3 -47% | 7.7 -0% |
| Load Average * | 30.6 | 27.5 10% | 29 5% | 28.5 7% | 51.6 -69% | 38 -24% | 30.9 -1% |
| Load Maximum * | 28.2 | 33.7 -20% | 28.7 -2% | 29.2 -4% | 69.7 -147% | 45 -60% | 40.3 -43% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh | HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 62 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 45 Wh | Dell Vostro 15-5568 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -31% | -7% | 15% | -12% | -15% | -14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1163 | 698 -40% | 765 -34% | 1231 6% | 883 -24% | 746 -36% | 1011 -13% |
| H.264 | 489 | 277 -43% | 402 -18% | 571 17% | 512 5% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 534 | 406 -24% | 467 -13% | 632 18% | 462 -13% | 513 -4% | 357 -33% |
| Load | 128 | 109 -15% | 177 38% | 151 18% | 129 1% | 123 -4% | 110 -14% |
Comparado com o seu predecessor o ThinkPad L570 é antes de tudo uma atualização Kaby Lake. O processador Kaby Lake oferece apenas um leve aumento do desempenho em comparação com o seu predecessor Skylake, mas não traz vantagens em outras áreas: A duração da bateria é significantemente mais longa e pode durar todo um dia na universidade.
Kaby Lake oferece uma duração de bateria incrementada.
Assim como deve ocorrer com as ferramentas de trabalho, o aparelho quase não esquenta e funciona de forma silenciosa. A ventoinha de resfriamento não se ativa repentinamente sem motivo, motivo pelo qual muitos usuários criticaram o ThinkPad L560.
Um SSD NVMe garante um sistema veloz e ágil. Graça à escotilha de manutenção, não deve ser problema substituir o SSD. O ThinkPad oferece outras opções de expansão: um slot M.2 2242 adicional pode ser montado com um modem LTE (antenas já instaladas) ou um segundo SSD.
Não foram feitas modificações na carcaça; ele utiliza a mesma carcaça que o ThinkPad L560. A Lenovo poderia ter feito um pouco mais aqui. A carcaça não é a mais estável do seu tipo. Como ferramenta de trabalho, o ThinkPad deve oferecer mais neste aspecto. Depois de tudo, pode se assumir que o aparelho será utilizado em movimento. O teclado, ClickPad e TrackPoint são os habituais dispositivos de entrada de alta qualidade da Lenovo. Embora sintamos falta da iluminação de fundo do teclado, que já faltava no predecessor.
O ThinkPad tem uma tela full HD com ângulos de visão estáveis e uma superfície mate. O brilho e o contraste são médios, mas muitos baixos para um portátil deste preço.
Pro
Contra
Compared with its predecessor, the ThinkPad L570 is first and foremost a Kaby Lake upgrade. The Kaby Lake processor offers only a slight performance increase compared with its Skylake predecessor, but it does bring advantages in other areas: The battery runtime is significantly longer and can last an entire day at university.
Kaby Lake offers increased battery life.
Just as it should be for work tools, the device hardly heats up and runs quietly. The cooling fan does not suddenly turn up for no reason, which many users criticized the ThinkPad L560 for.
An NVMe SSD ensures a quick and nimble system. Thanks to the maintenance hatch, it should be no problem to change the SSD. The ThinkPad offers further options for expansion: an additional M.2 2242 slot can be mounted either with an LTE modem (antennas are already installed) or a second SSD.
No changes have been made to the case; it has the same case as the ThinkPad L560. Lenovo could have done a little bit more here. The case is not the most stable of its kind. As a work tool, the ThinkPad should offer more in this regard. After all, it can be assumed that the device will be used on the go. Keyboard, ClickPad and TrackPoint are Lenovo’s usual high quality input devices. Although we do miss backlighting for the keyboard, which was already missing from the predecessor.
The ThinkPad features a full HD screen with stable viewing points and a matte surface. Brightness and contrast are average, but too low for a notebook of this price.
Lenovo Thinkpad L570 20J9S01600
- 04/14/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
