Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad L470 (i5-7200U, FHD-IPS)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET (jseb) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
| Dell Latitude 5480 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
| HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET (jseb) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 273 cd/m²
Contraste: 783:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.21% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA AUO1E3D, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5480 LG Philips LGD0553, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 Lenovo N140HCE-EAA, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -2% | -11% | 18% | -3% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 42.21 | 41.6 -1% | 41.23 -2% | 37.6 -11% | 49.46 17% | 40.62 -4% | 42.2 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.7 | 61.9 -1% | 61.4 -2% | 56.6 -10% | 74.5 19% | 61.2 -2% | 62.3 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.71 | 43.06 -1% | 42.67 -2% | 38.85 -11% | 51.1 17% | 41.96 -4% | 43.72 0% |
| Response Times | 4% | 10% | 18% | 11% | 25% | 8% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50.4 ? | 41.6 ? 17% | 40.8 ? 19% | 43.2 ? 14% | 41 ? 19% | 32.8 ? 35% | 44.4 ? 12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.8 ? | 34 ? -10% | 30.4 ? 1% | 24.4 ? 21% | 30 ? 3% | 26.4 ? 14% | 29.6 ? 4% |
| PWM Frequency | 192 ? | ||||||
| Screen | 7% | -5% | -26% | -17% | 6% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 274 | 306 12% | 244 -11% | 216 -21% | 343 25% | 215.9 -21% | 245 -11% |
| Brightness | 256 | 287 12% | 231 -10% | 203 -21% | 332 30% | 205 -20% | 225 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 88 4% | 89 5% | 83 -2% | 88 4% | 90 6% | 83 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.3 14% | 0.37 -6% | 0.47 -34% | 0.69 -97% | 0.22 37% | 0.24 31% |
| Contrast | 783 | 1020 30% | 659 -16% | 460 -41% | 497 -37% | 981 25% | 1021 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 6.2 -2% | 6.41 -5% | 8.98 -47% | 9.06 -49% | 5.1 16% | 6.89 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.8 | 13.6 1% | 13.4 3% | 14.07 -2% | 14.84 -8% | 15.6 -13% | 17.62 -28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 5.8 -2% | 5.94 -4% | 9.61 -69% | 9.87 -73% | 4 30% | 6.45 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.04 108% | 2.28 96% | 2.63 84% | 2.5 88% | 2.41 91% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 6419 101% | 6277 104% | 6101 107% | 11265 58% | 11115 58% | 6856 95% | 6857 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40.2 | 39.62 -1% | 39.3 -2% | 35.9 -11% | 47 17% | 41.96 4% | 40.1 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62.4 | 61.44 -2% | 61.1 -2% | 56.7 -9% | 75 20% | 61.15 -2% | 61.8 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
5% | 1% /
-2% | -6% /
-17% | 4% /
-6% | 9% /
7% | 2% /
-0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3294 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4172 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4111 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G) | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Dell Latitude 5480 Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8 | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 Toshiba HG6 THNSFJ256GCSU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 116% | -2% | -14% | 57% | 3% | -7% | |
| Read Seq | 495.2 | 1155 133% | 476.5 -4% | 491.2 -1% | 1285 159% | 469.4 -5% | 480.9 -3% |
| Write Seq | 485.7 | 1076 122% | 458.7 -6% | 322.2 -34% | 283.6 -42% | 264.8 -45% | 426.4 -12% |
| Read 512 | 323.4 | 811 151% | 346.4 7% | 310.1 -4% | 679 110% | 408.1 26% | 361.8 12% |
| Write 512 | 291.5 | 862 196% | 291.1 0% | 276 -5% | 300.8 3% | 265.5 -9% | 220.9 -24% |
| Read 4k | 34.2 | 55.5 62% | 35.15 3% | 19.57 -43% | 41.79 22% | 24.66 -28% | 21.51 -37% |
| Write 4k | 74.3 | 134.6 81% | 78.8 6% | 77.8 5% | 138.6 87% | 114.8 55% | 71.5 -4% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 321.3 | 496.2 54% | 276 -14% | 146.3 -54% | 507 58% | 380.3 18% | 277.6 -14% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 188 | 425.4 126% | 178.3 -5% | 241.4 28% | 293.3 56% | 207.2 10% | 230.4 23% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1540 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 55477 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5839 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 771 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 41.4 | 23.1 | 19.6 | 6.5 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 30.4 | 24.7 | 16.1 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 13.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 29.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.8 / 37.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.6 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-9.5 °C / -17.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.22 / 0.34 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.6 / 6.3 / 7 Watt |
| Carga |
29.1 / 42.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 6500U, Radeon R5 M330, Toshiba HG6 THNSFJ256GCSU, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -14% | -18% | -13% | 18% | -31% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 3.1 -19% | 2.7 -4% | 3 -15% | 2.3 12% | 6.64 -155% | 3.21 -23% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 6.3 -0% | 5.5 13% | 5.4 14% | 5.2 17% | 6.67 -6% | 6.15 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7 | 7.9 -13% | 6.5 7% | 6.3 10% | 5.6 20% | 7.78 -11% | 6.82 3% |
| Load Average * | 29.1 | 29.5 -1% | 44.2 -52% | 37.5 -29% | 27.2 7% | 30.83 -6% | 28.5 2% |
| Load Maximum * | 42.3 | 57.3 -35% | 65.2 -54% | 61.1 -44% | 28.7 32% | 31.7 25% | 34.5 18% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 6500U, Radeon R5 M330, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 45 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh | HP ProBook 640 G3 Z2W33ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 46 Wh | Dell Latitude 5480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -22% | -9% | -21% | -8% | 8% | 42% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1398 | 1153 -18% | 1043 -25% | 1083 -23% | 1477 6% | 1448 4% | |
| H.264 | 647 | 431 -33% | 623 -4% | 503 -22% | 571 -12% | 519 -20% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 480 | 425 -11% | 438 -9% | 326 -32% | 414 -14% | 523 9% | 964 101% |
| Load | 130 | 97 -25% | 110 -15% | 124 -5% | 151 16% | 177 36% | 159 22% |
Pro
Contra
Com o L470, a Lenovo oferece um ThinkPad orientado para o orçamento, que, acima de tudo, deve ser interessante para estudantes e empresas.
Por um preço relativamente baixo, o L470 oferece o conhecido e excelente teclado ThinkPad, incluindo o TrackPoint. Também na caixa: Uma tela IPS Full HD, que não pode ser considerada como garantida nesta categoria de preço. A carcaça de plástico não se sente de qualidade alta, no entanto, se sente bastante robusta e possui dobradiças duráveis. Como portátil empresarial, o L470 oferece uma boa variedade de portas. Aqui, é preciso lamentar a falta de uma porta tipo USB tipo C, no entanto, isso é um pouco compensado pelo fato de que a Lenovo ainda integra uma porta docking dedicada. Portanto, não se depende das estações dock USB Tipo C. O que também é bom é que a Lenovo ainda equipa o L470 com uma porta VGA, que é uma característica única entre os ThinkPads atuais. Para escolas, universidades e empresas que ainda utilizam projetores antigos, este é um importante ponto de venda. Neste caso, a boa duração da bateria e a flexibilidade de uma bateria substituível devem ser apreciadas, embora ela eleve um pouco o aparelho.
A Lenovo não cometeu grandes erros. Em primeiro lugar e acima de tudo nesta categoria está o irritante ruído da bobina, o que é uma grande pena, pois, de outra forma, o dispositivo teria sido completamente silencioso durante a o modo inativo. O afogamento da GPU, funcionando com a bateria, também é compreensível. A baixa cobertura do espaço de cores da tela não deve ser vista de forma negativa com um aparelho destinado aos negócios, mas deve ser mencionado, no entanto. Finalmente, é preciso criticar o período de garantia padrão, um ano não é suficiente.
O vencedor do preço/desempenho: Com um preço baixo e recursos legados, como uma porta VGA e uma bateria substituível, o L470 é um portátil empresarial interessante de 14 polegadas.
Apesar destas desvantagens, o L470 merece uma recomendação como um pacote de preço/desempenho atraente. Contra o seu concorrente interno mais próximo, o E470, o L470, um pouco mais caro, pode distinguir-se através de uma porta de estação docking dedicada, uma porta VGA e a bateria substituível. No entanto, com o Nvidia GeForce 940MX, o E470 é mais interessante para os gamers casuais. Acima de tudo, o L470 derrota os ProBooks 440 e 640 da HP, graças à tela IPS, porque ambos os Probooks vêm com telas TN. O concorrente mais durão é o Dell Latitude 5480, que, em termos de preço, compete mais com o ThinkPad T470 que o L470.
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00
- 11/02/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
