Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad L390 (i5-8265U, FHD)
Connectivity
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380-20M5000WGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380-20M5000WGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380-20M5000WGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380-20M5000WGE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 300 cd/m²
Contraste: 903:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.9
ΔE Greyscale 5.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.42% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE LP133WF2-SPL8, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES LGD052D, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA IVO M133NVF3-R0, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7390 LGD059B, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L380-20M5000WGE Lenovo LEN4094, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 SHP1484, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | 54% | 62% | 0% | 66% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.42 | 40.23 0% | 64.2 59% | 67.8 68% | 40.34 0% | 68.9 70% |
| sRGB Coverage | 60.4 | 60.3 0% | 89.2 48% | 95.1 57% | 60.7 0% | 96.6 60% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.8 | 41.59 -1% | 65.2 56% | 67.8 62% | 41.69 0% | 69.6 67% |
| Response Times | -7% | -21% | 7% | 5% | -65% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42.8 ? | 41.6 ? 3% | 36 ? 16% | 36.8 ? 14% | 44 ? -3% | 62.4 ? -46% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 27.2 ? 9% | 24.8 ? 17% | 30.4 ? -1% | 26 ? 13% | 45.6 ? -52% |
| PWM Frequency | 30490 ? | 20490 ? -33% | 1020 ? -97% | 1008 ? -97% | ||
| Screen | 5% | 35% | 34% | 2% | 46% | |
| Brightness middle | 298 | 262 -12% | 316 6% | 303.8 2% | 271 -9% | 428 44% |
| Brightness | 278 | 253 -9% | 326 17% | 289 4% | 253 -9% | 405 46% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 82 1% | 85 5% | 86 6% | 89 10% | 87 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.28 15% | 0.19 42% | 0.31 6% | 0.17 48% | 0.26 21% |
| Contrast | 903 | 936 4% | 1663 84% | 980 9% | 1594 77% | 1646 82% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 5.7 12% | 4.5 31% | 2.9 55% | 14.89 -129% | 3.8 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 23.9 | 22.4 6% | 12.1 49% | 5.79 76% | 31.08 -30% | 7.2 70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.9 | 4.8 2% | 2.9 41% | 1.72 65% | 4.43 10% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 3.6 36% | 5 11% | 3.7 34% | 2.51 55% | 4.4 21% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.15 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.118 104% | 2.14 103% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6669 97% | 7096 92% | 6018 108% | 6323 103% | 6455 101% | 7067 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.4 | 38.3 0% | 57.9 51% | 63 64% | 38 -1% | 62.8 64% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60.1 | 60.1 0% | 87.3 45% | 95 58% | 60 0% | 96.4 60% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
2% | 23% /
28% | 34% /
36% | 2% /
2% | 16% /
29% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 30490 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 30490 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 30490 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3378 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4737 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3787 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 7390 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Lenovo ThinkPad L380-20M5000WGE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -19% | 1% | 11% | -28% | 6% | 54% | |
| Write 4K | 99.6 | 111.3 12% | 108.5 9% | 139.4 40% | 84.6 -15% | 121.3 22% | 116.1 ? 17% |
| Read 4K | 37.22 | 32.46 -13% | 40.53 9% | 43.18 16% | 38.52 3% | 41.89 13% | 189.5 ? 409% |
| Write Seq | 1432 | 526 -63% | 1026 -28% | 1075 -25% | 557 -61% | 878 -39% | 1409 ? -2% |
| Read Seq | 2072 | 1430 -31% | 2080 0% | 1639 -21% | 1393 -33% | 1963 -5% | 1624 ? -22% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 439.7 | 516 17% | 451 3% | 662 51% | 339.5 -23% | 543 23% | 360 ? -18% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 264.8 | 366.6 38% | 269.7 2% | 413.9 56% | 255.4 -4% | 397.7 50% | 396 ? 50% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1549 | 524 -66% | 1770 14% | 1195 -23% | 558 -64% | 1204 -22% | 1492 ? -4% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3318 | 1783 -46% | 3214 -3% | 3116 -6% | 2541 -23% | 3387 2% | 3313 ? 0% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380-20M5000WGE | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380-20M5000WGE | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (1089 - 9375, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L380-20M5000WGE | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1863 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7458 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 934 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 54.7 | 28.33 | 23.19 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 14.7 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.5 / 29.5 / 29.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 30.6 / 31.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.3 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.1 °C / 77.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+2.6 °C / 4.7 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.63 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 6.8 / 9.8 Watt |
| Carga |
32.4 / 52 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L380-20M5000WGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -8% | 9% | -14% | 20% | 2% | -14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 4.5 -18% | 4.5 -18% | 3.3 13% | 4.8 -26% | 2.7 29% | 3.81 ? -0% | 4.54 ? -19% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 6.8 -0% | 6.4 6% | 5.9 13% | 8.6 -26% | 5.6 18% | 6.94 ? -2% | 7.49 ? -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.8 | 8.8 10% | 9.2 6% | 6.2 37% | 10.4 -6% | 9.2 6% | 8.75 ? 11% | 9.14 ? 7% |
| Load Average * | 32.4 | 36.8 -14% | 35.7 -10% | 43.2 -33% | 37.9 -17% | 30 7% | 35 ? -8% | 42.8 ? -32% |
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 46.2 11% | 65.4 -26% | 45.2 13% | 48.5 7% | 30.4 42% | 47.5 ? 9% | 61.3 ? -18% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | HP ProBook 430 G5-3KX72ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 49 Wh | Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L380-20M5000WGE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 0% | 9% | 58% | 32% | 41% | 36% | |
| Reader / Idle | 974 | 766 -21% | 1032 6% | 1129 16% | 1300 ? 33% | ||
| H.264 | 566 | 481 -15% | 704 ? 24% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 419 | 418 0% | 424 1% | 664 58% | 498 19% | 697 66% | 600 ? 43% |
| Load | 83 | 140 69% | 141 70% | 117 41% | 118.1 ? 42% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo ThinkPad L390 é uma atualização direta do anterior ThinkPad L380. Enquanto o modelo mais novo embala uma nova plataforma no interior, o exterior permanece completamente inalterado.
Com isto em mente, não é de surpreender que os pontos fortes e fracos do ThinkPad L390 sejam praticamente idênticos ao seu antecessor. Um de seus pontos fortes é que o portátil funciona sem ruído do ventilador na maior parte do tempo e que o ventilador é ainda bastante silencioso sob uso intenso. Os dispositivos de entrada também são recomendáveis: A combinação de touchpad e TrackPoint é muito confortável e o teclado ThinkPad de tamanho normal é tão bom quanto se poderia esperar. A primeira diferença real em comparação com o L380 é o desempenho da CPU, que foi melhorado pela Lenovo com um limite de TDP superior. Outros pros para o ThinkPad L390 incluem o chassi estável, a boa seleção de portas e a capacidade de atualização da RAM - com os dois slots de RAM de até 64 GB, o que é muito útil para um portátil compacto. Por último, mas não menos importante, o preço acessível também pode ser considerado positivo.
A tela não é completamente ruim e é até um pouco mais brilhante em comparação com a do L380, mas a baixa gama de cores continua a ser um ponto sensível. Outro ponto negativo sobre o L390 é o fato de que ele possui menos recursos empresariais do que outros ThinkPads. Por exemplo, falta-lhe uma porta docking mecânica, o ThinkShutter, bem como um leitor de Smartcard. Infelizmente, a duração da bateria é pior em comparação com o ThinkPad L380 e o chassi do L390 esquenta notavelmente mais que seu antecessor também. Além disso, o L390 tem uma garantia padrão de apenas um ano e não conta com uma porta Thunderbolt.
O ThinkPad L390 é um sólido cavalo de batalha móvel sem grandes falhas, e oferece um bom valor pelo dinheiro, assim como seu antecessor.
Apesar desses pontos negativos, o veredicto para o ThinkPad L390 é positivo, em geral, e ganha a nossa recomendação. O Lenovo ThinkPad L390 pode ser considerado um portátil de trabalho móvel atraente e acessível, especialmente para estudantes.
Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE
- 02/15/2019 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
