Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad E580 (i7-8550U, RX 550)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 292 cd/m²
Contraste: 1526:1 (Preto: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.92 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.32% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE BOE NV156FHM-N49, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 5580 BOE NV15N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ Chi Mei CMN15D3 / N156HCE-EAA, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 4% | 7% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40 | 39.89 0% | 41.57 4% | 42.44 6% | 38.65 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.2 | 59.5 2% | 60.7 4% | 63.2 9% | 58 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.32 | 41.24 0% | 42.94 4% | 43.94 6% | 39.94 -3% |
| Response Times | -33% | -30% | 2% | 14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 51 ? -6% | 43 ? 10% | 45 ? 6% | 44.8 ? 7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 30 ? 6% | 33 ? -3% | 32 ? -0% | 25.6 ? 20% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 50 ? -100% | 1020 ? -96% | 25000 ? 0% | |
| Screen | -74% | -7% | -23% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 290 | 214 -26% | 234 -19% | 215 -26% | 242 -17% |
| Brightness | 267 | 201 -25% | 224 -16% | 198 -26% | 243 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 77 -5% | 84 4% | 78 -4% | 75 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.43 -126% | 0.18 5% | 0.32 -68% | 0.24 -26% |
| Contrast | 1526 | 498 -67% | 1300 -15% | 672 -56% | 1008 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 10.68 -118% | 5.3 -8% | 5.15 -5% | 4.65 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.52 | 18.07 -90% | 9.09 5% | 10.89 -14% | 9.64 -1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.92 | 11.32 -288% | 4 -37% | 4.25 -46% | 3.39 -16% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.26 97% | 2.46 89% | 2.61 84% | 2.7 81% |
| CCT | 6091 107% | 12204 53% | 6441 101% | 6603 98% | 6246 104% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 38 3% | 39 5% | 40 8% | 36.69 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 59 2% | 60 3% | 63 9% | 57.66 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -35% /
-52% | -11% /
-9% | -5% /
-13% | 0% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P51 20HH0016GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 i5 UHD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4273 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5140 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3757 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -15% | -2% | 45% | 22% | |
| Score Total | 1099 | 607 -45% | 959 -13% | 1578 44% | 1200 9% |
| Score Write | 237 | 300 27% | 286 21% | 369 56% | 325 37% |
| Score Read | 582 | 204 -65% | 448 -23% | 813 40% | 602 3% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.173 | 0.159 8% | 0.228 -32% | 0.036 79% | 0.138 20% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.176 | 0.141 20% | 0.071 60% | 0.06 66% | 0.095 46% |
| 4K-64 Write | 91.6 | 195.5 113% | 186.5 104% | 232.5 154% | 164 79% |
| 4K-64 Read | 419 | 137.1 -67% | 368.7 -12% | 654 56% | 417.1 0% |
| 4K Write | 68.5 | 73.4 7% | 75.2 10% | 73.1 7% | 98 43% |
| 4K Read | 31.54 | 17.96 -43% | 29.4 -7% | 37.12 18% | 32.07 2% |
| Seq Write | 770 | 315.9 -59% | 242 -69% | 636 -17% | 633 -18% |
| Seq Read | 1315 | 493.8 -62% | 496.8 -62% | 1227 -7% | 1531 16% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ | |
| Dell Latitude 5580 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4474 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11982 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2516 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 155.3 | 88.3 | 72.6 | 22.17 |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 49 | 44.85 | 29.85 | 16.97 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 44.31 | 35.98 | 18.01 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.1 / 30.1 / 31.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 37.7 / 38 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.1 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 5580 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.56 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7.4 / 10.4 / 10.3 Watt |
| Carga |
57 / 57 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE i5-8550U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 5580 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 26% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 21% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7.4 | 3.8 49% | 4.3 42% | 3.4 54% | 2.8 62% | 4.1 45% |
| Idle Average * | 10.4 | 6.6 37% | 10.1 3% | 5.8 44% | 6.3 39% | 6.3 39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.3 | 11.3 -10% | 11.8 -15% | 8 22% | 6.9 33% | 7.1 31% |
| Load Average * | 57 | 38 33% | 32 44% | 38 33% | 51.6 9% | 54.8 4% |
| Load Maximum * | 57 | 45 21% | 29 49% | 32 44% | 69.7 -22% | 66.4 -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.8 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE i5-8550U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh | HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 45 Wh | Dell Latitude 5580 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Acer TravelMate P2510-M-51ZQ i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 25% | 22% | 52% | 24% | 7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 861 | 883 3% | 746 -13% | 910 6% | 1164 35% | |
| H.264 | 544 | 536 -1% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 404 | 462 14% | 513 27% | 613 52% | 525 30% | 341 -16% |
| Load | 81 | 129 59% | 123 52% | 111 37% | 88 9% |
Pro
Contra
O E480 com dGPU não conseguiu chamar nossa atenção e garantir uma recomendação, apesar de sua fenomenal relação de preço-desempenho, principalmente porque esquentou muito, um problema que o E580 maior também sofre, porém em um grau um pouco mais baixo.
O E580 compartilha muitas das qualidades de seu irmão menor, como o excelente teclado, a combinação de TrackPoint e touchpad, sua capacidade de atualização exemplar, e sua decente tela IPS (fora a cobertura do espaço de cores). Além disso, a carcaça foi melhorada em ralação à do E570.
No entanto, toda moeda tem dois lados, e o E580 também compartilha muitas de suas desvantagens com o seu irmão menor. Uma das principais é o SDD bastante lento que conseguiu ser ainda mais lento. Além disso, o E580 possui um leitor microSD em vez de um leitor de cartões SD de tamanho normal, e ainda não entendemos por que a Lenovo tomou essa decisão. O gerenciamento do aquecimento é deficiente, e as temperaturas da superfície de até 60 °C (~140 °F) ainda são altas demais. Pelo menos o ventilador melhorou um pouco, o que já é um grande ponto positivo. Infelizmente, este aparente beneficio paga um preço alto: O desempenho da CPU é decepcionante, por dizer pouco. O i7-8550U nominalmente mais veloz, resultou ser mais lento que o i5-8250U do E480. Embora ainda seja muito mais veloz que a CPU dual-core do seu predecessor, atualizar o E580 do i5 para o i7 não faz sentido algum. A duração da bateria é tão medíocre quando a do E480, e a garantia do portátil se limita a 12 meses. E finalmente, descobrimos o desempenho da GPU se afogando fortemente com a bateria.
O E580 certamente esquenta menos que o seu irmão menor. Por isso, considerando a sua mais que decente relação de preço-desempenho, merece nossa recomendação.
Apesar de todos seus pontos negativos, o E580 merece nossa recomendação, no entanto, não sem uma advertência. Somente vale a pena comprar os SKUs i5, e usa-los sobre suas pernas pode se tornar um problema muito quente. Deixando os problemas de lado, o E580 é um portátil de escritório capaz de lidar com jogos, com ambições de multimídia.
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KS001RGE
- 02/19/2018 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
