Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad E495: Dispositivo de escritório barato com muita energia, mas sem iluminação do teclado
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 75 %
iluminação com acumulador: 244 cd/m²
Contraste: 1418:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.37% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 N140HCG-GQ2, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE B140HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE Lenovo NV140FHM-N49, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE B140HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 57% | -8% | -7% | -8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 42.37 | 67 58% | 38.98 -8% | 39.85 -6% | 39.21 -7% 38.48 -9% |
| sRGB Coverage | 63.5 | 98.5 55% | 58.6 -8% | 58.6 -8% | 58.8 -7% 57.9 -9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.8 | 69.2 58% | 40.27 -8% | 41.18 -6% | 40.52 -7% 39.76 -9% |
| Response Times | 25% | -3% | -46% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.8 ? | 32.4 ? 21% | 44 ? -8% | 48.4 ? -19% | 44.8 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.8 ? | 15.2 ? 51% | 30 ? 3% | 38.4 ? -25% | 33.6 ? -9% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 26040 ? 4% | 1250 ? -95% | ||
| Screen | 35% | -0% | 0% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle | 241 | 420 74% | 278 15% | 305 27% | 289 20% |
| Brightness | 230 | 391 70% | 257 12% | 295 28% | 271 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 75 | 88 17% | 85 13% | 90 20% | 87 16% |
| Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.29 -71% | 0.19 -12% | 0.23 -35% | 0.19 -12% |
| Contrast | 1418 | 1448 2% | 1463 3% | 1326 -6% | 1521 7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 2.1 55% | 5.1 -9% | 5.3 -13% | 5.6 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.7 | 5.5 72% | 19.3 2% | 18.9 4% | 20.8 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.2 | 0.7 83% | 4.5 -7% | 5 -19% | 4.7 -12% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 3.4 -31% | 2.7 -4% | 2.3 12% | 2.7 -4% |
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.22 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.09 105% | 1.96 112% |
| CCT | 6507 100% | 7168 91% | 6685 97% | 6246 104% | 6506 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40.3 | 63.5 58% | 37.1 -8% | 37.7 -6% | 37.2 -8% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63.3 | 98.6 56% | 58.4 -8% | 58.2 -8% | 58.5 -8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 39% /
37% | -4% /
-2% | -18% /
-9% | -6% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 40 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8734 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 Score | 3485 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (1668 - 4317, n=44) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE | |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (1089 - 9375, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (1095 - 2901, n=41) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3013 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1639 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 The Witcher 3 low | |
| Average of class Office (16 - 177, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (22 - 50.7, n=18) | |
| 1366x768 The Witcher 3 medium | |
| Average of class Office (12 - 106.3, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (16.3 - 33.8, n=10) | |
| 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 high | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 59.1, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (6.7 - 18.3, n=14) | |
| 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra | |
| Average of class Office (3.8 - 34, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (4.44 - 10.1, n=7) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 81.9 | 14.3 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 64 | 54.5 | 28.3 | 27.2 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 23.8 | 17.3 | 15.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 29.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.8 / 34.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.7 °C / -3 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.41 / 0.54 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.1 / 5.86 / 6.36 Watt |
| Carga |
30.4 / 50 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE R5 3500U, Vega 8, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 R5 PRO 3500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE i7-8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -25% | -67% | 10% | -33% | -33% | -29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 5.1 -24% | 6.8 -66% | 2.76 33% | 6.2 -51% | 5.68 ? -39% | 4.52 ? -10% |
| Idle Average * | 5.86 | 7.7 -31% | 9.4 -60% | 5.96 -2% | 8.6 -47% | 8.75 ? -49% | 7.48 ? -28% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.36 | 10.7 -68% | 12.4 -95% | 6.57 -3% | 9.7 -53% | 10.1 ? -59% | 9.12 ? -43% |
| Load Average * | 30.4 | 35.8 -18% | 57.2 -88% | 28.2 7% | 37.4 -23% | 37.8 ? -24% | 42.8 ? -41% |
| Load Maximum * | 50 | 43.2 14% | 63.1 -26% | 43.6 13% | 44.8 10% | 46.2 ? 8% | 61.6 ? -23% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE R5 3500U, Vega 8, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 R5 PRO 3500U, Vega 8, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE i7-8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE R5 2500U, Vega 8, 45 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 30% | -6% | 22% | -32% | 35% | |
| H.264 | 472 | 708 50% | 492 4% | 687 46% | 341 -28% | 704 ? 49% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 497 | 544 9% | 419 -16% | 485 -2% | 323 -35% | 602 ? 21% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo ThinkPad E495 é um portátil de escritório sólido por pouco dinheiro. Por menos de 700 Euros (~US$ 770), você recebe uma carcaça estável, ótimos dispositivos de entrada, muita energia e uma bateria decente. A comparação com o modelo Intel também mostra que a Lenovo limita um pouco artificialmente o E495. O plástico na superfície da unidade base parece muito mais barato com seu revestimento áspero e não entendemos por que não há iluminação no teclado ou um leitor de digitais nem mesmo a um custo extra.
O desempenho do SoC Ryzen é muito bom e a CPU e a GPU obtêm uma pontuação melhor que a do Intel Core i5. No entanto, a Radeon RX 550X (opcional) dedicada no ThinkPad E490 oferece visivelmente mais potência gráfica e, portanto, é recomendada se você também quiser usar o ThinkPad para jogos. Nem o E490 nem o E495 oferecem Thunderbolt 3, portanto, a conexão de uma eGPU não é possível. Para explorar todo o potencial do SoC AMD, você também precisa de outro módulo de RAM.
Bom valor pelo dinheiro: O ThinkPad E495 oferece mais energia do que o modelo Intel um pouco mais caro e não possui mais desvantagens em termos de duração da bateria. No entanto, deve-se aceitar a falta de recursos (especialmente a iluminação do teclado) e o plástico mais barato.
Atenção: Desde a análise do ThinkPad E490, atualizamos nosso sistema de pontuação para a versão 7 (veja Aqui). Isso reduz a classificação do E490 de 89% para 86%. O ThinkPad E485 atinge 84%. A discrepância, conforme listamos neste artigo, resulta das diferenças no equipamento e do material da carcaça.
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
- 09/16/2019 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
